Cell-mediated Allograft Rejection Research Articles

The role of t/b lymphocyte collaboration in the regulation of autoimmune and alloimmune responses.

The present review highlights the two areas of research pursuit in our laboratory: (1). the regulation of the autoimmune T cell response to pancreatic islet beta cells using the nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse model of type 1 diabetes and (2). the regulation the T cell response to alloantigens. Our work has established a central role for B lymphocytes in driving both autoimmune and allo-immmune T cell responses. Our studies indicate that: (1). B cell-deficient NOD mice are protected from autoimmune diabetes; (2). targeted disruption of cognate T/B cell collaboration via major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II prevents both T cell-mediated islet destruction and allograft rejection; and (3). maternal transmission of islet-reactive autoantibodies potentiates the activation of diabetogenic T cells, highlighting the important role of B cells in the early targeting of islet beta cells.

Preventing NK cell activation by donor dendritic cells enhances allospecific CD4 T cell priming and promotes Th type 2 responses to transplantation antigens.

Although much progress has been made in understanding the role of NK cells in bone marrow transplantation, little is known about their function in CD4 T cell-mediated allograft rejection. We have previously shown that in the absence of CD8 T lymphocyte priming, the in vivo default development pathway of alloreactive CD4 T cells was strongly biased toward Th2 phenotype acquisition. In this study, we investigate the impact of NK cells on the activation and differentiation of alloreactive CD4 T cells in various donor/recipient combinations. Our data demonstrate that defective inhibition of host NK cells by donor APCs including dendritic cells (DCs) results in diminished allospecific Th cell responses associated with the development of effector Th cells producing IFN-gamma rather than type 2 cytokines. Turning host NK cells off was sufficient to restore strong alloreactive CD4 T cell priming and Th2 cell development. Similar results were obtained by analyzing the effect of NK cell activation on CD4 T cell responses to skin allografts. However, despite the dramatic effect of NK cells on alloreactive Th1/Th2 cell development, the kinetics of skin graft rejection were not affected. Thus, Th2 differentiation is a major pathway of alloreactive CD4 T cell development during solid organ transplant rejection, as long as host NK and CD8 T cells are not activated. We propose the hypothesis that MHC class I-driven interactions between donor DCs and host NK cells or CD8 T cells might result in DC-carried signals controlling the dynamics of alloreactive CD4 T cell priming and polarization.

Inability to Induce Tolerance Through Direct Antigen Presentation

Both the direct and indirect antigen presentation pathways are important mechanisms for T cell-mediated allograft rejection. Studies using knockout mice and monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated that CD4+ T cells are both necessary and sufficient for the rejection of allogeneic tissues, including skin, heart, and islet. Furthermore, combined blockade of the CD28/B7 and CD154/CD40 costimulatory pathways induces tolerance in multiple CD4+ T-cell dependent allograft models. In this study, we addressed the T-cell requirement for costimulation in direct antigen presentation. We demonstrated that class II-specific alloreactive T-cell receptor transgenic T cells were sufficient to mediate allograft rejection independent of costimulatory blockade. Analysis of the costimulatory capacity of different antigen presenting cell (APC) populations demonstrated that APCs resident within the donor skin, Langerhans cells, are potent stimulators not requiring CD28- or CD154-dependent costimulation for direct major histocompatibility complex (MHC) antigen presentation. These results complement previous work examining the role of costimulation on CD8+ T cells, supporting a model in which the effectiveness of costimulatory blockade in the setting of transplantation may be selective for the indirect pathway of MHC alloantigen presentation.

Cutting edge: membrane lymphotoxin regulates CD8(+) T cell-mediated intestinal allograft rejection.

Blocking the CD28/B7 and/or CD154/CD40 costimulatory pathways promotes long-term allograft survival in many transplant models where CD4(+) T cells are necessary for rejection. When CD8(+) T cells are sufficient to mediate rejection, these approaches fail, resulting in costimulation blockade-resistant rejection. To address this problem we examined the role of lymphotoxin-related molecules in CD8(+) T cell-mediated rejection of murine intestinal allografts. Targeting membrane lymphotoxin by means of a fusion protein, mAb, or genetic mutation inhibited rejection of intestinal allografts by CD8(+) T cells. This effect was associated with decreased monokine induced by IFN-gamma (Mig) and secondary lymphoid chemokine (SLC) gene expression within allografts and spleens respectively. Blocking membrane lymphotoxin did not inhibit rejection mediated by CD4(+) T cells. Combining disruption of membrane lymphotoxin and treatment with CTLA4-Ig inhibited rejection in wild-type mice. These data demonstrate that membrane lymphotoxin is an important regulatory molecule for CD8(+) T cells mediating rejection and suggest a strategy to avoid costimulation blockade-resistant rejection.

Donor IFN-gamma receptors are critical for acute CD4(+) T cell-mediated cardiac allograft rejection.

Recent studies using mouse models demonstrate that CD4(+) T cells are sufficient to mediate acute cardiac allograft rejection in the absence of CD8(+) T cells and B cells. However, the mechanistic basis of CD4-mediated rejection is unclear. One potential mechanism of CD4-mediated rejection is via elaboration of proinflammatory cytokines such as IFN-gamma. To determine whether IFN-gamma is a critical cytokine in CD4-mediated acute cardiac allograft rejection, we studied whether the expression of IFN-gamma receptors on the donor heart was required for CD4-mediated rejection. To investigate this possibility, purified CD4(+) T cells were transferred into immune-deficient mice bearing heterotopic cardiac allografts from IFN-gamma receptor-deficient (GRKO) donors. While CD4(+) T cells triggered acute rejection of wild-type heart allografts, they failed to trigger rejection of GRKO heart allografts. The impairment in CD4-mediated rejection of GRKO hearts appeared to primarily involve the efferent phase of the immune response. This conclusion was based on the findings that GRKO stimulator cells provoked normal CD4 proliferation in vitro and that intentional in vivo challenge of CD4 cells with wild-type donor APC or the adoptive transfer of in vitro primed CD4 T cells failed to provoke acute rejection of GRKO allografts. In contrast, unseparated lymph node cells acutely rejected both GRKO and wild-type hearts with similar time courses, illustrating the existence of both IFN-gamma-dependent and IFN-gamma-independent mechanisms of acute allograft rejection.

Ligation of 4-1BB (CDw137) regulates graft-versus-host disease, graft-versus-leukemia, and graft rejection in allogeneic bone marrow transplant recipients.

4-1BB is expressed on activated CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cells; its ligand, 4-1BB ligand is expressed on APCs. Despite expression on both T cell subpopulations, 4-1BB has been reported to predominantly affect CD8(+) T cell responses. By quantifying graft-vs-host disease alloresponses in vivo, we demonstrate that both CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell-mediated alloresponses are regulated by 4-1BB/4-1BB ligand interactions to approximately the same extent. 4-1BB receptor-facilitated CD4(+) T cell-mediated alloresponses were partly CD28 independent. In two distinct marrow graft rejection systems, host CD8(+) and CD4(+) T cells each separately contributed to host anti-donor T cell-mediated allograft rejection. alpha 4-1BB mAb increased the graft-vs-leukemia effect of a suboptimal number of donor splenocytes given later post bone marrow transplantation by bolstering allogeneic responses resulting in leukemia elimination. In summary, 4-1BB ligation is a potent regulator of CD4(+) and CD8(+) T cell-mediated allogeneic responses in vivo. Modifying the ligation of 4-1BB represents a new approach to altering the graft-vs-host disease and graft-vs-leukemia effects of allogeneic T cells post bone marrow transplantation.

Blockade of the CD40 pathway fails to prevent CD8 T cell-mediated intestinal allograft rejection

Blockade of the CD40 pathway fails to prevent CD8 T cell-mediated intestinal allograft rejection

Different time course of circulating adhesion molecules and hyaluran during hepatic allograft rejection.

Inducible adhesion molecules are involved in cell-mediated allograft rejection. In addition, the endothelium is the main target of this process. This study investigated, whether soluble (s) forms of vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1) are elevated during cellular rejection and whether hyaluran is a useful marker of endothelial function in liver transplantation. Serum levels of sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and hyaluran were determined in 24 controls and 27 hepatic transplant recipients. These patients were divided in two groups: group I, 14 patients without rejection; and group II, 13 patients with rejection. Samples were collected on day 1 and 7 after transplantation, on the day of liver biopsy, and after treatment of the rejection. We found a significant increase in sICAM-1 levels in the postoperative period in the rejection group compared with the non rejection group. It persisted significantly elevated until the diagnosis of rejection was made. In contrast, sVCAM-1 was only significantly elevated in the rejection group when diagnosis of rejection was evident. Hyaluran levels were also significantly elevated in the rejection group at diagnosis of rejection. We noticed a significant decline in sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and hyaluran levels after successful treatment of rejection. In addition, we observed in the non-rejection group a stable lower levels of hyaluran during the entire postoperative period. The release of circulating adhesion molecules is a prominent feature coinciding with the first episode of hepatic rejection. Differential patterns of sICAM-1 and sVCAM-1 exist during rejection. In addition, hyaluran levels may be a sensitive marker of liver endothelial cell function in the postoperative period of liver transplantation.

Cutting Edge: Blockade of the CD28/B7 Costimulatory Pathway Inhibits Intestinal Allograft Rejection Mediated by CD4+ But Not CD8+ T Cells

The effect of blocking the CD28/B7 costimulatory pathway on intestinal allograft rejection was examined in mice. Murine CTLA4Ig failed to prevent the rejection of allografts transplanted into wild-type or CD4 knockout (KO) mice but did inhibit allograft rejection by CD8 KO recipients. This effect was associated with decreased intragraft mRNA for IFN-gamma and TNF-alpha and increased mRNA for IL-4 and IL-5. This altered pattern of cytokine production was not observed in allografts from murine CTLA4Ig-treated CD4 KO mice. These data demonstrate that blockade of the CD28/B7 pathway has different effects on intestinal allograft rejection mediated by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and suggest that these T cell subsets have different costimulatory requirements in vivo. The results also suggest that the inhibition of CD4+ T cell-mediated allograft rejection by CTLA4Ig may be related to down-regulation of Th1 cytokines and/or up-regulation of Th2 cytokines.

Chemokine receptor (CXCR4) mRNA-expressing leukocytes are increased in human renal allograft rejection.

Mononuclear cell infiltration is a common feature of cell-mediated renal transplant rejection. Chemokines and their corresponding receptors likely play a central role in directing specific classes of leukocytes to graft sites during rejection. Localization of chemokine receptors may help us understand how specificity in leukocyte trafficking is achieved in renal inflammatory processes. The localization of the chemokine receptor CXCR4 in human kidney and in renal transplant rejection is unknown. We generated a riboprobe specific for the detection of CXCR4 mRNA by in situ hybridization to evaluate cellular sites of synthesis of this receptor in native human kidneys (n=11) and in human allograft nephrectomies with features of severe rejection (n=14). By in situ hybridization, CXCR4 mRNA expression is undetectable in intrinsic glomerular, tubular, and renovascular cells in native kidneys. When renal interstitial inflammation is present, CXCR4 mRNA expression is localized to a large fraction of infiltrating leukocytes. Large numbers of CXCR4-expressing cells are detected in cell-mediated renal allograft rejection. Double immunolabeling for CD3 antigen identified a large fraction of infiltrating CXCR4 mRNA-expressing cells as T lymphocytes. CXCR4 mRNA-expressing cells were frequently seen in neointimal lesions of vascular rejection in allograft nephrectomies. CXCR4 mRNA expression was identified in infiltrating neointimal T lymphocytes, but not smooth muscle cells by immunolabeling. We demonstrate the involvement of CXCR4 mRNA-expressing infiltrating cells in human renal interstitial and vascular allograft rejection. Signaling via the CXCR4 receptor may be one mechanism by which chemokines mediate leukocyte trafficking in renal allograft rejection.

A Synthetic CD4-CDR3 Peptide Analog Enhances Skin Allograft Survival Across a MHC Class II Barrier

The efficacy of a synthetic peptide analogue (rD-mPGPtide), mimicking the CDR3 region in the first domain of the CD4 surface molecule, was investigated in a murine model for CD4+ T cell-mediated skin allograft rejection. A single injection of rD-mPGPtide shortly before transplantation exhibited significantly prolonged graft survival in the B6 anti-B6.C-H2bm12 MHC class II-disparate strain combination. Long-term graft survival (>100 days) was achieved when thymectomized adult recipient mice were transplanted along with rD-mPGPtide treatment. The peptide also affected secondary rechallenge responses with MHC class II allografts. In addition, the inhibitory effect of the rD-mPGPtide in this transplantation model was directed against CD4+ T cells and was exclusively specific toward donor alloantigen. In vitro analysis of CD4+ T cells isolated from the draining lymph nodes of rD-mPGPtide-treated recipients indicated a 450-fold decrease in precursor frequency in response to donor allostimulation compared with the untreated control group. There was also significant down-regulation of the frequency of IL-2-, IFN-gamma-, and IL-4-producing CD4+ T cells upon in vitro allogeneic restimulation of host cells 4 days posttransplantation. However, these same CD4+ T cells maintained the capacity to produce normal cytokine levels upon third-party allostimulation. Thus, these studies demonstrate that a CD4-CDR3 peptide analogue can specifically and effectively prolong skin graft survival across MHC class II barriers.

IN VIVO MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF LEFLUNOMIDE IN ALLO-TRANSPLANTATION AND XENO-TRANSPLANTATION

678 Background: Leflunomide (Lef) is effective in controlling autoimmune disease, cancer and transplantation rejection. Two activities have been identified for Lef; inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase at IC50 ≤ 5 µM; and inhibition of protein tyrosine kinases at IC50≥ 50 µM. We have examined the in vivo mechanism of action of Lef in controlling allograft and xenograft rejection in Lewis rats. Methods: Lewis rats were transplanted with hearts from Brown Norway (BN) rats or Golden Syrian hamsters. Immunosuppression was Lef (5, 15 or 35 mg/kg/day; gavage) alone, or in combination with uridine (500 mg/kg/day; ip). The serum concentrations of the active metabolite of Lef, A77 1726, and uridine were quantified following Lef and uridine administration. All transplanted grafts were examined histologically at the end of the experiment, and scored following a modified grading of cellular rejection of cardiac biopsies. Results:Table Survival of Lef-treated Lewis rats or grafts were calculated from day of transplantation. * Some Lewis recipients died with beating grafts.Conclusion: (1) ≥15 mg/kg Lef resulted in optimum immunosuppression. (2) Uridine partially antagonized the ability of ≤15 mg/kg Lef to control allograft rejection, but dramatically antagonized the ability of Lef to control xenograft rejection. (3) The effect of uridine on the immunosuppressive activity was significantly reduced at ≥15 mg/kg Lef; (4) Uridine was able to reduce the toxic effect of high-dose Lef.(5) The peak A77 1726 concentrations in the serum were 78, 266 and 478µM for 5, 15 or 35 mg/kg Lef. (6) The control of T cell-mediated allograft rejection may be mediated by the inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation as well as pyrimidine synthesis, while control of B cell-dependent xenograft rejection by Lef is primarily dependent on the inhibition of pyrimidine synthesis.

IN VIVO MECHANISMS OF ACTION OF LEFLUNOMIDE IN ALLO-TRANSPLANTATION AND XENO-TRANSPLANTATION.

678 Background: Leflunomide (Lef) is effective in controlling autoimmune disease, cancer and transplantation rejection. Two activities have been identified for Lef; inhibition of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase at IC50≤ 5 μM; and inhibition of protein tyrosine kinases at IC50 ≥ 50μM. We have examined the in vivo mechanism of action of Lef in controlling allograft and xenograft rejection in Lewis rats. Methods: Lewis rats were transplanted with hearts from Brown Norway (BN) rats or Golden Syrian hamsters. Immunosuppression was Lef (5, 15 or 35 mg/kg/day; gavage) alone, or in combination with uridine (500 mg/kg/day; ip). The serum concentrations of the active metabolite of Lef, A77 1726, and uridine were quantified following Lef and uridine administration. All transplanted grafts were examined histologically at the end of the experiment, and scored following a modified grading of cellular rejection of cardiac biopsies. Results:TableConclusion: (1) ≥15 mg/kg Lef resulted in optimum immunosuppression. (2) Uridine partially antagonized the ability of ≤15 mg/kg Lef to control allograft rejection, but dramatically antagonized the ability of Lef to control xenograft rejection. (3) The effect of uridine on the immunosuppressive activity was significantly reduced at ≥15 mg/kg Lef;(4) Uridine was able to reduce the toxic effect of high-dose Lef. (5) The peak A77 1726 concentrations in the serum were 78, 266 and 478 μM for 5, 15 or 35 mg/kg Lef. (6) The control of T cell-mediated allograft rejection may be mediated by the inhibition of tyrosine phosphorylation as well as pyrimidine synthesis, while control of B cell-dependent xenograft rejection by Lef is primarily dependent on the inhibition of pyrimidine synthesis.

Genetic engineering as an approach to xenotransplantation.

A discordant organ xenograft, such as a heart or kidney transplanted from pig to human, is rejected within 1 to 2 hours by a process called hyperacute rejection (HAR) caused in large or full measure by preexisting host xenoreactive natural antibodies (XNAs) and complement. HAR can be averted by blocking either complement or XNAs; but the xenograft is then rejected at 3 to 4 days by a process called delayed xenograft rejection (DXR), which can occur without the presence of T cells. DXR involves type II endothelial cell (EC) activation (the phase of activation that includes up-regulation of proinflammatory genes in the EC), infiltration into the graft of host monocytes and natural killer cells (both of which appear to be activated), and a complex cytokine picture. We discuss in this paper various approaches that might help prevent DXR, after which we assume that one would still have to deal with a xenograft counterpart of the T cell-mediated allograft rejection response. The approach to avoiding DXR focuses largely on genetic engineering of the ECs in the graft.

DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF GALLIUM NITRATE ON T LYMPHOCYTE AND ENDOTHELIAL CELL ACTIVATION

The immunosuppressive agents used clinically to prevent allograft rejection exert their effects by interfering with antigen-dependent T cell activation, endothelial cell function, or both. Gallium nitrate (GN) is immunosuppressive both in vitro and in vivo, and has potential for clinical use in transplant recipients. Therefore, we analyzed the influence of GN on gonadal vein endothelial cell (GVEC) and T cell activation. GVEC were stimulated with IFN gamma or TNF alpha in the presence or absence of GN, and tested for changes in levels of MHC class I, MHC class II, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression. GN did not interfere with the baseline or cytokine-enhanced expression of these molecules. Rather, it increased the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 on GVEC, and this effect was further augmented in the presence of IFN gamma. In contrast, GN inhibited T cell proliferation stimulated by allogeneic GVEC or allogeneic monocytes in a dose-dependent manner. In transwell experiments, GN blocked the induction of MHC class II expression on isolated GVEC caused by alloactivated T cells, but not by recombinant IFN gamma. This suggests that GN can interfere indirectly with inflammatory responses of endothelial cells by interfering with local T cell activation and lymphokine production. Once lymphokines are produced, GN does not interfere with their effects on endothelial cells. GN is thought to act through transferrin receptors, but GVEC, unlike T cells, do not increase their expression of transferrin receptors, after stimulation with cytokines. This may explain their relative lack of sensitivity to GN. In general, GN appears to stimulate endothelial cells but suppress T cells. This paradoxic effect suggests that therapy with GN may enhance T cell-independent inflammatory responses, such as cellular infiltration and repair of tissue damage, while suppressing T cell-dependent responses, such as T cell-mediated tissue destruction and allograft rejection.

DIFFERENTIAL EFFECTS OF GALLIUM NITRATE ON T LYMPHOCYTE AND ENDOTHELIAL CELL ACTIVATION

The immunosuppressive agents used clinically to prevent allograft rejection exert their effects by interfering with antigen-dependent T cell activation, endothelial cell function, or both. Gallium nitrate (GN) is immunosuppressive both in vitro and in vivo, and has potential for clinical use in transplant recipients. Therefore, we analyzed the influence of GN on gonadal vein endothelial cell (GVEC) and T cell activation. GVEC were stimulated with IFN gamma or TNF alpha in the presence or absence of GN, and tested for changes in levels of MHC class I, MHC class II, vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 expression. GN did not interfere with the baseline or cytokine-enhanced expression of these molecules. Rather, it increased the expression of intercellular adhesion molecule-1 on GVEC, and this effect was further augmented in the presence of IFN gamma. In contrast, GN inhibited T cell proliferation stimulated by allogeneic GVEC or allogeneic monocytes in a dose-dependent manner. In transwell experiments, GN blocked the induction of MHC class II expression on isolated GVEC caused by alloactivated T cells, but not by recombinant IFN gamma. This suggests that GN can interfere indirectly with inflammatory responses of endothelial cells by interfering with local T cell activation and lymphokine production. Once lymphokines are produced, GN does not interfere with their effects on endothelial cells. GN is thought to act through transferrin receptors, but GVEC, unlike T cells, do not increase their expression of transferrin receptors, after stimulation with cytokines. This may explain their relative lack of sensitivity to GN. In general, GN appears to stimulate endothelial cells but suppress T cells. This paradoxic effect suggests that therapy with GN may enhance T cell-independent inflammatory responses, such as cellular infiltration and repair of tissue damage, while suppressing T cell-dependent responses, such as T cell-mediated tissue destruction and allograft rejection.

Assessment of soluble adhesion molecules (sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, sELAM-1) and complement cleavage products (sC4d, sC5b-9) in urine. Clinical monitoring of renal allograft recipients.

Increasing evidence exists that inducible adhesion molecules are involved in cell-mediated allograft rejection. In addition, complement activation during rejection has been described. This study investigated, whether specific molecules derived from either pathway are excreted into urine during rejection and whether they can provide useful diagnostic tools for the monitoring of renal transplant recipients. Urinary concentrations of soluble adhesion molecules (sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, sE-selectin) and of complement cleavage products (sC4d and sC5b-9), were determined by standardized ELISA in 30 normal controls and 80 samples from 49 recipients of renal allografts. In contrast to the low amounts of adhesion molecules and complement components uniformly excreted by healthy persons (group 0), marked differences were observed among allograft recipients. To prove the clinical relevance of these differences in excretion, patient samples were assigned to 5 categories according to clinical and histopathological criteria: group I--acute steroid-resistant rejection (n = 10); group II--acute steroid-sensitive rejection (n = 10); group III--chronic rejection (n = 23); group IV--stable graft function (n = 27); and group V--miscellaneous disorders (n = 10), including infections, CsA overdoses, and glomerulonephritis. Urinary levels of sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and sC4d were significantly higher in group I compared with all other groups (P < 0.01). The difference in sICAM-1 excretion between groups III and IV also reached statistical significance (P < 0.05). Urinary concentrations of sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and sC4d were reflective of their histological distribution in corresponding graft biopsies. None of the patients excreted E-selectin in detectable amounts. Excretion of the terminal membrane attack complex C5b-9 was not significantly associated with any diagnosis. It is concluded that for clinical purposes the combined evaluation of sICAM-1, sVCAM-1, and sC4d is most useful and can provide valuable information with regard to the severity and the type of allograft rejection.

Current concepts in cell-mediated hepatic allograft rejection leading to ductopenia and liver failure

Hepatic allograft rejection is presently classified into acute and chronic rejection based on histological features, timing and reversibility. However, because features of both types of rejection can occur at any time, and in many combinations, the terms "acute" and "chronic" seem inappropriate in some instances. Thus the term "cellular rejection" better defines the histological features of portal hepatitis, nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis and endotheliitis, which are independent of time and response to therapy. Similarly, because progressive bile duct destruction leading to a decrease in the number of interlobular and septal bile ducts is the major histological feature of "chronic rejection," the term "ductopenic rejection," defined as the loss of bile ducts in 50% or more of portal tracts independent of time and reversibility, seems more appropriate. The pathogenesis of cell-mediated rejection has not been completely explained; however, direct immunocytic attack on small bile ducts and small arteries appear to be the major feature. The process may lead to bile duct loss ("ductopenia"). The pathogenetic role of foam-cell arteritis resulting in ischemic bile duct injury and the role of humoral mechanisms in causing ductopenic rejection awaits further clarification. In the past, irreversible ductopenic rejection occurred in approximately 10% of all patients who underwent their first liver transplantation; this figure, however, appears to be decreasing. The clinical features of irreversible rejection include persistent and progressive cholestasis; rising serum levels of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase; and a decrease in hepatic synthetic function. Ductopenic rejection can occur early (2 to 5 wk after liver transplantation) but most often develops between 6 wk and 6 mo after transplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Current concepts in cell-mediated hepatic allograft rejection leading to ductopenia and liver failure

Hepatic allograft rejection is presently classified into acute and chronic rejection based on histological features, timing and reversibility. However, because features of both types of rejection can occur at any time, and in many combinations, the terms "acute" and "chronic" seem inappropriate in some instances. Thus the term "cellular rejection" better defines the histological features of portal hepatitis, nonsuppurative destructive cholangitis and endotheliitis, which are independent of time and response to therapy. Similarly, because progressive bile duct destruction leading to a decrease in the number of interlobular and septal bile ducts is the major histological feature of "chronic rejection," the term "ductopenic rejection," defined as the loss of bile ducts in 50% or more of portal tracts independent of time and reversibility, seems more appropriate. The pathogenesis of cell-mediated rejection has not been completely explained; however, direct immunocytic attack on small bile ducts and small arteries appear to be the major feature. The process may lead to bile duct loss ("ductopenia"). The pathogenetic role of foam-cell arteritis resulting in ischemic bile duct injury and the role of humoral mechanisms in causing ductopenic rejection awaits further clarification. In the past, irreversible ductopenic rejection occurred in approximately 10% of all patients who underwent their first liver transplantation; this figure, however, appears to be decreasing. The clinical features of irreversible rejection include persistent and progressive cholestasis; rising serum levels of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase and gamma-glutamyltransferase; and a decrease in hepatic synthetic function. Ductopenic rejection can occur early (2 to 5 wk after liver transplantation) but most often develops between 6 wk and 6 mo after transplantation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Cell-Mediated Cytotoxicity, Allograft Rejection, and Tumor Immunity

Publisher Summary The term “cell-mediated cytotoxicity” applies to lytic reactions that require the participation of lymphoid or non-lymphoid cells but not of added complement. It has been clearly established that several pathways, including different cell types, are involved in cytotoxic reactions in vitro. With membrane-associated antigens, such as transplantation, and tumor-associated antigens, the cytotoxic effect of effector cells on adequate target cells is most often highly specific and requires intimate contact rather than release of diffusible toxic factors. Specific cell-mediated cytotoxicity in vitro can be divided into three categories according to the nature of the effector cells.