Cell Division In Caulobacter Crescentus Research Articles

DipM controls multiple autolysins and mediates a regulatory feedback loop promoting cell constriction in Caulobacter crescentus

Proteins with a catalytically inactive LytM-type endopeptidase domain are important regulators of cell wall-degrading enzymes in bacteria. Here, we study their representative DipM, a factor promoting cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. We show that the LytM domain of DipM interacts with multiple autolysins, including the soluble lytic transglycosylases SdpA and SdpB, the amidase AmiC and the putative carboxypeptidase CrbA, and stimulates the activities of SdpA and AmiC. Its crystal structure reveals a conserved groove, which is predicted to represent the docking site for autolysins by modeling studies. Mutations in this groove indeed abolish the function of DipM in vivo and its interaction with AmiC and SdpA in vitro. Notably, DipM and its targets SdpA and SdpB stimulate each other’s recruitment to midcell, establishing a self-reinforcing cycle that gradually increases autolytic activity as cytokinesis progresses. DipM thus coordinates different peptidoglycan-remodeling pathways to ensure proper cell constriction and daughter cell separation.

Molecular architecture of the DNA-binding sites of the P-loop ATPases MipZ and ParA from Caulobacter crescentus

The spatiotemporal regulation of chromosome segregation and cell division in Caulobacter crescentus is mediated by two different P-loop ATPases, ParA and MipZ. Both of these proteins form dynamic concentration gradients that control the positioning of regulatory targets within the cell. Their proper localization depends on their nucleotide-dependent cycling between a monomeric and a dimeric state and on the ability of the dimeric species to associate with the nucleoid. In this study, we use a combination of genetic screening, biochemical analysis and hydrogen/deuterium exchange mass spectrometry to comprehensively map the residues mediating the interactions of MipZ and ParA with DNA. We show that MipZ has non-specific DNA-binding activity that relies on an array of positively charged and hydrophobic residues lining both sides of the dimer interface. Extending our analysis to ParA, we find that the MipZ and ParA DNA-binding sites differ markedly in composition, although their relative positions on the dimer surface and their mode of DNA binding are conserved. In line with previous experimental work, bioinformatic analysis suggests that the same principles may apply to other members of the P-loop ATPase family. P-loop ATPases thus share common mechanistic features, although their functions have diverged considerably during the course of evolution.

A DNA damage-induced, SOS-independent checkpoint regulates cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.

Author SummaryCells have evolved sophisticated mechanisms for repairing their DNA and maintaining genome integrity. A critical aspect of the repair process is an arrest of cell cycle progression, thereby ensuring that cell division is not attempted before the genome has been repaired and fully duplicated. Our paper explores the molecular mechanisms that underlie the inhibition of cell division following DNA damage in the bacterium Caulobacter crescentus. For most bacteria, the primary, and only mechanism previously described involves the SOS response, in which DNA damage induces cleavage of the transcriptional repressor LexA, driving induction of a battery of genes that includes an inhibitor of cell division (sulA in E. coli and sidA in Caulobacter). Here, we report that Caulobacter cells have a second, SOS-independent damage response pathway that induces another division inhibitor, didA, which works together with sidA to block cell division following DNA damage. We also identify the damage-sensitive transcription factor responsible for inducing DidA. Finally, our study demonstrates that DidA and SidA inhibit cell division in an atypical manner. Many division inhibitors in bacteria appear to inhibit the protein FtsZ, which forms a ring at the site of cell division. DidA and SidA, however, target a trio of proteins, FtsW/I/N, that help synthesize the new cell wall that will separate the daughter cells (the septum). In sum, our work expands our understanding of how bacterial cells respond to DNA damage and the mechanisms by which they regulate cell division.

No SOS needed: a second bacterial checkpoint system stops cell division.

Cell division must be tightly coordinated with DNA replication so that a complete genome ends up in each daughter cell. That coordination is especially critical when DNA is damaged, as lengthy delays may be required to repair broken strands. To prevent premature division, cells detect the presence of broken DNA with dedicated sensor proteins, which inhibit division while they promote repair. In bacteria, this “checkpoint” system was originally thought to be the sole responsibility of the so-called SOS response, in which damaged DNA leads to the cleavage of a transcriptional repressor, causing synthesis of both repair enzymes and a cell division inhibitor. However, multiple experiments have shown that even when the SOS response is disabled, some bacteria are able to sense damage and delay division. In this issue of PLOS Biology, Joshua Modell, Michael Laub, and colleagues show that a second, independent system works alongside the SOS system, one that is sensitive to a specific type of DNA damage and that induces its own suite of response proteins. The authors began their search for the mystery inhibitor by inducing DNA damage in cells of the model bacterium Caulobacter crescentus in which the SOS system had been inactivated. They found six genes whose up-regulation could not be explained by the actions of known SOS regulators. Through a series of experiments, one gene emerged that bore all the characteristics of a cell division inhibitor and consequently was christened damage-induced cell division inhibitor A, or didA. Overexpression of the didA gene strongly inhibited division (Figure 1) in the absence of SOS proteins, indicating its independence from that system. Conversely, treatment with a DNA toxin in the absence of both didA and the SOS system's inhibitor sidA led most cells to divide despite the DNA damage, reducing viability. Figure 1 Caulobacter cells producing DidA cannot divide as DidA localizes to and blocks the activity of cell division proteins at midcell (DidA-YFP with cell boundaries outlined in white). The presence of both SOS and non-SOS systems introduces redundancy, surely a benefit in such a critical cellular control response. However, the two systems were not responsive to precisely the same insults, the authors found. Both systems responded to a toxin that formed crosslinks between the two strands. The SOS system, but not the didA system, was especially responsive to depletion of the nucleotide pool, while the didA system, but not the SOS system, responded strongly to creation of double-strand breaks. A key step in the Escherichia coli SOS system is the inhibition of polymerization of the structural protein, FtsZ, which forms a ring at the site of constriction, which is critical for positioning of the division machinery (the “divisome”). In contrast to many bacterial division inhibitors, the authors showed that DidA did not interact with FtsZ. Instead, they found evidence that it most likely binds to a late-arriving member of the divisome, FtsN. However, this interaction, they showed, did not disrupt the divisome or prevent the localization of other members of the complex. The actual mechanism, they suggest, involves a complex formed among three divisome proteins: FtsN, FtsI, and FtsW. Excess production of DidA normally would shut down cell division, but this effect could be overcome by mutations in either the ftsW or ftsI genes, despite the fact that DidA bound to neither protein directly. Instead, the authors propose that, in the absence of DidA, the three proteins form an active complex that promotes constriction, and when DidA binds FtsN, it converts the complex into an inactive state. Finally, the authors showed that expression of didA was driven by the transcriptional regulator DriD. Treatment with zeocin, a didA-specific DNA toxin, caused DriD to bind to didA's promoter and increase transcription. Zeocin did not, however, up-regulate the driD gene itself, indicating that damage-induced posttranslational modification of preexisting DriD protein is a key step in the regulatory pathway. Together, these results identify a novel mechanism of cell division control in Caulobacter. While details will probably differ in other types of bacteria, the identification of a second control system is likely to lead to the search for similar systems elsewhere. In addition, since even disabling both SOS and non-SOS systems did not entirely prevent normal regulation of cell division in Caulobacter, the authors note, yet more control systems may remain to be discovered. Modell JW, Kambara TK, Perchuk BS, Laub MT (2014) A DNA Damage-Induced, SOS-Independent Checkpoint Regulates Cell Division in Caulobacter crescentus . doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.1001977

Intracellular chemical gradients: morphing principle in bacteria

Advances in computational biology allow systematic investigations to ascertain whether internal chemical gradients can be maintained in bacteria – an open question at the resolution limit of fluorescence microscopy. While it was previously believed that the small bacterial cell size and fast diffusion in the cytoplasm effectively remove any such gradient, a new computational study published in BMC Biophysics supports the emerging view that gradients can exist. The study arose from the recent observation that phosphorylated CtrA forms a gradient prior to cell division in Caulobacter crescentus, a bacterium known for its complicated cell cycle. Tropini et al. (2012) postulate that such gradients can provide an internal chemical compass, directing protein localization, cell division and cell development. More specifically, they describe biochemical and physical constraints on the formation of such gradients and explore a number of existing bacterial cell morphologies. These chemical gradients may limit in vitro analyses, and may ensure timing control and robustness to fluctuations during critical stages in cell development.

TheCaulobacterTol-Pal Complex Is Essential for Outer Membrane Integrity and the Positioning of a Polar Localization Factor

Cell division in Caulobacter crescentus involves constriction and fission of the inner membrane (IM) followed about 20 min later by fission of the outer membrane (OM) and daughter cell separation. In contrast to Escherichia coli, the Caulobacter Tol-Pal complex is essential. Cryo-electron microscopy images of the Caulobacter cell envelope exhibited outer membrane disruption, and cells failed to complete cell division in TolA, TolB, or Pal mutant strains. In wild-type cells, components of the Tol-Pal complex localize to the division plane in early predivisional cells and remain predominantly at the new pole of swarmer and stalked progeny upon completion of division. The Tol-Pal complex is required to maintain the position of the transmembrane TipN polar marker, and indirectly the PleC histidine kinase, at the cell pole, but it is not required for the polar maintenance of other transmembrane and membrane-associated polar proteins tested. Coimmunoprecipitation experiments show that both TolA and Pal interact directly or indirectly with TipN. We propose that disruption of the trans-envelope Tol-Pal complex releases TipN from its subcellular position. The Caulobacter Tol-Pal complex is thus a key component of cell envelope structure and function, mediating OM constriction at the final step of cell division as well as the positioning of a protein localization factor.

A new factor stimulating peptidoglycan hydrolysis to separate daughter cells in Caulobacter crescentus

Cell division in Gram-negative bacteria involves the co-ordinated invagination of the three cell envelope layers to form two new daughter cell poles. This complex process starts with the polymerization of the tubulin-like protein FtsZ into a Z-ring at mid-cell, which drives cytokinesis and recruits numerous other proteins to the division site. These proteins are involved in Z-ring constriction, inner- and outer-membrane invagination, peptidoglycan remodelling and daughter cell separation. Three papers in this issue of Molecular Microbiology, from the teams of Lucy Shapiro, Martin Thanbichler and Christine Jacobs-Wagner, describe a novel protein, called DipM for Division Involved Protein with LysM domains, that is required for cell division in Caulobacter crescentus. DipM localizes to the mid-cell during cell division, where it is necessary for the hydrolysis of the septal peptidoglycan to remodel the cell wall. Loss of DipM results in severe defects in cell envelope constriction, which is deleterious under fast-growth conditions. State-of-the-art microscopy experiments reveal that the peptidoglycan is thicker and that the cell wall is incorrectly organized in DipM-depleted cells compared with wild-type cells, demonstrating that DipM is essential for reorganizing the cell wall at the division site, for envelope invagination and cell separation in Caulobacter.

The Caulobacter crescentus polar organelle development protein PodJ is differentially localized and is required for polar targeting of the PleC development regulator.

Regulation of polar development and cell division in Caulobacter crescentus relies on the dynamic localization of several proteins to cell poles at specific stages of the cell cycle. The polar organelle development protein, PodJ, is required for the synthesis of the adhesive holdfast and pili. Here we show the cell cycle localization of PodJ and describe a novel role for this protein in controlling the dynamic localization of the developmental regulator PleC. In swarmer cells, a short form of PodJ is localized at the flagellated pole. Upon differentiation of the swarmer cell into a stalked cell, full length PodJ is synthesized and localizes to the pole opposite the stalk. In late predivisional cells, full length PodJ is processed into a short form which remains localized at the flagellar pole after cell division and is degraded during swarmer to stalked cell differentiation. Polar localization of the developmental regulator PleC requires the presence of PodJ. In contrast, the polar localization of PodJ is not dependent on the presence of PleC. These results indicate that PodJ is an important determinant for the localization of a major regulator of cell differentiation. Thus, PodJ acts directly or indirectly to target PleC to the incipient swarmer pole, to establish the cellular asymmetry that leads to the synthesis of holdfasts and pili at their proper subcellular location.

A dynamically localized histidine kinase controls the asymmetric distribution of polar pili proteins.

Each cell division in Caulobacter crescentus is asymmetric, yielding a swarmer cell with several polar pili and a non-piliated stalked cell. To identify factors contributing to the asymmetric biogenesis of polar pili, cytological studies of pilus assembly components were performed. We show here that the CpaC protein, which is thought to form the outer membrane pilus secretion channel, and its assembly factor, CpaE, are localized to the cell pole prior to the polymerization of the pilus filament. We demonstrate that the PleC histidine kinase, a two-component signal transduction protein shown previously to localize to the piliated cell pole before and during pilus assembly, controls the accumulation of the pilin subunit, PilA. Using an inactive form of PleC (PleCH610A) that lacks the catalytic histidine residue, we provide evidence that PleC activity is responsible for the asymmetric distribution of CpaE and itself to only one of the two cell poles. Thus, a polar signal transduction protein controls its own asymmetric location as well as that of a factor assembling a polar organelle.

CtrA mediates a DNA replication checkpoint that prevents cell division in Caulobacter crescentus.

Coordination of DNA replication and cell division is essential in order to ensure that progeny cells inherit a full copy of the genome. Caulobacter crescentus divides asymmetrically to produce a non-replicating swarmer cell and a replicating stalked cell. The global response regulator CtrA coordinates DNA replication and cell division by repressing replication initiation and transcription of the early cell division gene ftsZ in swarmer cells. We show that CtrA also mediates a DNA replication checkpoint of cell division by regulating the late cell division genes ftsQ and ftsA. CtrA activates transcription of the P(QA) promoter that co-transcribes ftsQA, thus regulating the ordered expression of early and late cell division proteins. Cells inhibited for DNA replication are unable to complete cell division. We show that CtrA is not synthesized in pre-divisional cells in which replication has been inhibited, preventing the transcription of P(QA) and cell division. Replication inhibition prevents the activation of the ctrA P2 promoter, which normally depends on CtrA phosphorylation. This suggests the possibility that CtrA phosphorylation may be affected by replication inhibition.

Dominant C-terminal deletions of FtsZ that affect its ability to localize in Caulobacter and its interaction with FtsA.

The cell division protein FtsZ is composed of three regions based on sequence similarity: a highly conserved N-terminal region of approximately 320 amino acids; a variable spacer region; and a conserved C-terminal region of eight amino acids. We show that FtsZ mutants missing different C-terminal fragments have dominant lethal effects because they block cell division in Caulobacter crescentus by two different mechanisms. Removal of the C-terminal conserved region, the linker, and 40 amino acids from the end of the N-terminal conserved region (FtsZdeltaC281) prevents the localization or the polymerization of FtsZ. Because two-hybrid analysis indicates that FtsZdeltaC281 does not interact with FtsZ, we hypothesize that FtsZdeltaC281 blocks cell division by competing with a factor required for FtsZ localization or that it titrates a factor required for the stability of the FtsZ ring. The removal of 24 amino acids from the C-terminus of FtsZ (FtsZdeltaC485) causes a punctate pattern of FtsZ localization and affects its interaction with FtsA. This suggests that the conserved C-terminal region of FtsZ is required for proper polymerization of FtsZ in Caulobacter and for its interaction with FtsA.

The molecular basis of asymmetric cell division in Caulobacter crescentus

The bacterium Caulobacter crescentus undergoes a simple developmental program within each cell cycle, resulting in the formation of two different daughter cells: a motile swarmer cell and a non-motile stalked cell. The generation of two cell types is a consequence of the asymmetric positioning of proteins, compartmentalized gene expression and differential programming of DNA replication capacities in the predivisional cell. The localization of a developmentally expressed chemotaxis receptor to the swarmer pole is attributable to two distinct mechanisms: polar targeting, followed by pole-specific proteolysis. In contrast, swarmer pole-specific transcription of flagellar genes results from the pole-specific activation of a transcription factor.

Plasmid and chromosomal DNA replication and partitioning during the Caulobacter crescentus cell cycle

Cell division in Caulobacter crescentus yields a swarmer and a stalked cell. Only the stalked cell progeny is able to replicate its chromosome, and the swarmer cell progeny must differentiate into a stalked cell before it too can replicate its chromosome. In an effort to understand the mechanisms that limit chromosomal replication to the stalked cell, plasmid DNA synthesis was analyzed during the developmental cell cycle of C. crescentus, and the partitioning of both the plasmids and the chromosomes to the progeny cells was examined. Unlike the chromosome, plasmids from the incompatibility groups Q and P replicated in all C. crescentus cell types. However, all plasmids tested showed a ten- to 20-fold higher replication rate in the stalked cells than the swarmer cells. We observed that all plasmids replicated during the C. crescentus cell cycle with comparable kinetics of DNA synthesis, even though we tested plasmids that encode very different known (and putative) replication proteins. We determined the plasmid copy number in both progeny cell types, and determined that plasmids partitioned equally to the stalked and swarmer cells. We also re-examined chromosome partitioning in a recombination-deficient strain of C. crescentus, and confirmed an earlier report that chromosomes partition to the progeny stalked and swarmer cells in a random manner that does not discriminate between old and new DNA strands.

Rate, origin, and bidirectionality of Caulobacter chromosome replication as determined by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis.

Cell division in Caulobacter crescentus yields progeny cells that differ with respect to cell structure and developmental program. Chromosome replication initiates in the daughter stalked cell but is repressed in the daughter swarmer cell until later in the cell cycle. To study cell-type-specific DNA initiation, chromosome replication was directly analyzed by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Analysis of Dra I restriction fragments of DNA taken at various times from synchronized cell cultures labeled with 2'-deoxy[3H]guanosine has allowed us to determine the origin of DNA replication, the rate and direction of fork movement, and the order of gene replication. The first labeled Dra I fragment to appear contains the site of replication initiation. Based on the correlation of the physical and genetic maps derived by Ely and Gerardot [Ely, B. & Gerardot, C. J. (1988) Gene 68, 323-333], the origin was localized to a 305-kilobase fragment containing the rrnA gene. Furthermore, the sequential replication through unmapped Dra I fragments has enabled us to localize their positions on the genome. The order of appearance of labeled restriction fragments revealed that the chromosome replicates bidirectionally at a fork movement rate of 21 kilobases per minute.

Asymmetric segregation of heat-shock proteins upon cell division in Caulobacter crescentus

Three Caulobacter crescentus heat-shock proteins were shown to be immunologically related to the Escherichia coli heat-shock proteins GroEL, Lon and DnaK. A fourth heat-shock protein was detected with antibody to the C. crescentus RNA polymerase. This 37,000 M r heat-shock protein might be related to the E. coli 32,000 M r heat-shock sigma subunit. The synthesis of the major C. crescentus RNA polymerase sigma factor was not induced by heat shock. The E. coli GroEL protein and the related protein from C. crescentus were also induced by treatment with hydrogen peroxide. Like some of the proteins in the heat-shock protein families of Drosophila and yeast, the four heat-shock proteins in C. crescentus were found to be regulated developmentally under normal conditions. All four proteins were synthesized in the predivisional cell, but the progeny showed cell type-specific bias in the level of enhanced synthesis after heat shock. The 92,000 M r Lon homolog and the 37,000 M r RNA polymerase subunit were preferentially synthesized in the stalked cell, whereas the synthesis of the 62,000 M r GroEL homolog was enhanced in the progeny swarmer cell. Furthermore, the four heat-shock proteins synthesized in the predivisional cell were partitioned in a specific manner upon cell division. The stalked cell, which initiates chromosome replication immediately upon division, received the Lon homolog, the DnaK homolog and the 37,000 M r RNA polymerase subunit. The GroEL homolog, however, was distributed equally to both the stalked cell and the swarmer cell. These results provide access to the functions of C. crescentus heat-shock proteins under both normal and stress conditions. They also allow an investigation of the regulatory signals that modulate the asymmetric distribution of proteins and their subsequent cell type-specific expression in the initial stages of a developmental program.

Localization of Surface Structures During Procaryotic Differentiation: Role of Cell Division in Caulobacter crescentus

Asymmetric cell division in Caulobacter crescentus produces two cell types, a stalked cell and a new swarmer cell, with characteristics surface structures. We have examined the role of the cell cycle in the differentiation of these two cells using adsorption of bacteriophage phi LC72, the assembly of the polar flagellum, and stalk formation as assays for changes in surface morphology. Previous studies of this aquatic bacterium [17,25] have suggested that the replicating chromosome acts as a "clock' in timing the formation of the flagellar filament at one pole of the new swarmer cell. the analysis of conditional cell cycle mutants presented here extends these results by showing that DNA synthesis is also required for adsorption of phage phi LC72 and, more importantly, they also suggest that a late cell division step is involved in determining the spatial pattern in which the phage receptors and flagella are assembled. We propose that this cell division step is required for formation of "organizational' centers which direct the assembly of surface structures at the new cell poles, and for the polarity reversal in assembly that accompanies swarmer cell to stalked cell development.

Regulation of periodic protein synthesis in the cell cycle: Control of initiation and termination of flagellar gene expression

Conditional mutations and drugs that specifically block DNA synthesis and cell division in Caulobacter crescentus have been used to analyze the role of the cell cycle in differentiation. The results suggest that the DNA synthetic pathway, and not an intact cell division pathway, acts to time the periodic synthesis of flagellin A, flagellin B and the hook protein. The expression of these flagellar genes is apparently controlled at the level of transcription, with initiation of the synthetic periods dependent on a specific stage of chromosome replication. The required stage of replication, or DNA execution point, occurs near mid-S phase at approximately 0.65 of the swarmer cell cycle. Examination of a C. crescentus polyhook mutant PCM103 indicates, however, that the DNA synthetic pathway is only one level of regulation over flagellum formation. In the mutant, hook protein synthesis is coupled to DNA synthesis and is initiated at the expected time in the cell cycle, but hook protein synthesis is not repressed at the normal time, hook assembly fails to terminate and only a low level of flagellin is detected. Thus the defect in this strain, which grows and divides normally, appears to affect a sequence of developmental events at a point after the induction of the hook protein. These findings are consistent with a hierarchy of controls that regulates the periodic synthesis of flagellar proteins and their assembly in the flagellum. Initiation of hook protein and flagellin synthesis requires a specific stage of chromosome replication, while later stages of flagellum formation, including the termination of hook protein synthesis, also require a second level of regulation that is defective in strain PCM 103.

Regulation of cell cycle events in asymmetrically dividing cells: functions required for DNA initiation and chain elongation in Caulobacter crescentus.

To study the regulation of cell cycle events after asymmetric cell division in Caulobacter crescentus, we have identified functions that are required for DNA synthesis in the stalked cell produced at division and in the new stalked cell that develops from the swarmer cell 60 min after division. The initiation of DNA synthesis in the two progeny cells is dependent upon at least two common functions. One of these is a requirement for protein synthesis and the other is a gene product identified in a temperature-sensitive cell cycle mutant. DNA chain elongation requires a third common function. The characteristic pattern of DNA synthesis in C. crescentus appears to be controlled in part by the expression of these functions in the two stalked cells at different times after cell division. The age distribution for Caulobacter cells in an exponential population has been calculated (Appendix by Robert Tax) and used to analyze some of the results.

Requirement of a cell division step for stalk formation in Caulobacter crescentus

Penicillin G at low concentrations blocked cell division in Caulobacter crescentus without inhibiting cell growth. The long filamentous cells formed after two to three generations under these conditions had a stalk at one pole and usually one or more flagella at the opposite pole. The failure of the filaments to form a second stalk at the flagellated pole indicates that stalk formation was dependent upon completion of a step that was also required for cell division. Two observations support this conclusion. (i) Penicillin did not stop the normal development of synchronous swarmer cells into stalked initiation and stalk elongation. (ii) When the action of penicillin was reversed by the addition of penicillinase to cultures of filaments, stalks were not formed at the nonstalked pole until after cell division had occurred; thus the normal order of development events was maintained: cell division leads to stalk formation. These results are consistent with a model in which the organization of the developmental program for stalk formation occurs before cell division as a consequence of steps that branch from the cell division pathway.

Effect of cis-platinum(II)diamminodichloride on cell division of Hyphomicrobium and Caulobacter.

Low concentrations of the radiomimetic agent cis-platinum(II)diamminodichloride (PDD) inhibited cell division in Caulobacter crescentus (0.1 mug/ml) and Hyphomicrobium sp. strain B-522 (1.0 mug/ml) without altering the length of prosthecae. After exposure, cells of C. crescentus appeared as long filaments, whereas only the bud portion of Hyphomicrobium underwent elongation. PDD-treated cells of both species were multinucleated. After the removal of PDD by washing, filaments of C. crescentus fragmented unequally and then normal growth resumed. In Hyphomicrobium (where division involves release of swarmer cells that arise as buds on the distal ends of hyphae), potential septation sites formed in the presence of PDD remained inactive after washing. Reinitiation of cell division in this species was dependent upon the synthesis of new hyphae that could arise from either end of the elongated bud. This finding suggests that the PDD-induced lesion at a given septation site is irreversible and, upon removal of this compound, alternate sites must be synthesized for the subsequent occurrence of cell division.