Background aimsClustered Regularly Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats (CRISPR)–associated genome editing (GE) components (e.g., nucleases, guide RNAs (gRNAs), and plasmids) are used to genetically modify cells during development of ex vivo genome-edited cell therapies. Prolonged presence of GE components may increase the risk of unintended genome modifications (e.g., off-target editing and chromosomal rearrangements). This risk is a function of the stability of the GE components, culture conditions (i.e., culture length, media changes, etc.), and the nature of the GE component (i.e., only plasmids can be integrated into a cell's genome). Testing for residual GE components on ex vivo genetically edited drug products is generally recommended in current regulatory guidance (CBER 2024).For allogenic cell therapies derived from induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSC), cells typically undergo clonal selection and extensive culturing following completion of genome editing. This post-engineering clonal selection substantially reduces the amount of residual GE components while the long-duration cell culture significantly reduces the presence of active residual GE components. Here we present a case in which the need for testing of the drug product for residual GE components has been eliminated. MethodsIn silico modeling was used to estimate clearance mechanisms across a variety of relevant assumptions, including disposition of extracellular GE components via media changes and dilution of intracellular GE components via cell expansion. Determining the ability of each GE component—alone or in complex with other GE components—to modify genomic material was assessed by a series of both in vitro and ex vivo (i.e., engineering cells) studies. For the in vitro studies, a DNA cutting assay was developed to assess the ability of the component to cut a representative DNA strand. For the ex vivo modification of cells, an assessment of the knock-out of the relevant gene was completed by flow cytometry specifically assessing the presence or absence of protein expression on the modified cells. The persistence and stability of GE components were examined under cell-mimicking conditions and in ex vivo modified cells. The components were stressed under multiple conditions mimicking a range of culture conditions and tested in the aforementioned DNA cutting assay. The presence of residual gRNA was directly assessed in the ex vivo modified cells via a gRNA-specific digital droplet polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) assay. ResultsSimulations estimating genome editing residual clearance via dilution for extracellular residuals (via media changes) or intracellular residuals (via cell doubling) demonstrate clearance of measurable residuals within 28 days of cell culture. Studies simulating the stability of genome editing residuals estimate less than 7 days for the nuclease, gRNA and ribonucleoprotein (RNP) complex. gRNA was undetectable by 8 days post-engineering under actual engineering conditions. Additionally, without gRNA present, CRISPR Cas12a nucleases did not demonstrate evidence of cutting.In contrast, plasmid DNA can be randomly integrated into the genome and free plasmid is highly stable under cell culture-like conditions (50+ days). Additionally, plasmid DNA integrated in cells will propagate during mitosis, leading to the additional risk of expansion of an unintentional integration event. ConclusionsBoth the gRNA and nuclease in the RNP complex are required for DNA cutting. Neither individual component nor the complex are stable beyond 7 days in culture-mimicking conditions. These findings suggest that the risk of unplanned genomic modification resulting from residual gRNA or nuclease is minimal for processes in which extensive culture is performed after the completion of genome editing and clonal selection. However, the risk of residual plasmid DNA integration is significantly higher regardless of the manufacturing process. The residual plasmid itself is quite stable (at least 50 days) and the risk of random, off-target integration is present. By establishing the stability of these components, we have demonstrated that testing for residual gRNA or nuclease is not warranted for clonally derived allogeneic cell therapies.
Read full abstract
Oct 31, 2024
Ylenia Jabalera + 9
Just Published
Open Access