Pre-compression stress (σpc) has been widely used as a criterion for assessing the susceptibility of soil to compaction. Confined compression (CCT), semi-confined compression (SCCT) and plate sinkage (PST) tests are the most practical procedures to estimate σpc. Discrepant estimates of σpc may be obtained from the above tests mainly due to differences in boundary conditions. The aim of this study was to simulate these compaction tests using the finite element method (FEM) to compare σpc estimated from stress-strain curves with the simulated yield stress. It was hypothesized that for a given simulated yield stress, σpc estimated either at the point of maximum curvature or the point of Casagrande's method is not the same as simulated yield stress for different tests. FEM models were developed in ABAQUS with elastic-perfectly plastic law and Drucker-Prager yield criterion for the soil material. Yield stresses of 20, 50, 75, 100, 125, 150, 200 and 300 kPa were examined. The results showed that the stress at the point of maximum curvature was close to the simulated yield stress in CCT but smaller than that in SCCT and PST. Casagrande's method overestimated σpc (averagely by 40%) for all the tests. A more precise estimate of σpc was obtained at the point of maximum curvature than the Casagrande’s method in experimental CCT and PST on remolded soils. Cyclic loading-unloading CCT and PST to different stress levels showed that a safe threshold for preventing a severe plastic strain is significantly smaller (with a factor of 0.5 and 0.8 for CCT and PST, respectively) than σpc in either of the tests.
Read full abstract