Objective: Vascular stiffness is considered to be a reliable marker of cardiovascular risk. Gold standard method of the arterial stiffness assessment – applanation tonometry - is technically complicated, observer-related; measurements are blood pressure (BP) dependent, thus, novel techniques are now under discussion, the cardio-ankle vascular index (CAVI) in particular. Application of accepted cut-off value of 9,0 can lead to misestimation of age-related differences. The aim of our study was to estimate cut-off values for CAVI in different age-groups of Russian population. Design and method: 1336 apparently healthy participants aged 25–65 years were randomly selected from Saint-Petersburg inhabitants (a sample form ESSE-RF study). All participants signed informed consent and filled in the questionnaire regarding risk factors, concomitant diseases and therapy. Fasting lipids, glucose (Abbott Architect 8000 (USA)) and BP measurement were performed. From whole cohort a group of healthy subjects (288) without CVD, dyslipidemia, hypertension and diabetes mellitus was selected. CAVI was measured by VaSera VS-1500 (Fukuda, Japan). Results: In our sample 175 of patients (13%) had CAVI value higher than accepted cut-off 9,0. Calculated regression equation CAVI = 5,29 + age*0,047 we transformed to CAVI = 6,70 + 0,047*age for including of 13% of pathological cases (87% percentile) in every age group. The cut-off values of CAVI for different age groups in healthy subjects in total population-based sample were calculated (Table 1).Conclusions: Application of CAVI cut-off values according to age groups may promote to more precise detection of subclinical vascular damage – to prevent underestimation in younger age and overestimation in older age groups.
Read full abstract