For 25 years, I have directed organizations that help the needy and employ social workers, educators, counselors, and psychologists. In the past 5 years, newer workers in their late 20s and early 30s have been approaching me in greater numbers than before to complain about how unhappy they are with their salaries and why they may leave their helping profession. I tell them I recognize that the $33,500 starting salary for master's degree employees to live in New York City is low. But I add, as I always have, that they should feel compensated by the good they achieve. I tell them that that is what allowed me to find satisfaction in practicing law in Harlem in the 1970s while earning substantially less than my fellow Georgetown Law School graduates. But this advice no longer satisfies the new workers, who complain about the cost of living, how the gap has grown significantly between what their friends with graduate degrees in business earn and what they can, and why when I entered the nonprofit sector, society encouraged helping but now emphasizes economic and material success. In a 1992 study of more than 3,000 volunteers, I found that people who helped others regularly—meaning weekly—enjoyed less stress and experienced a greater sense of self-worth compared with those who volunteered only once a year.1 I reported that burnout—a range of symptoms resulting from stress and feeling out of control that can lead to emotional and physical exhaustion—was reduced when helping professionals aided their patients or clients in a different or extra way. This additional helping enhanced self-esteem and restored idealism as antidotes to daily stress and the feelings of burnout. Other studies have come to similar conclusions. In 1999, Schwartz and Sender looked at patients with multiple sclerosis, having 1 group provide telephone support to the other, and then followed their health for 3 years. Helpers had less depression and fatigue and greater self-esteem than nonhelpers.2 Those who helped others had a reduced awareness of their pain and discomfort. A 1992 study of persons older than 60 years who provided informal support to others—delivering meals, chauffeuring—found that helpers had less depression and a greater sense of personal control than nonhelpers.3 Also in 1992, a study of women's health found that women who had many roles in life enjoyed better health than those who did not—but only if 1 of those roles included volunteering.4 Helping others appears to reduce personal discomfort by replacing the thoughts that cause stress—problems at work or other parts of life—with the self-enhancing good feelings received when helpers have personal contact with those they help and do this helping regularly. Physicians who treat homeless patients, for example, report high levels of career satisfaction despite the low fees received. A stress buffer for helping professionals is critical in today's society, which not only challenges many aspects of medical practice, but also sees younger people earning less generally. People between the ages of 35 and 44 years, for example, after inflation earn 9% less than their counterparts 25 years ago. Modern society judges success in materialistic terms. Today's pressures have changed social thinking. A recent study of Israeli mothers showed that 40% wanted their children to go into high-tech industry jobs compared with 15% who wanted them to become physicians.5 Perhaps medical schools, which require students to sacrifice so much, should set aside some time in the curriculum to explain what produces job satisfaction. Young physicians can be unique role models for other professionals, who come to respect that the physicians' work combines analytic thinking, a strong need for peer recognition, and a desire to help others. If more young physicians chose to set aside some part of their practice to helping the needy, they would be improving their own job satisfaction and setting a valuable example. Physicians, who have been taken to task at times for being too concerned with high fees, ironically have an ability to reduce their own job stress and that of many of their critics.