Cardioverter Defibrillators In Children Research Articles

Midterm experience with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children and young adults

This single-centre study was undertaken to review our experience with implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) implantation in children with relatively different aetiologies. We retrospectively reviewed the records of the paediatric patients who underwent ICD implantation between October 2001 and December 2008. The data of these patients were collected by reviewing the patients' medical records and computerized departmental pacemaker databases. A total of 28 patients who underwent ICD implantation during this period were included in this study. The median age was 12 years and median weight was 32 kg. Most of the patients had ion-channel diseases (n = 13) or cardiomyopathy (n = 11). Devices were implanted for either secondary (n = 22) or primary (n = 6) prevention. The selected ICD generator type was single chamber in 22 patients, dual chamber in 5 patients, and biventricular in 1. Nineteen patients received 122 shocks. Fifteen of 22 patients (68.2%) from the secondary prevention group and 2 of 6 patients (33.3%) from the primary prevention group experienced at least one appropriate shock during a median period of 11.3 months (range: 4 days-6.5 years). Forty-two inappropriate shocks were delivered in seven (31.8%) patients from the secondary prophylaxis group during a median period of 11.3 months. The most important reason for inappropriate shocks was T-wave oversensing. In six patients, lead-related acute or chronic complications occurred. The ICD was safe and effective in interrupting malignant arrhythmias in children and adolescents with a high risk of sudden cardiac death. However, the occurrence of lead complications is significant. The incidence of therapies delivered by the device, with appropriate and inappropriate shocks, was high and interfered with the quality of life. The most important reason for inappropriate shocks was T-wave oversensing. Careful programming is mandatory to reduce the inappropriate shocks.

Effective Cardioverter Defibrillator Implantation in Children Without Thoracotomy: A Valid Alternative

The implantation method for a cardioverter defibrillator in children is poorly standardized because of obvious features related to size and predisposing cardiac disease in children presenting with malignant ventricular arrhythmia. We propose an alternative method of implanting a cardioverter defibrillator without the need for associated thoracotomy, based on the subxiphoidal insertion of an epicardial bipolar ventricular pacing and sensing lead, an active can placed in the abdomen, and a subcutaneous array tunneled along the left thoracic wall as a shock electrode. This technique offers the advantage of an effective and minimally invasive implantable cardioverter defibrillator with wide applicability for children, independent of their size and cardiac status.

Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator Lead Performance

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) have revolutionized the treatment of patients at risk for sudden cardiac death. In the nearly 3 decades since the first human ICD implant,1 millions of devices have been implanted worldwide and innumerable lives have been saved. Successful resuscitation of a potentially lethal ventricular arrhythmia by an ICD system depends on successful arrhythmia detection and timely delivery of therapy. Both the ICD generator and the ICD lead are critical components of this system. The lead, in particular, is literally a lifeline whose purpose is to convey critical information about the heart’s rhythm to the ICD generator and, in turn, to deliver life-sustaining therapy when needed. Failure of an ICD lead may result in significant clinical events, including failure to pace, failure to defibrillate, inappropriate shocks, and even death. Article p 2727 ICD leads, like many medical technologies, have undergone a remarkable transformation. Epicardial leads, which necessitated a thoracotomy for lead placement, have given way to transvenous leads, which are easier to implant, less costly, and associated with decreased morbidity and mortality.2 Important advances in transvenous lead technology, such as the development of steroid elution, smaller diameter leads, novel insulations, and multipolar leads, have translated into meaningful clinical benefits for patients. Although modern ICD leads consist primarily of electrodes, conductors, insulation, and a fixation mechanism to attach the lead to the myocardium, lead design and performance vary from model to model. Indeed, monitoring of performance is critical not only to identify products with increased failure rates but also to provide physicians and patients with realistic expectations of device performance. In the current issue of Circulation , Eckstein et al add to our understanding of ICD lead performance.3 The investigators conducted a retrospective analysis of 1317 consecutive patients who received ICD systems (including 38 different ICD lead …

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities

ACC/AHA/HRS 2008 Guidelines for Device-Based Therapy of Cardiac Rhythm Abnormalities

Initial Experience With Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator Systems Using Epicardial and Pleural Electrodes in Pediatric Patients

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children have proven to be an effective therapy for life-threatening ventricular arrhythmias. The optimal electrode and device placement for implantable cardioverter defibrillator therapy in children is still controversial. We describe our initial experience after epicardial and pleural electrode insertion with abdominal or intrathoracic device placement in 8 children.

Lessons From the Failure and Recall of an Implantable Cardioverter-Defibrillator

Multiple clinical trials have shown that a properly functioning implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) is capable of interrupting sudden death caused by ventricular tachyarrhythmias. Unfortunately, ICDs are complex medical devices, and they do not always perform as expected. For example, only 5% of ICD batteries last >7 years, and most dual-chamber ICD models must be replaced for battery depletion every 3 to 5 years.1 Normal battery depletion, however, is reliably predicted by routine follow-up methods before an ICD fails. In contrast, electronic malfunctions are unpredictable and may not be detected by standard follow-up techniques before an ICD is unable to deliver effective therapy. Thus, sudden cardiac arrest or death may be the first and only sign that an ICD has failed.2 Recently, we reported the death of a 21-year-old patient who received a Prizm 2 DR model 1861 ICD pulse generator (Guidant, Inc) in 2001 to prevent sudden cardiac death resulting from hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.3 In March 2005, this young man experienced a witnessed arrest and could not be resuscitated. His ICD was returned to Guidant, which found that the device had failed during the delivery of a shock. The cause of failure was massive electronic damage caused by electrical overstress that occurred when a short circuit developed between a high-voltage wire and a tube used to test the housing during manufacturing (see the Figure). At the time of our patient’s death, Guidant had knowledge of 25 similar Prizm 2 DR model 1861 failures in patients, 3 of whom had required rescue defibrillation. Indeed, Guidant had first observed this mode of failure 3 years earlier, in February 2002, when 2 returned Prizm 2 DR pulse generators exhibited the same short circuiting that caused our patient’s device to fail. Guidant was sufficiently concerned about these failures that manufacturing changes were made …

Efficacy of implantable cardioverter defibrillator in children with dilated cardiomyopathy

Sudden cardiac death (SCD) is a well-known risk in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). This study tests the hypothesis that implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) may prevent SCD in children with DCM.

Use of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Use of pacemakers and implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children and adolescents: A reassessment of indications

Implantable cardioverter defibrillators in children and adolescents: A reassessment of indications

P1539 Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in children and young adolescents: potential benefit and complications

P1539 Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator in children and young adolescents: potential benefit and complications

Use of a single coil transvenous electrode with an abdominally placed implantable cardioverter defibrillator in children.

While transvenous defibrillator electrode placement avoiding a thoracotomy is preferable, electrode size, a large intercoil spacing, and the need for subclavicular device placement preclude this approach in most children. We investigated a single RV coil to an abdominally placed active can ICD device. Five children ages 8-16 years (weight 21-50 kg, mean 35 kg) underwent ICD placement. Placement of a single coil Medtronic model 6932 or 6943 electrode was performed via the left subclavian vein approach and the electrode positioned in the RV apex with the coil lying along the RV diaphragmatic surface. The ICD (Medtronic Micro Jewel II model 7223 Cx) was implanted in a left abdominal pocket with the lead tunneled from the infraclavicular region to the pocket. Implant DFTs were < or = 15 J using a biphasic waveform. DFTs rechecked within 3-month postimplant were unchanged. Lead impedance at implant ranged from 38 to 56 omega, mean 51 omega. Follow-up was 3-21 months (total 82 months) with no electrode dislodgment, lead fractures, or inappropriate discharges. Two of the five patients have had successful appropriate ICD discharges. Transvenous ICD electrode placement can be performed in children as small as 20 kg with the device implanted in a cosmetically acceptable abdominal pocket that is well tolerated. Excellent DFTs can be achieved. This approach avoids a thoracotomy in all but the smallest child, does not require subclavicular placement of the device, and avoids use of a second intravascular coil.

Comparison of frequency of complications of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children versus adults

Compared with adults patients (n = 309) receiving implantable cardioverter-defibrillators at the same institution, pediatric patients (n = 11) exhibited a trend toward lower defibrillation thresholds. At follow-up of 29 +/- 17 months, the incidence of recurrent arrhythmias was similar, but lead revisions and device infections were more common in the pediatric patients.

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children: A perspective on current and future uses

Implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in children: A perspective on current and future uses