ED INFORMATION 269 number of categories in the memory set, and (c) the typicality of the test probe. In scanning experiments, latency has been shown to increase with an increase in both the number and size of categories in the memory set (Homa, 1973; Naus, 1974); in semantic verification tasks, verification of statements is faster for typical (a robin is a bird) than for atypical (a raven is a bird) subordinates. In experiments on category abstraction, the degree of abstraction is enhanced as the size of the category (Homa et al., 1973) and the number of categories are increased (Homa & Chambliss, 1975). Furthermore, low-distortion patterns are classified more accurately than highlevel ones are classified (Homa, 1978), and low-distortion patterns are situated more centrally in a multidimensional space (Homa, Reed, & Curtis, Note 1). Thus, degree of distortion shares some similarity to the notion of typicality in semantic verification tasks. In the present study, the retrievability of abstracted information was investigated in two experiments. In Experiment 1, subjects initially acquired information about a number of different categories. On subsequent days, subsets from this population were selected to define memory sets composed of varying numbers of categories (N = 1, 2, 3) and category sizes (s = 1, 2, 3) in a manner analogous to high-speed scanning experiments for semantically categorized memory sets (Homa, 1973). Test probes included both positive and negative stimuli; negative stimuli were either familiar and categorically known stimuli (related negatives) or categorically inappropriate stimuli (unrelated negatives). A major concern was whether the abstracted categories, acquired during an earlier learning phase, would function to effectively short-circuit the search in a manner obtained for semantic categories (Homa, 1973). If so, then both the number of abstracted categories as well as their size should influence the latency function. In Experiment 2, the emphasis was shifted to the comparison process presumably involved in verification. Two manipulations were used to assess the comparison process: (a) the degree of prior category abstraction, and (b) the degree of distortion (typicality) of the test probe. Unlike Experiment 1, all test probes in Experiment 2 were novel, and the latencies reflected more a comparison process than a scan for specific memorial information. To the extent that category abstraction enhances the comparison process, it was predicted that manipulating category abstraction by increasing category size during acquisition would produce RT-functions of negative slope, i.e., the greater the category size, the smaller the latency. This content downloaded from 207.46.13.105 on Wed, 25 May 2016 06:31:59 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms 270 OMOHUNDRO AND HOMA