Care In Different Countries Research Articles

Measuring patient satisfaction in oncology units: interview-based psychometric validation of the ‘Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care’ in Greece

The aim of this study is to validate the 'Comprehensive Assessment of Satisfaction with Care' (CASC) in Greece. A total of 84 cancer inpatients met the inclusion criteria. Of them, 32 (38%) refused to participate, leading to a 62% response rate. For the translation of the scale, we followed the European Social Survey procedures encompassing four stages. Interview-based administration was chosen in order to obtain more reliable results in terms of time of assessment, response rate and data omission. Multitrait scaling analyses along with construct, scale-discriminant validity and reliability tests were carried out to establish the Greek version of CASC. Scales on doctors' technical skills, care organization and general satisfaction were in support of the European structure. In general, Doctors' scales had the anticipated structures. Most variations were noticed in the Nurses' scales, leading to a revised item-scale formation, and may reflect different importance patients attribute to various aspects of health care in different countries. Greek version of CASC may be a practical, valid and reliable tool for assessing patient satisfaction in oncology settings. Cross-cultural validation of the existing tools is necessary to enable comparison between various countries and settings. Interview-based administration should be considered when validating patient satisfaction instruments.

Primary care funding and organisational policy options and implications: a narrative review of evidence from five comparator countries

To review innovative models of primary care in different countries in order to identify potential mechanisms for reforming primary care policy in Australia. We conducted a narrative review and synthesis of evidence about models of primary care from four English-speaking comparator countries (New Zealand, Canada, the United Kingdom and the United States) and one European country (The Netherlands), with a particular focus on the relevance and applicability of these models to Australia. We identified four key mechanisms for bringing about reform in primary care: flexible funding, quality frameworks, regional-level primary care organisations, and primary care infrastructure. These mechanisms are interdependent. There are tensions and tradeoffs involved in balancing professional and bureaucratic control and in linking quality and accountability mechanisms. Enhanced linkage between researchers, policymakers and professional groups could assist in exploring options for effective primary care reform.

Core competencies of the European internist: A discussion paper

In an attempt to enhance the quality of internal medicine practice and to reform the education of internists across Europe, the European Board of Internal Medicine (formed by the European Federation of Internal Medicine and the European Union of Medical Specialists Section of Internal Medicine) has launched a project aimed at defining core competencies that are common to all internists. The compilation of six core competencies presented in this paper consists of patient care; medical knowledge; communication skills; professionalism, ethical, and legal issues; organizational planning and service management skills; and academic activities. These core competencies are the foundation required for the provision of high-quality medical care everywhere, regardless of the professional traditions and organization of health care in different countries. The authors hope this paper will stimulate constructive discussion and thoughtful debate, and that it will be followed by a collaborative effort to develop and endorse a European consensus.

Thirty years of the Union of National European Paediatric Societies and Associations (UNEPSA)

The Union of National European Paediatric Societies and Associations was founded in 1976 in Rotterdam. Thirty years later, the authors--former presidents and secretaries general--present a retrospective on the activities and achievements of UNEPSA. In 2006, 36 of 46 (78%) European countries, including some countries of the former Soviet Union, were members of UNEPSA. UNEPSA has created a forum for the mutual discussion of matters concerning paediatrics. UNEPSA is closely linked with the International Pediatric Association (IPA). It was never UNEPSA's ambition to promote a uniform European paediatrics. In the 30 years of its existence, it became clear that the diversity of paediatric care in different countries in Europe is extreme. During the "cold war", UNEPSA was able to cross boundaries between socialist and capitalist countries in Europe, and it was due to the activity of individual members of the UNEPSA council that clinical co-operation and research activities were initiated crossing many political borders. Annual meetings of national paediatric presidents focus on the most urgent problems of paediatric health care. "Europaediatrics" became the tri-annual congress for all general paediatricians and paediatric sub-specialists in Europe. The main research activities of UNEPSA concentrated on identifying the demography of primary, secondary and tertiary care paediatrics in Europe. UNEPSA is an active paediatric association representing more than three quarters of all European countries. After 30 years, it is still an expanding and vital instrument in improving the medical care of all children and the co-operation of their carers in Europe.

International Programme for Resource Use in Critical Care (IPOC) – a methodology and initial results of cost and provision in four European countries

A standardized top-down costing method is not currently available internationally. An internally validated method developed in the UK was modified for use in critical care in different countries. Costs could then be compared using the World Health Organization's Purchasing Power Parities (WHO PPPs). This was an observational, retrospective, cross-sectional, multicentre study set in four European countries: France, UK, Germany and Hungary. A total of 329 adult intensive care units (ICUs) participated in the study. The costs are reported in international dollars ($) derived from the WHO PPP programme. The results show significant differences in resource use and costs of ICUs over the four countries. On the basis of the sum of the means for the major components, the average cost per patient day in UK hospitals was $1512, in French hospitals $934, in German hospitals $726 and in Hungarian hospitals $280. The reasons for such differences are poorly understood but warrant further investigation. This information will allow us to better adjust our measures of international ICU costs.

International comparisons of patients’ views on quality of care

To compare patients' views on quality of care in different countries using a theory-based instrument, while at the same time controlling for the following potential confounders: type of care system (private vs public), type of care (kind of health problem), gender, age, and subjective wellbeing. Patients capable of communicating in wards (medical and surgical departments) and day surgery departments in England, France, Norway, and Sweden were recruited consecutively, to participate in a programme run by the health-care company Capio. Ward patients: England (n=1236), France (n=1051), Norway (n=226), and Sweden (n=428). Day surgery patients: England (n=887), France (n=544), Norway (n=101), and Sweden (n=742). Average response rate across settings: approximately 75 per cent. Patients evaluated the quality of the care they actually received and the subjective importance they ascribed to different aspects of care. The questionnaire "Quality from the patient's perspective" (QPP) was used (modified short version). Cross-national comparisons were made within each of the two care contexts (wards and day surgery) separately for men and women. Quality of care evaluations were adjusted for age and subjective wellbeing. English and French patients scored significantly higher than Norwegian and Swedish on both kinds of ratings (perceived reality and subjective importance), in both kinds of care contexts, and in both sexes. Cross-national comparisons of patients' views on care can give meaningful guidance for practitioners only if they are context-specific and if well-known confounders are controlled for.

Structural Process and Implementation Programs of Pharmaceutical Care in Different Countries

Pharmaceutical care started in the nineties in the United States and has rapidly extended in many other countries. Although there are different trends, such as clinical pharmacy services, cognitive services, medication management, medication review, they all share the same philosophy and objectives, namely "the responsible provision of drug therapy for the purpose of achieving definite outcomes that improve a patient's quality of life". To attain these objectives, a pharmaceutical care process has to be followed point-by-point in order to detect possible medication-related problems. Furthermore, pharmacists have to work together with patients, and ultimately with physicians to establish a care plan. This methodology requires basic skills of documentation and communication and therefore, it is important to establish implementation programs aimed at community-, hospital-, and consultant pharmacists, and to consider PC as a basic element of University teaching programs and postgraduate studies. Moreover, there are still barriers that hinder the provision of this service and have to be overcome. In this article, we have revised the implementation process and the existing projects in many countries and we conclude that despite the enormous amount of work, there is still much to be done from sides of Administration and pharmacists themselves.

There is no perfect health system.

Extensive research into quality of care in different countries yields no conclusive findings that one system is better or worse than others. Quality does not necessarily vary with financing mechanisms; even countries with single-payer systems have variations in quality. Quality is not directly related to the amount spent on health care, since the highest-spending country (the United States) does not have measurably better outcomes. Investments in the quality measurement and reporting systems in all countries would substantially increase the opportunities to learn from cross-national comparisons.

Mother-baby inpatient psychiatric care in different countries: data collection and issues - introduction.

The material was presented during a symposium on "Mother-Baby joint admission for mental health care in different countries" at the Marcé Society International Biennial Scientific Meeting in Sydney (Australia) in 2002 (25-27 September 2002). The introduction stresses the main contribution of each of the six papers. It discusses the general context of perinatal psychiatry and offers guidelines for perinatal health care.

The European Socio‐Demographic Schedule (ESDS): rationale, principles and development

To design an internationally valid and practical instrument on which data can be recorded for small areas that describes the sociodemographic characteristics known to be associated with psychiatric morbidity and service use. (1) Identification of a set of sociodemographic characteristics which, on the basis of currently available evidence, would be expected to influence needs for and provision of mental health care in different countries. (2) Selection of a subset of these for inclusion in the schedule based on likely degree of cross-cultural validity and on the types and formats of the data routinely available in each country. (3) Revision of the schedule following a pilot by EPCAT members. The European Socio-Demographic Schedule (ESDS) was successfully employed to collect sociodemographic data in seven catchment areas. Differences were found between the areas in terms of availability of data as well as in the resulting profiles. The ESDS has been shown to be applicable in a number of European countries.

The evolution of geriatric medicine.

The evolution of geriatric medicine has been associated with increasing knowledge about aging--social, psychologic and biologic--and its effect on the clinical presentation of illness. It also has been associated with varying patterns of the historical development of medical care in different countries. Overall, two main forms of geriatric medicine are developing worldwide--one an accredited specialty practiced within a State medical service, the other based in large hospitals for the aged where physicians train themselves but are not accredited. The system of geriatric care in Great Britain is described and the importance is emphasized of: 1) assessment before admission, 2) progressive care of the patient, and 3) the day hospital. Future developments in relation to internal medicine and family practice are considered. Research into the causes of atheromatous vascular disease and senile dementia is of fundamental importance for the whole future of geriatric medicine.