Reconstruing Codependency Using Self-in-Relation Theory: A Feminist Perspective (Collins, 1993) was a thought-provoking and well-written but frequently misleading analysis and critique of the concept of codependency. As the second author of one of the articles Collins cited as part of her argument (Jacob, Favorini, Meisel, & Anderson, 1978), I felt compelled to respond. Our article was written 16 years ago and, therefore, predates the popularization and perhaps the formulation of the construct. The studies we reviewed typically assessed the presence of psychopathology using measures such as the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (Hathaway & McKinley, 1951) and did not look for codependent behavior specifically. This is an important distinction glossed over by Collins. In the 15 years since our article was published, a great deal has been learned about addicted family systems that suggests the prevalence of impaired problem solving and communication; physical, emotional, and sexual abuse; and lasting negative consequences for the children of these families. Certainly, to locate the pathology of such a system in the addict's spouse is, as Collins contends, the However, as an adult child of alcoholics (ACOA), I can testify personally to the value of the concept of in the recovery process of surviving family members. Therefore, I would like to respond to several points in Collins's article. Collins's summary of the definitions of and descriptions of behavior and characteristics associated with it are consistent with what I have read on the subject. The hallmark trait is caretaking behavior -- the codependent individual will meet the needs of another before meeting his or her own needs and will do this consistently. Collins suggests that the term codependency is applied primarily to women and that the behaviors described result in large part from societal prescriptions of appropriate coping behavior for women. However, authors writing on this subject do not limit the term's application to women. Because most addicted individuals have been male (this is changing), women may have more often shown this pattern, but it is not limited in theory or in reality to women. Use of the term sick to label this behavior does seem extreme, but most of the writings I have seen directed to ACOAs and those recovering from are primarily supportive and caring and do not convey a tone of blaming the victim. Although there is documentation that stress-related health problems are common in spouses of alcoholics, I agree with Collins that extension of the disease concept from addiction to is inappropriate. Studies on Codependency Collins actually cites no studies directly testing the existence of codependence. Tweed and Ryff (1991) and Seefeldt and Lyon (1991) both assessed ACOA characteristics but did not focus specifically on codependence. The latter source is a conference paper unavailable to this writer. Tweed and Ryff compared higher-socioeconomic-status, demographically matched ACOAs and non-ACOAs (according to the Children of Alcoholics Screening Test) on 10 self-report measures of psychological distress and well-being, personality, and psychological development. Well-being assessment was included to examine resilience. ACOAs were significantly more depressed and anxious but did not differ on the other eight measures. However, the younger part of their sample were all college students, and the measures used do not adequately tap the concept of codependence, nor is the term used in their article. The ACOAs had significantly more often received psychiatric treatment and were significantly more concerned that they might have eating or alcohol problems; they also more often reported emotional abuse in childhood. Furthermore, all measures were self-reported, allowing denial and social desirability to operate. …