Care Bundles For Patients Research Articles

Implementation Evaluation of an Early Notification Care Bundle for Patients with Hip Fracture (eHIP)

Introduction: Hip fracture in older adults results in significant mortality and is one of the costliest fall-related injuries. The Australian Commission for Quality and Safety in Health Care hip fracture clinical care standards consolidate the best available evidence for managing this patient group; however, uptake is variable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the implementation and effectiveness of a multidisciplinary early activation mechanism and bundle of care (eHIP) on patient and health service outcomes. Methods: This controlled pre- and post-test study was conducted from June 2019–June 2021 at a large regional hospital in Australia. We hypothesised that eHIP would result in at least 50% of hip fracture patients receiving six or more components of the ACSQHC Hip Fracture Clinical Care Standard. Secondary outcomes include hospital-acquired complication rates and acute treatment costs. Results: There were 565 cases included for analysis. After implementation of eHIP (the post-period), 88% of patients received a correct activation of the eHIP pathway, sustained over 12 months. The proportion of patients receiving the primary outcome of six or more components increased from 36% to 49%. Care at presentation (pain and cognitive assessment) increased by 23%, and unrestricted mobilisation within 24 h improved by 10%. Prescription of appropriate analgesia improved 10-fold (5.2–57%), and patients receiving the gold standard fascia iliaca block increased from 68% to 88%. Acute treatment costs did not significantly change. Discussion/Conclusion: eHIP, a hip fracture care program incorporating evidence-based behaviour change theory, resulted in sustained improvements to patient care as recommended by the ACSQHC Hip Fracture Clinical Care Standard.

Pilot implementation of a telemedicine care bundle: Antimicrobial stewardship, patient satisfaction, clinician satisfaction, and usability in patients with sinusitis.

Telemedicine-specific clinical pathways (CPWs), coupled with electronic health record (EHR) order panels, provide an opportunity to ensure evidence and guideline concordant care for conditions at risk for inconsistent diagnoses and management strategies. Standardized provider and patient-facing illness scripts may fill gaps in clinicians' communication skills secondary to a training deficit in virtual care delivery. We aimed to implement and assess the impact of a novel care bundle for sinusitis on antimicrobial use, patient satisfaction, clinician satisfaction, and usability in patients with sinusitis. A sinusitis care bundle (SCB) for virtual urgent care patients included a sinusitis CPW with communication scripts, sinusitis order panels (SOP), and a patient education smart-phrase (SPESP) within visit instructions. Antimicrobial use was assessed during a 15-month period prior to the start of SCB element implementations and 14-months following, using statistical process control charts. Patient satisfaction was measured using Likert-style surveys. Clinician satisfaction was assessed using a novel survey addressing the SCB-targeted domains (decision support, communication, efficiency, usability, and overall satisfaction). There were 69,785 and 64,019 evaluable patients in the pre-care and post-care bundle periods, respectively. Despite a significant increase in patients receiving a sinusitis diagnosis in the post-care bundle period (3.2% pre- vs. 6.2% post-, p < 0.001), antimicrobial prescribing decreased by 3.9% (p < 0.001), with statistical process control evidence of special cause change. There was a 5.1% decrease (p < 0.001) in negative patient survey responses after implementation. Clinician survey revealed substantial agreement in the domains relating to improving communication with patients and/or families, with the highest satisfaction for the SPESP over the SOP. Implementation of a telemedicine care bundle for patients diagnosed with sinusitis can balance multiple elements of quality care. The combination of a clinical care pathway, standardized language, and order panels within the EHR has the potential to improve patient satisfaction and decrease antimicrobial prescribing.

SG-APSIC1031: Reappraisal of the effectiveness of a care bundle for patients with candidemia

Objectives: Candidemia has become one of the leading causes of healthcare-associated bloodstream infection, particularly in the intensive care unit. The management of candidemia remains challenging. We reassessed the protective effectiveness of a comprehensive care bundle on the management of candidemia and the effects of compliance with each element on the outcomes of patients. Methods: This network meta-analysis was conducted using the frequentist method. The participants included adult patients both infected with candidemia and who received bundle care. The primary outcome was the all-cause mortality among the patients included. Results: Studies in which a care bundle was created for patients with candidemia were identified, and 5 eligible studies with 5,808 participants were enrolled for further analysis. The random-effects model of the overall odds ratio (OR) revealed a significant reduction in the risk of all-cause mortality compared with that of the controls (OR, 0.599; 95% CI, 0.378–0.949; P = .025), as well as a reduction in the risk of developing persistent candidemia compared with the controls (OR, 0.483; 95% CI, 0.245–0.952; P = .008). In addition, no single element reached a protective effectiveness to improve the clinical outcome. Conclusions: This meta-analysis demonstrated that the combination of core elements in the care bundle resulted in protective effects, in that the all-cause mortality rates and incidence rates were effectively reduced among patients with persistent candidemia.

Application of PDCA cycle combined with care bundles for patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy for sepsis

Application of PDCA cycle combined with care bundles for patients undergoing continuous renal replacement therapy for sepsis

Evaluating a Pharmacist-Initiated Care Bundle for Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a cause of significant morbidity and mortality, and management of patients with this complex disease remains a challenge. Pharmacists work within an interdisciplinary health care team to coordinate services and ensure that standards of care are met. A pharmacist-initiated care bundle provided in the outpatient setting has shown promising results in improving COPD management. To evaluate, in the acute care setting, the effectiveness of a pharmacist-initiated COPD care bundle in improving compliance with health care measures known to improve outcomes in patients with COPD. This retrospective chart review included patients with acute exacerbation of COPD admitted from May 14, 2019, to February 29, 2020. Completion rates for the 6 individual components of the COPD care bundle were compared between patients who did and did not receive the pharmacist-initiated intervention. A subgroup of 22 patients received the following additional interventions: documentation of the modified Medical Research Council score, assessment of COPD medications, and vaccination review and administration. A total of 106 patients were included in the analysis, 53 patients in each of the control and intervention groups. The pharmacist-initiated intervention increased completion rates for the overall COPD care bundle from 2% to 17% (p = 0.003), for provision of the COPD flare-up action plan from 4% to 79% (p < 0.001), and for provision of smoking cessation education from 0% to 36% (p = 0.04); however, there was no significant difference in assessment by a respiratory therapist. For the subgroup that received additional interventions, vaccination reviews were conducted for 21 (96%) of the 22 patients, which led to 9 (41%) receiving a guideline-recommended vaccine. Pharmacist involvement in initiation of the care bundle significantly increased completion rates for the activities included in the care bundle.

Improved outcomes following the implementation of a decompensated cirrhosis discharge bundle

IntroductionMortality from liver disease is increasing and management of decompensated cirrhosis (DC) is inconsistent across the UK. Patients with DC have complex medical needs when discharged from hospital and early...

Impact of a care bundle for patients with blunt chest injury (ChIP): A multicentre controlled implementation evaluation.

BackgroundBlunt chest injury leads to significant morbidity and mortality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of a multidisciplinary chest injury care bundle (ChIP) on patient and health service outcomes. ChIP provides guidance in three key pillars of care for blunt chest injury—respiratory support, analgesia and complication prevention. ChIP was implemented using a multi-faceted implementation plan developed using the Behaviour Change Wheel.MethodsThis controlled pre-and post-test study (two intervention and two non-intervention sites) was conducted from July 2015 to June 2019. The primary outcome measures were unplanned Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions, non-invasive ventilation use and mortality.ResultsThere were 1790 patients included. The intervention sites had a 58% decrease in non-invasive ventilation use in the post- period compared to the pre-period (95% CI 0.18–0.96). ChIP was associated with 90% decreased odds of unplanned ICU admissions (95% CI 0.04–0.29) at the intervention sites compared to the control groups in the post- period. There was no significant change in mortality. There were higher odds of health service team reviews (surgical OR 6.6 (95% CI 4.61–9.45), physiotherapy OR 2.17 (95% CI 1.52–3.11), ICU doctor OR 6.13 (95% CI 3.94–9.55), ICU liaison OR 55.75 (95% CI 17.48–177.75), pain team OR 8.15 (95% CI 5.52 –-12.03), analgesia (e.g. patient controlled analgesia OR 2.6 (95% CI 1.64–3.94) and regional analgesia OR 8.8 (95% CI 3.39–22.79), incentive spirometry OR 8.3 (95% CI 4.49–15.37) and, high flow nasal oxygen OR 22.1 (95% CI 12.43–39.2) in the intervention group compared to the control group in the post- period.ConclusionThe implementation of a chest injury care bundle using behaviour change theory was associated with a sustained improvement in evidence-based practice resulting in reduced unplanned ICU admissions and non-invasive ventilation requirement.Trial registrationANZCTR: ACTRN12618001548224, approved 17/09/2018

A pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza vaccination quality improvement program for women receiving chemotherapy for gynecologic cancers at a major tertiary cancer Centre

ObjectiveInternational guidelines recommend pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza vaccination for all patients with solid organ malignancies prior to initiating chemotherapy. Baseline vaccination rates (March 2019) for pneumococcal pneumonia and influenza at our tertiary cancer centre were 8% and 40%, respectively. The aim of this study was to increase the number of gynecologic chemotherapy patients receiving pneumococcal and influenza vaccinations to 80% by March 2020. MethodsWe performed an interrupted time series study using structured quality improvement methodology. Three interventions were introduced to address vaccination barriers: an in-house vaccination program, a staff education campaign, and a patient care bundle (pre-printed prescription, information brochure, vaccine record booklet). Process and outcome data were collected by patient survey and pharmacy audit and analyzed on statistical process control charts. ResultsWe identified 195 eligible patients. Pneumococcal and influenza vaccination rates rose significantly from 5% to a monthly mean of 61% and from 36% to a monthly mean of 67%, respectively. The 80% target was reached for both vaccines during one or more months of study. The in-house vaccination and staff education programs were major contributors to the improvement, whereas the information brochure and record booklet were minor contributors. ConclusionsThree interventions to promote pneumococcal and influenza vaccination among chemotherapy patients resulted in significantly improved vaccination rates. Lessons learned about promoting vaccine uptake may be generalizable to different populations and vaccine types. In response to the global COVID-19 pandemic, initiatives to expand the program to all chemotherapy patients at our centre are underway.

Artificial Intelligence in Acute Kidney Injury: From Static to Dynamic Models.

Artificial intelligence (AI) is the development of computer systems that normally require human intelligence. In the field of acute kidney injury (AKI) AI has led to an evolution of risk prediction models. In the past, static prediction models were developed using baseline (eg, preoperative) data to evaluate AKI risk. Newer models which incorporated baseline as well as evolving data collected during a hospital admission have shown improved predicative abilities. In this review, we will summarize the advances made in AKI risk prediction over the last several years, including a shift toward more dynamic, real-time, electronic medical record-based models. In addition, we will be discussing the role of electronic AKI alerts and decision support tools. Recent studies have demonstrated improved patient outcomes through the use of these tools which monitor for nephrotoxin medication exposures as well as provide kidney focused care bundles for patients at high risk for severe AKI. Finally, we will briefly discuss the pitfalls and implications of implementing these scores, alerts, and support tools.

Factors influencing the implementation and uptake of a discharge care bundle for patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a qualitative focus group study

BackgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is one of the most common causes of mortality and morbidity in high-income countries. In addition to the high costs of initial hospitalization, COPD patients frequently return to the emergency department (ED) and are readmitted to hospital within 30 days of discharge. A COPD acute care discharge care bundle focused on optimizing care for patients with an acute exacerbation of COPD has been shown to reduce ED revisits and hospital readmissions. The aim of this study was to explore and understand factors influencing implementation and uptake of COPD discharge care bundle items in acute care facilities from the perspective of health care providers and patients.MethodsQualitative methodology was adopted. Nine focus groups were conducted using a semi-structured guide: seven with acute and primary/community health care providers and two with patients/family members. Focus groups were audiotaped, transcribed verbatim, and coded and analyzed using a thematic approach.ResultsForty-six health care providers and 14 patients/family members participated in the focus groups. Health care providers and patients identified four factors that can challenge the implementation of COPD discharge care bundles: process of care complexities, human capacity in care settings, communication and engagement, and attitudes and perceptions towards change. Both health care providers and patients recognized process of care complexity as the most important determinant of the COPD discharge bundle uptake. Processes of care complexity include patient activities in seeking and receiving care, as well as practitioner activities in making a diagnosis and recommending or implementing treatment. Important issues linked to human capacity in care settings included time constraints, high patient volume, and limited staffing. Communication during transitions in care across settings and patient engagement were also broadly discussed. Other important issues were linked to patients’, providers’, and system attitudes towards change and level of involvement in COPD discharge bundle implementation.ConclusionsComplexities in the process of care were perceived as the most important determinant of COPD discharge bundle implementation. Early engagement of health providers and patients in the uptake of COPD discharge bundle items as well as clear communication between acute and post-acute settings can contribute positively to bundle uptake and implementation success.

Using and implementing care bundles for patients with acute admission for COPD: qualitative study of healthcare professionals’ experience in four hospitals in England

BackgroundCare bundles are sets of evidence-based interventions to improve quality of hospital care at admission and discharge. Within a wider multi-method evaluation of care bundles for adults with an emergency...

Negative pressure wound therapy reduces surgical site infections

ObjectiveSurgical site infection (SSI) with lower extremity incisions represents a modifiable source of major morbidity. Our institutional bundled care protocol to decrease SSI includes optimization of perioperative risk factors, dedicated wound closure tray, and voluntary use of a closed surface negative pressure wound therapy (cNPWT) device applied over closed incisions in the operating room. This study examined the individual effect of cNPWT on SSI reduction and other perioperative outcomes. MethodsAll patients with lower extremity or infrainguinal incisions between January 2016 and December 2017 were prospectively identified and tracked for infectious complications. All patients were treated with the same perioperative care bundle to reduce SSI. cNPWT was applied over closed incisions at the discretion of the surgeon. The 90-day outcomes regarding SSI, return to operating room, death, and readmission were tracked. Univariate and multivariate analysis using binary logistic regression for factors associated with SSI was performed for patients with and without cNPWT devices, with P < .05 determined to be significant. ResultsThere were 504 patients included, 225 with cNPWT and 279 with standard dressings. Between the groups, there were no major differences in mean age, mean body mass index, perioperative transfusions, use of prosthetic, reoperative field, dialysis status, and presence of diabetes. There were significantly more women (39.6% vs 27.2% female; P < .01) and active smokers (47.1% vs 30.2%; P < .01) in the cNPWT group along with increased mean operative times (238.3 vs 189.0 minutes; P < .01). Univariate analysis revealed significantly fewer SSIs with cNPWT (9.8% vs 19.0% in standard dressings; P < .01) along with decreased perioperative mortality (5.8% vs 11.2%; P = .04). There were no differences in return to operating room (27.6% cNPWT vs 27.7% standard; P = .97) or readmissions (29.8% cNPWT vs 26.5%; P = .43), but more returns to the operating room were for wound-related problems in the standard dressings group (48.3% vs 26.2%; P < .01). Binary logistic regression using an SSI end point demonstrated that female sex increases SSI (odds ratio, 2.43; confidence interval, 1.37-4.30; P < .01), whereas cNPWT reduces SSI (odds ratio, 0.32; confidence interval, 0.17-0.63; P < .01). ConclusionsThe use of negative pressure wound therapy devices decreases the incidence of infrainguinal wound infections. This occurs as an independent factor as part of a patient care bundle targeting modifiable variables in perioperative care.

A pilot study on assessing the gap between nurses’ task performances and knowledge pertaining the same with reference to “ I COUGH” initiative- a call for promoting patient ‘care bundle’ assignments in low-income nations

Background: The health sector in low-income nations has been crippled owing to low resources, lack of trained staff and a scarcity of effective health-related reforms. Amidst such a scenario, implementation of patient-centered care bundle approaches could help reprise the autonomy and standards of care for healthcare providers as well as safeguard patient safety. Methods: We sought to determine the gap between task performance and the underlying knowledge pertaining the same among nurses from intensive and high dependency neurosurgical units within three hospitals in Nepal through a questionnaire-based approach focusing on task assignments to prevent pulmonary complications among their patients and scoring them with references to the variables of ‘I COUGH’, a similar patient care bundle initiative. Results: There is a gross discrepancy between the patterns of task performance and the knowledge regarding the rationale behind the same tasks among nurses working in critical care neurosurgical units. In reference to I COUGH, nurses had below 50% knowledge on interventions aimed to prevent pulmonary complications among their patients, irrespective of the level of experience attained in the units. Furthermore, none of them had complete knowledge regarding all components of effective chest physiotherapy. Conclusion: There is the utmost need for the implementation of patient-focused care bundle approaches in upraising the health delivery standards, especially in low-income nations. Such initiatives can promote autonomy amongst healthcare professionals on patient care as well as assuring better patient outcomes by minimizing complications.

A pilot study on assessing the gap between nurses' task performances and knowledge pertaining the same with reference to " I COUGH" initiative- a call for promoting patient 'care bundle' assignments in low-income nations.

Background:The health sector in low-income nations has been crippled owing to low resources, lack of trained staff and a scarcity of effective health-related reforms. Amidst such a scenario, implementation of patient-centered care bundle approaches could help reprise the autonomy and standards of care for healthcare providers as well as safeguard patient safety. Methods:We sought to determine the gap between task performance and the underlying knowledge pertaining the same among nurses from intensive and high dependency neurosurgical units within three hospitals in Nepal through a questionnaire-based approach focusing on task assignments to prevent pulmonary complications among their patients and scoring them with references to the variables of 'I COUGH', a similar patient care bundle initiative. Results:There is a gross discrepancy between the patterns of task performance and the knowledge regarding the rationale behind the same tasks among nurses working in critical care neurosurgical units. In reference to I COUGH, nurses had below 50% knowledge on interventions aimed to prevent pulmonary complications among their patients, irrespective of the level of experience attained in the units. Furthermore, none of them had complete knowledge regarding all components of effective chest physiotherapy. Conclusion:There is the utmost need for the implementation of patient-focused care bundle approaches in upraising the health delivery standards, especially in low-income nations. Such initiatives can promote autonomy amongst healthcare professionals on patient care as well as assuring better patient outcomes by minimizing complications.

Pulmonary rehabilitation based care bundle for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Pulmonary rehabilitation based care bundle for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Outcome assessment of emergency laparotomies and associated factors in low resource setting. A case series.

BackgroundEmergency laparotomy is a high risk procedure which is demonstrated by high morbidity and mortality. However, the problem is tremendous in resource limited settings and there is limited data on patient outcome. We aimed to assess postoperative patient outcome after emergency laparotomy and associated factors.MethodsAn observational study was conducted in our hospital from March 11- June 30, 2015 using emergency laparotomy network tool. All consecutive surgical patients who underwent emergency laparotomy were included. Binary and multiple logistic regressions were employed using adjusted odds ratios and 95% CI, and P-value < 0.05 was considered to be statistically significant.ResultA total of 260 patients were included in the study. The majority of patients had late presentation (>6hrs) to the hospital after the onset of symptoms of the diseases and surgical intervention after hospital admission. The incidences of postoperative morbidity and mortality were 39.2% and 3.5% respectively. Factors associated with postoperative morbidity were preoperative co-morbidity (AOR = 0.383, CI = 0.156–0.939) and bowel resection (AOR = 0.232, CI = 0.091–0.591). Factors associated with postoperative mortality were anesthetists' preoperative opinion on postoperative patient outcome (AOR = 0.067, CI = 0.008–0.564), level of consciousness during recovery from anaesthesia (AOR = 0.114, CI = 0.021–10.628) and any re-intervention within 30 days after primary operation (AOR = 0.083, CI = 0.009–0.750).Conclusion and recommendationThe incidence of postoperative morbidity and mortality after emergency laparotomy were high. We recommend preoperative optimization, early surgical intervention, and involvement of senior professionals during operation in these risky surgical patients. Also, we recommend the use of WHO or equivalent Surgical Safety Checklist and establishment of perioperative patient care bundle including surgical ICU and radiology investigation modalities such as CT scan.

Care Bundles after Discharging Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Exacerbation from the Emergency Department.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is the second leading cause of emergency department (ED) admissions to hospital, and nearly a third of patients with acute exacerbation (AE) of COPD are re-admitted to hospital within 28 days after discharge. It has been suggested that nearly a third of COPD admissions could be avoided through the implementation of evidence-based care interventions. A COPD discharge bundle is a set of evidence-based practices, aimed at improving patient outcomes after discharge from AE COPD; body of evidence supports the usefulness of discharge care bundles after AE of COPD, although there is a lack of consensus of what interventions should be implemented. On the other hand, the implementation of those interventions also involves different challenges. Important care gaps remain regarding discharge care bundles for patients with acute exacerbation of COPD discharged from EDs There is an urgent need for investigations to guide future implementation of care bundles for those patients discharged from EDs.

Effectiveness of a multidisciplinary patient care bundle for reducing surgical-site infections.

Surgical-site infection (SSI) is associated with significant healthcare costs. To reduce the high rate of SSI among patients undergoing colorectal surgery at a cancer centre, a comprehensive care bundle was implemented and its efficacy tested. A pragmatic study involving three phases (baseline, implementation and sustainability) was conducted on patients treated consecutively between 2013 and 2016. The intervention included 13 components related to: bowel preparation; oral and intravenous antibiotic selection and administration; skin preparation, disinfection and hygiene; maintenance of normothermia during surgery; and use of clean instruments for closure. SSI risk was evaluated by means of a preoperative calculator, and effectiveness was assessed using interrupted time-series regression. In a population with a mean BMI of 30 kg/m2 , diabetes mellitus in 17·5 per cent, and smoking history in 49·3 per cent, SSI rates declined from 11·0 to 4·1 per cent following implementation of the intervention bundle (P =0·001). The greatest reductions in SSI rates occurred in patients at intermediate or high risk of SSI: from 10·3 to 4·7 per cent (P = 0·006) and from 19 to 2 per cent (P < 0·001) respectively. Wound care modifications were very different in the implementation phase (43·2 versus 24·9 per cent baseline), including use of an overlying surface vacuum dressing (17·2 from 1·4 per cent baseline) or leaving wounds partially open (13·2 from 6·7 per cent baseline). As a result, the biggest difference was in wound-related rather than organ-space SSI. The median length of hospital stay decreased from 7 (i.q.r. 5-10) to 6 (5-9) days (P = 0·002). The greatest reduction in hospital stay was seen in patients at high risk of SSI: from 8 to 6 days (P < 0·001). SSI rates remained low (4·5 per cent) in the sustainability phase. Meaningful reductions in SSI can be achieved by implementing a multidisciplinary care bundle at a hospital-wide level.

What are the optimum components in a care bundle aimed at reducing post-operative pulmonary complications in high-risk patients?

BackgroundPost-operative pulmonary complications (POPC) are common, predictable and associated with increased morbidity and mortality, independent of pre-operative risk. Interventions to reduce the incidence of POPC have been studied individually, but the use of a care bundle has not been widely investigated. The purpose of our work was to use Delphi consensus methodology and an independently chosen expert panel to formulate a care bundle for patients identified as being at high of POPC, as preparation towards an evaluation of its effectiveness at reducing POPC.MethodsWe performed a survey of members of the ESICM POIC section to inform a Delphi consensus and to share their opinions on a care bundle to reduce POPC, the POPC-CB. We formed a team of 36 experts to participate in and complete an email-based Delphi consensus over three rounds, leading to the formulation of the POPC-CB.ResultsThe survey had 362 respondents and informed the design of the Delphi consensus. The Delphi consensus resulted in a proposed POPC-CB that incorporates components before surgery-supervised exercise programmes and inspiratory muscle training, during surgery, low tidal volume ventilation with individualised PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure), use of routine monitoring to avoid hyperoxia and efforts made to limit neuromuscular blockade, and post-operatively, deep breathing exercises and elevation of the head of the bed.ConclusionA care bundle has been suggested for evaluation in surgical patients at high risk of POPC. Evaluation of feasibility of both implementation and effectiveness is now indicated.

Systematic review of a patient care bundle in reducing staphylococcal infections in cardiac and orthopaedic surgery

Surgical site infections (SSIs) are serious adverse events hindering surgical patients' recovery. In Australia and New Zealand, SSIs are a huge burden to patients and healthcare systems. A bundled approach, including pre-theatre nasal and/or skin decolonization has been used to reduce the risk of staphylococcal infection. The aim of this review is to assess the effectiveness of the bundle in preventing SSIs for cardiac and orthopaedic surgeries. The review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses statement. Published literature was searched in PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library of Systematic reviews. Identified articles were selected and extracted based on a priori defined Population-Intervention-Comparator-Outcome and eligibility criteria. Data of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative observational studies were synthesized by meta-analyses. Quality appraisal tools were used to assess the evidence quality. The review included six RCTs and 19 observational studies. The bundled treatment regimens varied substantially across all studies. RCTs showed a trend of Staphylococcus aureus SSIs reduction due to the bundle (relative risk = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.33, 1.06) with moderate heterogeneity. Observational studies showed statistically significant reduction in all-cause and S. aureus SSIs, with 51% (95% CI = 0.41, 0.59) and 47% (95% CI = 0.35, 0.65), respectively. No publication biases were detected. SSIs in major cardiac and orthopaedic surgeries can be effectively reduced by approximately 50% with a pre-theatre patient care bundle approach.