The relative retentive properties of various luting agents were investigated by measurement of the tensile force necessary to remove cast gold, occlusal inlays seated with the different cements. The influence of the cement base and cavity liners on retention was also studied. 1. 1. Inlays cemented with the zinc phosphate cement (Tenacin) offered the greatest resistance to removal. The results obtained with Kryptex, the silico-phosphate cement, were essentially the same but the retention decreased when the silicate cement, New Filling Porcelain, was used. 2. 2. Inlays cemented with the zinc oxide-eugenol cements, Temrex, and Temporary Cement, required less force to remove than when the same restorations were seated with the phosphoric acid cements. There were some differences between individual products. One material, Temp-Bond, designed for temporary cementation, exhibited considerably less retention than the others. 3. 3. Varnish-type cavity liners, Copalite and Repelac, did not appreciably alter the retentive properties of zinc phosphate cement, although use of Pulpdent, a liner consisting of a suspension of calcium hydroxide, did impair the retention somewhat. 4. 4. The retention of inlays cemented with zinc phosphate cement was not affected by placing either a zinc oxide-eugenol (Cavitec) base or calcium hydroxide (Dycal) base in a depression in the floor of the cavity.
Read full abstract