Abstract Background Although autism is highly prevalent, no single care centre has a sufficient number of patients to produce generalizable knowledge; this slows the pace of quality improvement research. Learning health networks (LHNs) offer a promising solution to improve the quality and efficiency of healthcare by integrating clinical and research data. The Autism Care Network (ACNet) is an LHN composed of 20 clinics across the United States and Canada dedicated to developing the most effective approach to care for children with autism. In Canada, the majority of autistic patients receive a majority of their ongoing care in the community. Therefore, to make meaningful improvements in the continuum of care for patients and their families, it is essential that the ACNet be extended to include community physicians. Objectives The primary objectives were to (1) understand the current data collection practices, learning needs, clinic capacity, areas of improvement, and overall interest of community physicians in participating in a LHN and (2) identify community physicians’ perspectives on the benefits and disadvantages of participating in a LHN and ways in which their engagement in a LHN can be supported. Design/Methods In-depth semi-structured interviews were conducted participants who were purposively sampled from community providers who had previously participated in autism-focused educational programming. The interview guide was developed by the three ACNet sites based on experience with LHNs and working with community physicians. Data were analyzed using an interpretative phenomenological analysis approach with a social constructivist paradigm. Results Analysis of 29 interviews identified 5 primary themes: (1) “Navigating Administrative Challenges,” which highlighted the lack of time, resources, and administrative capacity in the community; (2) “Improving Data Collection Practices”, which emphasized the barriers to consistently collecting information from patients and families; (3) “Increasing Provider Confidence and Competence,” which explored the challenges of navigating the everchanging landscape of community autism care; (4) “Breaking Down Silos”, which focused on fragmented care and the lack of communication between allied health resources, diagnostic hubs, and community physicians; and (5) “Systemic and Societal Barriers to Achieving Best Practices,” which explored the systemic barriers that impact autism care for physicians and families. Conclusion This study provides an understanding of the experiences of community physicians regarding the challenges of community-based autism care. LHNs have the potential to address several of the issues highlighted by community physicians in autism care. Additionally, LHNs can play an important role in improving community care in fields beyond autism.