Cell Identity Genes Research Articles

TEAD transcription factors are required for normal primary myoblast differentiation in vitro and muscle regeneration in vivo.

The TEAD family of transcription factors (TEAD1-4) bind the MCAT element in the regulatory elements of both growth promoting and myogenic differentiation genes. Defining TEAD transcription factor function in myogenesis has proved elusive due to overlapping expression of family members and their functional redundancy. We show that silencing of either Tead1, Tead2 or Tead4 did not effect primary myoblast (PM) differentiation, but that their simultaneous knockdown strongly impaired differentiation. In contrast, Tead1 or Tead4 silencing impaired C2C12 differentiation showing their different contributions in PMs and C2C12 cells. Chromatin immunoprecipitation identified enhancers associated with myogenic genes bound by combinations of Tead4, Myod1 or Myog. Tead4 regulated distinct gene sets in C2C12 cells and PMs involving both activation of the myogenic program and repression of growth and signaling pathways. ChIP-seq from mature mouse muscle fibres in vivo identified a set of highly transcribed muscle cell-identity genes and sites bound by Tead1 and Tead4. Although inactivation of Tead4 in mature muscle fibres caused no obvious phenotype under normal conditions, notexin-induced muscle regeneration was delayed in Tead4 mutants suggesting an important role in myogenic differentiation in vivo. By combining knockdown in cell models in vitro with Tead4 inactivation in muscle in vivo, we provide the first comprehensive description of the specific and redundant roles of Tead factors in myogenic differentiation.

LIM domain-binding 1 maintains the terminally differentiated state of pancreatic β cells.

The recognition of β cell dedifferentiation in type 2 diabetes raises the translational relevance of mechanisms that direct and maintain β cell identity. LIM domain-binding protein 1 (LDB1) nucleates multimeric transcriptional complexes and establishes promoter-enhancer looping, thereby directing fate assignment and maturation of progenitor populations. Many terminally differentiated endocrine cell types, however, remain enriched for LDB1, but its role is unknown. Here, we have demonstrated a requirement for LDB1 in maintaining the terminally differentiated status of pancreatic β cells. Inducible ablation of LDB1 in mature β cells impaired insulin secretion and glucose homeostasis. Transcriptomic analysis of LDB1-depleted β cells revealed the collapse of the terminally differentiated gene program, indicated by a loss of β cell identity genes and induction of the endocrine progenitor factor neurogenin 3 (NEUROG3). Lineage tracing confirmed that LDB1-depleted, insulin-negative β cells express NEUROG3 but do not adopt alternate endocrine cell fates. In primary mouse islets, LDB1 and its LIM homeodomain-binding partner islet 1 (ISL1) were coenriched at chromatin sites occupied by pancreatic and duodenal homeobox 1 (PDX1), NK6 homeobox 1 (NKX6.1), forkhead box A2 (FOXA2), and NK2 homeobox 2 (NKX2.2) - factors that co-occupy active enhancers in 3D chromatin domains in human islets. Indeed, LDB1 was enriched at active enhancers in human islets. Thus, LDB1 maintains the terminally differentiated state of β cells and is a component of active enhancers in both murine and human islets.

Enhancers and super-enhancers have an equivalent regulatory role in embryonic stem cells through regulation of single or multiple genes.

Transcriptional enhancers are critical for maintaining cell-type–specific gene expression and driving cell fate changes during development. Highly transcribed genes are often associated with a cluster of individual enhancers such as those found in locus control regions. Recently, these have been termed stretch enhancers or super-enhancers, which have been predicted to regulate critical cell identity genes. We employed a CRISPR/Cas9-mediated deletion approach to study the function of several enhancer clusters (ECs) and isolated enhancers in mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells. Our results reveal that the effect of deleting ECs, also classified as ES cell super-enhancers, is highly variable, resulting in target gene expression reductions ranging from 12% to as much as 92%. Partial deletions of these ECs which removed only one enhancer or a subcluster of enhancers revealed partially redundant control of the regulated gene by multiple enhancers within the larger cluster. Many highly transcribed genes in ES cells are not associated with a super-enhancer; furthermore, super-enhancer predictions ignore 81% of the potentially active regulatory elements predicted by cobinding of five or more pluripotency-associated transcription factors. Deletion of these additional enhancer regions revealed their robust regulatory role in gene transcription. In addition, select super-enhancers and enhancers were identified that regulated clusters of paralogous genes. We conclude that, whereas robust transcriptional output can be achieved by an isolated enhancer, clusters of enhancers acting on a common target gene act in a partially redundant manner to fine tune transcriptional output of their target genes.

Nucleoporin-mediated regulation of cell identity genes.

The organization of the genome in the three-dimensional space of the nucleus is coupled with cell type-specific gene expression. However, how nuclear architecture influences transcription that governs cell identity remains unknown. Here, we show that nuclear pore complex (NPC) components Nup93 and Nup153 bind superenhancers (SE), regulatory structures that drive the expression of key genes that specify cell identity. We found that nucleoporin-associated SEs localize preferentially to the nuclear periphery, and absence of Nup153 and Nup93 results in dramatic transcriptional changes of SE-associated genes. Our results reveal a crucial role of NPC components in the regulation of cell type-specifying genes and highlight nuclear architecture as a regulatory layer of genome functions in cell fate.

Enhancer priming by H3K4 methyltransferase MLL4 controls cell fate transition.

Transcriptional enhancers control cell-type-specific gene expression. Primed enhancers are marked by histone H3 lysine 4 (H3K4) mono/di-methylation (H3K4me1/2). Active enhancers are further marked by H3K27 acetylation (H3K27ac). Mixed-lineage leukemia 4 (MLL4/KMT2D) is a major enhancer H3K4me1/2 methyltransferase with functional redundancy with MLL3 (KMT2C). However, its role in cell fate maintenance and transition is poorly understood. Here, we show in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs) that MLL4 associates with, but is surprisingly dispensable for the maintenance of, active enhancers of cell-identity genes. As a result, MLL4 is dispensable for cell-identity gene expression and self-renewal in ESCs. In contrast, MLL4 is required for enhancer-binding of H3K27 acetyltransferase p300, enhancer activation, and induction of cell-identity genes during ESC differentiation. MLL4 protein, rather than MLL4-mediated H3K4 methylation, controls p300 recruitment to enhancers. We also show that, in somatic cells, MLL4 is dispensable for maintaining cell identity but essential for reprogramming into induced pluripotent stem cells. These results indicate that, although enhancer priming by MLL4 is dispensable for cell-identity maintenance, it controls cell fate transition by orchestrating p300-mediated enhancer activation.

Plastid osmotic stress influences cell differentiation at the plant shoot apex

The balance between proliferation and differentiation in the plant shoot apical meristem is controlled by regulatory loops involving the phytohormone cytokinin and stem cell identity genes. Concurrently, cellular differentiation in the developing shoot is coordinated with the environmental and developmental status of plastids within those cells. Here, we employ an Arabidopsis thaliana mutant exhibiting constitutive plastid osmotic stress to investigate the molecular and genetic pathways connecting plastid osmotic stress with cell differentiation at the shoot apex. msl2 msl3 mutants exhibit dramatically enlarged and deformed plastids in the shoot apical meristem, and develop a mass of callus tissue at the shoot apex. Callus production in this mutant requires the cytokinin receptor AHK2 and is characterized by increased cytokinin levels, downregulation of cytokinin signaling inhibitors ARR7 and ARR15, and induction of the stem cell identity gene WUSCHEL. Furthermore, plastid stress-induced apical callus production requires elevated plastidic reactive oxygen species, ABA biosynthesis, the retrograde signaling protein GUN1, and ABI4. These results are consistent with a model wherein the cytokinin/WUS pathway and retrograde signaling control cell differentiation at the shoot apex.

Abstract 066: Enhancer Repertoires That Define Renin Cell Identity

Control of the renin cell phenotype is crucial for the regulation of blood pressure and fluid- electrolyte homeostasis. Enhancers are cis -acting DNA sequences that harbor distinct chromatin features and regulate gene expression in an orientation-independent manner. Recently, clusters of enhancers or super-enhancers (SE) highly enriched with master transcription factors, possessing open chromatin configuration and in close proximity to cell-identity genes have been proposed. We tested the hypothesis that renin cells have unique repertoires of enhancers and super-enhancers, distinct from other cell types. Those regulatory clusters may in turn confer the identity of renin cells. To define the genome-wide enhancer landscape characteristic of renin cells, we studied As4.1 cells, kidney tumor cells that express renin constitutively, and native renin cells sorted from the kidneys of Ren1cKO-YFP + mice. In these mice, the renin promoter drives YFP expression thus marking the renin cells. We used genome-wide ChIP-Seq for Med1 (subunit 1 of the Mediator complex), H3K27Ac (active enhancers) and Pol II (to visualize putative genomic areas undergoing transcription). The ROSE algorithm we used to ascertain super-enhancers. Chromatin accessibility genome-wide was assessed using ATAC-Seq. The results were compared to twenty-one other cell types that do not express renin. In As4.1 cells, we identified 14,871 enhancers based on H3K27Ac. Of those, 888 were classified as super-enhancers. The Med1 signal in As4.1 cells showed a SE localized 5kb upstream the Ren1 gene, which was ranked at position 25 among other SEs. The H3K27Ac signal showed highest occupancy in the same region. ChIP-Seq for H3K27Ac in YFP + cells showed 211 SEs of 2,987 peaks. The SE for the renin gene possessed the highest signal and ranked number 1, indicating its importance in renin cells. One hundred and thirteen SEs were unique to renin cells, including the SE associated with the renin gene. ATAC-Seq signals overlapped with the renin SE and the classical enhancer indicating that the chromatin was accessible for transcription. In summary, renin-expressing cells possess distinct repertoires of unique enhancers and super-enhancers that acting in concert are likely to determine the renin phenotype.

Integrative Genomics Outlines a Biphasic Glucose Response and a ChREBP-RORγ Axis Regulating Proliferation in β Cells

Glucose is an important inducer of insulin secretion, but it also stimulates long-term adaptive changes in gene expression that can either promote or antagonize the proliferative potential and function of β cells. Here, we have generated time-resolved profiles of enhancer and transcriptional activity in response to glucose in the INS-1E pancreatic β cell line. Our data outline a biphasic response with a first transcriptional wave during which metabolic genes are activated, and a second wave where cell-cycle genes are activated and β cell identity genes are repressed. The glucose-sensing transcription factor ChREBP directly activates first wave enhancers, whereas repression and activation of second wave enhancers are indirect. By integrating motif enrichment within late-regulated enhancers with expression profiles ofthe associated transcription factors, we have identified multiple putative regulators of the second wave. These include RORγ, the activity of which is important for glucose-induced proliferation of both INS-1E and primary rat β cells.

Abstract 1187: Discovery of new AML and MDS patient subsets sensitive to the highly selective RARα agonist SY-1425 (tamibarotene) through super-enhancer analysis

Abstract Super-enhancers (SEs) are large, highly active chromatin regions that regulate key cell identity genes including oncogenes in malignant cells. Using our gene control platform, we identified SEs genome-wide in 60 primary AML patient samples to enable the discovery of novel tumor vulnerabilities. One of the SEs that showed a highly asymmetric distribution amongst patient samples was associated with the gene encoding the retinoic acid receptor alpha (RARα). We have discovered that the presence of a RARA SE is predictive for response of non- APL AML cell lines to the highly selective RARα agonist SY-1425. SY-1425 is a clinical stage RARα agonist with improved PK, potency, and selectivity over existing pan-retinoic acid agonists. SY-1425 has sub-nanomolar potency on RARα, with 200-2000 fold selectivity over other RAR family members. SY-1425 treatment of AML cell lines containing a RARA SE results in 0.2-2 nanomolar EC50 anti-proliferative effects, whereas proliferation of cell lines without SEs are not affected. The RARA enhancer level (as measured by H3K27ac ChIP-seq) is well correlated with mRNA levels for RARα. Two patient derived xenograft models with high RARα mRNA show prolonged survival and tumor cell differentiation response to SY-1425, whereas two models with low RARα mRNA do not show a treatment effect. In contrast, treatment with the non-selective agonist ATRA fails to show a survival benefit in a RARα mRNA high model, presumably due to its lower agonist activity and its inferior PK. RARα is a nuclear hormone receptor that acts as a transcriptional repressor when unliganded and as a transcriptional activator when bound by an agonist. SY-1425 treatment of SE containing AML cells shows a transcriptional response very similar to retinoid treatment of APL cells. Analysis of ex vivo treated primary AML cells as well as analysis of bone marrow and blood samples from SY-1425 treated patient derived xenograft models support an anti-proliferative and differentiation induction effect in cells containing the RARA SE but not in cells lacking the RARA SE. In addition to AML, a sub-population of MDS patient samples also contain elevated RARα mRNA levels, suggesting the potential utility of SY-1425 in this closely related indication. In summary, using our gene control platform, we have identified subsets of non-APL AML and MDS who may respond to the selective RARa agonist, SY-1425. A phase 2 clinical study with SY-1425 is being planned in patients identified with a novel biomarker based on these findings. Citation Format: Michael R. McKeown, Emily Lee, Chris Fiore, Matthew L. Eaton, Jeremy Lopez, Ryan Corces-Zimmerman, Ravindra Majeti, Christian Fritz, Eric Olson. Discovery of new AML and MDS patient subsets sensitive to the highly selective RARα agonist SY-1425 (tamibarotene) through super-enhancer analysis. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 1187.

Epigenetic regulation of alternative promoters and enhancers in progenitor, immature, and mature gonadotrope cell lines

Gonadotrope cell identity genes emerge in a stepwise process during mouse pituitary development. Cga, encoding for the α-subunit of TSH, LH, and FSH, is initially detected at E11.5 followed by Gnrhr and steroidogenic factor Sf1 at E13.5, specifying cells engaged in a gonadotrope cell fate. Lhb and Fshb appear at E16.5 and 17.5, respectively, typifying differentiated gonadotrope cells. Using the αT1-1, αT3-1 and LβT2 cell lines recapitulating these stages of gonadotrope differentiation, DNA methylation at Gnrhr and Sf1 was investigated. Regulatory regions were found hypermethylated in progenitor αT1-1 cells and hypomethylated in differentiated LβT2 cells. Abundance of RNA polymerase II together with active histone modifications including H3K4me1, H3K4me3, and H3K27ac were strictly correlated with DNA hypomethylation. Analyses of epigenomic modifications and chromatin accessibility were further extended to Isl1, Lhx3, Gata2, and Pitx2, highlighting alternative usages of specific regulatory gene domains in progenitor αT1-1, immature αT3-1, and mature LβT2 gonadotrope cells.

Distinct Gene Regulatory Pathways for Human Innate versus Adaptive Lymphoid Cells

Innate lymphoid cells (ILCs) serve as sentinels in mucosal tissues, sensing release of soluble inflammatory mediators, rapidly communicating danger via cytokine secretion, and functioning as guardians of tissue homeostasis. Although ILCs have been extensively studied in model organisms, little is known about these "first responders" in humans, especially their lineage and functional kinships to cytokine-secreting T helper (Th) cell counterparts. Here, we report gene regulatory circuitries for four human ILC-Th counterparts derived from mucosal environments, revealing that each ILC subset diverges as a distinct lineage from Th and circulating natural killer cells but shares circuitry devoted to functional polarization with their Th counterparts. Super-enhancers demarcate cohorts of cell-identity genes in each lineage, uncovering new modes of regulation for signature cytokines, new molecules that likely impart important functions to ILCs, and potential mechanisms for autoimmune disease SNP associations within ILC-Th subsets.

Abstract PR16: Targeting the chromatin architecture established by PAX3-FOXO1 in rhabdomyosarcoma

Abstract Master transcription factors establish enhancers to regulate cell identity genes by recruiting epigenetic machinery, and are sequentially exchanged during changes in cell identity (ie, differentiation). Commonly, the fusion of transcription factors profoundly alters proper progression of cell identity, serving as the signature oncogenic event in many malignancies. The most common soft tissue cancer of childhood, rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), is characterized by an inability to exit the proliferative myoblast-like state, presumably by blocking myogenic transcription factors from advancing the active enhancer landscape. This is achieved by either chromosomal translocation resulting in the oncogenic fusion transcription factor PAX3/7-FOXO1 (Fusion-Positive alveolar subtype, FP-RMS) or mutations in the tyrosine kinase/RAS/PIK3C axis (Fusion-Negative embryonal subtype, FN-RMS). Patients who harbor a PAX-fusion typically relapse despite aggressive therapy and have very poor survival. Here we hypothesized that the PAX3-FOXO1 fusion gene causes epigenetic reprogramming resulting in increased proliferation and a failure to terminally differentiate. Furthermore we hypothesized that disrupting the epigenetic machinery recruited by this fusion gene would provide a tractable target for therapy. We mapped the landscape of epigenetic alterations caused by the PAX3-FOXO1 fusion gene using a combination of RNA-seq, DNase hypersensitivity, and ChIP-seq against histone marks and transcription factors in cell lines and models of FP-RMS. We found high expression of several master transcription factors (including MYOD1, MYOG, MYCN, and SOX8) in FP-RMS primary tumors and cell lines, resembling human skeletal muscle myoblasts. ChIP-seq revealed that PAX3-FOXO1 is exclusively bound to distal, active enhancers and the histone modification most enriched surrounding PAX3-FOXO1 was acetylated H3K27. Furthermore we found that the introduction of the fusion gene into fibroblast cells opened up the chromatin at these same sites, completely rewiring the active enhancer landscape, recapitulating a transcriptome locked in a myoblast-like state. Genome-wide profiling of MYOD1, MYOG and MYCN reveals that all three master regulators collaborative bind at nearly every PAX3-FOXO1 driven super enhancer (SE), while typical enhancers (TEs) rarely have more than two of these four. PAX3-FOXO1 has a 7-fold preference for SEs over TEs. We also find that PAX3-FOXO1 bound, myogenic enhancers are decommissioned throughout normal skeletal muscle differentiation. To identify small molecules that would inhibit the PAX3-FOXO1 induced epigenetic machinery we treated a panel of FP-RMS cell lines with 1912 targeted agents and chemical probes at multiple concentrations and measured cell viability. Classes of molecules selectively potent for PAX3-FOXO1 driven cells (as compared to normal fibroblasts) hit connected biologically relevant targets including SE controlled receptor tyrosine kinases (including FGFR4, IGF1R, ALK), and transcriptional cofactors involved in SE complexes (including HDACs and BRD). In an expanded panel of RMS cell lines we confirmed that FP-RMS is selectively sensitive to the BET bromodomain inhibitors with the most potent being JQ1. These inhibitors selectively suppress PAX3-FOXO1 dependent transcription as measured by reporter assays and RNA-seq analysis. Indeed, coactivators of looped chromatin p300, MED1 and BRD4 excessively co-localize with PAX3-FOXO1 genome wide. In vivo, JQ1 selectively ablated PAX3-FOXO1 dependent SE driven transcription, and significantly delayed tumor progression in xenografts of PAX3-FOXO1 driven cell lines. In conclusion we found that PAX3-FOXO1 establishes myogenic super enhancers that are sensitive to BET bromodomain inhibition which constitutes a novel therapeutic strategy for children with PAX-fusion driven rhabdomyosarcoma. This abstract is also presented as Poster A16. Citation Format: Berkley E. Gryder, Marielle E. Yohe, Jack Shern, Hsien-Chao Chou, Young Song, Rajesh Patidar, Sam Li, Sivasish Sindiri, Abigail Cleveland, Hongling Liao, Xinyu Wen, Xiaohu Zhang, Lesley Mathews-Griner, Rajarshi Guha, Paul Shinn, Marc Ferrer, Scott Martin, Madhu Lal, Craig Thomas, Javed Khan. Targeting the chromatin architecture established by PAX3-FOXO1 in rhabdomyosarcoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Advances in Pediatric Cancer Research: From Mechanisms and Models to Treatment and Survivorship; 2015 Nov 9-12; Fort Lauderdale, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(5 Suppl):Abstract nr PR16.

Understanding super-enhancers.

Super-enhancers are defined as cluster of enhancers with dense TF binding, which can activate proximal cell-identity gene expression. Here we review the identification, functional significance of super-enhancers, and their relationships with cancer. With the current intense interests in super-enhancers, more super-enhancers will be defined and studied in different cell types and tissues and in different developmental and biological contexts to reveal molecular mechanisms of their functions.

Plastid osmotic stress influences cell differentiation at the plant shoot apex

The balance between proliferation and differentiation in the plant shoot apical meristem is controlled by regulatory loops involving the phytohormone cytokinin and stem cell identity genes. Concurrently, cellular differentiation in the developing shoot is coordinated with the environmental and developmental status of plastids within those cells. Here, we employ an Arabidopsis thaliana mutant exhibiting constitutive plastid osmotic stress to investigate the molecular and genetic pathways connecting plastid osmotic stress with cell differentiation at the shoot apex. msl2 msl3 mutants exhibit dramatically enlarged and deformed plastids in the shoot apical meristem, and develop a mass of callus tissue at the shoot apex. Callus production in this mutant requires the cytokinin receptor AHK2 and is characterized by increased cytokinin levels, downregulation of cytokinin signaling inhibitors ARR7 and ARR15, and induction of the stem cell identity gene WUSCHEL Furthermore, plastid stress-induced apical callus production requires elevated plastidic reactive oxygen species, ABA biosynthesis, the retrograde signaling protein GUN1, and ABI4. These results are consistent with a model wherein the cytokinin/WUS pathway and retrograde signaling control cell differentiation at the shoot apex.

Systematic identification and annotation of human methylation marks based on bisulfite sequencing methylomes reveals distinct roles of cell type-specific hypomethylation in the regulation of cell identity genes.

DNA methylation is a key epigenetic mark that is critical for gene regulation in multicellular eukaryotes. Although various human cell types may have the same genome, these cells have different methylomes. The systematic identification and characterization of methylation marks across cell types are crucial to understand the complex regulatory network for cell fate determination. In this study, we proposed an entropy-based framework termed SMART to integrate the whole genome bisulfite sequencing methylomes across 42 human tissues/cells and identified 757 887 genome segments. Nearly 75% of the segments showed uniform methylation across all cell types. From the remaining 25% of the segments, we identified cell type-specific hypo/hypermethylation marks that were specifically hypo/hypermethylated in a minority of cell types using a statistical approach and presented an atlas of the human methylation marks. Further analysis revealed that the cell type-specific hypomethylation marks were enriched through H3K27ac and transcription factor binding sites in cell type-specific manner. In particular, we observed that the cell type-specific hypomethylation marks are associated with the cell type-specific super-enhancers that drive the expression of cell identity genes. This framework provides a complementary, functional annotation of the human genome and helps to elucidate the critical features and functions of cell type-specific hypomethylation.

SEA: a super-enhancer archive

Super-enhancers are large clusters of transcriptional enhancers regarded as having essential roles in driving the expression of genes that control cell identity during development and tumorigenesis. The construction of a genome-wide super-enhancer database is urgently needed to better understand super-enhancer-directed gene expression regulation for a given biology process. Here, we present a specifically designed web-accessible database, Super-Enhancer Archive (SEA, http://sea.edbc.org). SEA focuses on integrating super-enhancers in multiple species and annotating their potential roles in the regulation of cell identity gene expression. The current release of SEA incorporates 83 996 super-enhancers computationally or experimentally identified in 134 cell types/tissues/diseases, including human (75 439, three of which were experimentally identified), mouse (5879, five of which were experimentally identified), Drosophila melanogaster (1774) and Caenorhabditis elegans (904). To facilitate data extraction, SEA supports multiple search options, including species, genome location, gene name, cell type/tissue and super-enhancer name. The response provides detailed (epi)genetic information, incorporating cell type specificity, nearby genes, transcriptional factor binding sites, CRISPR/Cas9 target sites, evolutionary conservation, SNPs, H3K27ac, DNA methylation, gene expression and TF ChIP-seq data. Moreover, analytical tools and a genome browser were developed for users to explore super-enhancers and their roles in defining cell identity and disease processes in depth.

Abstract B1-60: Predicting drug response by profiling the epigenome: Super-enhancers as biomarkers

Abstract Identifying biomarkers that predict clinical responses to anticancer therapies is an important challenge in oncology. A desirable biomarker is a cell-identifying feature that can distinguish between drug responsive and unresponsive cell types. Most of the best studied biomarkers are gene mutations or copy-number changes, where the genomic alteration is the key defining feature. However, not all differences in clinical responses can be attributed to genetic differences. Therefore, it is critical that we identify other cellular features that can predict response. A recently described epigenomic feature, termed super-enhancer (SE), defines key cell identity and disease genes and SEs are effectors of initiating and maintaining cell type-specific gene expression programs. In this work we generate super-enhancer maps across multiple cancer cell lines and connect those maps to response to different drug treatments. We show that super-enhancers can be used as biomarkers to predict response to drugs across multiple cell-line models of cancer. This work suggests that interrogating epigenomic features, and in particular super-enhancers, can be a powerful biomarker discovery platform and can enable rational patient selection and therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: David A. Orlando, Michael R. McKeown, Mei Wei Chen, Cindy Collins, Matthew G. Guenther, Christian C. Fritz. Predicting drug response by profiling the epigenome: Super-enhancers as biomarkers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Computational and Systems Biology of Cancer; Feb 8-11 2015; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(22 Suppl 2):Abstract nr B1-60.

Abstract A1-69: Predicting drug response by profiling the epigenome: Super-enhancers as biomarkers

Abstract Identifying biomarkers that predict clinical responses to anticancer therapies is an important challenge in oncology. A desirable biomarker is a cell-identifying feature that can distinguish between drug responsive and unresponsive cell types. Most of the best studied biomarkers are gene mutations or copy-number changes, where the genomic alteration is the key defining feature. However, not all differences in clinical responses can be attributed to genetic differences. Therefore, it is critical that we identify other cellular features that can predict response. A recently described epigenomic feature, termed super-enhancer (SE), defines key cell identity and disease genes and SEs are effectors of initiating and maintaining cell type-specific gene expression programs. In this work we generate super-enhancer maps across multiple cancer cell lines and connect those maps to response to different drug treatments. We show that super-enhancers can be used as biomarkers to predict response to drugs across multiple cell-line models of cancer. This work suggests that interrogating epigenomic features, and in particular super-enhancers, can be a powerful biomarker discovery platform and can enable rational patient selection and therapeutic strategies. Citation Format: David A. Orlando, Michael R. McKeown, Mei Wei Chen, Cindy Collins, Matthew G. Guenther, Christian C. Fritz. Predicting drug response by profiling the epigenome: Super-enhancers as biomarkers. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Translation of the Cancer Genome; Feb 7-9, 2015; San Francisco, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(22 Suppl 1):Abstract nr A1-69.

High-density P300 enhancers control cell state transitions.

BackgroundTranscriptional enhancers are frequently bound by a set of transcription factors that collaborate to activate lineage-specific gene expression. Recently, it was appreciated that a subset of enhancers comprise extended clusters dubbed stretch- or super-enhancers (SEs). These SEs are located near key cell identity genes, and enriched for non-coding genetic variations associated with disease. Previously, SEs have been defined as having the highest density of Med1, Brd4 or H3K27ac by ChIP-seq. The histone acetyltransferase P300 has been used as a marker of enhancers, but little is known about its binding to SEs.ResultsWe establish that P300 marks a similar SE repertoire in embryonic stem cells as previously reported using Med1 and H3K27ac. We also exemplify a role for SEs in mouse T helper cell fate decision. Similarly, upon activation of macrophages by bacterial endotoxin, we found that many SE-associated genes encode inflammatory proteins that are strongly up-regulated. These SEs arise from small, low-density enhancers in unstimulated macrophages. We also identified expression quantitative trait loci (eQTL) in human monocytes that lie within such SEs. In macrophages and Th17 cells, inflammatory SEs can be perturbed either genetically or pharmacologically thus revealing new avenues to target inflammation.ConclusionsOur findings support the notion that P300-marked SEs can help identify key nodes of transcriptional control during cell fate decisions. The SE landscape changes drastically during cell differentiation and cell activation. As these processes are crucial in immune responses, SEs may be useful in revealing novel targets for treating inflammatory diseases.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12864-015-1905-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Broad H3K4me3 is associated with increased transcription elongation and enhancer activity at tumor-suppressor genes.

Tumor suppressors are mostly defined by inactivating mutations in tumors, yet little is known about their epigenetic features in normal cells. Through integrative analysis of 1,134 genome-wide epigenetic profiles, mutations from >8,200 tumor-normal pairs and our experimental data from clinical samples, we discovered broad peaks for trimethylation of histone H3 at lysine 4 (H3K4me3; wider than 4 kb) as the first epigenetic signature for tumor suppressors in normal cells. Broad H3K4me3 is associated with increased transcription elongation and enhancer activity, which together lead to exceptionally high gene expression, and is distinct from other broad epigenetic features, such as super-enhancers. Genes with broad H3K4me3 peaks conserved across normal cells may represent pan-cancer tumor suppressors, such as TP53 and PTEN, whereas genes with cell type-specific broad H3K4me3 peaks may represent cell identity genes and cell type-specific tumor suppressors. Furthermore, widespread shortening of broad H3K4me3 peaks in cancers is associated with repression of tumor suppressors. Thus, the broad H3K4me3 epigenetic signature provides mutation-independent information for the discovery and characterization of new tumor suppressors.