Cardiac Natriuretic Hormones Research Articles

Pathophysiological and clinical relevance of circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic hormones: are they merely markers of cardiac disease?

Several specific and sensitive markers for myocardial injury as well as diagnostic tests for the assessment and stratification of cardiovascular risk have been recently introduced in clinical laboratories. However, until a few years ago, there were no laboratory tests for diagnosis, stratification and follow-up of patients with heart failure. The assay for cardiac natriuretic hormones (CNH) fills this gap. Heart failure is not only the most frequent "final common pathway" in cardiovascular disease, but is also the most common primary hospital discharge diagnosis, as well as the most common cause of death in patients over 50 years of age in Western countries; therefore, CNH assay may be destined to assume a growing relevance in clinical cardiology. However, to consider CNH assay only as a general and functional indicator of cardiac structural disease, without recalling that atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are powerful hormones, may lead to underestimation of the physiological role they play in healthy subjects as well as in patients with heart failure. Indeed, the circulating levels of CNH should be always interpreted taking into account not only hemodynamic factors and myocardial performance, but also their relationship with the counter-regulatory neuroendocrine system (including renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, sympathetic system, endothelins, cytokines and vasopressin), as well as other hormones (such as sex steroid hormones, thyroid hormones and glucocorticoids).

The circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic hormones in healthy adults: effects of age and sex.

In order to study the relationships between sex hormones, aging, and circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic peptides and to define reference values for atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) assays, we measured the plasma levels of cardiac natriuretic peptides in a large group of healthy adults divided according to age and sex. We studied 216 healthy subjects of both sexes (109 men and 107 women) with age ranging from 20 to 77 years (mean 43.2+/-14.8 years). All subjects were non-obese and had normal arterial blood pressure; they were free from acute diseases, including asymptomatic heart disease. Highly sensitive and specific IRMA methods were used to measure plasma ANP and BNP. The mean ANP value in healthy adult subjects of both sexes was 17.8+/-10.9 pg/ml with no significant difference between men (16.7+/-10.0 pg/ml) and women (18.8+/-11.7 pg/ml). The mean BNP value in healthy adult subjects of both sexes was 9.9+/-9.0 pg/ml with a significant difference (p<0.0001) between men (7.7+/-7.1 pg/ml) and women (12.2+/-10.2 pg/ml). There was a weak linear relationship between age and either ANP (r=0.350, p<0.0001) or BNP (r=0.254, p=0.0002) values. When the circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic hormones, and age and sex were analyzed by multiple stepwise regression analysis, both age and sex significantly and independently contributed to the regression. Our study indicates independent positive effects of aging and female sex hormones on ANP and BNP levels in healthy adult subjects. These effects should be taken into account in the calculation of appropriate reference values for cardiac natriuretic hormones.

Increase in circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic peptides after hormone replacement therapy in postmenopausal women

The mechanisms that mediate the cardioprotective action of steroid hormones in postmenopausal women are poorly understood. To study the inter-relationship between female steroid hormones and cardiac natriuretic peptides, plasma levels of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured in postmenopausal women, both before and after oestrogen replacement therapy. A total of 22 healthy postmenopausal women (mean age 51.9+/-4.6 years) were enrolled in the study; all had been postmenopausal for at least 1 year and all reported climacteric symptoms accompanied by increased levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (>30 m-i.u./ml) and luteinizing hormone (>20 m-i.u./ml), and a reduction in oestradiol (<25 pg/ml). All women were given hormone replacement therapy with transdermal oestradiol, either patch (50 microg/24 h) or gel (1 mg/day), cyclically combined with oral dihydrogesterone (10 mg/day for 12 days/month, on days 19-30 of the month). ANP and BNP were measured directly in plasma samples with specific and sensitive immunoradiometric assays before and after hormone replacement therapy (transdermal oestradiol combined with oral dihydrogesterone). Body weight, arterial blood pressure and echocardiographic examination values did not change after hormone replacement therapy. As expected, serum oestradiol increased significantly and gonadotropins decreased as an effect of the hormone replacement therapy. On average, both ANP and BNP had increased significantly after 3 months of hormone replacement therapy [ANP: before treatment, 17.6+/-9.6 pg/ml; after, 23.6+/-5.6 pg/ml (P=0.0173); BNP: before treatment, 12.6+/-10.2 pg/ml; after, 19.8+/-14.0 pg/ml (P<0.0001)]. Our study indicates that hormone replacement therapy for a period of 3 months induces a rise in the circulating levels of cardiac natriuretic hormones in postmenopausal women. Our data also suggest the working hypothesis that cardiac natriuretic peptides may play an important role in mediating the cardioprotective effects of female steroid sex hormones in women throughout life.

Diagnostic potential of cardiac natriuretic peptides in dialysis patients

In the general population, the plasma concentrations of atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP) and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) are useful to predict left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH) and LV systolic dysfunction. Whether these cardiac hormones have a similar diagnostic potential in dialysis patients is unknown. We studied the diagnostic value of ANP and BNP for alterations in LV mass and function in a cohort of 246 dialysis patients without clinical evidence of heart failure. Both ANP and BNP were independently related to left ventricular mass (P < 0.0001) as well as to ejection fraction (P < 0.0001). In an analysis based on a prospectively defined threshold (95th percentile of the normal range), BNP had a significantly higher (P < 0.01) sensitivity (88%) than ANP (51%) for the diagnosis of LVH, but the positive predictive value of the two peptides was very similar (92 and 87%, respectively, P = NS). However, the negative predictive value of BNP for excluding LVH was 22% higher than that of ANP (53 vs. 31%, P = 0.05). Both natriuretic peptides had a high sensitivity for the detection of LV dysfunction (87 and 94%), but their positive predictive value was low (25 and 15%). Importantly, both ANP and BNP proved to be very useful for excluding this alteration (negative predictive value 97 and 96%, respectively). An analysis based on the "best cut-offs" of each peptide as identified on the basis of the ROC curves augmented the positive and negative prediction values of BNP for the diagnosis of LVH to 95 and 61%, respectively. This approach also raised the BNP-positive prediction value for the identification of LV dysfunction to 31% but did not modify the diagnostic potential of ANP (either for LVH or for LV dysfunction). Measuring the plasma concentration of cardiac natriuretic hormones, particularly BNP, may be useful for the identification of dialysis patients with LVH or for excluding systolic dysfunction.

Measurement of Cardiac Natriuretic Hormones (Atrial Natriuretic Peptide, Brain Natriuretic Peptide, and Related Peptides) in Clinical Practice: The Need for a New Generation of Immunoassay Methods

Cardiac natriuretic hormones (CNHs) are a family of related peptides, including atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), brain natriuretic peptide (BNP), and other peptides derived from the N-terminal portion of the proANP and proBNP peptide chains. Assays for cardiac natriuretic peptides have been proposed to help assess clinical conditions associated with expanded fluid volume. In particular, the assays can be useful for distinguishing healthy subjects from patients in different stages of heart failure. Measurements of these hormones have also been considered for prognostic indicators of long-term survival in patients with heart failure and/or after acute myocardial infarction. The different CNHs differ in their production/secretion patterns and have different clearance rates. Furthermore, there are numerous proposed assay configurations for each of these hormones, and it is not clear which assay provides the best pathophysiological and/or clinical information. Here we review recent studies concerning the competitive (such as RIA, enzyme immunoassay, or luminescence immunoassay) and noncompetitive immunoassays (such as two-site IRMA, ELISA, or immunoluminometric assay) for the different cardiac natriuretic peptides to compare the analytical characteristics and clinical relevance of assays for the different CNHs and the different assay formats. Developing sensitive, precise, and accurate immunoassays for cardiac natriuretic peptides has been difficult because of their low concentrations (on average, approximately 3-6 pmol/L) in healthy subjects and because of their structural, metabolic, and physiological characteristics. Competitive assays have historically suffered from lack of sensitivity and specificity for the biologically active peptides. These usually require tedious extraction procedures prior to analysis. Recently, immunometric assays have been developed that have improved sensitivity and specificity; it appears these will be the methods of choice. To date, there is no consensus on the best assay procedure of cardiac natriuretic peptides. To facilitate widespread propagation of determination of these hormones in routine clinical practice, it will be necessary to study the new generation of noncompetitive immunometric methods that are less time-consuming and more sensitive and specific. Although several studies suggest that BNP exhibits better clinical utility than the other CNHs, more studies examining multiple CNHs in the same cohorts of patients will be necessary.

Turnover studies on cardiac natriuretic peptides: methodological, pathophysiological and therapeutical considerations.

Cardiac natriuretic peptide hormones (ANP and BNP) are synthesized and secreted by the heart, producing several biological effects, such as natriuresis, vasorelaxation, hypotension, and neuromodulation. Extensive studies conducted in both animals and humans have documented that cardiac natriuretic peptides (CNPs) are secreted into the circulatory system via the coronary sinus into the right atrium, and then rapidly degraded and removed from the blood by plasma proteases and specific clearance receptors. Usually, studies of CNPs kinetics have been carried out following an experimental protocol in which labeled or unlabeled hormone is administered (by constant infusion or bolus injection) and the corresponding concentration of the hormone is measured in peripheral venous blood. However, when a uniform intravascular concentration throughout artero-venous vessels is lacking due to the very rapid clearance of the substance being studied (such as CNPs), the classical compartmental or none compartmental approach may not be suitable for interpreting the experimental data. In this case, a more physiological circulatory model, which does not assume a uniform intravascular distribution of the hormone and comprises several anatomo-functional blocks arranged in a series and supplied by the same flow (cardiac output) should be adopted. Different experimental designs (infusion or bolus injection) as well as multiple sampling sites (aorta and pulmonary artery, inferior vena cava, femoral vein) were used in ANP kinetic studies. Using a circulatory approach, ANP has been demonstrated to be rapidly distributed and degraded; in healthy subjects about 50% of ANP secreted into the right atrium is extracted by the peripheral tissues during the first pass throughout the body. Since CNPs have important fluid-volume regulatory features, it has been postulated that they also play a key role in volume homeostasis in several pathophysiological states, such as congestive heart failure. Indeed, a markedly altered degradation and distribution of ANP in patients with cardiac failure who show a resistance to its natriuretic effects, even in those on the early stage of clinical disease, whose CNPs plasma levels are in the normal range, have been demonstrated. Recent studies indicate that some drugs, by inhibiting the degradation of CNPs by plasma proteases and can thus affect CNP kinetics, may be useful in the treatment of arterial hypertension and cardiac failure.

Natriuretic peptides inhibit angiotensin II-induced proliferation of rat cardiac fibroblasts by blocking endothelin-1 gene expression.

The present study was aimed to test the role of endothelin-1 (ET-1) as a possible autocrine/paracrine growth factor for cardiac fibroblasts, and to examine its interaction with cardiac natriuretic hormones. Expression of preproET-1 (ppET-1) mRNA by cultured cardiac fibroblasts from neonatal rats was demonstrated by Northern blot analysis using cDNA for rat ppET-1 as a probe. Angiotensin II (ANG II) and ET-1 transiently (30 min) increased steady-state ppET-1 mRNA levels in cardiac fibroblasts. Both ET-1 and ANG II significantly stimulated [3H] thymidine incorporation into cardiac fibroblasts, whose effects were dose-dependently inhibited by an ETA receptor antagonist (BQ123), BQ123 also inhibited both ET-1- and ANG II-induced ppET-1 mRNA expression. Both atrial and brain natriuretic peptides (ANP, BNP), which activate particulate guanylate cyclase, inhibited ppET-1 mRNA expression and [3H]thymidine incorporation stimulated by ANG II and ET-1. Sodium nitroprusside, a soluble guanylate cyclase activator, and 8-bromocyclic GMP, a membrane-permeable cGMP derivative, similarly inhibited ppET-1 mRNA expression and [3H]-thymidine incorporation. BNP was more potent than ANP to inhibit ANG II- and ET-1-stimulated DNA synthesis, whereas BNP and ANP were almost equipotent in stimulating cGMP generation in cardiac fibroblasts. Our data demonstrated that ANG II and ET-1 upregulate ET-1 gene expression in rat cardiac fibroblasts partly via cyclic GMP-dependent mechanism, and that natriuretic peptides inhibit ANG II-stimulated proliferation of cardiac fibroblasts, possibly by inhibiting ET-1 gene expression. Our data suggest the possible role of endogenous ET-1 as an autocrine/paracrine growth factor for cardiac fibroblasts and its close interaction with natriuretic peptides in the regulation of cardiac fibrosis.

Detection of left ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: comparison of clinical, echocardiographic, and neurohormonal methods.

The SAVE study showed that captopril improves mortality in patients with left ventricular dysfunction after myocardial infarction and that this benefit occurred even in patients with no clinically overt heart failure. On the basis of this, it seems important to identify correctly which patients have left ventricular dysfunction after a myocardial infarction. The objective was to compare various methods of identifying patients with left ventricular dysfunction (left ventricular ejection fraction, LVEF, < or = 40%) after acute myocardial infarction. The methods compared were echocardiography (quantitative and qualitative visual assessment), clinical evaluation (subjective assessment and three clinical score methods), and measurement of plasma concentrations of cardiac natriuretic peptide hormones (atrial and brain natriuretic peptides, ANP and BNP). Cross sectional study of left ventricular function in patients two to eight days after acute myocardial infarction. Coronary care unit of a teaching hospital. 75 survivors of a recent myocardial infarction aged 40 to 88 with no history of cardiac failure and without cardiogenic shock at the time of entry to the study. Sensitivities and specificities of the various methods of detecting left ventricular dysfunction were calculated by comparing them with a cross sectional echocardiographic algorithm for LVEF. Clinical impression was poor at identifying LVEF < 40% (sensitivity 46%). Clinical scoring improved this figure somewhat (modified Peel index sensitivity 64%). Qualitative visual assessment echocardiography was a more sensitive method (sensitivity 82%) for detecting LVEF < 40%. Plasma BNP concentration was also a sensitive measure for detecting left ventricular dysfunction (sensitivity 84%) but plasma ANP concentration was much poorer (sensitivity 64%). Left ventricular dysfunction is easily and reliably detected by echocardiographic measurement of LVEF and also by a quick qualitative echocardiographic assessment but is likely to be missed by clinical assessment alone. High concentrations of plasma BNP maybe another useful indicator of left ventricular dysfunction, particularly in hospitals where not all patients can be screened by echocardiography or radionuclide ventriculography after myocardial infarction.