Abstract

Introduction: Ceftolozane–tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA) are new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL/IBL) and antibiotics. There are few data regarding their impact on Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI). The objective of our study was, therefore, to determine and compare the number of CDI occurring after treatment with CT or CZA and carbapenem (CBP). Methods: All patients who received at least one dose of CT or CZA in our hospital between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2019 were included. We compared, during the same period, the number of CDI after CT or CZA treatment and CBPs by using a chi-square test of Fischer’s exact test when required. p value < 0.05 was considered as significant. Results: Among the 53 patients receiving CZA and 42 patients receiving CT, two and one, respectively, developed a CDI within 90 days. Of the three (3%) patients who developed a CDI, one died 15 days after his second CDI (36 days after initiation of CZA). Of the 2291 patients receiving CBP, 37 (1.6%) developed a CDI within 90 days. There was no significant difference between the number of CDI occurring after CBP and CT or CZA treatment. CT or CZA use is not associated with an increased rate of CDI compared to CBP.

Highlights

  • Ceftolozane–tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA) are new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL/IBL) and antibiotics

  • The difference can be explained by the fact that our study looked for episodes of C. difficile infection and not for carriage in the stool

  • There was no significant difference between the number of Clostridioides difficile infections (CDI) occurring after CBP and CT or CZA

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ceftolozane–tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA) are new beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL/IBL) and antibiotics. The objective of our study was, to determine and compare the number of CDI occurring after treatment with CT or CZA and carbapenem (CBP). Ceftolozane–tazobactam (CT) and ceftazidime–avibactam (CZA) are newly validated beta-lactam/beta-lactamase inhibitors (BL/BLI). Both provide expansive antimicrobial coverage of Gram-negative bacteria, including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and stable activity against many β-lactamases as well as coverage of most extended-spectrum β-lactamaseproducing (ESBL) organisms [1,2]. CZA is active against carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae that produce Class A carbapenemases such as KPC [3]. Avibactam does not inactivate metallo-β-lactamases (MBL) such as New Delhi metallo (NDM)-βlactamases, and, CZA is of no interest against these strains [4].

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call