Abstract Introduction Discussions about the benefits and risks of invasive procedures, including their alternatives, are an integral part of certain patient consultations in Cardiology. However, patients absorb only a fraction of the information shared during a single encounter, often due to time constraints, leading to an incomplete understanding. Video animation tools were designed to better facilitate communication and consolidate patient (and family members) understanding in advance of their procedure. Purpose We are a high-volume tertiary cardiac centre, and we aimed to assess real-world patient feedback having introduced an online cardiac video animation tool into our organisation. Methods In July 2022, we obtained unlimited patient access to a digital tool that offers short, multi-language narrated video animations covering the breadth of cardiac procedures (cardiac intervention, electrophysiology, structural and cardiac surgery). It is accessible on any device, including a desktop, laptop, or mobile phone. Specifically, we purchased password protected access to 31 video animations in three local languages. Web-links and QR codes for each video animation were designed. These were shared with patients and family members during different stages of the patients’ journey through the hospital. We sampled qualitative feedback from a cohort of patients attending pre-assessment clinic, measured on our electronic patient record via a 3-point Likert scale. Results As illustrated in Figure 1, we adapted our patient pathway to integrate use of this resource in the patient journey by 1) notifying patients during their out-patient cardiologist consultation; 2) emailing video links integrated within an e-consent process; 3) introducing video links as QR codes in patient letters; 4) reminding patients during their nurse-led pre-assessment clinic; 5) via hospital poster advertisements; 6) and on the front page of the hospital website. Since its introduction 18 months ago, 20,607 animation views have occurred, with 90% watched to completion. The three most popular animations were "angiogram/angioplasty" (4135), atrial fibrillation ablation (1415), and TAVI (1243). From July 2022 to December 2023, 1,878 patients have attended our nurse led pre-assessment clinic, and we sampled qualitative feedback from about 20% (342 patients). As demonstrated in Figure 2, 84% of patients felt the procedural video animations were quite helpful/very helpful. The remaining 16% found it "not helpful", with anecdotal reasons being "inability to access the technology", "feeling already adequately informed", or "not wanting to know". Conclusion In our high-volume tertiary centre, online narrated video animations discussing cardiac procedures were successfully implemented into our patient pathway and deemed helpful by the majority of our patients.Fig1.Process map of the patient journeyFig2.Patients’ feedback regarding video