The continuity of the counter-revolutionary tradition of the west of France is one of the most commonly accepted propositions in the country's electoral history. Everyone recognizes that the areas where the priests rejected the oath of loyalty to the Civil Constitution of the Clergy in I791 were also the areas where the Catholic and royalist guerrilla war known as chouannerie broke out a few years later. The chouan tradition survived throughout the nineteenth and twentieth centuries in the form of the region's continued preference for legitimist and later conservative deputies. The continuities appear to go even further back than the I790s as well. Roger Dupuy and Jean Meyer argued that the parishes which supported the bonnets rouges in I675 in the Finistere were those which supported the Republic in the 1790s, while the quiescent parishes later supported the chouans. A continuing tradition of anti-seigneurial and anti-urban revolt thus stretched across the sixteenth, seventeenth and eighteenth centuries.' Even more arresting was the continuity of Catholic traditions in Upper Brittany. M. Lagr6e was able to show that the parishes around Vitre which supported the Catholic League in the sixteenth century were later chouan and royalist in the nineteenth.2 Any debate about this has been directed towards explaining the fact of these remarkable continuities. Andre Siegfried, who began his studies of electoral geography by trying to explain the refractory west, attributed popular royalism to the combined pressure of resident nobles on their tenants and of priests on their parishioners.3 But Siegfried has been out of favour for some time. Paul Bois found