Abstract Purpose
This systematized literature review aims to assess reporting units used by hospital LCAs to communicate their environmental impact through life-cycle assessment. As the healthcare sector increasingly prioritizes sustainability, understanding the choice of reporting unit is crucial. This analysis aims to provide recommendations for effective communication of environmental performance.
Method
A systematized literature search was conducted for life-cycle assessments and carbon footprint studies of healthcare organizations or systems in the databases PubMed and Web of Science. The identified units were analyzed using seven criteria, including the differentiation between input and output flows, treatment complexities, quantity of provided services, quality of provided services, longevity of services, matching with system boundaries, and data availability.
Results
Seven reporting flows were identified: (i) floor area, (ii) number of beds, (iii) workforce, (iv) expenditure, (v) patient load, (vi) revenue, and (vii) the diagnosis-related groups case mix. Each flow has its own advantages and disadvantages; the best reporting flow for an assessment depends on the specific goals and objectives and should be meaningful to stakeholders. However, none of the reporting flows measure the actual function of healthcare organizations, i.e., the impact on the health of the patients. However, data on this flow, such as quality-adjusted life years, are not available in a meaningful quantity.
Conclusions
In conclusion, this literature review highlights the importance of reporting unit selection in communicating the environmental impact of healthcare organizations through life-cycle assessment. The present analysis identified seven reporting flows, each with its own advantages and disadvantages. These findings are of importance for decision makers to contextualize given data and to choose the most suitable reporting flow for their own assessment. Future research might evaluate the quantitative impact of the reporting flow decision.
Read full abstract