Carotid Endarterectomy Research Articles

Transcarotid arterial revascularization for symptomatic carotid web

ObjectivesSymptomatic carotid web is an increasingly recognized cause of acute ischemic stroke with a high risk of recurrent ischemic events despite aggressive medical interventions. Surgical interventions including transfemoral carotid artery stenting (TFCAS) and carotid endarterectomy have been described to reduce this risk, but transcarotid arterial revascularization (TCAR) has not been evaluated for this purpose. Materials and MethodsPatients with cerebral ischemia from carotid web underwent TCAR with flow reversal. Patients were monitored for periprocedural complications and assessed at follow-up for clinical evidence of recurrent ischemia. ResultsSix cases over the course of 21 months were identified, 2 males and 4 females with a median age of 59.5 (interquartile range of 39). All underwent technically successful TCAR without periprocedural complications no post-procedural cerebral ischemia over a median follow-up time of 21 months. ConclusionsIn this small series of patients, TCAR provided a safe and effective treatment of carotid webs that had previously caused cerebral ischemia.

Outcome of Primary Closure Following Carotid Endarterectomy with A Novel Technique: An Eight-Year Multi-Center Cohort Study

Outcome of Primary Closure Following Carotid Endarterectomy with A Novel Technique: An Eight-Year Multi-Center Cohort Study

STROKE: A COMPREHENSIVE OVERVIEW OF TRENDS, PREVENTION, AND TREATMENT (LITERATURE REVIEW)

A stroke is an emergency medical condition, commonly referred to as a cerebrovascular accident, occurs when the blood supply to the brain is interrupted, depriving brain tissue of oxygen and essential nutrients. This interruption can lead to rapid neurological impairment and, if not treated promptly, permanent brain damage or even death. Stroke is primarily categorized into two types: ischemic, resulting from arterial blockage, and hemorrhagic, caused by a ruptured blood vessel. Conditions such as acute cerebral circulatory disorder, atherosclerosis, and carotid artery stenosis are strongly associated with an increased stroke risk. Understanding these underlying factors is crucial for effective prevention, early detection, and management of stroke. Globally, stroke ranks as the second lead in cause of disability and mortality, disproportion at early affecting low-and-middle - income countries. Efforts in stroke prevention emphasizes the significance of early detection, management, promoting healthy lifestyles, and implementing legislative measures. The healthcare costs associated with stroke are substantial and projected to grow significantly. Socioeconomic factors and adverse working conditions also influence stroke incidence. Advancements in surgical revascularization techniques, such as carotid endarterectomy and stenting, have demonstrated efficacy in reducing stroke risk. Continuous research and development of optimal treatment strategies and monitoring protocols are essential for improving stroke outcomes and mitigating its global burden.

Current Therapy for Carotid Webs

IntroductionCarotid webs are a potential cause of ischemic stroke, particularly in younger patients with few traditional risk factors. Despite advances in imaging technology, the management of carotid webs remains poorly defined due to its rarity, absence of evidence-based guidelines, and the unique challenges presented by these lesions. This narrative review evaluates current knowledge on carotid web management, emphasizing diagnostic features, pathophysiological considerations, and treatment strategies. MethodsA literature search was conducted using PubMed and Google Scholar databases with search terms “carotid web management,” “carotid web treatment,” and “carotid web,” focusing on studies published between 2014 and 2024. ResultsCarotid webs are a variant of fibromuscular dysplasia and represent a potential source of embolic strokes. Despite the low overall prevalence, they account for a significant proportion of strokes in younger patients, with a high risk of recurrence when managed medically. Diagnosis often requires advanced imaging, such as CTA or MRA. Treatment options include medical management, carotid endarterectomy, and stenting, though no consensus guidelines exist. Medical management alone has a high recurrent stroke risk. ConclusionCarotid webs should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with cryptogenic stroke, particularly in younger individuals. Given the high recurrence rates with medical management, both endarterectomy and stenting are recognized as safe and effective treatment options. Future prospective studies are needed to determine the optimal management strategy, including the role of preoperative anticoagulation and comparative outcomes of different treatment modalities.

What the National Coverage Determination for Carotid Artery Stenting Means for the Treatment of Patients with Carotid Artery Disease

ObjectivesIn October 2023, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) agreed to revisit its national coverage determination (NCD) for carotid artery stenting (CAS). We provide an overview of the arguments presented in favor and against NCD expansion, and discuss the likely ramifications on patient care and outcomes in the future. MethodsWe completed a narrative review of the arguments presented in favor and against NCD expansion. ResultsArguments presented in favor of the CAS NCD expansion predominantly focused on the outcomes of four large multicenter randomized controlled trials published between 2010 and 2021 that reported similar outcomes for composite endpoints between patients undergoing CAS and carotid endarterectomy. The main arguments against expanding the CAS NCD centered around higher patient stroke risks with CAS, increasing healthcare costs, premature decision-making, and the lack of a validated shared decision-making tool that can be readily applied to carotid revascularization. ConclusionsBy expanding the indications for CAS to asymptomatic and standard-risk patients, they will be exposed to excess and unnecessary risks without any evident benefits, potentially leading to widespread adoption of a procedure driven by financial incentives rather than genuine patient benefits.

Histological Validation of 3D Variable Flip Angle TSE Multi-Contrast Magnetic Resonance Vessel Wall Imaging in Characterizing Carotid Vulnerable Atherosclerotic Plaques

BackgroundAccurate assessment of the vulnerability of carotid atherosclerotic plaques is crucial for stroke prevention. The three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance (MR) vessel wall imaging (VWI) has been increasingly employed to evaluate carotid plaques due to its extensive coverage and isotropic high spatial resolution. However, the accuracy of such technique lacks validation by histology. ObjectiveThis study aims to validate the accuracy of 3D multi-contrast MR VWI used variable-flip-angle (VFA) and turbo spin echo (TSE) readout in identifying vulnerable carotid plaques, using histological analysis as a reference. MethodsTwenty-one male patients (mean age: 64.4 ± 7.2 years) scheduled for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) were recruited for this study. All patients underwent carotid multi-contrast MR VWI, including 3D T1- and T2-weighted variable flip angle-based turbo spin echo (VFA-TSE) sequences, as well as 3D time of flight (TOF) MR angiography (MRA), using a 3.0T MR system. Histological processing was performed for carotid plaque specimens. The presence or absence, along with the area measurements, of lipid-rich necrotic core (LRNC), intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), and calcifications (CA) were independently evaluated on both MR images and histological sections. Cohen’s kappa (κ) analysis was utilized to determine the agreement between 3D multi-contrast MR VWI and histology in identifying carotid plaque compositions before and after excluding compositions bellow certain size threshold. Spearman’s correlation analysis was also conducted to assess the agreement in quantifying plaque compositions. ResultsA total of 81 slices of MR images were successfully matched with histological sections. Moderate to almost perfect agreements were observed between 3D MR VWI and histology in the identification of LRNC (κ: 0.85 and 0.89), IPH (κ: 0.65 and 0.69), and CA (κ: 0.46 and 0.62) before and after excluding compositions smaller than 0.79 mm2. Strong to very strong correlations were found in the quantification of plaque compositions including LRNC (r=0.88), IPH (r=0.80), and CA (r=0.74) between MR imaging and histology. ConclusionThe 3D VFA-TSE multi-contrast MR VWI is capable of accurately characterizing vulnerable carotid atherosclerotic plaques.

International Validation of the Vascular Registry of Switzerland, Swissvasc: A VASCUNET Report

Data validity and completeness is essential for registry data, and a meaningful interpretation of differences between countries can only be made if the data are robust within each of the countries. Therefore, the VASCUNET collaboration has performed validation of several vascular registries and has so far published the validation results of national vascular registries of Sweden, Denmark, and Malta. The findings of the validation of the Swissvasc Registry, the vascular registry of Switzerland, are presented here. Five of 34 hospitals participating in Swissvasc were visited by two international validators. Independent evaluation of the procedures of carotid endarterectomy, infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) repair, and bypass surgery for lower extremity arterial disease (LEAD) was performed. Local administrative data and Swissvasc Registry data were compared for external validation, as well as registry data of 15 randomly picked cases within each group with data from individual patient records for internal validation. Hospital administrative data identified 265 carotid, 399 AAA, and 399 LEAD procedures, whereas Swissvasc identified 265 carotid, 398 AAA, and 395 LEAD procedures. Four LEAD procedures were found in hospital administrative data but not in Swissvasc. External validity was 100% for carotids, 99.8% for AAA, and 99% for LEAD. In internal validation, 5.2% of the variable data were missing in Swissvasc, and 2.4% were different from data in patient records, resulting in external validity of 92.8% for carotids, 94.4% for AAA, and 90.1% for LEAD. The VASCUNET template was used for international validation of registry data, and demonstrated that Swissvasc is a reliable system of quality data collection for the participating vascular centres, with excellent external validity and good internal validity. Quality in the Swissvasc registry data was clearly superior to local administrative data.

Periprocedural clinical outcomes of stenting and endarterectomy in patients with carotid artery stenosis

Purpose: To identify the chief pathological cause of extracranial cerebrovascular disease, which is atherosclerosis, we analyzed and compared the early and 6-month morbidity and mortality rates of patients who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) for carotid artery stenosis. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively included patients who had undergone surgical endarterectomy and endovascular carotid stent implantation for carotid artery stenosis between April 2019 and August 2022. We evaluated neurological examinations, routine blood tests, neurological and systemic complications, mortality rates, and follow-up colour Doppler ultrasonography 6 months post-discharge. Results: The study included a total of 300 patients, with 52.7% (n = 158) undergoing CEA and 47.3% (n = 142) undergoing endovascular stent implantation (CAS). The patients’ average ages were 66±8 years in the CEA group and 70±7.4 years in the CAS group, suggesting that those undergoing CAS were generally older. Notably, there were significantly more instances of congestive heart failure and a history of cerebrovascular disease within the CAS group compared to the CEA group. However, no significant difference was observed in the rates of postprocedural complications. Furthermore, there were no cases of mortality reported in either group. Conclusion: The preferred method for treating severe carotid artery stenosis should be determined by considering patient characteristics and preferences, as well as the complication rates in the centre.

Effect of carotid endarterectomy on the serum level of neurogranin

Effect of carotid endarterectomy on the serum level of neurogranin

Retrospective Analysis of a Novel Grading System for Evaluating the Long-Term Benefit of Revascularization on Carotid Artery Stenosis

ObjectiveTo estimate revascularization benefit for carotid artery stenosis, with a novel grading system containing symptoms, stenosis, plaque, and collaterals collateral compensation (SSPC grading system). MethodsA retrospective multicenter study examined 945 consecutive patients diagnosed with carotid stenosis from January 2013 to December 2017. The cohort was classified into two groups: the revascularization group and the best medical therapy (BMT) group. Demographic, clinical, and lesion characteristics of all patients were recorded and five-year non-procedural stroke survival was calculated using Kaplan-Meier curve analyses. ResultsOf the 945 patients, 514 underwent carotid revascularization (483 for carotid endarterectomy [CEA] and 31 for transfemoral-carotid artery stenting [TF-CAS]) and 431 patients were treated with BMT. Patients in the revascularization group had a significantly higher proportion of preprocedural stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and grades of stenosis. Of the patients in the revascularization group, 3.1% were classified as SSPC I, 10.3% as SSPC II, 41.4% as SSPC III, and 45.1% as SSPC IV. Meanwhile, 17.9% were classified as SSPC I, 19.7% as SSPC II, 49.2% as class III, and 13.2% had class IV in the BMT group. Procedural stroke developed in 13 patients (2.5%) following revascularization (10 of them were non-disabling). The overall rate of freedom from any non-procedural stroke was 94.1±1.1% in the revascularization group and 89.5±1.6% in the BMT group (P=0.01). Subgroup analysis was conducted for asymptomatic carotid stenosis (ACS) and carotid near-occlusion (CNO) patients. Non-significance was noted in the rate of freedom from any non-procedural stroke between revascularization and BMT in both ACS and CNO subgroups (P=0.09 and 0.12, respectively). Of note, in ACS patients graded as SSPC III, a significant difference in stroke survival was found between the revascularization and BMT group (96.0±2.0% vs. 89.1±2.4%, P=0.04). Meanwhile, in symptomatic CNO patients, similar results were found regarding SSPC classification (94.8±3.6% vs. 63.8±14.9%, P=0.01). ConclusionsThe SSPC grading system stratifies the patients with carotid artery stenosis and predicts the long-term benefits of revascularization. Meanwhile, potential revascularization benefits could be better attained via SSPC classes in specific patients with ACS and CNO.

The Evolution of Carotid Surgery

This review traces the evolution of carotid surgery from its ancient roots to modern practice. The first significant appreciation of the carotid arteries’ role in cerebral ischemia was made by Johann Jakob Wepfer in his 1658 book on apoplexy, which described the separate blood supply to each cerebral hemisphere by the carotid arteries. The 16th-19th centuries saw initial attempts at carotid ligation, while the 20th century marked significant advancements. The first carotid endarterectomy (CEA) by DeBakey, Cooley, and Eastcott in the 1950s paved the way for a new technique in carotid surgery and many subsequent refinements in surgical techniques related to CEA. The latter half of the 20th century brought innovations such as patch angioplasty, microsurgical techniques, and intraoperative shunting, significantly improving outcomes. Pivotal clinical trials established CEA as the standard treatment for symptomatic carotid stenosis. The emergence of carotid artery stenting (CAS) in the 1980s introduced a less invasive alternative, sparking ongoing debates about optimal treatment strategies. Recent developments include transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) and transfemoral CAS, with studies comparing their efficacy to traditional CEA. Current research focuses on plaque morphology and novel diagnostic factors to further personalize treatment strategies for carotid artery stenosis.

The role of inflammation biomarkers in carotid artery stenosis procedures

BackgroundCarotid revascularization procedures, such as carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS), can lead to restenosis. Monitoring restenosis onset through biomarkers is crucial in clinical practice. This study aimed to evaluate inflammation biomarkers in CEA and CAS to determine their predictive value for restenosis risk post-procedure. MethodsA retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical records of patients with carotid stenosis who underwent CEA or CAS over one year at the Vascular Surgery departments of an interuniversity center. Eligible asymptomatic patients with carotid stenosis (70-99%) underwent revascularization. Differences between pre- and early post-procedural inflammation indices were assessed, and restenosis risk was evaluated using Receiver Operating Curve analysis and logistic regression. ResultsThe cohort comprised 100 patients, 68 undergoing CEA and 32 undergoing CAS. Significant values were observed for inflammation ratios post-CEA: neutrophils to lymphocytes ratio (NLR) (p=0.036), platelets to lymphocytes ratio (PLR) (p=0.009), monocytes to lymphocytes ratio (MLR) (p<0.001), systemic inflammation index (SII) (p=0.024), systemic immune response index (SIRI) (p=0.003), and aggregate inflammation response index (AISI) (p<0.001). At 12-month follow-up, 12% of patients experienced restenosis; 50% were men and 50% women. Women showed a higher restenosis rate (26.1% vs 7.8%). Pre-intervention NLR (OR [95% CI] = 13.38 [1.88 to 95.44], p=0.010) and SIRI (OR [95% CI] = 10.22 [2.65 to 39.43], p=0.001) remained significantly associated with restenosis after adjusting for sex and smoking. ConclusionThe study provided a predictive model for restenosis, identifying pre-intervention NLR and SIRI as independent predictors of restenosis at 12-month follow-up.

Treatment of Symptomatic Carotid Webs

The present study aims to describe the clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of patients with symptomatic carotid web treated at a single institution in South America. Retrospective study of a single-center experience of patients with carotid webs surgically treated from September 2019 to September 2023. 10 patients had carotid webs, six (60%) were females. Median age was 54.5 years (range: 35-77 years). All patients were symptomatic. Diagnosis was made in 90% (n=9) of the patients with either computed tomography angiography or magnetic resonance alone. One (10%) patient underwent angiography for definite diagnosis. The median interval from the first neurological event to intervention was 90 months (range: 3 days- 108 months). Four (40%) patients underwent surgical treatment within one month from symptom onset and carotid web diagnosis, with a median of 3.5 days (range: 3-9 days). Six (60%) patients underwent delayed surgical treatment since the cause of the neurological event was uncertain, with a median of 54 months (range: 6 - 108 months). These six patients had recurrent neurological events. Three (30%) patients underwent carotid endarterectomies with polyurethane patch and three (30%) by eversion technique. Three (30%) patients underwent segmental resection and reanastomosis of the internal carotid artery. One underwent internal carotid artery plasty with saphenous vein. At a median follow-up of 30 months (range: 6-46 months), one patient persists with mild aphasia, another patient has severe aphasia and right hemiparesis, both as sequalae of their initial strokes, and another patient has suffered 3 non-ischemic episodes of brief transient right hemiparesis attributed to epileptic seizures. The other seven patients remain without new neurological events. Neurological events of carotid distribution deserve accurate imaging work up, keeping in mind the diagnosis of carotid web. Surgical treatment for carotid web seems effective for preventing recurrences; nevertheless, further studies are warranted to define the best management for these patients.

Артериальное и венозное кровообращение у пациентов с выраженным стенозом внутренних сонных артерий до и в разные сроки после проведения каротидной эндартерэктомии

In continuation of earlier studies of the features of venous outflow from the head and neck in patients with varying degrees of stenosis of the internal carotid arteries (ICA), in this article the authors present data on the features of arterial inflow and venous outflow in patients with a high degree of stenosis before and at different periods after carotid endarterectomy. Material and methods 30 patients with stenosis ˃ 60%, were examined before and after surgery at 10-14 days, 6 months and 1 year. The control group consisted of 30 patients without ICA stenosis and signs of systemic and regional phlebohypertension. The results were compared with the control and between the groups. Results The study has shown that venous outflow through the PV in orthostasis at different times after CEAE prevailed over venous outflow in clinostasis. The average values of the total volumetric blood flow through the PV statistically significantly increase after surgery in both clinostasis and orthostasis. Conclusions The presence of phlebohypertension with severe stenosis of the ICA may indicate a relationship between atherosclerotic lesions of the ICA and changes in venous outflow and the formation of systemic or regional phlebohypertension. When restoring blood flow through the ICA with stenosis ˃ 60% after CEAE, the predominance of venous outflow remains in the horizontal position along the IJV system.

Current Practices in Carotid Surgery.

We outline the indications and contraindications of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and appraise four key areas still debated to this day; shunting versus non-shunting, patch angioplasty (PA) versus primary closure (PC) and local anaesthesia (LA) versus general anaesthesia (GA). Importantly, we compare CEA with Best Medical Therapy (BMT), which is an area that is still largely debated, principally because many of the studies conducted to date do not reflect the era of modern BMT practices, and these outcomes are eagerly awaited. Literature searches were conducted using Pubmed with the keywords 'carotid', and 'endarterectomy', which provided a wide variety of journals and articles. We further stratified our data by using only randomised control trials (RCTs), meta-analyses, and systematic reviews, and then excluded studies with asymptomatic disease, diabetes, and plaque-imaging studies, including studies that did not fit our four desired topics for discussion. For each of the different domain's, results demonstrated similar peri-operative outcomes when comparing shunting vs. non-shunting and modality of anaesthesia and therefore practice still remains dependent on operator experience and preference. Patch-angioplasty reduces the risk of subsequent stroke, transient ischaemic attack (TIA), and re-stenosis compared to PC. In carotid stenosis >50% BMT offers limited benefits without accompanying surgical intervention and BMT alone tends to be advantageous primarily for patients with <50% carotid stenosis. Where CEA is appraised in terms of superiority of the procedural components; the literature does not support wildly contrasting outcomes to change majority practice. However, the area of considerable interest is superiority of BMT to surgical intervention in terms of both carotid artery stenting (CAS) and CEA and more studies need to be conducted in this area.

Using MSCT to Diagnose and Categorize High Bifurcation of the Common Carotid Artery Before Carotid Endarterectomy in Older Individuals

Using MSCT to Diagnose and Categorize High Bifurcation of the Common Carotid Artery Before Carotid Endarterectomy in Older Individuals

A Prosthetic Conduit can be Used Safely for TransCarotid Artery Revascularization Under Local Anesthesia in High-Risk Patients.

Surgical management of carotid stenosis has evolved from open carotid endarterectomy (CEA) to include multiple alternative procedures including transfemoral carotid artery stenting (tfCAS) and transcarotid artery stenting. In recent years, Transcarotid Artery Revascularization (TCAR) has emerged as a third option, combining open cut down to the common carotid artery (CCA) with endovascular stenting and neuroprotection via reversal of cerebral blood flow. In this case series, a modified TCAR procedure using a prosthetic conduit was successfully performed exclusively under local anesthesia in a total of 10 patients with carotid artery stenosis, high cardiac risk, and anatomical contraindications to a traditional TCAR.

A Routine Coronary Angiography before Carotid Endarterectomy as an Example of Interdisciplinary Work: The Immediate Results of the Surgery.

The aim: to evaluate the incidence of obstructive lesions of the coronary arteries during routine coronary angiography (CAG) before carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and the incidence of perioperative complications. Materials and Methods: We examined a continuous sample of 498 patients before CEA who underwent an invasive evaluation of the coronary bed during CAG. Depending on the hemodynamic significance of coronary artery lesions, the patients were divided into three groups: group I-obstructive coronary artery disease (≥70%) (n = 309, 62.0%); group II-non-obstructive lesions of the coronary arteries (<70%) (n = 118, 23.7%); group III-intact coronary arteries (n = 71, 14.3%). The groups were compared with each other according to the data of the preoperative examination (clinical and anamnestic parameters, laboratory data and results of echocardiography), as well as according to the immediate results of the operation. In the hospital period, adverse cardiovascular events were assessed: death, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation or flutter (AF/AFL) and combined endpoint. Results: The groups differed significantly in the presence of symptoms of angina pectoris, myocardial infarction and myocardial revascularization procedures in their medical history and in the presence of chronic ischemia of the lower extremities. However, in the group of intact coronary arteries, the symptoms of angina were in 14.1% of patients, and a history of myocardial infarction was in 12.7%. Myocardial revascularization before CEA or simultaneously with it was performed in 43.0% of patients. As a result, it was possible to reduce the number of perioperative cardiac complications (mortality 0.7%, perioperative myocardial infarction 1.96%). Conclusions: The high incidence of obstructive lesions in the coronary arteries in our patients and the minimum number of perioperative complications favor routine CAG before CEA.

Bow Hunter Phenomenon From Advanced Cerebrovascular Disease Treated With Subclavian Artery Stenting and Carotid Endarterectomy.

Bow Hunter syndrome (BHS) is a rare disorder characterized by mechanical occlusion of the vertebral artery (VA) during neck rotation, resulting in symptomatic, transient, and positional vertebrobasilar insufficiency. We describe a case of a 76-year-old female who presented with dizziness and right ear tinnitus triggered by right head rotation. Her symptoms would immediately resolve upon returning her head to the neutral position. CT angiogram showed 80% stenosis of the left subclavian artery origin, 50%-70% stenosis of the proximal right internal carotid artery (ICA), and near occlusive stenoses of the origins of the bilateral VAs. After failing conservative management, the patient was treated with left subclavian artery stenting, followed by a right carotid endarterectomy (CEA) 6weeks later. Follow-up at 1month showed resolution of paroxysmal symptoms and no neurological sequelae. To our knowledge, there have not yet been reported cases of patients with concurrent BHS, subclavian artery stenosis, and carotid artery stenosis. We suggest that global revascularization via subclavian artery stenting and CEA may be considered as treatment for patients with BHS complicated by other cerebrovascular disease secondary to stenoses of the ICA and subclavian artery. This approach obviates the need for more complex surgery or endovascular intervention of the VA.

Comparative Analysis of Somatosensory-Evoked Potentials and Transcranial Doppler Ultrasound for Cerebral Ischemia Detection in Carotid Endarterectomy: Insights from Network Meta-Analysis and Clinical Data

OBJECTIVEThis study aims to compare the diagnostic efficacy of somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEP) and transcranial Doppler sonography (TCD) for monitoring cerebral tissue ischemia during carotid endarterectomy (CEA) using network meta-analysis and retrospective analysis of clinical data. METHODSFor the meta-analysis, we conducted a comprehensive search of four electronic databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Web of Science) from inception to September 2023, resulting in the inclusion of 52 relevant articles. Additionally, a retrospective study was conducted at our hospital, involving patients who underwent CEA surgery from July 2019 to July 2021. RESULTSThe network meta-analysis incorporated 52 articles, with ranking results indicating that SEP demonstrated superior performance in specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy , with surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) values of 99.9%, 93.8%, 96.6%, and 99.9%, respectively. Furthermore, TCD exhibited the highest sensitivity with a SUCRA value of 92.0%. A total of 190 patients meeting inclusion criteria were included in the retrospective study. The area under the curve (AUC) for SEP's receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.787, compared to TCD's AUC of 0.606. SEP demonstrated a sensitivity of 66.67%, with a specificity of 90.76%, PPV of 19.05%, NPV of 98.82%, and accuracy of 90%. For TCD, the diagnostic performance measures included a sensitivity of 50.00%, specificity of 71.19%, PPV of 5.35%, NPV of 97.76%, and accuracy of 70.53%. The Fisher's exact test for sensitivity yielded a result of P=1.000. The χˆ2 test for specificity resulted in χˆ2=22.863, with P<0.001. Continuous correction χˆ2 tests for PPV and NPV showed χˆ2=2.005 (P=0.157) and χˆ2=0.069 (P=0.793), respectively. Additionally, the χˆ2 test for accuracy showed χˆ2=22.742, with P<0.001. CONCLUSIONSDuring CEA, SEP appears to provide a slightly more reliable indication of the ischemic condition in cerebral tissues compared to TCD.