Cardiac Life Support Course Research Articles

Realistic simulation and medical students' performance in the Advanced Cardiac Life Support course: a comparative study.

Clinical practice has benefited from new methodologies such as realistic simulation (RS). RS involves recreating lifelike scenarios to more accurately reflect real clinical practice, enhancing learners' skills and decision-making within controlled environments, and experiencing remarkable growth in medical education. However, RS requires substantial financial investments and infrastructure. Hence, it is essential to determine the effectiveness of RS in the development of skills among medical students, which will improve the allocation of resources while optimizing learning. This cross-sectional study was carried out in the simulation laboratory of a medical school, and the performance of students who underwent two different curriculum matrices (without RS and with RS, from 2021 to 2022) in the Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course was compared. This test was chosen considering that the competencies involved in cardiac life support are essential, regardless of the medical specialty, and that ACLS is a set of life-saving protocols used worldwide. We observed that the impact of RS can be different for practical abilities when compared with the theoretical ones. There was no correlation between the general academic performance and students' grades reflecting the RS impact. We conclude that RS leads to less remediation and increased competence in practical skills. RS is an important learning strategy that allows repeating, reviewing, and discussing clinical practices without exposing the patient to risks.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Realistic simulation (RS) positively affected the performance of the students differently; it had more influence on practical abilities than theoretical knowledge. No correlation between the general academic performance and grades of the students without RS or with RS was found, providing evidence that RS is an important tool in Advanced Cardiac Life Support education.

Title evaluation of the cardiac advanced life support (CALS) course

Title evaluation of the cardiac advanced life support (CALS) course

Knowledge of pulse oximetry among emergency and critical care nurses.

The pulse oximeter is a simple, cost-effective and reliable device for estimating arterial blood oxygen saturation. Nurses are required to be knowledgeable in pulse oximeter use. Little is known about nurses' knowledge of pulse oximetry in the Middle East region. To assess nurses' knowledge of pulse oximetry among emergency and critical care nurses and to explore predictors of nurses' knowledge of pulse oximetry. This is the second part of data analysis that was first presented in the 'proficiency in ECG' study conducted in Jordan. The original data used for both parts of analysis included a questionnaire with two tests; a knowledge of pulse oximeter test and an ECG proficiency test. Participants were asked to take, alone without receiving assistance, both tests. In this study, the second part of analysis, the focus is on the pulse oximeter test. The test consisted of 21 items that emphasize knowledge of basic physiological principles as well as device limitations; whether technical or interpretation. The test administration procedure also included asking participants to provide socio-demographic variables. In the original data collected in both parts of analysis, nurses working in the emergency department, cardiac care units or intensive care units from nine different hospitals (1 governmental, 6 private and 2 educational) and holding a bachelor degree or higher were asked to participate. The total number of participating nurses was 210; out of 247 approached (response rate, 85%). The mean score in the nurses' knowledge of pulse oximetry test was 12.33 out of 21, corresponding to 58.7%. The clinical area currently working in predicted the knowledge of pulse oximetry test score after controlling for all other variables. Emergency department and intensive care unit nurses scored higher than cardiac care unit nurses by 1.86 and 1.63 points respectively (58.2% and 60% respectively). Nurses consistently report inadequate education and training concerning pulse oximeter use and interpretation. A revision to hospital in-service education seminars and undergraduate nurses' curriculum to assure adequate preparation is needed. Knowledge of pulse oximetry among emergency and critical care nurses is modest. This is a challenge worldwide. Predictors of nurses' knowledge of pulse oximetery are the clinical area currently working in (ICU and ED nurses are more knowledgeable than CCU nurses), proficiency in electrocardiography and taking an advanced cardiac life support course.

Resuscitation team training in Rwanda: A mixed method study exploring the combination of the VAST course with Advanced Cardiac Life Support training

IntroductionThe influence of non-technical skills training on resuscitation performance in low-resource settings is unknown. This study investigates combining the Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training Course with Advanced Cardiac Life Support training on resuscitation performance in Rwanda. MethodsParticipants in this mixed method study are members of resuscitation teams in three district hospitals in Rwanda. The intervention was participation in a 2-day Advanced Cardiac Life Support course followed by the 3-day Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training Course. Quantitative primary endpoints were time to initiation of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, time to epinephrine administration, and time to defibrillation. Qualitative data on workplace implementation were gathered during focus groups held 3-months post-intervention. ResultsForty-seven participants were recruited. Quantitative data showed a statistically significant decrease in time to cardiopulmonary resuscitation, epinephrine administration, and defibrillation from pre- to post-Advanced Cardiac Life Support, with times of [43.3 (49.7) seconds] versus [16.5 (20) sec], p = <0.001; [137.3 (108.9) sec] versus [51.3 (37.9)], p = <0.001; and [218.5 (105.8) sec] versus [110.8 (87.1) sec], p = <0.001; respectively. These improvements were maintained following the Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training Course, and at 3-month retention testing. Qualitative analysis highlighted five key themes: ability to initiate cardiopulmonary resuscitation; team coordination for task allocation; empowerment; desire for training and mentorship; and advocacy for system improvement. ConclusionA modified 2-day Advanced Cardiac Life Support course improved resuscitation time indicators with retention 3-months later. Combining the Vital Anaesthesia Simulation Training Course and Advanced Cardiac Life Support led to better team coordination, empowerment to act, and advocacy for system improvement. This pairing of courses has promise for improving Advanced Cardiac Life Support skills amongst healthcare workers in low-resource settings.ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05278884.

Electrocardiogram Interpretation Competency of Medical Interns in Saudi Arabia: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Objective To determine the competence of medical interns in Saudi Arabia in interpreting common ECG abnormalities, explore limitations, and facilitate solutions to the development of ECG interpretation skills in Saudi Arabia. Methods This cross-sectional study was conducted from 11 June 2022 to 3 November 2022 using the convenience stratified sampling technique among 373medical interns (54.4% male and 45.6% female) in 15 medical colleges within Saudi Arabia. Results Almost all (91.7%) of the participants recognized the basic ECG elements, as they correctly identified normal ECG patterns. The mostwell-understood ECG pathologies were ventricular fibrillation, atrial fibrillation, and acute myocardial infarction, which were accurately interpreted by 69.2%, 67.8%, and 61.9% of the participants, respectively. The least understood ECG result was a pathological Q wave, which only 20.9% recognized. Most (63.5%) participants attributed their challenges in ECG interpretation to their inadequate training in college, and 57.4% of them stated that practical case-based training could best facilitate the improvement of their skills in ECG interpretation. Conclusion Most of the participants showed unsatisfactory performance in ECG interpretation. Despite their completion ofadvanced cardiac life support courses, their overall performance did not improve significantly. Most of them believed that their colleges did not adequately train them to read ECGs. Thus, a majority think case-based training is a key strategy for improving their ECG interpretation skills.

Advanced Cardiac Life Support instruction in the new norm: Evaluating the hybrid versus the traditional model

Introduction: Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course is one of the mandatory certifications for the majority of medical as well as some nursing professionals. There are, however, multiple variations in its instruction model worldwide. We aim to evaluate the efficacy of traditional ACLS course versus a hybrid ACLS course utilised during the COVID-19 pandemic. Methods: This retrospective study was carried out at SingHealth Duke-NUS Institute of Medical Simulation using course results of participants in the centre’s ACLS course between May to October 2019 for the traditional course were compared with participants attending the hybrid course from February to June 2021. Results: A total of 925 participants were recruited during the study period. Of these, 626 participants were from the traditional group and 299 participants were from the hybrid learning group. There is no statistically significant difference between the two group (χ2=1.02 p = 0.313) in terms of first pass attempts; first pass attempt at MCQ (p=0.805) and first pass attempt at practical stations (p=0.408). However, there was statistically significant difference between the mean difference in results of traditional vs hybrid MCQ score, -0.29 (95% CI: -0.57 to -0.01, p=0.0409). Finally, senior doctors were also found to perform better than junior doctors in both traditional (p=0.0235) and hybrid courses (p=0.0309) at the first pass attempt of ACLS certification. Conclusion: Participants in the hybrid ACLS course demonstrated at least equal overall proficiency in certification of ACLS as compared to the traditional instruction.

Promoting Nurses' Self-Efficacy in Advanced Cardiac Life Support Through High-Fidelity Simulation

Background Self-efficacy in resuscitation is influenced by various educational models, including high-fidelity simulation (HFS). Method Sixty-two nurses who were enrolled in an Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course using HFS were recruited for this pretest-posttest, quasi-experimental study. Self-efficacy was assessed three times-twice via the participants' self-report and once via the instructor's assessment-using the Resuscitation Self-Efficacy Scale (RSES). Results The four dimensions of self-efficacy-recognition, debriefing and recording, responding and rescuing, and reporting-improved after the HFS education (t = 4.89, SE = 1.84, p < .001, confidence interval [-12.7, -5.33]). The instructor's scoring was higher than the participants' scoring in two of the four dimensions. The score on the ACLS written examination was positively correlated with the posttest RSES score (r = 0.303, p = .017). Despite minimal variations between demographic subgroups, nurses who had never been involved in resuscitation exhibited a significant improvement in self-efficacy after the HFS ACLS education (t = 4.72, SE = 2.54, p < .001, confidence interval [-17.3, -6.7]). Conclusion Self-efficacy can be a core measurable outcome that gauges nurses' clinical competency concerning HFS education for ACLS. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2022;53(4):185-192.].

HISTORICAL SELECTION: Rosenberg MB. Simulation technology in anesthesiology. Anesth Prog. 2000;47(1):8-11.

HISTORICAL SELECTION: Rosenberg MB. Simulation technology in anesthesiology. Anesth Prog. 2000;47(1):8-11.

Innovative cardiac life support course - hybrid model: international medical university experience during the COVID pandemic

NA

Acil Servis Hekimlerinde Eğitimler ve Kursların Değerlendirilmesi

Objective: The aims of this research is to evaluate residency training and in-service courses through the eyes of emergency physicians. Method: This research is cross-sectional. A questionnaire was conducted with 202 of 248 physicians working in emergency departments in Adana city center between 01 July - 31 December 2016. The questionnaire included sociodemographic information of physicians, assessments of residency training offered, and taking courses. Descriptive analyzes and chi-square test were used in the study. Results: In our study, the rate of emergency physicians under the age of 30 was 27.7% and the rate of physicians with a career less than 10 years was 47% and 20,8% of the physicians stated that they received emergency medicine residency training in their institution. 69% of 42 physicians who received residency training stated that the training was good. In our study, 15.3% of the physicians did not participate in any course, while 80.2% of them considered themselves sufficient in cases of cardiopulmonary arrest. Conclusion: In our researh, it was found that the participation of the in-service courses related to cardiopulmonary resuscitation is high among emergency physicians. Those who take the advances cardiac life support course feel more sufficient in cases of cardiopulmonary arrest. Residency training has been evaluated as highly good.

E‐learning in advanced cardiac life support: Outcome and attitude among healthcare professionals

Background:Advanced cardiac life support provides healthcare professionals with knowledge and skills needed in dealing with cardiac emergencies. By incorporating e‐learning in advanced cardiac life support courses, it allows for easier accessibility of learning materials and a more personalized learning schedule at a lower overall cost.Objectives:This study aims to compare the outcome of e‐learning advanced cardiac life support versus conventional advanced cardiac life support among healthcare professionals and determine their attitude on e‐learning.Methods:A total of 96 candidates attending advanced cardiac life support courses in Hospital Universiti Sains Malaysia between January 2016 and May 2017 were included in the study. In total, 48 candidates were enrolled on each arm. Candidates in conventional advanced cardiac life support undertook a 2‐day face‐to‐face course. Participants in e‐learning advanced cardiac life support completed 6 h of online lecture videos prior to 1‐day modified face‐to‐face course. All candidates were assessed by pre‐ and post‐course multiple‐choice questions and practical cardiac arrest simulation test. Only post‐course and cardiac arrest simulation test marks contribute to the passing or failure of the candidates.Results:Candidates in e‐learning advanced cardiac life support courses had higher mean scores on the pre‐course multiple‐choice questions (69.1, SD: 19.1) compared to those in conventional advanced cardiac life support courses (58.6, SD: 16.6, p &lt; 0.001). The cardiac arrest simulation test pass rate on e‐learning advanced cardiac life support was higher than conventional advanced cardiac life support courses although statistically not significant (95.8% vs 87.5%; p = 0.134). The overall pass rate was 93.8% for e‐learning advanced cardiac life support versus 83.3% in conventional advanced cardiac life support (p = 0.099). A majority of the candidates had positive attitude towards e‐learning.Conclusion:E‐learning advanced cardiac life support courses demonstrated better results in terms of knowledge compared to conventional advanced cardiac life support, with equivalent skill scores. Shorter course duration, lesser cost and participants’ satisfaction were the added benefits. Further study can be done to explore the utilization of e‐learning materials among healthcare professionals and its other advantages.

An evaluation of manual tidal volume and respiratory rate delivery during simulated resuscitation.

Excessive minute ventilation during cardiac arrest may cause lung injury and decrease the effectiveness of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). However, little is known about how clinicians deliver tidal volumes and respiratory rates during CPR. In this cross-sectional study, licensed practitioners attending an American Heart Association (AHA) Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course performed CPR and manual ventilation on a high-fidelity simulator during the megacode portion of the course. Delivered tidal volumes and respiratory rates were measured on a monitor. During the first scenario, results were not displayed to participants, but were displayed during the second scenario. Fifty-two clinicians participated in this study. Average height was 169 (157,178) cm. Pre-monitor display tidal volumes delivered were larger in male participants compared to female participants (684.6±134.4 vs 586.7±167.6ml, P=0.05). Those using medium-sized gloves delivered smaller tidal volumes than those using small or large gloves. Twenty-two (42.3%) delivered tidal volume in the range of 5-8ml/kg of predicted body weight for the simulation manikin, and 35 (67.3%) delivered tidal volumes with >20% variability among breaths. All participants met the target respiratory rate around 10 breaths/min. Tidal volume delivery varied greatly during manual ventilation and fewer than half participants delivered tidal volume at 5-8ml/kg to the manikin. Sex and glove size appeared to impact tidal volume delivery when the participants were unaware of what they were delivering. Participants were able to meet the target respiratory rate around 10 without audio or visual feedback.

Electrocardiogram Interpretation Competency Among Paramedic Students.

BackgroundElectrocardiography is an essential emergency tool used in the pre-hospital setting. However, no studies have yet assessed electrocardiogram (ECG) interpretation among emergency medical services (EMS) students in Saudi Arabia. This study aimed to determine the ECG interpretation competency of paramedic students.MethodologyCross-sectional, single-center study, a pre-validated, self-administered, two-part questionnaire first created by Coll-Badell et al was used to assess the ECG interpretation competency of paramedic students at Prince Sultan College for Emergency Medical Services (PSCEMS) in King Saud University. Participant data were collected and analyzed to identify factors associated with improved competency.ResultsAll students of PSCEMS were included, and 137 of 248 paramedic students completed the questionnaire (55% response rate); 88 students (64.2%) scored >7.5 points, indicating competency in (ECG) interpretation. Factors such as grade point average (GPA) (>3.5) and enrollment in cardiology and advanced cardiac life support courses were found to be significantly associated with competency (p<0.001).ConclusionThe majority of paramedic students were found to be competent in ECG interpretation. GPA and enrollment in cardiology and advanced cardiac life support courses were significantly associated with improved competency.

Evaluation of manual chest compressions according to the updated cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines and the impact of feedback devices in an educational resuscitation course

BackgroundThe cardiopulmonary resuscitation guidelines revised in 2015 recommend target chest compression rate (CCR) and chest compression depth (CCD) of 100–120 compressions per minute (cpm) and 5–6 cm, respectively. We hypothesized that the new guidelines are harder to comply with, even with proper feedback.MethodsThis prospective observational study using data collected from the participants of an Immediate Cardiac Life Support course included the evaluation of chest compressions using performance data from a feedback device after the completion of the course. Participants completed chest compressions for 1 min and were provided with feedback, after which they performed another cycle of CC. Primary outcome measures were CCR and CCD as well as the correct CCR percentage and CCD percentage for pre and post feedback.ResultsThe study included a total of 88 participants. The median pre-CCR was 112.5 cpm (interquartile range [IQR] 108–116 cpm), and the median correct pre-CCR percentage was 96% (IQR 82.5–99.5%). After the feedback, there was a slight increase in the correct CCR percentage (99% [IQR 92.5–100%]). Conversely, the median pre-CCD was 5.4 cm (IQR 4.9–5.8 cm), and the median pre-correct CCD percentage was 66% (IQR 18.5–90%). The increase in the median post-correct CCD percentage to 72% (IQR 27–94%) observed after the feedback was not statistically significant (P = 0.361).ConclusionsCompliance with the new guidelines for chest compressions, especially those regarding the CCD, might be difficult. However, whether the changes in guidelines affect outcomes in actual clinical settings is uncertain and requires further investigation.

Validation Study on Immediate Cardiac Life Support Course for Primary Clinical Intern using Paper Participant Survey developed for Off-the-job-trainings

Validation Study on Immediate Cardiac Life Support Course for Primary Clinical Intern using Paper Participant Survey developed for Off-the-job-trainings

Abstract 462: Medical Emergency Team Replaces Code Blue Activations at Pediatric Hospital

Introduction: In free-standing pediatric hospitals, the Code Blue team may be activated for events in adults to provide triage, resuscitation, medical screening exams, EMTALA documentation and disposition decisions. However, activation of the Code Blue team can require significant time and critical care resources and may delay patient care if the activation is external to the building. Hypothesis: Development of a small triage team focused on specific adult triage algorithms will provide a safe, effective and efficient alternative to Code Blue team response. Methods: 407 bed tertiary pediatric hospital, within metropolitan area. Collaborative multi-disciplinary QI process to design and simulate the roles, workflow and documentation of the Medical Emergency Team (MET). Education and communication to hospital-wide staff on MET, as well as MET responders completion of Advanced Cardiac Life Support course. Collaboration with local EMS leadership to coordinate transfer of patient was also undertaken. Results: MET roles were developed and two configurations of the MET team were implemented July 2018: one inside the footprint of the building and anther outside the footprint of the building, including the hospital grounds. The teams consisted of a mid-level provider, charge nurse, two security officers and a shift administrator: inside team relied on ICU provider and charge nurse, while outside team led by Emergency Medicine provider and charge nurse. Each team had a backpack with supplies, and transport gurney. Since inception, 199 activations occurred, 191 inside and 8 outside the facility. The activations included 45 staff or volunteers, 84 adult visitors, 75 pediatric visitors. Outcome for the activations: 57 transported to the hospital ED, 47 transported to another facility, 21 refused treatment and 68 had resolution of concerns. EMTALA documentation was complete in 112/137 (82%). Conclusions: Pediatric hospitals have substantial adult populations, where medical emergencies that arise rely on Code Blue in medical emergencies for simplicity. Development of a response team for nonpatients allows specific training, triage, and processes to improve care and reduce drain on ICU resources.

P017: Impact of the use of a checklist for transcutaneous cardiac pacing on competency of junior residents undergoing an advanced cardiac life support course

Introduction: Transcutaneous cardiac pacing (TCP) is recommended for the treatment of symptomatic bradycardia, a life-threatening condition. Although TCP is taught in ACLS (advanced cardiac life support) courses, it is a difficult skill to master for junior residents. The main objective of this study is to measure the impact of having access to a checklist on successful TCP implementation. Our hypothesis was that the availability of a CL would improve performance of junior residents in the management of symptomatic bradycardia by facilitating TCP. Methods: We conducted a prospective, randomized, single-site study. First-year residents entering postgraduate programs and taking a mandatory ACLS course were enrolled. Students had didactic sessions on the management of symptomatic bradycardia followed by hands-on teaching on a low-fidelity manikin (ALS® simulator, Laerdal) using a CL conceived for this project as a teaching tool. Study participants were then assessed with a simulation scenario requiring TCP. Participants were randomly assigned to groups with and without CL accessibility. Performances were graded on six critical tasks. The primary outcome was the successful use of TCP, defined as having completed all tasks. Participants then completed a post-test questionnaire. Sample size estimation was based on a previous project (Ranger et al., 2018). Accepting an alpha error of 0.05 and a power of 80%, 45 participants in each group would permit the detection of 26.5% in performance gain. Results: Of 250 residents completing the ACLS course in 2017, 85 voluntary participants were randomized to a control group (no CL available during testing, n = 42) or an experimental group (CL available during testing, n = 43). Six participants in the experimental group adequately used TCP compared to five participants in the control group (p = 0.81, chi-squared test). Out of the 43 participants who had access to the CL, only 2 (5%) used it. Reasons why the CL was infrequently used were stated as the following: 24 participants (56%) mentioned not realizing it was available, 8 (19%) considered it was of little to no utility and 5 (19%) forgot a CL existed. Conclusion: Availability of a checklist previously used during simulation teaching did not increase junior residents’ capacity to correctly apply TCP. Non-recognition of CL availability and decreased perceived need for it were the main reasons for marginal use. Our results suggest that there are many limiting factors to CL effectiveness.

Medical Behavior in Cardiorespiratory Arrest before and After Simulation Based on Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) Course

Abstract Background: The Advanced Cardiac Life Support (ACLS) course is designed to teach cardiovascular emergency, aiming to promote a harmonious and synchronized work of the entire hospital team, making the multidisciplinary job more effective in the execution of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). Objective: To compare the effectiveness of CPR performed between physicians trained on ACLS and non-trained physicians. Methods: A questionnaire was applied to physicians working at the emergency room of hospitals in Curitiba, state of Parana, whose resolution required theoretical and practical knowledge about CPR. For analysis, descriptive statistics and Fisher's association analysis were used, and the medians of the groups were evaluated by Mann-Whitney/Kruskal-Wallis with significance of 5%. Results: Thirty-four physicians were volunteers, of whom 20 had taken the ACLS course (Group A) and 14 had not (Group B). The trained physicians obtained the highest median (4.00 vs. 3.00, p = 0.06) of correct answers. Group A scored at least 3 of the 5 questions in the questionnaire, showing better performance than Group B (OR = 6.75, 95% CI, 1.1 < OR < 41.0, p = 0.04). The year of the course did not significantly change the performance in the questionnaire. Conclusion: It is suggested that the ACLS course was effective in qualifying physicians to handle situations of cardiorespiratory arrest properly, which was reproduced by the better performance in the resolution of the questionnaire. It is believed that when the sample of volunteers is increased, the trends found materialize the other hypotheses proposed.

Knowledge and experience of cardiopulmonary resuscitation among cardiologists in clinical practice: A multicenter cross-sectional study.

Objective:This study aimed to investigate the theoretical knowledge and clinical experience of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) among Turkish cardiologists according to the recommendations of the 2015 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines.Methods:A total of 120 cardiologists from 14 different medical centers (six university and eight research-education hospitals) in İstanbul were included in the study. The questionnaire consisting of 29 open-ended and multiple choice questions on CPR was used and validated based on the ERC guidelines published in 2015. The percentage of correct answers was calculated for each participant.Results:Of the 120 cardiologists included in this study, 108 (90%) accepted the participation, and the median percentage of correct answers for theoretical questions was 53% (38-72). The percentage of correct answers for interventional cardiologists (48%, n=52) was significantly higher [60% (50–66) vs. 46% (38-52), p<0.001]. Regarding the type of medical centers, no statictical difference was found in terms of theoretical knowledge on CPR [57% (50-72) university hospitals vs. 49% (41-57) research-education hospitals, p=0.160). Peri-arrest transthoracic echocardiography was used in 71% of cases. The ratio of participants who had received an advanced cardiac life support course in the preceding year was only 19% (n=20), and those participants had a significantly higher score regarding the CPR theoretical knowledge questions [68% (54-70) vs. 46% (38-51), p<0.001].Conclusion:The theoretical knowledge of cardiologists on CPR is not satisfactory according to the 2015 ERC guidelines. An increased frequency of CPR training courses may improve this result.

Decision-making in cardiac arrest: physicians' and nurses' knowledge and views on terminating resuscitation.

IntroductionMany cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) attempts are unsuccessful and must be terminated. On the contrary, premature termination results in a self-fulfilling prophecy. This study aimed to investigate 1) physicians’ self-assessed competence in terminating CPR, 2) physicians’ and nurses’ knowledge of the European Resuscitation Council guidelines on termination, and 3) single factors leading to termination.MethodsQuestionnaires were distributed at advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) courses at a university hospital in Denmark. Participants included ACLS health care providers, ie, physicians and nurses from cardiac arrest teams, intensive care and anesthetic units or medical wards with a duty to provide ACLS. Physicians were divided into junior physicians (house officers) and experienced physicians (specialist registrars and consultants).ResultsOverall, 308 participants responded (104 physicians and 204 nurses, response rate: 98%). Among physicians, 37 (36%) did not feel competent to decide when to terminate CPR (junior physicians: n=16, 64%, compared with experienced physicians: n=21, 28%, P=0.002). Two (2%) physicians and one (0.5%) nurse were able to state the contents of termination guidelines. Several factors were reported to impact termination, including absence of a pupillary light reflex (physicians: 17%, nurses: 22%) and cardiac standstill on echocardiography (physicians: 18%, nurses: 20%). Moreover, nine (9%) physicians and 35 (17%) nurses would terminate prolonged CPR despite a shockable rhythm present.ConclusionOne-third of all physicians did not feel competent to decide when to terminate CPR. Physicians’ and nurses’ knowledge of termination guidelines was poor, and both professions reported unvalidated or controversial factors as a single reason for terminating CPR.