Causes Of Health Inequalities Research Articles

The role of payment and financing in achieving health equity.

The aim was to identify healthcare payment and financing reforms to promote health equity and ways that the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) may promote those reforms. AHRQ convened a payment and financing workgroup-the authors of this paper-as part of its Health Equity Summit held in July 2022. This workgroup drew from its collective experience with healthcare payment and financing reform, as well as feedback from participants in a session at the Health Equity Summit, to identify the evidence base and promising paths for reforms to promote health equity. The payment and financing workgroup developed an outline of reforms to promote health equity, presented the outline to participants in the payment and financing session of the July 2022 AHRQ Health Equity Summit, and integrated feedback from the participants. This paper did not require novel data collection; the authors collected the data from the existing evidence base. The paper outlines root causes of health inequity and corresponding potential reforms in five domains: (1) the differential distribution of resources between healthcare providers serving different communities, (2) scarcity of financing for populations most in need, (3) lack of integration/accountability, (4) patient cost barriers to care, and (5) bias in provider behavior and diagnostic tools. Additional research is necessary to determine whether the proposed reforms are effective in promoting health equity.

Integrating Social Care into Healthcare: A Review on Applying the Social Determinants of Health in Clinical Settings.

Despite the substantial health and economic burdens posed by the social determinants of health (SDH), these have yet to be efficiently, sufficiently, and sustainably addressed in clinical settings-medical offices, hospitals, and healthcare systems. Our study contextualized SDH application strategies in U.S. clinical settings by exploring the reasons for integration and identifying target patients/conditions, barriers, and recommendations for clinical translation. The foremost reason for integrating SDH in clinical settings was to identify unmet social needs and link patients to community resources, particularly for vulnerable and complex care populations. This was mainly carried out through SDH screening during patient intake to collect individual-level SDH data within the context of chronic medical, mental health, or behavioral conditions. Challenges and opportunities for integration occurred at the educational, practice, and administrative/institutional levels. Gaps remain in incorporating SDH in patient workflows and EHRs for making clinical decisions and predicting health outcomes. Current strategies are largely directed at moderating individual-level social needs versus addressing community-level root causes of health inequities. Obtaining policy, funding, administrative and staff support for integration, applying a systems approach through interprofessional/intersectoral partnerships, and delivering SDH-centered medical school curricula and training are vital in helping individuals and communities achieve their best possible health.

An Invitation to Imagine: Conclusion of the HPP Series "What Is Anti-Racism in Health Promotion Practice?"

Throughout Volume 24 (2023) of Health Promotion Practice, we presented responses to our Call for content addressing the question, "What is Anti-Racism in Health Promotion Practice?" With Editorial Board colleagues, Aditi Srivastav Bussells and Carlos Rodríguez-Diaz, we (Keon L. Gilbert and Kathleen M. Roe) sought frameworks for action and practical examples that would catalyze, support, and (re)invigorate the field in response to the urgent need to eliminate racism as a cause of inequalities in health. This conversation with artist Wriply Bennett concludes the series. We invite scholars and practitioners to review all 17 contributions to the series and to continue to ask - and address - the question 'What is anti-racism in our practice, scholarship, and lives?"

Gender Differences in Migrant Workers Health in China.

Objectives: This study aimed to explore the distribution and differences in the health status of migrant workers in China by gender and age. In addition, it investigated the causes of health inequalities among them. Methods: This paper analyzes the differences in health status across age groups for migrant workers of different genders based on the data from the China Migrant Dynamic Survey in 2018. It also empirically assesses how education level and health insurance impact gender-related health inequalities. Results: The results suggest that female migrant workers in China have significantly lower health levels than males. Furthermore, these differences in health are exacerbated with age. This disparity may be attributed to lower participation in social insurance participation and less educational attainment among female migrant workers than their male counterparts. Conclusion: The government should take effective practical measures to increase the social insurance participation rate of female migrant workers. Moreover, investing in female education to reduce health inequality among migrant workers is essential.

The inverse relationship between income and the prevalence of dementia in high-income nations

Dementia continues to be a serious problem worldwide. A negative relationship between the prevalence of dementia and the level of socioeconomic status (SES), such as income can be observed in most countries. The aim of the study in this paper is to explore the possible pathways that contribute to this negative relationship. This article analyses and presents three possible causes of health inequalities between SES gradients in dementia and possible solutions to them, through a large collection of articles. Differences in health literacy, housing levels and social support caused by SES such as different incomes lead to social inequalities in health through behavioral/cultural pathway material pathway and psychosocial pathway respectively.

Intersectional Stigma as a Fundamental Cause of Health Disparities: A case study of how drug use stigma intersecting with racism and xenophobia creates health inequities for Black and Hispanic persons who use drugs over time.

Recent evidence points to racial and ethnic disparities in drug-related deaths and health conditions. Informed by stigma, intersectionality, intersectional stigma, and fundamental cause theories, we aimed to explore whether intersectional stigma was a fundamental cause of health. We document key events and policies over time and find that when progress is made new mechanisms emerge that negatively affect health outcomes for Black and Hispanic persons. We then focus on intersectional stigma targeting Black and Hispanic persons who use drugs. We document that when a person, or group of people, occupy multiple stigmatized identities the processes of stigmatization and scapegoating are particularly persistent and pernicious since people and groups can be stigmatized and scapegoated on varying intersections. We propose that an intersectional stigma framework allows for a better understanding of observed patterns over time, thereby providing a better guide for policies and interventions designed to reduce disparities. As a framework, intersectional stigma aims to recognize that when different sources of stigma collide, a new set of circumstances is created for those who reside in the intersection. We conclude that intersectional stigma is a fundamental cause of health inequities and provide policy recommendations aimed at dismantling intersectional stigma processes and mitigating the effects of intersectional stigmas to ultimately promote better health outcomes for Black and Hispanic persons who use drugs.

Continuity of Trust: Health Systems' Role in Advancing Health Equity Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Given COVID-19's disproportionate impact on populations that identify as Black, Indigenous, and People of Color (BIPOC) in the United States, researchers and advocates have recommended that health systems and institutions deepen their engagement with community-based organizations (CBOs) with longstanding relationships with these communities. However, even as CBOs leverage their earned trust to promote COVID-19 vaccination, health systems and institutions must also address underlying causes of health inequities more broadly. In this commentary, we discuss key lessons learned about trust from our participation in the U.S. Equity-First Vaccination Initiative, an effort funded by The Rockefeller Foundation to promote COVID-19 vaccination equity. The first lesson is that trust cannot be "surged" to meet the needs of the moment until it is no longer deemed important; rather, it must predate and outlast the crisis. Second, to generate long-term change, health systems cannot simply rely on CBOs to bridge the trust gap; instead, they must directly address the root causes of this gap among BIPOC populations.

Antiracist Structural Intervention at the Emory University Institutional Review Board.

Although racial and ethnic categories are social constructs without inherent biologic or genetic meaning, race and ethnicity impact health outcomes through racism. The use of racial categories in biomedical research often misattributes the cause of health inequities to genetic and inherent biological differences rather than to racism. Improving research practices around race and ethnicity is an urgent priority and requires education as well as structural change. We describe an evidence-based intervention for an institutional review board (IRB). Our IRB now requires all biomedical study protocols to define racial and ethnic classifications they plan to use, to state whether they are describing or explaining differences between groups, and to provide justification for any use of racial or ethnic group variables as covariates. This antiracist IRB intervention is an example of how research institutions can help ensure the scientific validity of studies and avoid the unscientific reification of race and ethnicity as inherently biological or genetic concepts.

Cultural Competence Guides for COVID-19 Messaging in Hispanic Communities.

The Rio Grande Valley in South Texas comprises 5% percent of Texas's population yet 17%of Texas's COVID-19 deaths. We aimed to address underlying mistrust and systemic racism in our Hispanic community that contributes to health inequities by developing a cultural competence guide for public health messaging. We employed a mixed method design (e.g., focus groups, surveys, interviews) to develop and implement a cultural competence guide in an iterative community-informed process. We created a general cultural competence guide, one for the Hispanic community and one for the hard-of-hearing community. Our cultural competence guides provide an interpretation as to whether the message is culturally competent or requires revisions. The guides have the following five categories: content and clarity, emotions and values, audience and inclusivity, call to action, and gestalt. The Hispanic community needs more culturally competent public health messaging to address a key root cause of health inequities surrounding COVID-19. Our novel, concise guides can help organizations and individuals seeking to create culturally sensitive and, therefore, more effective public health messaging for Hispanic or deaf and hard-of-hearing communities.

Leading Change at Berkeley Public Health: Building the Anti-racist Community for Justice and Social Transformative Change

A transformative change grounded in a commitment to antiracism and racial and health equity is underway at the University of California, Berkeley, School of Public Health. Responding to a confluence of national, state, and local circumstances, bold leadership, and a moral and disciplinary imperative to name and address racism as a root cause of health inequities, our community united around a common vision of becoming an antiracist institution. Berkeley Public Health has a long history of efforts supporting diversity, equity, inclusion, belonging, and justice. Building upon those efforts, we pursued an institution-wide initiative, one that creates a more equitable and inclusive school of public health that models and supports the development of future public health leaders, practitioners, scholars, and educators. Grounded in the principles of cultural humility, we recognized that our vision was a journey, not a destination. This article describes our efforts from June 2020 through June 2022 in developing and implementing ARC4JSTC (Anti-racist Community for Justice and Social Transformative Change), a comprehensive, multiyear antiracist change initiative encompassing faculty and workforce development, student experience, curriculum and pedagogy, community engagement outreach, and business processes. Our work is data informed, grounded in principles of change management, and focused on building internal capacity to promote long-term change. Our discussion of lessons learned and next steps helps to inform our ongoing work and antiracist institutional change efforts at other schools and programs of public health.

A Case Analysis of the Equity-Focused Health Impact Assessment on Reducing Health Inequality in Canberra

In relation to COVID-19, people in policy settings are exposed to a number of health inequalities that are interconnected with many complex determinants. However, few Equity-Focused Health Impact Assessment (EfHIA) studies have been highlighted as relevant to the ongoing pandemic. The EfHIA is regarded as a mechanism for identifying multidimensional causes of health inequality and presents an opportunity to improve interventions in the development of policies or programmes. This research uses an EfHIA Community Funding Programme (CFP) conducted in Canberra to evaluate the performance of EfHIA, evaluating its process and influences on reducing health inequality, with the main findings being that this assessment performs well in relation to health promotion. This study provides a systematic literature review of the theoretical and practical literature, with the evidence reviewed suggesting that it is essential to adopt effective EfHIA strategies and tools to address root issues of health inequality in relation to policy. In this regard, this research considers the extent to which positive changes can be attributed to strategies of the EfHIA across. Finally, in pursuit of effectiveness and equity, the twin-track approach of health promotion and health equality should be utilised in making decisions, the EfHIA having been implemented over a short period with only few resources in most cases. More theoretical research and empirical studies are therefore required to contribute to the use of EfHIA tools so as to reduce health inequality in the future.

The application of intersectional multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) to examine birthweight inequities in New York City.

Exploring the intersection of dimensions of social identity is critical for understanding drivers of health inequities. We used multilevel analysis of individual heterogeneity and discriminatory accuracy (MAIHDA) to examine the intersection of age, race/ethnicity, education, and nativity status on infant birthweight among singleton births in New York City from 2012 to 2018 (N=725,875). We found evidence of intersectional effects of various systems of oppression on birthweight inequities and identified U.S.-born Black women as having infants of lower-than-expected birthweights. The MAIHDA approach should be used to identify intersectional causes of health inequities and individuals affected most to develop policies and interventions redressing inequities.

The Association of Reported Experiences of Racial and Ethnic Discrimination in Health Care with COVID-19 Vaccination Status and Intent — United States, April 22, 2021–November 26, 2022

In 2021, the CDC Director declared that racism is a serious threat to public health,* reflecting a growing awareness of racism as a cause of health inequities, health disparities, and disease. Racial and ethnic disparities in COVID-19-related hospitalization and death (1,2) illustrate the need to examine root causes, including experiences of discrimination. This report describes the association between reported experiences of discrimination in U.S. health care settings and COVID-19 vaccination status and intent to be vaccinated by race and ethnicity during April 22, 2021-November 26, 2022, based on the analysis of interview data collected from 1,154,347 respondents to the National Immunization Survey-Adult COVID Module (NIS-ACM). Overall, 3.5% of adults aged ≥18 years reported having worse health care experiences compared with persons of other races and ethnicities (i.e., they experienced discrimination), with significantly higher percentages reported by persons who identified as non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) (10.7%), non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) (7.2%), non-Hispanic multiple or other race (multiple or other race) (6.7%), Hispanic or Latino (Hispanic) (4.5%), non-Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander (NHOPI) (3.9%), and non-Hispanic Asian (Asian) (2.8%) than by non-Hispanic White (White) persons (1.6%). Unadjusted differences in prevalence of being unvaccinated against COVID-19 among respondents reporting worse health care experiences than persons of other races and ethnicities compared with those who reported that their health care experiences were the same as those of persons of other races and ethnicities were statistically significant overall (5.3) and for NHOPI (19.2), White (10.5), multiple or other race (5.7), Black (4.6), Asian (4.3), and Hispanic (2.6) adults. Findings were similar for vaccination intent. Eliminating inequitable experiences in health care settings might help reduce some disparities in receipt of a COVID-19 vaccine.

Dismantling weight stigma in eating disorder treatment: Next steps for the field.

The authors posit current guidelines and treatment for eating disorders (EDs) fail to adequately address, and often perpetuate, weight stigma. The social devaluation and denigration of higher-weight individuals cuts across nearly every life domain and is associated with negative physiological and psychosocial outcomes, mirroring the harms attributed to weight itself. Maintaining focus on weight in ED treatment can intensify weight stigma among patients and providers, leading to increased internalization, shame, and poorer health outcomes. Stigma has been recognized as a fundamental cause of health inequities. With no clear evidence that the proposed mechanisms of ED treatment effectively address internalized weight bias and its association with disordered eating behavior, it is not hard to imagine that providers' perpetuation of weight bias, however unintentional, may be a key contributor to the suboptimal response to ED treatment. Several reported examples of weight stigma in ED treatment are discussed to illustrate the pervasiveness and insidiousness of this problem. The authors contend weight management inherently perpetuates weight stigma and outline steps for researchers and providers to promote weight-inclusive care (targeting health behavior change rather than weight itself) as an alternative approach capable of addressing some of the many social injustices in the history of this field.

Addressing racism in the workplace through simulation: So much to unlearn.

Racism exists in the healthcare system and is a root cause of health inequities among Indigenous Peoples. When microaggressions of racism are carried out by healthcare providers, therapeutic trust may be broken and quality of care may be impacted. Anti-racism response training is considered best practice in recognizing and addressing racism. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of a virtual (synchronous) anti-racism response training workshop among a group of rehabilitation therapists from across Canada. A 90-minute virtual anti-racism simulation workshop for rehabilitation therapists was developed and delivered virtually four times across Canada between 2020 and 2021. Following an introduction and pre-briefing, role-playing among participants was used to address microaggressive Indigenous-specific racism, followed by an in-depth debriefing with trained facilitators. A post-workshop survey was conducted to evaluate this anti-racism simulation workshop and assess the impact on participating occupational therapists (OTs) and physiotherapists (PTs). Following each simulation workshop, participants were invited to complete an anonymous post-activity survey (n = 20; 50% OTs, 45% PTs). Open text responses were analyzed thematically from the perspective of critical race theory. The majority of the participants self-identified as women (95%); white (90%); mid-career (52%); and had never personally experienced racism (70%). All participants agreed that the workshop gave them ideas on how to start dismantling racism in their workplace. Thematic analysis resulted in four themes: so much to unlearn, remain humble, resist the silence, and discomfort is okay. Despite feelings of discomfort, OTs and PTs appreciated anti-racism skills-based training and recognized the importance of taking action on racism in the workplace. Findings from this study support online (synchronous) anti-racism training as a viable and effective means of creating space for rehabilitation professionals to lean into brave conversations that are necessary for developing strategies to address racial microaggressions impacting Indigenous persons in the workplace. We believe that these small steps of preparing and practicing anti-racism strategies among rehabilitation therapists are essential to achieving a collective goal of dismantling racism in the health system.

Proceedings from the Second Medical Summit on Firearm Injury Prevention, 2022: Creating a Sustainable Healthcare Coalition to Advance a Multidisciplinary Public Health Approach.

Proceedings from the Second Medical Summit on Firearm Injury Prevention, 2022: Creating a Sustainable Healthcare Coalition to Advance a Multidisciplinary Public Health Approach.

Abstract P150: Residential Segregation and Hypertension Risk in Black and White Americans

Introduction: Black adults experience the highest hypertension burden of any American group. Evidence indicates social factors adversely affecting Black people explain some of the excess hypertension burden. It’s unclear whether residential segregation, a key cause of health inequities, has a differential impact on Black and White people. Hypothesis: The magnitude of the association of residential segregation and risk of incident hypertension will be greater in Black than White people. Methods: Our sample included 6,143 Black and White REasons for Geographic And Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study participants without prevalent hypertension (2003-7), and with a follow-up visit 9.3 years later. Baseline county-level segregation was measured with the (1) dissimilarity index (DI, the difference in race distribution of census tracts relative to their county), (2) isolation index (ISI, the degree to which Black people are exposed only to one another in a county), and (3) interaction index (ITI, the degree to which Black people are exposed to White people in a county). Modified Poisson regression estimated the risk ratios (RR) of incident hypertension per SD increment of baseline residential segregation. Results: The mean (SD) age was 61(8) years for Black people and 62(8) years for White people. Hypertension incidence was 46% for Black people and 33% for White people. There was no association of any of the three measures of residential segregation (DI, ISI and ITI) with incident hypertension, with RRs all around 1.0 ( Figure ). Conclusions: Three measures of residential segregation were not associated with incident hypertension risk in Black and White participants of the REGARDS cohort. Findings differ from a previous study that reported that a measure of racial clustering was associated with higher risk of hypertension in Black people. Taken together, findings suggest that, in Black people, different domains of residential segregation capture factors related differently to hypertension development.

Abstract P253: Neighborhood Socioeconomic Status and Psychosocial Health Among Asian Americans Adults in New York City

Introduction: Social determinants of health, including one’s neighborhood environment, are a fundamental cause of health inequities. Low neighborhood socioeconomic status (NSES) is associated with adverse psychosocial and physical health profiles, yet limited data exists among Asian Americans. Our study aim was to determine the association between NSES with depressive symptoms and psychological distress among Asian American adults in New York City (NYC). Methods: The NYC Community Health Survey (CHS) is a population based annual telephone survey used to track the health of NYC residents. It is conducted in five languages including Mandarin and Cantonese. Data are weighted to be representative of NYC as a whole. Our sample included data from 4,557 Asian American participants of the 2017-2020 CHS cycles who were geolinked to their respective neighborhoods, conceptualized as the community district (CD). From publically available CD profiles, we constructed a NSES factor score from four indicators: proportion of the CD unemployed, in poverty, with a high rent burden, and with less than a high school education. Psychosocial health was measured using the Kessler-6 (K6) for nonspecific psychological distress and the 8-item Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ8) for depressive symptoms, with higher scores indicating worse psychosocial health. We used hierarchical linear models to determine the association between NSES tertile with outcomes stratified by Asian sub-group or region (Chinese, Indian subcontinent, or other Asian). Models were adjusted for individual level age, sex, income, and education. All analyses accounted for the complex survey design of the CHS. Results: Among NYC Asian American residents, 52.1% were women, 45% were age 25-44 years, 25% had less than a high school education, and 56% lived below 200% of the federal poverty level. Among Chinese residents of NYC, living in a neighborhood of low compared with high NSES, was associated with lower PH8 score (beta: -0.65, 95% CI: -1.10, -0.19). Among residents of NYC with heritage from the Indian subcontinent, living in a neighborhood of low compared with high NSES, was associated with a higher K6 score (beta: 1.27, 95% CI: 0.59, 1.95). Associations were not significant among other Asians or for other outcomes. Conclusion: Our results indicate a heterogeneous association between NSES with psychosocial health among Asian Americans of NYC, persisting beyond individual-level SES. Low NSES was associated with adverse psychosocial health among Asians from the Indian subcontinent but better psychosocial health among Chinese Americans. Further examination into potential sources of resilience such as social cohesion, for Chinese American residents residing in low resourced neighborhoods, is warranted.

Vital Needs of Dutch Homeless Service Users: Responsiveness of Local Services in the Light of Health Equity.

Healthcare and social services aim to ensure health equity for all users. Despite ongoing efforts, marginalized populations remain underserved. The Dutch HOP-TR study intends to expand knowledge on how to enable the recovery of homeless service users. A naturalistic meta-snowball sampling resulted in a representative sample of homeless services (N = 16) and users (N = 436). Interviews collected health and needs from user and professional perspectives in a comprehensive, rights-based ecosystem strategy. We calculated the responsiveness to needs in four domains (mental health, physical health, paid work, and administration). Most service users were males (81%) with a migration background (52%). In addition to physical (78%) and mental health needs (95%), the low education level (89%) and functional illiteracy (57%) resulted in needs related to paid work and administration support. Most had vital needs in three or four domains (77%). The availability of matching care was extremely low. For users with needs in two domains, met needs ranged from 0.6-13.1%. Combined needs (>2 domains) were hardly met. Previous research demonstrated the interdependent character of health needs. This paper uncovers some causes of health inequity. The systematic failure of local services to meet integrating care needs demonstrates the urgency to expand recovery-oriented implementation strategies with health equity in mind.

Swimming Together Upstream: How to Align MLP Services with U.S. Healthcare Delivery.

Medical-legal partnership (MLP) embeds attorneys and paralegals into care delivery to help clinicians address root causes of health inequities. Notwithstanding decades of favorable outcomes, MLP is not as well-known as might be expected. In this essay, the authors explore ways in which strategic alignment of legal services with healthcare services in terms of professionalism, information collection and sharing, and financing might help the MLP movement become a more widespread, sustainable model for holistic care delivery.