The calculations were done for a steel of composition in wt.%: 1.24 Mn, 0.88 Ni, 0.47 Mo, 0.21 Cr, 0.25 Si, 0.004 V, 0.008 Al, 0.21 C, 0.005 N, and balance Fe. Comparisons were made with an experimental alloy of the same composition, but containing in addition 0.03 Cu, 0.002 S, and 0.007 P. The solid solution phases were described as a two-sublattice model with formula (Fe,Mn,Ni,Mo,Cr,Si,V,Al)a(C,N,Va)c, where Va stands for vacancy. In the case of body-centered cubic ferrite ðaÞ, a = 1 and c = 3. For facecentered cubic austenite ðcÞ, a = 1 and c = 1. Available assessments of Fe-based quaternary carbide and nitride systems (Fe-M-M-C and Fe-M-M-N, M standing for metal) and the corresponding subsystems were considered adequate for the reliability of the calculations. Complete descriptions were available for all important lower-order systems such as Fe-C, Fe-N, Fe-M, M-C, M-N, Fe-M-C, and Fe-M-N. The computed equilibrium mole fractions of austenite, ferrite and various carbides and nitrides as a function of annealing temperature are shown in Fig. 1. Figure 1(b) shows in greater detail the austenite formation as well as the cementite and n-carbide dissolution. To produce an austenite fraction of 0.4, the calculations yield an intercritical annealing temperature of 720 C. An independent experimental verification in the authors group showed that this temperature is 725 C for this steel. Despite the influence of variables such as thermal history, prior microstructure and incomplete attainment of equilibrium during the intercritical anneal, the agreement is good.
Read full abstract