Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Cases Research Articles

Predictive value of microcirculation for pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation weaning test: Amonocentric prospective observational study.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is widely used for children treated for refractory respiratory failures or refractory cardiogenic shock. Its duration depends on organ functions recovery. Weaning is decided using macro-circulatory tools, but microcirculation is not well evaluated. Sidestream dark-field video imaging is used to assess the perfusion of the sublingual microvascular vessels. The aim of this study was to assess the predictive value of microcirculatory indices in ECMO weaning. This prospective monocentric study examined pediatric patients at Trousseau Hospital between March 2017 and December 2020. The study included all patients from 35 weeks of gestational age to 18 years old who were treated with ECMO. Children were divided into two groups: one with stability after weaning and the other with instability after weaning. We collected clinical and biological data, ventilation parameters, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation parameters, and drugs used at admission and after the weaning test. Microcirculations videos were taken after weaning trials with echocardiography and blood gas monitoring. The study included 30 patients with a median age of 29 days (range: 1-770 days) at admission, including 18 patients who received venoarterial ECMO (60%). There were 19 children in the stability group and 11 in the instability group. Macrocirculatory and microcirculatory indices showed no differences between groups. The microvascular flow index was subnormal in both groups (2.3 (1.8-2.4) and 2.3 (2.3-2.6), respectively; p = 0.24). The microvascular indices were similar between cases of venovenous and venoarterial ECMO and between age groups. Microcirculation monitoring at the weaning phase did not predict the failure of ECMO weaning.

Installed strategy and clinical observation of self-made extracorporeal membrane oxygenation system in the treatment of critically ill patients

To summarize the strategy and method for the treatment of critically ill patients with self-made extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) system. A observative study was conducted. Fifty-six patients with ECMO assisted support in Fuwai Central China Cardiovascular Disease Hospital from December 2020 to December 2021 were enrolled. According to the clinical situation of the patients and the wishes of the family, conventional ECMO package (conventional group) or self-made ECMO package (self-made group) was chosen. In the conventional group, the disposable ECMO package was used to install the machine, pre charge and exhaust the air. In the self-made group, the disposable consumables commonly used in extracorporeal circulation during cardiac surgery (including centrifugal pump heads, membrane oxygenation, tubes, connectors, etc.) were used to create a self-made ECMO system. Based on the patient's situation, personalized tube model selection and length control were carried out. The preparation time, auxiliary time, auxiliary method, total pre charge volume, free hemoglobin (FHb) levels after 2 hours of ECMO operation and operating costs, as well as changes in hemodynamics, arterial blood gas analysis, and blood indicators within 48 hours after ECMO placement in the two groups were recorded. The occurrence of adverse events related to the ECMO system during ECMO adjuvant therapy in two groups was simultaneously observed. Fifty-six patients were enrolled finally, with 28 cases in the conventional group and 28 cases in the self-made group, and all successfully completed the operation of ECMO. There was no statistically significant difference in ECMO system preparation time, auxiliary time, auxiliary method, and FHb levels after 2 hours of ECMO operation between the conventional group and the self-made group [preparation time (minutes): 13±4 vs. 15±5, auxiliary time (hours): 287±34 vs. 276±42, veno-arterial ECMO (cases): 22 vs. 24, veno-venous ECMO (cases): 6 vs. 4, FHb after 2 hours of ECMO operation (mg/L): 226±67 vs. 253±78, all P > 0.05]. However, the total pre charge volume and operating costs in the self-made group were significantly lower than those in the conventional group [total pre charge volume (mL): 420±25 vs. 650±10, operating costs (ten thousand yuan): 3.8±0.4 vs. 6.7±0.3, both P < 0.01]. The hemodynamics, arterial blood gas analysis, and blood indicators of patients in the two groups were relatively stable within 48 hours after ECMO operation, and most of the indicators between the two groups showed no statistically significant differences. The hemoglobin (Hb) levels at 12, 24, and 48 hours after the machine transfer in the self-made group were significantly higher than those in the conventional group (g/L: 128.5±23.7 vs. 117.5±24.3 at 12 hours, 121.3±31.3 vs. 109.6±33.2 at 24 hours, 118.5±20.1 vs. 105.2±25.7 at 48 hours, all P < 0.05). Both groups of patients did not experience any adverse event related to the ECMO system, such as membrane pulmonary infiltration, joint detachment, and massive hemolysis, during the ECMO assisted treatment process. When implementing ECMO for critically ill patients in clinical practice, a self-made ECMO system with disposable consumables commonly used in extracorporeal circulation during cardiac surgery can be used for cardiopulmonary function assistance support, thereby saving patients medical costs and alleviating their dependence on disposable ECMO package in clinical practice.

Formal Ethics Consultation in Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients: A Single-Center Retrospective Cohort of a Quaternary Pediatric Hospital.

To examine characteristics associated with formal ethics consultation (EC) referral in pediatric extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) cases, and document ethical issues presented. Retrospective cohort study using mixed methods. Single-center quaternary pediatric hospital. Patients supported on ECMO (January 2012 to December 2021). We compared clinical variables among ECMO patients according to the presence of EC. We defined optimal cutoffs for EC based on run duration, ICU length of stay (LOS), and sum of procedures or complications. To identify independent explanatory variables for EC, we used a forward stepwise selection multivariable logistic regression model. EC records were thematically characterized into ethical issues. Of 601 ECMO patients and 225 patients with EC in 10 years, 27 ECMO patients received EC (4.5% of ECMO patients, 12% of all ECs). On univariate analysis, use of EC vs. not was associated with multiple ECMO runs, more complications/procedures, longer ICU LOS and ECMO duration, cardiac admissions, decannulation outcome, and higher mortality. Cutoffs for EC were ICU LOS >52 days, run duration >160 hours, and >6 complications/procedures. Independent associations with EC included these three cutoffs and older age. The model showed good discrimination (area under the curve 0.88 [0.83, 0.93]) and fit. The most common primary ethical issues were related to end-of-life, ECMO discontinuation, and treatment decision-making. Moral distress was cited in 22 of 27 cases (82%). EC was used in 4.5% of our pediatric ECMO cases, with most ethical issues related to end-of-life care or ECMO discontinuation. Older age, longer ICU LOS, prolonged runs, and multiple procedures/complications were associated with greater odds for EC requests. These data highlight our single-center experience of ECMO-associated ethical dilemmas. Historical referral patterns may guide a supported decision-making framework. Future work will need to include quality improvement projects for timely EC, with evaluation of impacts on relevant endpoints.

Building an Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Program at a High-volume Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Center

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) is an emerging approach to cardiac arrest. We present two contrasting cases from a high-volume extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) center (defined as greater than 30 ECMO cases per year) without a 24/7 ECPR program to highlight how to establish an ECPR program with a focus on patient selection and outcome optimization. In one case, a patient presented with cardiac arrest during initial triage for chest pain within the emergency department, and in the other case, a patient experienced an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest with prolonged no-flow and low-flow time. Despite the lack of a 24/7 ECPR program at the presenting center, both patients received an ECPR evaluation, as both patients presented while all services necessary for ECMO cannulation were available. The in-hospital cardiac arrest patient was successfully cannulated for ECMO during cardiopulmonary resuscitation and survived with few complications. The out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patient was deemed a poor candidate for ECPR and expired soon after presentation. These two cases highlight the complex decision-making in ECPR and further illustrate how to create ECPR protocols at a high-volume ECMO center before resources are available for a 24/7 ECPR program.

Two cases of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for ventilator-dependent infants with bronchopulmonary dysplasia and pulmonary hypertension

Bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) and pulmonary hypertension (PH) are potentially fatal complications in prematurely born infants. Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) may be a life-saving option for managing infants with BPD and PH. We present 2 patients who were successfully weaned off mechanical ventilators (MVs) through the application of ECMO. The patients were transferred to our institution after receiving MV care for 8 and 10 months, respectively, for BPD and PH. We were able to remove the patients from MVs after a period of ECMO-mediated lung rest. Although more research is required to determine specific criteria for ECMO use in patients with BPD and PH, our clinical experiences may contribute to the early application of ECMO in MV-dependent patients.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy delivery hospitalization and postpartum readmission trends, risk factors, and outcomes

ObjectiveTo evaluate risk for peripartum cardiomyopathy during delivery and postpartum hospitalizations, and analyze associated trends, risk factors, and clinical outcomes. MethodsThe 2010–2020 Nationwide Readmissions Database was used for this retrospective cohort study. Delivery hospitalizations along with postpartum readmissions occurring within five months of delivery discharge were analyzed. Risk factors associated with peripartum cardiomyopathy were analyzed with unadjusted and adjusted logistic regression models with odds ratios as measures of effect. Risk for severe adverse outcomes associated with peripartum cardiomyopathy was analyzed. Trends were analyzed with joinpoint regression. ResultsOf 39,790,772 delivery hospitalizations identified, 9,210 were complicated by a diagnosis of peripartum cardiomyopathy (2.3 per 10,000). Risk for a 5-month readmission with a peripartum cardiomyopathy diagnosis was 4.8 per 10,000. Factors associated with peripartum cardiomyopathy during deliveries included preeclampsia with severe features (OR 18.9, 95 % CI 17.2, 20.7), preeclampsia without severe features (OR 6.9, 95 % CI 6.1, 7.8), multiple gestation (OR 4.7, 95 % CI 4.1, 5.3), chronic hypertension (OR 10.1, 95 % CI 8.9, 11.3), and older maternal age. Associations were attenuated but retained significance in adjusted models. Similar estimates were found when evaluating associations with postpartum readmissions. Peripartum cardiomyopathy readmissions were associated with 10 % of overall postpartum deaths, 21 % of cardiac arrest/ventricular fibrillation diagnoses, 18 % of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases, and 40 % of cardiogenic shock. In joinpoint analysis, peripartum cardiomyopathy increased significantly during delivery hospitalizations (average annual percent change [AAPC] 2.2 %, 95 % CI 1.0 %, 3.4 %) but not postpartum readmissions (AAPC 0.0 %, 95 % CI −1.6 %, 1.6 %). ConclusionRisk for peripartum cardiomyopathy increased during delivery hospitalizations over the study period. Obstetric conditions such as preeclampsia and chronic medical conditions that are increasing in prevalence in the obstetric population were associated with the highest odds of peripartum cardiomyopathy.

Mortality on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: Evaluation of independent risk factors and causes of death during venoarterial and venovenous support.

Most patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decease during therapy on the system. However, the actual causes of death have not been studied sufficiently. This study analyses the etiology, prevalence, and risk factors for the outcome variable death during ongoing ECMO for all patients and divided according to venoarterial (VA) or venovenous (VV) support. We retrospectively analysed all patients receiving ECMO support at our institution between March 2006 to January 2021. Only the patients deceased during ongoing support were included. 2016 patients were placed on VA (n = 1168; 58%) or VV (n = 848; 42%) ECMO; 759 patients (37.7%) deceased on support. The causes of death differed between the support types: VA ECMO patients mostly died from cerebral ischemia (34%), low-cardiac output (LCO; 24.1%) and multi-organ failure (MOF; 21.6%), whereas in VV ECMO cases, refractory respiratory failure (28.2%), and sepsis (20.4%) dominated. Multivariate regression analysis revealed cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and acidosis prior to ECMO as risk factors for dying on VA ECMO, while high inotropic doses pre-ECMO, a high fraction of inspired oxygen on day 1, elevated lactate dehydrogenase, and international normalized ratio levels lead to an unfavourable outcome in VV ECMO patients. Even in highly experienced centers, ECMO mortality remains high and occurs mainly on support or 24h after its termination. The causes of death differ between VV and VA ECMO, depending on the underlying diseases responsible for the need of extracorporeal support.

The Minnesota Medical Operations Coordination Center: A COVID-19 Statewide Response to Ensure Access to Critical Care and Medical-Surgical Beds

COVID-19 led to unprecedented inpatient capacity challenges, particularly in ICUs, which spurred development of statewide or regional placement centers for coordinating transfer (load-balancing) of adult patients needing intensive care to hospitals with remaining capacity. Do Medical Operations Coordination Centers (MOCC) augment patient placement during times of severe capacity challenges? The Minnesota MOCC was established with a focus on transfer of adult ICU and medical-surgical patients; trauma, cardiac, stroke, burn, and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cases were excluded. The center operated within one health care system's bed management center, using a dedicated 24/7 telephone number. Major health care systems statewide and two tertiary centers in a neighboring state participated, sharing information on system status, challenges, and strategies. Patient volumes and transfer data were tracked; client satisfaction was evaluated through an anonymous survey. From August 1, 2020, through March 31, 2022, a total of 5,307 requests were made, 2,008 beds identified, 1,316 requests canceled, and 1,981 requests were unable to be fulfilled. A total of 1,715 patients had COVID-19 (32.3%), and 2,473 were negative or low risk for COVID-19 (46.6%). COVID-19 status was unknown in 1,119 (21.1%). Overall, 760 were patients on ventilators (49.1%COVID-19 positive). The Minnesota Critical Care Coordination Center placed most patients during the fall 2020 surge with the Minnesota Governor's stay-at-home order during the peak. However, during the fall 2021 surge, only 30%of ICU patients and 39%of medical-surgical patients were placed. Indicators characterizing severe surge include the number of Critical Care Coordination Center requests, decreasing placements, longer placement times, and time series analysis showing significant request-acceptance differences. Implementation of a large-scale Minnesota MOCC program was effective at placing patients during the first COVID-19 pandemic fall 2020 surge and was well regarded by hospitals and health systems. However, under worsening duress of limited resources during the fall 2021 surge, placement of ICU and medical-surgical patients was greatly decreased.

COVID-19 Is an Independent Risk Factor for Detrimental Invasive Fungal Disease in Patients on Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: A Retrospective Study.

Invasive fungal disease (IFD) is associated with the mortality of patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO). Several risk factors for IFD have been identified in patients with or without ECMO. Here, we assessed the relevance of coronavirus disease (COVID-19) for the occurrence of IFD in patients on veno-venous (V-V) ECMO for respiratory failure. In a retrospective analysis of all ECMO cases between January 2013 and December 2022 (2020-2022 for COVID-19 patients), active COVID-19 and the type, timing and duration of IFD were investigated. Demographics, hospital, ICU length of stay (LoS), duration of ECMO, days on invasive mechanical ventilation, prognostic scores (Respiratory ECMO Survival Prediction (RESP) score, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), Therapeutic Intervention Scoring System (TISS)-10, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score and Simplified Acute Physiology Score (SAPS)-II) and length of survival were assessed. The association of COVID-19 with IFD was investigated using propensity score matching and uni- and multivariable logistic regression analyses. We identified 814 patients supported with ECMO, and 452 patients were included in further analyses. The incidence of IFD was 4.8% and 11.0% in patients without and with COVID-19, respectively. COVID-19 status represented an independent risk factor for IFD (OR 4.30; CI 1.72-10.85; p: 0.002; multivariable regression analysis). In patients with COVID-19, 84.6% of IFD was candidemia and 15.4% represented invasive aspergillosis (IA). All of these patients died. In patients on V-V ECMO, we report that COVID-19 is an independent risk factor for IFD, which is associated with a detrimental prognosis. Further studies are needed to investigate strategies of antifungal therapy or prophylaxis in these patients.

Risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in the perioperative period of heart transplantation

Objective: To explore risk factors associated with in-hospital mortality in patients requiring extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in the perioperative period of heart transplantation. Methods: The data of ECMO cases in the perioperative period of heart transplantation from the Chinese Society of Extracorporeal Life Support (CSECLS) between January 2017 and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. These patients were divided into the survival group and non-survival group according to their outcomes at discharge. The demographics, indications and complications of ECMO between the two groups were compared, and the related risk factors of poor prognosis were analyzed. Results: A total of 77 patients were included in the study, including 67 males and 10 females, with a median age [M(Q1, Q3)] of 48 (36, 59) years. Sixty-three patients (81.8%) were successfully withdrawn from the ECMO and 46 patients (59.7%) survived to discharge. The median ECMO time was 139 (92, 253) hours. Compared with the survival group, the non-survival group (n=31) had more patients with chronic kidney disease before surgery [22.6% (7/31) vs 4.3% (2/46), P=0.034], and a higher proportion of continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) during ECMO [74.2% (23/31) vs 50.0% (23/46), P=0.034]. Moreover, the non-survival group had longer duration of extracorporeal circulation [262 (195, 312) vs 201 (155, 261) min, P=0.056] and higher lactate value in the first 24 hours of ECMO support [2.7 (2.1, 4.7) vs 2.3 (1.4, 3.8) mmol/L, P=0.060], but the differences were not statistically significant. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that perioperative application of CRRT was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in ECMO patients during heart transplantation (OR=19.345, 95%CI: 1.209-309.440, P=0.036). Conclusion: CRRT treatment during ECMO is a risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing heart transplantation.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: 2022 Year in Review.

The utilization of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for cardiopulmonary support continues to increase globally, with > 190,000 ECMO cases reported to the international Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. The present review aims to synthesize important contributions to the literature surrounding the management of mechanical ventilation, prone positioning, anticoagulation, bleeding complications, and neurologic outcomes for infants, children, and adults undergoing ECMO in 2022. Additionally, issues related to cardiac ECMO, Harlequin syndrome, and anticoagulation during ECMO will be discussed.

Analysis of Veno-Venous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for COVID-19 Compared to Non-COVID Etiologies.

This study analyzed the characteristics and outcomes of veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) for acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) due to COVID-19 versus non-COVID causes at US academic centers. V-V ECMO support has been utilized for COVID-19 patients with ARDS since the beginning of the pandemic. Mortality for ECMO in COVID-19 has been reported to be high but similar to reported mortality for ECMO support for non-COVID causes of respiratory failure. Using ICD-10 codes, data of patients who underwent V-V ECMO for COVID-19 ARDS were compared with patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID causes between April 2020 and December 2022. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality. Secondary outcome measures included length of stay and direct cost. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was performed to analyze differences in mortality between COVID and non-COVID groups, adjusting for other important risk factors (age, sex, and race/ethnicity). We identified and compared 6382 patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID causes to 6040 patients who underwent V-V ECMO for COVID-19. There was a significantly higher proportion of patients aged ≥ 65 years who underwent V-V ECMO in the non-COVID group compared with the COVID group (19.8% vs. 3.7%, respectively, P <0.001). Compared with patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID causes, patients who underwent V-V ECMO for COVID had increased in-hospital mortality (47.6% vs. 34.5%, P <0.001), length of stay (46.5±41.1 days vs. 40.6±46.1, P <0.001), and direct hospitalization cost ($207,022±$208,842 vs. $198,508±205,510, P =0.02). Compared with the non-COVID group, the adjusted odds ratio (OR) for in-hospital mortality in the COVID group was 2.03 (95% CI: 1.87-2.20, P <0.001). In-hospital mortality for V-V ECMO in COVID-19 improved during the study time period (50.3% in 2020, 48.6% in 2021, and 37.3% in 2022). However, there was a precipitous drop in the ECMO case volume for COVID starting in quarter 2 of 2022. In this nationwide analysis, COVID-19 patients with ARDS requiring V-V ECMO support had increased mortality compared with patients who underwent V-V ECMO for non-COVID etiologies.

Practice patterns in extracorporeal life support in tertiary cardiac intensive care units in north america: a survey-based analysis from the critical care cardiology trials network

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background The use of veno-arterial (VA) and veno-venous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has significantly increased in the last decade. However, there is substantial variability in practice patterns between institutions. To date, the optimal ECMO program model is unclear and possible differences between ECMO centers in staffing, organization and team structure have been poorly characterized. Purpose Our aim was to describe contemporary practices of care for patients undergoing ECMO in tertiary cardiac centers in North America. Methods An 11-question anonymous survey was sent to all participating sites in the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN), a prospective registry of advanced cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) in North America, coordinated by the TIMI Study Group. The survey evaluated ECMO staffing models, decision-making processes, cannulation and longitudinal care. Results The response rate was 100% (39/39) across CCCTN centers. The decision to proceed with VA ECMO was made as a team in 79% of the cases and in 58.3% of the VV ECMO cases, rather than by an individual specialty. An ECMO consult service was used in 67% of the centers, and integrated with the cardiogenic shock team in 58%. The most common specialty participating in the ECMO service was cardiothoracic surgery (CTS) (73.1%), followed by heart failure specialists (38.5%), with critical care cardiology (CCC) in only 23.1% of the centers (Figure 1A). In the majority of centers, VA ECMO cannulation was performed by CTS alone (46.2%), Interventional cardiology (IC) and CTS (38.5%), and IC alone (7.7%, Figure 1B). Cannulation for VA ECMO was not performed by intensivists at any center. VV ECMO cannulations were performed by CTS in 51.3%, intensivists in 17.9% and IC in 2.6% of the centers. VA ECMO patients were admitted to the cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit in 64.1% of centers, with 20.5 % admitted to the CICU (Figure 1C). VV ECMO patients were admitted to the cardiovascular surgical intensive care unit in 36.8% of sites, and the medical intensive care unit in 34.2%. The most common ECMO specialist model was having a perfusionist at the bedside, followed by nurse specialist (Figure 1D). Specialty services consulted within 24-48 hours of cannulation included physical therapy in 48.7%, palliative care in 30.8%, and bioethics in only 2.6% of centers. Simulation-based ECMO training is performed in 59% of the centers. Half (51.3%) of the centers perform ECPR, while 17.9% reported plans of developing a program. Conclusions Although there is significant variability in ECMO cannulation, location of care, staffing practices in advanced CICUs in North America, a multidisciplinary team approach is common in ECMO centers, with early involvement of physical therapy and palliative care specialists. Further research to establish the optimal model for ECMO programs is of high importance.

Prognostic value of perioperative change of neutrophil elastase and myeloperoxidase in coronary circulation on perioperative myocardial injury and clinical outcome of patients underwent surgical valve replacement

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of observing perioperative changes of myeloperoxidase (MPO) and neutrophil elastase (NE) in coronary artery circulation in patients underwent valve replacement surgery. Methods: This perspective cohort study was performed in patients who underwent valvular surgery in Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital and Fuwai Hospital from June 2021 to June 2022. Patients were divided into perioperative myocardial injury group and age-, sex- and type of cardiac procedure-matched non-perioperative myocardial injury control group in the ratio of 1∶1. Perioperative myocardial injury was defined as cardiac troponin T (cTnT)>0.8 μg/L on the first postoperative day (POD), and the cTnT level on the second POD increased by more than 10% compared with the cTnT level on the first POD. During the operation, blood samples were collected from the coronary sinus before clamping ascending aorta, and within 5 minutes after de-clamping ascending aorta. Then, the levels of MPO and NE on coronary sinus were continuously measured. The death, severe ventricular arrhythmia, pneumonia, re-intubation, repeat cardiac surgery, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT), mechanical ventilation time and the duration of intensive care unit (ICU) were recorded. The levels of MPO and NE and the incidence of clinical outcomes were compared between the myocardial injury group and the control group. The independent risk factors of myocardial injury were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression. Results: A total of 130 patients were enrolled, aged (60.6±7.6) years old, with 59 males (45.4%). There were 65 patients in the myocardial injury group and 65 patients in the control group. During hospitalization, there was no death, ECMO, IABP and CRRT cases in both groups. Compared with the control group, the incidence of severe ventricular arrhythmia (13.8%(9/65) vs. 3.1%(2/65), P=0.03), pneumonia (20.0%(13/65) vs. 3.1%(2/65), P=0.03), re-intubation (6.2%(4/65) vs. 0, P=0.04) was significantly higher in myocardial injury group. The mechanical ventilation time (16.8(10.7, 101.7) h vs. 7.5(4.7, 15.1) h, P<0.01), and the duration of ICU (3.7(2.7, 18.9) vs. 2.7(1.8, 6.9)d, P<0.01) were significantly longer in myocardial injury group compared with the control group. There was no significant difference in the levels of MPO and NE in coronary sinus blood between the two groups before aortic clamping (all P>0.05). However, MPO ((551.3±124.2) μg/L vs. (447.2±135.9) μg/L, P<0.01) and NE ((417.0±83.1)μg/L vs. (341.0±68.3)μg/L, P<0.01) after 5 min aortic de-clamping were significantly higher in myocardial injury group than in the control group. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the levels of NE (OR=1.02, 95%CI: 1.01-1.02, P<0.01), MPO (OR=1.00, 95%CI: 1.00-1.01, P=0.02) and mechanical ventilation time (OR=1.03, 95%CI: 1.01-1.06, P=0.02) were independent risk factors of myocardial injury in patients after surgical valvular replacement. Conclusion: Perioperative myocardial injury is related poor clinical outcomes, perioperative NE and MPO in coronary artery circulation are independent risk factors of perioperative myocardial injury in patients undergoing valve replacement surgery.

Disparities in Adult Patient Selection for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in the United States: A Population-Level Study.

Rationale: Disparities in patient selection for advanced therapeutics in health care have been identified in multiple studies, but it is unclear if disparities exist in patient selection for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), a rapidly expanding critical care resource. Objectives: To determine if disparities exist in patient selection for ECMO based on sex, primary insurance, and median income of the patient's neighborhood. Methods: In a retrospective cohort study using the Nationwide Readmissions Database 2016-2019, we identified patients treated with mechanical ventilation (MV) and/or ECMO with billing codes. Patient sex, insurance, and income level for patients receiving ECMO were compared with the patients treated with MV only, and hierarchical logistic regression with the hospital as a random intercept was used to determine odds of receiving ECMO based on patient demographics. Results: We identified 2,170,752 MV hospitalizations with 18,725 cases of ECMO. Among patients treated with ECMO, 36.1% were female compared with 44.5% of patients treated with> MV only (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] for ECMO, 0.73; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.70-0.75). Of patients treated with ECMO, 38.1% had private insurance compared with 17.4% of patients treated with MV only. Patients with Medicaid were less likely to receive ECMO than patients with private insurance (aOR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.52-0.57). Patients treated with ECMO were more likely to live in the highest-income neighborhoods compared with patients treated with MV only (25.1% vs. 17.3%). Patients living in the lowest-income neighborhoods were less likely to receive ECMO than those living in the highest-income neighborhoods (aOR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.60-0.67). Conclusions: Significant disparities exist in patient selection for ECMO. Female patients, patients with Medicaid, and patients living in the lowest-income neighborhoods are less likely to be treated with ECMO. Despite possible unmeasured confounding, these findings were robust to multiple sensitivity analyses. On the basis of previouswork describing disparities in other areas of health care, wespeculate that limited access in some neighborhoods, restrictive/biased interhospital transfer practices, differences in patient preferences, and implicit provider bias may contribute to the observed differences. Future studies with more granular data are needed to identify and modify drivers of observed disparities.

Simulators and Simulations for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: An ECMO Scoping Review.

High-volume extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) centers generally have better outcomes than (new) low-volume ECMO centers, most likely achieved by a suitable exposure to ECMO cases. To achieve a higher level of training, simulation-based training (SBT) offers an additional option for education and extended clinical skills. SBT could also help to improve the interdisciplinary team interactions. However, the level of ECMO simulators and/or simulations (ECMO sims) techniques may vary in purpose. We present a structured and objective classification of ECMO sims based on the broad experience of users and the developer for the available ECMO sims as low-, mid-, or high-fidelity. This classification is based on overall ECMO sim fidelity, established by taking the median of the definition-based fidelity, component fidelity, and customization fidelity as determined by expert opinion. According to this new classification, only low- and mid-fidelity ECMO sims are currently available. This comparison method may be used in the future for the description of new developments in ECMO sims, making it possible for ECMO sim designers, users, and researchers to compare accordingly, and ultimately improve ECMO patient outcomes.

The History of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and the Development of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Anticoagulation.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) was first started for humans in early 1970s by Robert Bartlett. Since its inception, there have been numerous challenges with extracorporeal circulation, such as coagulation and platelet activation, followed by consumption of coagulation factors and platelets, and biocompatibility of tubing, pump, and oxygenator. Unfractionated heparin (heparin hereafter) has historically been the defacto anticoagulant until recently. Also, coagulation monitoring was mainly based on bedside activated clotting time and activated partial thromboplastin time. In the past 50 years, the technology of ECMO has advanced tremendously, and thus, the survival rate has improved significantly. The indication for ECMO has also expanded. Among these are clinical conditions such as postcardiopulmonary bypass, sepsis, ECMO cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and even severe coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Not surprisingly, the number of ECMO cases has increased according to the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry and prolonged ECMO support has become more prevalent. It is not uncommon for patients with COVID-19 to be on ECMO support for more than 1 year until recovery or lung transplant. With that being said, complications of bleeding, thrombosis, clot formation in the circuit, and intravascular hemolysis still remain and continue to be major challenges. Here, several clinical ECMO experts, including the "Father of ECMO"-Dr. Robert Bartlett, describe the history and advances of ECMO.

Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Therapy - A review

Since the first successful case of Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) in early 1970’s till date, there has been quite a change in clinical approach and technology. The recent H1N1 flu pandemic led to a wider use of ECMO therapy worldwide, proving its superiority in supporting respiratory failures with better outcomes. More over centres applied it as a rescue therapy for refractory hypoxaemia and refractory circulatory failures understanding its benefits and limitations. Understanding and execution of the ECMO therapy can be quite challenging and may have a greater learning curve. Initiating the ECMO program in the hospital with an organised and planned approach may shorten the learning curve and improve outcomes. Multiple factors are responsible for successful and smoother functioning of the ECMO program, which should be identified and worked upon. There are many indications where ECMO therapy can be applied and understanding its potential in the hospital is of utmost importance. Along with this, forming an ECMO team with trained members, forming policies and protocols, and taking the right decisions at the right time are important. An in-depth review of every aspect of its successful institution has been discussed in this article.

Outcomes of Urgent Interhospital Transportation for Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Patients.

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can be used in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or respiratory failure. In South Korea, the need for transporting ECMO patients is increasing. Nonetheless, information on urgent transportation and its outcomes is scant. In this retrospective review of 5 years of experience in ECMO transportation at a single center, the clinical outcomes of transported patients were compared with those of in-hospital patients. The effects of transportation and the relationship between insertion-departure time and survival were also analyzed. There were 323 cases of in-hospital ECMO (in-hospital group) and 29 cases transferred to Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital without adverse events (mobile group). The median transportation time was 95 minutes (interquartile range [IQR], 36.5-119.5 minutes), whereas the median transportation distance was 115 km (IQR, 15-115 km). Transportation itself was not an independent risk factor for 28-day mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.818; IQR, 0.381-1.755; p=0.605), long-term mortality (OR, 1.099; IQR, 0.680-1.777; p=0.700), and failure of ECMO weaning (OR, 1.003; IQR, 0.467-2.152; p=0.995) or survival to discharge (OR, 0.732; IQR, 0.337-1.586; p=0.429). After adjustment for covariates, no significant difference in the ECMO insertion-departure time was found between the survival and mortality groups (p=0.435). The outcomes of urgent transportation, with active involvement of the ECMO center before ECMO insertion and adherence to the transport protocol, were comparable to those of in-hospital ECMO patients.

Successful extracorporeal membrane oxygenation therapy in a child with coronavirus 2019 disease-associated ARDS and chemotherapy for Ewing's sarcoma.

Most children and adolescents with SARS-CoV-2 infection show no or mild symptoms, but those with medical histories can be susceptible to more severe forms of disease. There are few reported cases of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in pediatric patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We present a previously healthy 13-year-old male diagnosed with metastatic Ewing’s sarcoma at the same time as catastrophic acute respiratory distress syndrome due to COVID-19, who was successfully supported by venovenous-ECMO while he received the corresponding chemotherapy protocol.ECMO can be used as salvage therapy in oncology pediatric patients with respiratory failure secondary to COVID-19. In addition, successful chemotherapy can be administered while patients are supported on ECMO.