Ceftazidime-avibactam Treatment Research Articles

Ceftazidime-avibactam treatment dilemma of blaKPC−2-containing Klebsiella pneumoniae due to the development of co-existence of mixed strains carrying blaKPC−2 or blaKPC−33 in lung transplant recipients

BackgroundCarbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a significant threat to immunocompromised populations, including lung transplant recipients. This study investigates mixed CRKP strains carrying either blaKPC−2 or blaKPC−33 following ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) exposure, particularly in the context of lung transplantation. Mixed CRKP strains with shifting resistance phenotypes were frequently identified in patients exposed to CAZ/AVI. We aimed to elucidate the transitional state of blaKPC variants by selecting CAZ/AVI-sensitive and -resistant CRKP strains from a lung transplantation patient.MethodsThe blaKPC-variant-carrying CRKP strains were collected from lung transplant recipients exposed to CAZ/AVI in less than two years. Antibiotic susceptibility testing (AST) was conducted using microbroth dilution, and whole-genome sequencing (WGS) was used to identify genotypes and resistance mechanisms. Limiting dilution, drop-plate, and in vitro induction experiments determined blaKPC-variant changes during CAZ/AVI administration. qPCR primers/probes were designed to identify blaKPC−2 mutations.ResultsAmong 104 lung transplant recipients infected by blaKPC-harboring CRKP strains and receiving CAZ/AVI, 10 (9.6%) experienced changing resistance phenotypes. The limiting dilution method found that Patient 10’s CRKP strains carried either blaKPC−2 or blaKPC−33. The drop-plate experiment showed differing growth patterns on CAZ/AVI mediums. The in vitro induction experiment demonstrated shifting from blaKPC−2 to blaKPC−33.ConclusionsThe study identified a “transitional state” of the mixed CRKP strains carrying either blaKPC−2 or blaKPC−33 in CAZ/AVI-exposed patients. Molecular diagnostics are crucial for identifying mixed strains and the transitional state of blaKPC variants, guiding treatment decisions in this complex landscape.

Clinical experience with ceftazidime/avibactam for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in neonates and children.

Klebsiella pneumoniae is a significant cause of healthcare-associated infections, resulting in high morbidity and mortality rates due to limited treatment options. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the treatment outcomes and the safety of Ceftazidime-avibactam in infections caused by extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in pediatric patients. This study included pediatric patients who received ceftazidime-avibactam treatment due to extensively drug-resistant or pandrug-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections, monitored in the pediatric intensive care, neonatal intensive care, and pediatric wards of Cukurova University Faculty of Medicine between 2022 and 2023. Patients' microbiological responses, clinical responses, medication side effects, and 30-day survival rates were evaluated. Eleven pediatric patients were included in the study, of whom nine were male (81.8%). The median age at the initiation of ceftazidime-avibactam treatment was 15months (range: 14days-183months). Sepsis was diagnosed in 9 patients (81.8%). Two premature infants (27 and 35weeks) were admitted to the neonatal ICU. Regarding the Klebsiella pneumoniae strains, 10 (91%) were extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and 1 (9%) was pandrug-resistant (PDR). Eight strains (72.7%) were carbapenem-resistant, and 9 (81.8%) were colistin-resistant. Microbiological response was noted in 8 patients (72.7%), clinical response was evident in 6 patients (54.5%). The 30-day survival rate was 54.5%, with six patients surviving. In our study, ceftazidime-avibactam has been identified as a significant treatment option for resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in critically ill children and premature infants with sepsis and organ failure, and it has been found to be well tolerated.

Dynamic evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance from a single patient through the IncX3_NDM-5 plasmid transfer and blaKPC mutation

The rapid dissemination of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) especially carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) poses a great threat to global public health. Ceftazidime-avibactam, a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination, has been widely used due to its excellent antibacterial activity against KPC-producing K. pneumoniae. However, several resistance mechanisms have been reported since its use. Here, we conducted a series of in vitro experiments to reveal and demonstrate the dynamic evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance including interspecies IncX3_NDM-5 plasmid transfer between Enterobacter cloacae and K. pneumoniae and blaKPC mutation from blaKPC-2 to blaKPC-33. Through the analysis of conjugation frequency and fitness cost, the IncX3_NDM-5 plasmid in this study showed strong transmissibility and stability in E. coli EC600 and clinical strain K. pneumoniae 5298 as recipient strain. With increasing ceftazidime-avibactam concentration, the conjugation frequency remained at 10-3-10-5, while the mutation frequency of K. pneumoniae 5298 was 10-6-10-8 at the same concentration. Further plasmid analysis (the IncX3_NDM plasmid from this study and other 658 plasmids from the NCBI database) revealed the diverse origin and genetic structure of blaNDM-5 carrying plasmids. E. coli (42.9%), China (43.9%), IncX3 (66.6%) are the most common strains, regions, and Inc types respectively. By analysing of genetic environment detected in IncX3 plasmids, the dominant structures (168/258, 65.1%) were identified: ISKox3-IS26-blaNDM-5-IS5-ISAba125-Tn3000-Tn3. In additon, several structural variations were found in the core gene structure. In conclusion, the high fitness and transmissibility of the IncX3_NDM-5 plasmids were noteworthy. More importantly, the diverse ceftazidime-avibactam resistance mechanisms including blaNDM-5 tranfer and blaKPC-2 mutation highlighted the importance of the continuous monitoring of antimicrobial susceptibility and carbapenemases subtype during ceftazidime-avibactam treatment.

In vitro mimicry of in vivo KPC mutations by ceftazidime-avibactam: phenotypes, mechanisms, genetic structure and kinetics of enzymatic hydrolysis

ABSTRACT Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is employed for the treatment of infections caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing K. pneumoniae (KPC-KP). Resistance to CZA is frequently linked to point mutations in the bla KPC. We conducted in vitro simulations of in vivo bla KPC mutations using CZA. Four pre-therapy KPC-KP isolates (K1, K2, K3, and K4) were evaluated, all initially exhibited susceptibility to CZA and produced KPC-2. The crucial distinction was that following CZA treatment, the bla KPC-2 mutated in K1, K2, and K3, rendering them resistant to CZA, while K4 achieved microbiological clearance, and bla KPC-2 remained unaltered. The induction assay identified various bla KPC-2 variants, including bla KPC-25, bla KPC-127, bla KPC-100, bla KPC-128, bla KPC-137, bla KPC-138, bla KPC-144 and bla KPC-180. Our findings suggest that the resistance of KPC-KP to CZA primarily results from the emergence of KPC variants, complemented by increased bla KPC expression. A close correlation exists between avibactam concentration and the rate of increased CZA minimum Inhibitory concentration, as well as bla KPC mutation. Inadequate avibactam concentration is more likely to induce resistance in strains against CZA, there is also a higher likelihood of mutation in the bla KPC-2 and the optimal avibactam ratio remains to be determined. Simultaneously, we selected a bla KPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae strain (mutated from bla KPC-2) and induced it with imipenem and meropenem, respectively. The bla KPC-2 was detected during the process, indicating that the mutation is reversible. Clinical use of carbapenems to treat KPC variant strains increases the risk of infection, as the gene can mutate back to bla KPC-2, rendering the strain even more cross-resistant to carbapenems and CZA.

Evolution of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol resistance in ST131-H30R1-Escherichia coli isolates with KPC-3 mutants and application of FTIR biotyping.

Ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol represent two of the few alternatives for infections by KPC-producing Enterobacterales. We reported the emergence of resistance to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol in a KPC-producing ST131-Escherichia coli (KPC-ST131-Ec) clinical isolate. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing, Fourier-transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, whole-genome sequencing, and cloning experiments were performed. A KPC-49-Ec isolate resistant to ceftazidime-avibactam (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and susceptible to cefiderocol (MICFDC: 2 mg/L) was recovered in a blood sample from an oncologic patient hospitalized in the medical ICU (June 2019) during ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. After 44 days, a KPC-31-Ec resistant to both ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L, MICFDC: 8 mg/L) was found in a rectal sample during a second cycle of ceftazidime-avibactam treatment. Both KPC-49 (R163S) and KPC-31 (D179Y) were detected in the epidemic ST131-H30R1-Ec high-risk clone and showed a phenotype resembling that of ESBL producers. FTIR spectroscopy managed to differentiate cefiderocol-susceptible and resistant ST131-Ec isolates, and these from others belonging to different clones. After cloning and transformation experiments, KPC-49 and KPC-31 were responsible for ceftazidime-avibactam resistance (MICCZA > 16/4 mg/L) and decreased carbapenem MICs (MICMER ≤ 0.12 mg/L, MICIMI ≤ 1 mg/L). KPC-31 was also shown to be associated with increased MICs of cefiderocol (twofold and threefold dilutions over KPC-3 and KPC-49, respectively). However, mutations in proteins participating in outer membrane stability and integrity, such as TolR, could have a more relevant role in cefiderocol resistance. The effects of ceftazidime-avibactam and cefiderocol co-resistance in clinical isolates of Enterobacterales producing KPC mutants make their identification challenging for clinical laboratories.IMPORTANCEThroughout four admissions in our hospital of a single patient, different KPC-3 variants (KPC-3, KPC-49, and KPC-31) were found in surveillance and clinical ST131-Escherichia coli isolates, after prolonged therapies with meropenem and ceftazidime-avibactam. Different patterns of resistance to cefiderocol and ceftazidime-avibactam emerged, accompanied by restored carbapenem susceptibility. The inability to detect these variants with some phenotypic methods, especially KPC-31 by immunochromatography, and the expression of a phenotype similar to that of ESBL producers, posed challenge to identify these variants in the clinical microbiology laboratory. Molecular methods and whole-genome sequencing are necessary and new techniques able to cluster or differentiate related isolates could also be helpful; this is the case of Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy, which managed in our study to discriminate isolates by cefiderocol susceptibility within ST131, and those from the non-ST131 ones.

Therapeutic insights: Use of ceftazidime-avibactam in pediatric patients.

The increasing worldwide prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria underscores the pressing demand for innovative therapeutic solutions. Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) represents a promising new drug combination that has received approval for specific infection types. However, there is limited information regarding its application in pediatric patients. This study investigates the effectiveness and adverse reactions associated with CAZ-AVI treatment in pediatric patients with life-threatening infections caused by MDR pathogens. The study was conducted at a tertiary children's hospital between December, 2021 and July, 2023. A total of 21 patients with life-threatening infections caused by MDR pathogens were enrolled in the study. All patients had underlying medical conditions: 10 had cerebral palsy, four had congenital neurometabolic disease, two had Nieman-Pick disease, two had cystic fibrosis, two had primary immunodeficiency, and one had leukemia. Among these, 12 patients had tracheostomies. Eight patients received CAZ- AVI monotherapy, and 13 patients received combination therapy. Microbiological eradication was achieved in 18 patients (85.7%), and a clinical response was observed in 20 patients (95.2%). Two patients (9.5%) experienced relapse with the same bacteria. One patient developed anaphylaxis, and one patient had elevated creatine phosphokinase levels that normalized following discontinuation of treatment. One patient died during the study period due to gastrointestinal bleeding. Ceftazidime-avibactam may be a promising new drug option for the treatment of life-threatening infections caused by MDR Gram-negative microorganisms in pediatric patients. However, further studies with larger case series are needed to further evaluate the efficacy and safety of CAZ-AVI in this population.

OXA-48 Dominance Meets Ceftazidime-Avibactam: A Battle Against Life-Threatening Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infections in the Intensive Care Unit.

Objective In this study, we aimed to describe the outcomes in ICU patients with bloodstream infection (BSI) or ventilatory-associated pneumonia (VAP) due to carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) who received ceftazidime-avibactam treatment at a tertiary care university hospital. Methods Patients aged 18 years or older who were admitted to the Anesthesiology and Reanimation ICU at Bursa Uludag University Faculty of Medicine Hospital between June 13, 2021, and July 16, 2023, and diagnosed with BSI or VAP due to CRKPwere included in this study. Results A total of 42 patients treated with ceftazidime-avibactam were included. Total crude mortality rates were 33.3% on day 14 and 54.8% on day 30. Mortality rates on the 14th and 30th days were 37.5% and 62.5% in patients with BSI and 27.8% and 44.4% in patients with VAP, respectively. There was no statistically significant difference between monotherapy and combination therapy in terms of mortality rates on days 14 and 30, respectively (3/11 vs. 11/31, p=0.620; 5/11 vs. 18/31, p=0.470). Immunosuppression (10/11 vs. 13/31, p=0.005), the Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score ≥8(at the initiation of treatment; 19/25 vs. 4/17, p<0.001), INCREMENT-CPE score ≥10 (12/16 vs. 3/10, p=0.024) and longer duration (in days) from culture collection to treatment initiation (5.0 ± 0.61 vs. 3.11 ± 0.48, p=0.024) were found to have a statistically significant effect on 30-day mortality. In multivariate analysis, a SOFA score≥8at the initiation of treatment (p=0.037, OR: 17.442, 95% CI: 1.187-256.280) was found to be a significant risk factor affecting mortality (30-day). Conclusion The mortality rates of patients with CRKP infection who were followed up in the ICU were found to be high, and it was observed that whether ceftazidime-avibactam treatment was given as a combination or monotherapy did not affect mortality.Further multicentre studies with a larger number of patientsare needed to gain a comprehensive understanding of the topic, given that this treatment is typically reserved for documented infections.

Emergence of KPC-134, a KPC-2 variant associated with ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in a ST11 Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical strain.

The emergence of various new Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variants leading to ceftazidime-avibactam treatment failure is a new challenge in current clinical anti-infection treatment. Here, we report a ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant K. pneumoniae 1072-2 clinical strain carrying a novel KPC variant, KPC-134, which differs from KPC-2 by both single mutation (D178A) and 8-amino acid insertions (asp-asp-asn-arg-ala-pro-asn-lys). The results of antimicrobial susceptibility testing showed that the isolate was resistant to meropenem (MIC = 4 mg/L), ceftazidime (MIC ≥ 32 mg/L), cefepime (MIC ≥128 mg/L), aztreonam (MIC ≥128 mg/L), and ceftazidime-avibactam (MIC ≥128 mg/L) but sensitive to imipenem (MIC = 0.5 mg/L), imepenem-relebactam (MIC = 0.5 mg/L), meropenem-vaborbactam (MIC = 2 mg/L), and aztreonam-avibactam (MIC = 4 mg/L). The plasmid containing blaKPC-134 was isolated from K. pneumoniae, and the blaKPC-134 gene was cloned into plasmid pHSG398 and transformed into an Escherichia coli DH5α to observe changes in antimicrobial resistance. The results indicated that the transformant was positive for blaKPC-134 and increased MICs of ceftazidime-avibactam, ceftazidime, cefepime, and aztreonam by 512-fold, 256-fold, 16-fold, and 4-fold, respectively, compared with the recipient. The results of third-generation sequencing showed that the blaKPC-134 gene was carried by a 133,789 bp IncFII-IncR plasmid, and many common resistance genes (including blaCTX-M-65, blaTEM-1B, blaSHV-12, rmtB, and catB4) along with the IS26, tnpR, ISkpn8, ISkpn6-like, and Tn1721 elements were identified. IMPORTANCE The emergence of various new KPC variants leading to ceftazidime-avibactam treatment failure is a new challenge for clinical anti-infection treatment. Here, we describe the characterization of a ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant blaKPC-134-positive Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical strain for the first time. K. pneumoniae bearing with KPC variant often mislead clinical anti-infection treatment because of their unique antimicrobial susceptibility profile and the tendency of conventional carbapenemase assays to give false negative results. Therefore, timely identification of KPC variants and effective anti-infective therapy are key to saving infected patients.

606. Efficacy and Safety of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Comparative Dosage Regimens in Patients with Kidney Injury: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Abstract Background Limited data are available for Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ AVI) dosing in patients with chronic kidney diseases. High rate of treatment failure was found among patients with chronic kidney diseases for which renally adjusted doses has been used(1). In our institution, higher than labeled adjusted dosing regimens (HLAD) has been used for the treatment of severe infections. Doses were driven from ceftazidime adjusted dosing regimens in CKD patients. Therefore, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety between labeled and HLAD regimens of CAZ-AVI in CKD patients. Methods A retrospective cohort study conducted between June 2018 and December 2020 in a tertiary hospital in Saudi Arabia, Jeddah. Patients ≥ 14 years old who received at least 48 hours of CAZ-AVI and have chronic kidney disease or on dialysis were included. The primary outcome was to assess the clinical cure of the HLAD group compared to labeled adjusted doses (LAD) group and defined as complete or partial resolution of fever and leukocytosis at the end of CAZ-AVI course. The secondary outcome was 30-day-mortality secondary to infections and recurrent of infections. Fisher's exact, chi-square test and contingency table analysis were used as appropriate. Results A total of 75 patients were included, 40 patients (46.7%) received HLAD. Fifty percent of the patients were on hemodialysis during CAZ-AVI course (n=38, 50%). The majority of our patients were in ICU (n=48, 64%). Clinical cure was relatively the same among the two groups with no statistical difference (57% with higher dose and 66%, 0.095 (-0.31-0.12), P=0.39). The number of 30-day mortality secondary to infection was higher (n=48, 64%) among the HLAD group compared to LAD group (74.2% and 55% respectively). Recurrence of infection were low in this study, which can be explained by the high rates of mortality, however, it was higher among patients who received LAD. Conclusion The efficacy and safety of both regimens of CAZ-AVI dosing were comparable and was not statistically significant in renally impaired patients. Larger studies are needed, however, to answer the study question on the use of higher than labeled adjusted dosing. Reference: Shields RK, Nguyen MH, Chen L, Press EG, Kreiswirth BN, Clancy CJ. Pneumonia and renal replacement therapy are risk factors for ceftazidime-avibactam treatment failures and resistance. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2018;62(5) Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures.

Increased zinc levels facilitate phenotypic detection of ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in metallo-β-lactamase-producing Gram-negative bacteria.

Ceftazidime-avibactam is one of the last resort antimicrobial agents for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant, Gram-negative bacteria. Metallo-β-lactamase-producing bacteria are considered to be ceftazidime-avibactam resistant. Here, we evaluated a semi-automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system regarding its capability to detect phenotypic ceftazidime-avibactam resistance in 176 carbapenem-resistant, metallo-β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates. Nine clinical isolates displayed ceftazidime-avibactam susceptibility in the semi-automated system and six of these isolates were susceptible by broth microdilution, too. In all nine isolates, metallo-β-lactamase-mediated hydrolytic activity was demonstrated with the EDTA-modified carbapenemase inactivation method. As zinc is known to be an important co-factor for metallo-β-lactamase activity, test media of the semi-automated antimicrobial susceptibility testing system and broth microdilution were supplemented with zinc. Thereby, the detection of phenotypic resistance was improved in the semi-automated system and in broth microdilution. Currently, ceftazidime-avibactam is not approved as treatment option for infections by metallo-β-lactamase-producing, Gram-negative bacteria. In infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negatives, we therefore recommend to rule out the presence of metallo-β-lactamases with additional methods before initiating ceftazidime-avibactam treatment.

Ceftazidime-avibactam treatment in bacteremia caused by OXA-48 carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae.

Therapeutic options for bacteremia caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) OXA-48-type are limited. The objective of this study was to analyze clinical success of CAZ-AVI compared with best available therapy (BAT) in patients with Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase-producing OXA-48-type bacteremia (CRKp-OXA-48). We conducted a retrospective, single-center observational study in adult patients with CRKp-OXA-48 between December 2015 and May 2019. We collected the patients' clinical and epidemiological characteristics, antibiotic treatment (CAZ-AVI vs. BAT), and evolution. Factors associated with clinical success were analyzed using binary logistic regression. The study included 76 patients with CRKp-OXA-48-type bacteremia 33 received CAZ-AVI and 43 BAT. CAZ-AVI was mainly used in monotherapy (91%). Clinical success was more common in patients < 70-year-old (OR 4.79, 95% CI [1.435-16.002], p = 0.011) and CAZ-AVI treatment (OR 6.69, 95% CI [1.68-26.604], p = 0.007). Kaplan-Meier survival curve of 14-day mortality showed a lower mortality in patients who received CAZ-AVI (log rank 0.013). However, CAZ-AVI did not achieve statistical difference in IPTW for 14- and 30-day mortality (aOR 0.1, 95% CI [0.02-1.22], p = 0.076 and aOR 1.7, 95% CI [0.48-5.98], p = 0.413, respectively). CAZ-AVI treatment might be associated with a greater clinical success in CRKp-OXA-48 bacteremia.

Identification of a Novel Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant KPC-2 Variant, KPC-123, in Citrobacter koseri Following Ceftazidime-Avibactam Treatment.

This study reported the identification of a novel ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant KPC-2 variant, KPC-123, in a Citrobacter koseri isolated from a patient in a Chinese hospital following ceftazidime-avibactam treatment of infection caused by OXA-232-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae. This novel KPC-123 consisting of 302 amino acids differs from KPC-2 by two insertions after positions 179 (ins179_TY) and 270 (ins270_DDKHSEA), respectively. Conjugation and cloning experiments confirmed that KPC-123 was able to confer high-level resistance to ceftazidime and ceftazidime/avibactam (MICs of 128 mg/L and 64/4 mg/L, respectively) and elevated MIC values of cefotaxime, cefepime, and aztreonam (4 mg/L, 2 mg/L, and 4 mg/L, respectively) but retained susceptibility to carbapenems. Whole-genome sequencing and genomic analysis revealed that blaKPC−123 within the “ISKpn27-blaKPC-ISKpn6” structure was located on a 93,814-bp conjugative plasmid that was almost identical to a blaKPC−2-carrying plasmid harbored in a K. pneumoniae isolate from the same sampling site of the patient, suggesting the transfer and in vivo evolution of this blaKPC-carrying plasmid. Hence, active surveillance of ceftazidime/avibactam resistance and the underlying mechanisms, which may facilitate the prevention and control of the dissemination of resistance, is needed.

The Rapid Emergence of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Resistance Mediated by KPC Variants in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in Zhejiang Province, China.

Ceftazidime-avibactam (CAV) is a new treatment option against carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. However, the rapid emergence of CAV resistance mediated by KPC variants has posed a severe threat to healthcare after its clinical application. The characteristics of CAV resistance in CRKP strains needs to be determined in China. A total of 477 CRKP isolates were collected from 46 hospitals in Zhejiang Province from 2018 to 2021. The results demonstrated that CAV had a potent activity against 94.5% of all CRKP (451/477, 95% CI: 93.0–96.1%) and 86.0% of CRKP strains carrying blaKPC genes (410/477, 95% CI: 83.5–88.4%). A total of 26 CAV-resistant strains were found. Among these strains, sixteen harbored metallo-β lactamases, and two carried KPC-2 carbapenemase and mutated ompK35 and ompK36. Eight CRKP strains encoded KPC-33 or KPC-93, belonging to ST11, among which seven strains were detected in patients hospitalized in 2021 after exposure to CAV and one strain was associated with intra-hospital spread. CAV is a potent agent in vitro against CRKP strains. The rapid development of CAV resistance mediated by various KPC variants after a short period of CAV treatment has increased and brought difficulties in treating infections caused by CRKP strains, especially those belonging to ST11. The surveillance of bacterial resistance against CAV is highly recommended due to the steep development of CAV resistance and rapid evolution of KPC enzymes.

Identification of a KPC Variant Conferring Resistance to Ceftazidime-Avibactam from ST11 Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Strains.

ABSTRACTA novel Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) variant, KPC-93, was identified in two Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates from a patient from China treated with ceftazidime-avibactam. KPC-93 possessed a five-amino-acids insertion (Pro-Asn-Asn-Arg-Ala) between Ambler positions 267 and 268 in KPC-2. Cloning and expression of the blaKPC-93 gene in Escherichia coli, followed by determination of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) values and kinetic parameters, showed that KPC-93 exhibited increased resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam, but a drastic decrease in carbapenemase activity. Our data highlight that a KPC variant conferring resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam could be easily induced by ceftazidime-avibactam treatment and that actions are required to control dissemination of these determinants.IMPORTANCE Ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) is a novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination with activity against serine β-lactamases, including the Ambler class A enzyme KPC. However, during recent years, there have been increasing reports of emergence of new KPC variants that could confer resistance to CZA. This has limited its clinical application. Here, we reported a new KPC variant, KPC-93, that could confer CZA resistance. KPC-93 possessed a five-amino-acids insertion (Pro-Asn-Asn-Arg-Ala) between Ambler positions 267 and 268 in KPC-2. Our findings have revealed the potential risk of blaKPC gene mutations associated with CZA exposure over a short period of time.

Impact of Ceftazidime-Avibactam Treatment in the Emergence of Novel KPC Variants in the ST307-Klebsiella pneumoniae High-Risk Clone and Consequences for Their Routine Detection.

The emergence of Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates carrying novel blaKPC variants conferring ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ/AVI) resistance is being increasingly reported. We evaluated the accuracy of phenotypic methods commonly used in routine clinical laboratories in the detection of novel K. pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) enzymes. Additionally, we characterized by whole-genome sequencing (WGS) the KPC-ST307-K. pneumoniae isolates recovered in our hospital before and after CAZ/AVI therapy. Rectal colonization or infection by carbapenem-resistant KPC-3 K. pneumoniae isolates (imipenem MIC, 16 mg/L; meropenem MIC, 8 to >16 mg/L) and CAZ/AVI-susceptible isolates (CAZ/AVI MIC, 1 to 2 mg/L) were first detected in three intensive care unit (ICU) patients admitted between March 2020 and July 2020. KPC K. pneumoniae isolates with increased CAZ/AVI MICs (8 to 32 mg/L) and carbapenem susceptibility (imipenem and meropenem MIC, <1 mg/L) were recovered within 6 to 24 days after CAZ/AVI treatment. WGS confirmed that all KPC K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to the sequence type 307 (ST307) high-risk clone and carried identical antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors. The presence of the novel blaKPC-46, blaKPC-66, and blaKPC-92 genes was confirmed in the K. pneumoniae isolates with increased CAZ/AVI MICs and restored carbapenem activity. KPC production was confirmed by immunochromatography, the eazyplex Superbug CRE system, and the Xpert Carba-R assay in all KPC K. pneumoniae isolates, but not in any isolate using chromogenic agar plates for carbapenemase producers (ChromID-CARBA), the KPC/MBL/OXA-48 Confirm kit, and the β-CARBA test. Nevertheless, all grew in chromogenic agar plates for extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) producers (ChromID-ESBL). We report the failure of the most common phenotypic methods used for the detection of novel KPC carbapenemases but not of rapid molecular or immunochromatography assays, thus highlighting their relevance in microbiology laboratories.

Efficacy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae Infection After Kidney Transplantation.

PurposeThe clinical efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI) in treating carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP)-infected recipients after kidney transplantation (KT) has not been well evaluated. We aimed to assess its efficacy in a single-center cohort of KT recipients infected with CRKP.Materials and MethodsWe retrospectively observed KT recipients diagnosed with CRKP infection from June 2019 to July 2021. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and secondary outcomes were 14-day clinical cure and 14-day microbiological cure. Logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between CAZ-AVI treatment and prognosis.ResultsA total of 54 CRKP-infected KT recipients were recorded in this study. Twenty-two recipients received CAZ-AVI and 32 received other antibiotic regimens. Recipients in both groups had similar baseline characteristics, with the most common site of infection being surgical site infections (n=27; 50.0%) and bloodstream infections (n=23; 42.6%). Recipients treated with CAZ-AVI had significantly lower 30-day mortality (3/22 vs 14/32, P=0.019), significantly higher 14-day clinical cure (18/22 vs 17/32, P=0.030) and 14-day microbiological cure (19/22 vs 15/32, P=0.003) compared with recipients receiving other treatment regimens. Kaplan–Meier survival curves for 30-day mortality confirmed the findings (log-rank=0.014). In a multivariate logistic regression model, receiving CAZ-AVI was found to be an independent protective factor for 30-day mortality (odds ratio=0.148, 95% confidence interval, 0.027–0.800; P=0.026). No significant side effects were recorded.ConclusionCAZ-AVI may be more valuable than other antibiotic regimens for the treatment of CRKP infection after kidney transplantation, and further large randomized controlled trials are needed to assess its efficacy.

Clostridioides difficile Infection Rates after Ceftolozane–Tazobactam and Ceftazidime–Avibactam Treatment Compared to Carbapenem Treatment: A Retrospective Single-Center Study

Introduction: Ceftolozane–tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA) are new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL/IBL) and antibiotics. There are few data regarding their impact on Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). The objective of our study was, therefore, to determine and compare the number of CDI occurring after treatment with CT or CZA and carbapenem (CBP). Methods: All patients who received at least one dose of CT or CZA in our hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 were included. We compared, during the same period, the number of CDI after CT or CZA treatment and CBPs by using a chi-square test of Fischer’s exact test when required. p value &lt; 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: Among the 53 patients receiving CZA and 42 patients receiving CT, two and one, respectively, developed a CDI within 90 days. Of the three (3%) patients who developed a CDI, one died 15 days after his second CDI (36 days after initiation of CZA). Of the 2291 patients receiving CBP, 37 (1.6%) developed a CDI within 90 days. There was no significant difference between the number of CDI occurring after CBP and CT or CZA treatment. CT or CZA use is not associated with an increased rate of CDI compared to CBP.

In vivo Selection of Imipenem Resistance Among Ceftazidime-Avibactam-Resistant, Imipenem-Susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolate With KPC-33 Carbapenemase

We describe in vivo evolution of carbapenem and ceftazidime-avibactam resistance by analyzing four longitudinal Klebsiella pneumoniae clinical isolates from a patient with pneumonia following antimicrobial treatment. The patient had fever, cough associated with expectoration, and new infiltration was found on the chest CT. Antimicrobial susceptibility was determined, and whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed to investigate its dynamic change of resistance phenotype. Population analysis profile was performed to investigate the population of Klebsiella pneumoniae. The infection started with a KPC-2-producing K. pneumoniae (ZRKP01, ceftazidime-avibactam-S/carbapenem-R). Then, after ceftazidime-avibactam treatment, the strain switched to D179Y mutant that is KPC-33 (ZRKP02, ceftazidime-avibactam-R/carbapenem-S), which restored carbapenem susceptibility. However, the restored carbapenem susceptibility in vivo was not stable and the subsequent use of imipenem against KPC-33-producing K. pneumoniae infection resulted in a reversion of KPC-2 producers (ZRKP03 and ZRKP04, ceftazidime-avibactam-S/carbapenem-R). Genetic analysis demonstrated that all four K. pneumoniae isolates belonged to sequence type 11and had identical capsular polysaccharide (KL47), identical porin genes, and same plasmid replicon types. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that four K. pneumoniae isolates showed a high degree of relatedness. Single nucleotide polymorphisms analysis indicated that the number of mutations observed in the KPC-33 isolate was more than in the wild-type KPC-2 isolates and the four KPC-Kp isolates evolved from a longitudinal evolution of K. pneumoniae harboring blaKPC-2 gene. This is the first report to observe the in vivo evolution of wild-type KPC-2 to KPC-33 and then the reversion to its original wild-type KPC-2. Through WGS, we demonstrated the role of selective pressure of antibiotic in the mutation and reversion of blaKPC genes, which leading to the dynamic change of KPC enzymes and the dynamic emergence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems.Statement: Recently, studies reported the emergence of ceftazidime-avibactam-resistant strains. The KPC mutations mediating ceftazidime-avibactam resistance are generally associated with the restoration of carbapenem susceptibility. However, clinical significance of this observation is unclear. In this manuscript, we demonstrate the role of selective pressure of antibiotic in the mutation and reversion of blaKPC genes, which leading to the dynamic change of KPC enzymes and the dynamic emergence of resistance to ceftazidime-avibactam and carbapenems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first report to observe the in vivo evolution of wild-type KPC-2 to KPC-33 and then the reversion to its original wild-type KPC-2. It should be noted that understanding the clinical significance of this observation is of critical importance, and reversion to carbapenem susceptibility would not imply a potential role for carbapenems monotherapy. We hope our study will draw attention to clinicians, so that this agent can be used most effectively for the longest period of time.

Review of Ceftazidime-Avibactam for the Treatment of Infections Caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Pseudomonas aeruginosa is an opportunistic Gram-negative pathogen that causes a range of serious infections that are often challenging to treat, as this pathogen can express multiple resistance mechanisms, including multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) phenotypes. Ceftazidime–avibactam is a combination antimicrobial agent comprising ceftazidime, a third-generation semisynthetic cephalosporin, and avibactam, a novel non-β-lactam β-lactamase inhibitor. This review explores the potential role of ceftazidime–avibactam for the treatment of P. aeruginosa infections. Ceftazidime–avibactam has good in vitro activity against P. aeruginosa relative to comparator β-lactam agents and fluoroquinolones, comparable to amikacin and ceftolozane–tazobactam. In Phase 3 clinical trials, ceftazidime–avibactam has generally demonstrated similar clinical and microbiological outcomes to comparators in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections, complicated urinary tract infections or hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by P. aeruginosa. Although real-world data are limited, favourable outcomes with ceftazidime–avibactam treatment have been reported in some patients with MDR and XDR P. aeruginosa infections. Thus, ceftazidime–avibactam may have a potentially important role in the management of serious and complicated P. aeruginosa infections, including those caused by MDR and XDR strains.

In vitro activity of cefiderocol against ceftazidime-avibactam susceptible and resistant KPC-producing Enterobacterales: cross-resistance and synergistic effects.

To assess the in vitro activity of cefiderocol (CFDC) against a collection of both ceftazidime-avibactam (CZA) susceptible and resistant KPC-producingEnterobacterales (KPC-EB) isolates. Secondly, to assess its synergistic activity in combination with different antibiotics. One hundred KPC-EB isolates were tested: 60 CZA susceptible and 40 CZA resistant. Among them, 17 pairs of CZA susceptible and resistant KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) isolates were collected from 17 distinct patients before and after CZA treatment, respectively. CFDC susceptibility was evaluated by both broth microdilution (lyophilized panels; Sensititre; Thermo Fisher) and disk diffusion testing. Results were interpreted using EUCAST breakpoints. Synergistic activity of CFDC in combination with CZA, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem, and amikacin against six characterized KPC-Kp strains, before and after acquisition of CZA resistance, was evaluated using gradient diffusion strip crossing method. CFDC resistance rate was significantly higher in CZA resistant EB subset than in the susceptible one (p < 0.001): 82.5% vs 6.7%. MIC50 and MIC90 values were 0.25 and 2mg/L, 8 and 64mg/L in CZA-susceptible and CZA-resistant subset, respectively. KPC-Kp isolates harboring KPC-D179Y or KPC-Δ242-GT-243 variants showed CFDC MICs ranging from 4 to 64mg/L. CFDC showed in vitro synergistic effect mostly with CZA, against both CZA susceptible and resistant isolates, resulting in a synergy rate of 66.7%. CZA resistance mechanisms in KPC-EB impair the in vitro activity of CFDC, often leading to co-resistance. CFDC in combination with the new β-lactamases inhibitors might represent a strategy to enhance its activity.