Cardioversion Of Atrial Fibrillation In Patients Research Articles

Abstract 16107: Post-Cardioversion Device-Related Thrombus in a Patient With Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion Device on Apixaban

Introduction and Importance: Current guidelines recommend against pre-procedural transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) prior to cardioversion in atrial fibrillation patients compliant with oral anticoagulants for at least 3 weeks. The relevance of these guidelines remain unclear in those undergoing repeat cardioversion. Case Presentation: 66-year-old male with a history of atrial fibrillation and an implanted left atrial appendage occlusion device(LAAO), compliant with apixaban, presented with dyspnea and lightheadedness. He was cardioverted into sinus rhythm 10 days prior to symptom onset with TEE unremarkable for thrombus. Vitals were remarkable for tachycardia and electrocardiogram revealed that the patient converted back into atrial fibrillation. Patient was then scheduled for cardioversion. At the patient’s request, a TEE was obtained which revealed a new thrombus in the left atrium located on his WATCHMAN device. Cardioversion was canceled and patient was admitted for coumadin initiation with lovenox bridge along with neurological monitoring due to increased stroke risk. Clinical Discussion: Restoration of sinus rhythm after cardioversion can lead to thrombus formation due to atrial stunning, a transitory dysfunction of the atrial appendage and atrium.Atrial stunning occurs immediately after cardioversion and can persist for several weeks. Time-span of preceding atrial fibrillation, presence of structural cardiovascular disease, and atrial size impact severity of atrial stunning and duration of anticoagulation needed.While anticoagulation decreases the risk of thrombus formation, it does not completely eliminate it, especially in those with increased stroke risk factors. Conclusion: Atrial fibrillation patients are susceptible to thrombus formation after cardioversion.Further studies should be done to assess the need for routine TEE after cardioversion in those with increased risk for stroke on anticoagulants or who have LAAO.

Transesophageal Echocardiogram Before Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation Patients.

Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) offers an invaluable, non-invasive avenue for diagnosing and managing various cardiac conditions, including atrial fibrillation (AF). As the most common cardiac arrhythmia, AF affects millions and can lead to severe complications. Cardioversion, a procedure to restore the heart's normal rhythm, is frequently conducted on AF patients resistant to medication. Due to inconclusive data, TEE's utility prior to cardioversion in AF patients remains ambiguous. Understanding TEE's potential benefits and limitations in this population could significantly influence clinical practice. This review aims to scrutinize the current literature on the use of TEE before cardioversion in AF patients. The principal objective is to understand TEE's potential benefits and limitations comprehensively. The study seeks to offer a clear understanding and practical recommendations for clinical practice, thereby improving the management of AF patients before cardioversion using TEE. A literature search of databases was conducted using the keywords "Atrial Fibrillation," "Cardioversion" and "Transesophageal echocardiography," resulting in 640 articles. These were narrowed to 103 following title and abstract reviews. After applying exclusion and inclusion criteria with a quality assessment, 20 papers were included: seven retrospective studies, 12 prospective observational studies, and one randomized controlled trial (RCT). Stroke risk associated with direct-current cardioversion (DCC) potentially results from post-cardioversion atrial stunning. Thromboembolic events occur post cardioversion, with or without prior atrial thrombus or cardioversion complications. Generally, cardiac thrombus localizes in the left atrial appendage (LAA), a clear contraindication to cardioversion. Atrial sludge without LAA thrombus in TEE is a relative contraindication. TEE before electrical cardioversion (ECV) in anticoagulated AF individuals is uncommon. In AF patients planned for cardioversion, contrast enhancement facilitates thrombus exclusion in TEE images, reducing embolic events. Left atrial thrombus (LAT) frequently occurs in AF patients, necessitating TEE examination. Despite the increased use of pre-cardioversion TEE, thromboembolic events persist. Notably, patients with post-DCC thromboembolic events had no LA thrombus or LAA sludge. The use of TEE-guided DCC has grown due to its ability to detect atrial thrombi pre-cardioversion, aiding risk stratification. Thrombus in the left atrium also signals an elevated risk of future thromboembolic events in AF patients. While atrial stunning post cardioversion detected by TEE is a significant risk factor for future thromboembolic events, further evidence is required. Therapeutic anticoagulation is essential during and post cardioversion, even if no atrial thrombus is detected. Current data recommends cardioversion guided by TEE, particularly in outpatient settings.

Automated left atrial strain after electrical cardioversion for atrial fibrillation

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Introduction Evidence shows that atrial dysfunction and stunning occur, after successful cardioversion from persistent atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm (SR). Electrical and mechanical recovery of the left atrium (LA), do not seem to coincide. Traditional Doppler parameters show reduced atrial contractility immediately after cardioversion, while mechanical improvement in atrial function mainly occurs within the first 4 weeks after sinus rhythm restoration. Purpose This study aimed to determine whether automated left atrial strain (auto-LA strain) could be used to measure global LA function and the time required for mechanical improvement to be seen in LA after cardioversion. Methods Auto-LA strain was measured via transthoracic echocardiography in 20 patients with persistent AF who had been cardioverted to SR and followed up for 3 months, and in a cohort of 20 healthy individuals. Conventional measures of atrial function derived from transmitral pulsed Doppler and tissue Doppler imaging of lateral mitral annulus were included, such as transmitral A wave velocity, A wave velocity-time integral, atrial fraction, A" wave velocity, and A" velocity-time integral. Results Immediately after cardioversion auto-LA strain was significantly lower than in control subjects. Atrial function improved over time with maximal change observed at 1 month after cardioversion. Doppler tissue imaging parameters were also normalised after 1 month of restoration to SR. Despite this initial improvement in LA function, the values of auto-LA strain remained stable for the following 3 months. Conclusion Although the electrical function of LA is immediately restored after successful cardioversion in AF patients, there remains a persistent degree of atrial dysfunction for at least 3 months. This difference could explain the increased propensity for these patients to develop recurrent atrial fibrillation. Additionally, this dysfunction could indicate longer-term use of anti-arrhythmic and antithrombotic medications in the AF cohort. Abstract Figure.

Direct Current Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation Patients on Edoxaban Therapy Versus Vitamin K Antagonists: a Real-world Propensity Score\u2013Matched Study

PurposeThe purpose of the present study was to compare the long-term effectiveness and safety of newly initiated anticoagulation with edoxaban (EDO) versus uninterrupted vitamin K antagonist (VKA) therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) scheduled for transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE)-guided direct electrical current cardioversion (DCC).MethodsA propensity score-matched cohort observational study was performed comparing the safety and effectiveness of edoxaban versus well-controlled VKA therapy among a cohort of consecutive non-valvular AF patients scheduled for DCC. The primary safety outcome was major bleeding. The primary efficacy outcome was the composite of stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), and systemic embolism (SE).FindingsA total of 130 AF patients receiving edoxaban 60-mg (EDO) treatment were compared with the same number of VKA recipients. The cumulative incidence of major bleedings was 1.54% in the EDO group and 3.08% in the VKA group (P = 0.4). The cumulative incidence of thromboembolic events was 1.54% in the EDO group and 2.31% in the VKA group (P = 0.9). A non-significant trend in improved adherence was observed between the EDO and VKA groups with a total anticoagulant therapy discontinuation rate of 4.62% (6/130) vs 6.15% (8/130), respectively (P = 0.06).ImplicationsOur study provides the evidence of a safe and effective use of edoxaban in this clinical setting, justified by no significant difference in major bleedings and thromboembolic events between edoxaban and well-controlled VKA treatments.

The prognostic value of soluble suppression of tumourigenicity 2 and galectin-3 for sinus rhythm maintenance after cardioversion due to persistent atrial fibrillation in patients with normal left ventricular systolic function.

Soluble suppression of tumourigenicity 2 (sST2) and galectin-3 are involved in cardiac fibrosis, inflammation, and remodelling. However, the place of sST2 and galectin-3 in predicting the outcomes of electrical cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) is uncertain. We evaluated whether these biomarkers could predict sinus rhythm (SR) maintenance after cardioversion of persistent AF in patients with normal left ventricular systolic function. The study included 80 patients with persistent AF, who underwent cardioversion from February 2016 to August 2018. The blood concentrations of sST-2 and galectin-3 were measured with ELISA and the ASPECT-PLUS assays. Clinical and electrocardiographic follow-up was performed at months 1, 6, and 12. Patients who maintained SR at 12 months had significantly lower concentrations of sST2, measured by ELISA and ASPECT-PLUS assays, than the remaining patients (16.9 ± 9.8 vs. 28 ± 22.9 ng/mL; P < 0.001; 28.7 ± 13.4 vs. 40 ± 25.1 ng/mL; P = 0.003); the concentration of galectin-3 did not differ between these patients. Multivariable logistic regression showed that log-transformed sST2 ELISA was a significant predictor of SR maintenance at 12 months [odds ratio 0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.03-0.58; P = 0.006]. On receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis, the areas under the curve for the concentration of sST2 was 0.752 (95% CI 0.634-0.870; P < 0.001). The concentrations of sST2 measured with the two assays were strongly correlated (rho = 0.8; CI 95% 0.7-0.87; P = 0.001). Soluble suppression of tumourigenicity 2, but not galectin-3, can be used to predict SR maintenance after cardioversion of AF in patients with normal left ventricular systolic function. The measurements of sST2 concentrations with the rapid lateral flow and enzyme-linked immunoassays were consistent.

CHA2DS2VASC Score and CHADS2 Score Similarly Predict the Risk for Left Atrial Thrombus in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation

Background: The present study was to evaluate the value of CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASC scores on predicting left atrial (LA) or left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombus in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients prior to ablation. Methods and results: A total of 397 patients with nonvalvular AF were analyzed to determine the relationship between CHADS2 and CHA2DS2VASC scores and LA/LAA thrombus identified on transesophageal echocardiography prior to ablation. LA/LAA thrombus was present in 38 patients (9.6%). There was a strong association between CHADS2 score or CHA2DS2VASC score and LA/LAA thrombus. No thrombus was identified in patients with CHA2DS2VASC score of 0 regardless of anticoagulation status. However, LA/LAA thrombus was detected in 2.9% patients with CHADS2 score of 0 without adequate anticoagulation, while no thrombus was present in the patients with CHADS2 score of 0 with adequate anticoagulation. Univariate analysis showed that heart failure (LVEF50%), LA ≥ 40 mm, diabetes mellitus, previous stroke or TIA, CAD, hypertension, inadequate coumadin therapy, CHADS2 score of ≥ 2 and CHA2DS2VASC score of ≥ 2 were significantly associated with LA/LAA thrombus. Multivariable Cox regression analysis demonstrated that CHA2DS2VASC score of ≥ 2 (p=0.02) and previous stroke or TIA (p=0.04) were independently associated with LA/LAA thrombus regardless of anticoagulation status. ROC curve analysis showed that CHADS2 score and CHA2DS2VASC score could be similarly used to predict the presence of LA thrombus. Conclusion: Both CHA2DS2VASC and CHADS2 scores were associated with LA/LAA thrombus in non-valvular AF patients. Although CHA2DS2VASC score and CHADS2 score had similar value to predict LA/LAA thrombus, CHA2DS2VASc score was better to identify low-risk patients for LA/LAA thrombus than CHADS2 score without anticoagulation. It seemed safe to perform AF ablation or cardio version in AF patients with a CHA2DS2VASC of 0 without TEE or anticoagulation therapy.

Outcomes After Cardioversion in Atrial Fibrillation Patients Treated with Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants (NOACs): Insights from a Meta-Analysis

There are limited data on outcomes following cardioversion in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients treated with non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs). A meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs in patients with AF undergoing cardioversion. PubMed, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL databases were searched from January 1, 2001 through to October 30, 2014. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing NOACs (apixaban, rivaroxaban and dabigatran) with warfarin in AF patients undergoing cardioversion were selected. The primary efficacy outcome was stroke and systemic embolism, and the primary safety outcome was major or clinically relevant non-major (CRNM) bleeding. We used random-effects models. Four RCTs were included, involving a total of 3635 randomized participants who underwent a total of 4257 cardioversions. A total of 12 events of stroke and systemic embolism were found in the NOAC group and ten events in the warfarin group [odds ratio (OR) 0.73, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.31-1.72]. Risk of major or CRNM bleeding was not different with NOACs, when compared with warfarin (OR 1.41, 95% CI 0.87-2.28). Data from patients enrolled in RCTs, showed that NOACs are effective and safe for AF patients undergoing cardioversion.

Low efficacy of cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator

AimsAtrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure are conditions that often coexist. Consequently, many patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) present with AF. We evaluated the effectiveness of internal cardioversion of AF in patients with an ICD.MethodsRetrospectively, we included 27 consecutive ICD patients with persistent AF who underwent internal cardioversion using the ICD. When ICD cardioversion failed, external cardioversion was performed.ResultsPatients were predominantly male (89 %) with a mean (SD) age of 65 ± 9 years and left ventricular ejection fraction of 36 ± 17 %. Only nine (33 %) patients had successful internal cardioversion after one, two or three shocks. The remaining 18 patients underwent external cardioversion after they failed internal cardioversion, which resulted in sinus rhythm in all. A smaller left atrial volume (99 ± 36 ml vs. 146 ± 44 ml; p = 0.019), a longer right atrial cycle length (227 (186–255) vs. 169 (152–183) ms, p = 0.030), a shorter total AF history (2 (0–17) months vs. 40 (5–75) months, p = 0.025) and dual-coil ICD shock (75 % vs. 26 %, p = 0.093) were associated with successful ICD cardioversion.ConclusionInternal cardioversion of AF in ICD patients has a low success rate but may be attempted in those with small atria, a long right atrial fibrillatory cycle length and a short total AF history, especially when a dual-coil ICD is present. Otherwise, it seems reasonable to prefer external over internal cardioversion when it comes to termination of persistent AF.

Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (Compilation of 2006 ACCF/AHA/ESC and 2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Recommendations)

This document is a compilation of the current American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association (ACCF/AHA) practice guideline recommendations for atrial fibrillation (AF) from the “ACC/AHA/ESC 2006 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation),”* the “2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update on the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (Updating the 2006 Guideline)”† and the “2011 ACCF/AHA/HRS Focused Update on the Management of Patients With Atrial Fibrillation (Update on Dabigatran).”‡ Updated and new recommendations from 2011 are noted and outdated recommendations have been removed. No new evidence was reviewed, and no recommendations included herein are original to this document. The ACCF/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines chooses to republish the recommendations in this format to provide the complete set of practice guideline recommendations in a single resource. ### 1.1. Pharmacological and Nonpharmacological Therapeutic Options #### 1.1.1. Rate Control During AF Class I 1. Measurement of the heart rate at rest and control of the rate using …

Cost Effectiveness of Antiarrhythmic Medications in Patients Suffering from Atrial Fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF), a supraventricular tachycardia disorder, is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia affecting 1-2% of the general population. Prevalence is highly related to age, with every fourth individual older than 40years old developing AF during his lifetime. Due to an aging population, the prevalence of AF is estimated to at least double within the next 50years. This article presents AF-related cost-of-illness studies and reviews 19 cost-effectiveness studies and six cost studies published roughly over the past decade, which have compared different antiarrhythmic medications for AF. A systematic literature search for studies published between June 2000 and December 2011 was conducted in PubMed using the combination of keywords ((atrial fibrillation OR atrial flutter) AND cost). Current cost-effectiveness analyses of dronedarone and the pill-in-the-pocket strategy are subject to substantial uncertainties with regard to clinical benefit. Comparing rate control with rhythm control, a cost-effectiveness advantage for rate control was shown in several but not all studies. Within antiarrhythmic drug treatments, magnesium added onto ibutilide was shown to be more cost effective than ibutilide alone. Comparing chemical and electrical cardioversion, the latter was recommended as more cost effective from the healthcare system perspective in all reviewed studies but one. Catheter ablation appeared more cost effective than antiarrhythmic drugs in the medium to long run after 3.2-63.9years. Admissions to hospital, inpatient care and interventional procedures as well as mortality benefit are key drivers for the cost effectiveness of AF medications. No clear cost-effectiveness advantage emerged for one specific antiarrhythmic drug from the studies that compared antiarrhythmic agents. Rate control as well as catheter ablation appear more cost effective than rhythm control in the treatment of AF. Rate control treatment also seems more cost effective than electrical cardioversion in AF patients.

Combination of Irbesartan and Amiodarone to Maintain Sinus Rhythm in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation After Rheumatic Valve Replacement

Atrial fibrillation (AF) after rheumatic valve replacement is the most common arrhythmic complication. Previous studies reported angiotensin-II receptor blocker can prevent AF. This study aimed to assess the effect of a combination of irbesartan and amiodarone on the maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion of AF in patients with post-rheumatic valve replacement in a randomized, controlled trial. Eighty-five consecutive patients undergoing rheumatic valve surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to an irbesartan plus amiodarone (irbesartan 150 mg/d, n=43) or an amiodarone group (n=42) starting 10 days before scheduled electrical cardioversion. The primary end-point was recurrence of AF. Pharmacological conversion was documented in 7 patients, and electrical conversion in 68 patients (87.2%). A higher rate of maintenance of sinus rhythm (69.8% vs 40.5%, P=0.01) and a better AF-free survival (chi(2)=7.466, P=0.006) were observed in the irbesartan plus amiodarone group compared to the amiodarone group during the 1-year follow-up period. Cox regression showed that use of irbesartan was an independent factor associated with the maintenance of sinus rhythm after cardioversion (OR=0.43, P=0.018), whereas increased left atrium diameter was associated with increased risk (OR=1.54, P=0.005). In patients with post-rheumatic valve replacement, the combination of amiodarone and irbesartan demonstrated a lower rate of AF recurrence after cardioversion than amiodarone alone, which might be due to preventing the atrial remodeling.

The Potential of D-dimer Levels as a Useful Clinical Marker of Clotting State after the Return of Sinus Rhythm

Fibrin D-dimers levels have been advocated as a useful clinical marker of thrombogenesis. It is accepted that patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) are characterized by increased levels of plasmatic d-dimers. AF is a high risk factor for hypercoagulability, with a substantial risk of thromboembolism. The most effective way of minimizing the increased thromboembolic risk and treating patients' symptoms is to return the heart rhythm to sinus rhythm by electrical or chemical cardioversion. However, cardioversion of AF itself leads to a further increased risk of thromboembolism. A marker of coagulation activation would be useful to identify patients at the highest thromboembolic risk after cardioversion in AF patients. Indicators of hypercoagulability, such as d-dimers, appear to be a useful parameter for assessing the degree of hypercoagulability of AF patients after cardioversion. Mean changes in plasma d-dimers levels could be used as a useful clinical marker of the clotting state after the return of atrial systole.

No Benefit of TEE Guidance in Patients Receiving Effective Anticoagulation Before Cardioversion of AF

Current guidelines recommend that patients receive warfarin for 3-4 weeks before and after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation (AF). Anticoagulation guided by transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been shown to be a viable alternative for cardioversion in AF patients with short-term or no anticoagulation. But how useful is the TEE-guided approach in AF patients who are receiving effective anticoagulation (INR, 2-3) …