Cardiac Devices Research Articles

Magnetic resonance-conditional cardiac implantable electronic devices: an Italian perspective on the prevalence of mixed-brand systems over time.

The historical restriction of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) has been lifted by certified MRI-conditional systems in recent years. Mixed-brand CIED systems consisting of a generator from one manufacturer and at least one lead from another manufacturer are not certified for MRI. We evaluated the temporal trend in the prevalence of mixed-brand systems in the era of MRI-conditional systems. Data were analyzed on 5853 CIEDs implanted de novo between 2012 and 2022 in 81 Italian centers linked to the nationwide Home Monitoring Expert Alliance network. The percentage of mixed-brand implants was calculated by device type (pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator [ICD], cardiac resynchronization therapy [CRT] device) and over time. A mixed-brand system was implanted in 4.1% (95% CI, 3.6-4.6%) of analyzed patients or, by device type, in 4.5% (3.5-5.7%) of pacemaker patients, 1.1% (0.7-1.7%) of ICD patients, and 6.8% (5.7-7.9%) of CRT pacemaker/defibrillator patients (p < 0.001). Prevalence of mixed-brand implants exhibited significant temporal fluctuations, first declining from 6.6% (2012-2014) to 1.3% (2019), and then increasing to 5.1% (2022). Temporal changes were statistically significant for pacemakers (p < 0.001) and CRT devices (p = 0.001), but not for ICDs (p = 0.438). In the decade between 2012 and 2022, mixed-brand CIED systems were more prevalent in patients treated with pacemakers and CRT devices than in ICD recipients. A decline in the prevalence of mixed-brand systems was observed after the introduction of MRI-conditional systems, reaching a minimum in 2019, followed by a progressive increase in the subsequent years.

Magnetic resonance imaging in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: the RESONANCE Spanish registry.

Despite increasing evidence demonstrating the safety of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs), this procedure is often neglected in this population. This Spanish registry aimed to determine the proportion of MRI referrals and performance among patients with pacemakers (PMs) or implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs). This prospective, multicenter, open-label registry involved 21 Spanish centers. Data were collected upon implant of PMs or ICDs from BIOTRONIK and one year after, and included the number of MRIs and computed tomography scans prescribed, performed and denied, and reasons for denial. Data from 1105 patients (mean age: 74.2 years) were analyzed and 982 completed the follow-up. Of them, 82.2% had a PM and 17.8% an ICD. A total of 351 imaging tests were prescribed in 220 patients (19.9%), including 52 MRIs in 39 patients (3.5%) and 299 computed tomography scans in 196 patients (17.8%). Among the MRIs, 44 (84.6%) were performed, five (9.6%) were not performed, and three (5.8%) were replaced by an alternative test. Most of the indicated computed tomography scans were performed (97.7%). The proportion of patients with an MRI scan referral was 4.6% during the pre-COVID-19 period and 2.6% during the COVID-19 period. No MRI-related arrhythmic ventricular event was reported. This registry revealed that only 3.5% of patients with CIEDs had an MRI referral over the study, with rates decreasing to 2.6% during the COVID-19 period. These rates contrast with the 85 MRIs conducted per 1000 inhabitants in Spain in 2020.

Device-device interference triggered by an abandoned pacemaker: A case report

Abstract Background Cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) are prone to electromagnetic interference. Common sources include household electronics and industrial machinery. However, medical equipment can also trigger interferences and cause CIED malfunction. Case summary We report on a 79-year-old male with sudden onset of presyncope. He has a long history of device therapy, including an active VVI leadless pacemaker and an abandoned abdominal pacemaker with epicardial leads. Automatic reactivation of the abandoned pacemaker due to reaching end-of-life mode led to interaction with the active pacemaker, inhibiting it in its function. Due to elevated capture threshold and insufficient output, pacing by the reactivated pacemaker was accompanied by intermittent loss of myocardial capture and patient symptoms. By changing the mode to VOO and increasing the pacing rate of the active pacemaker, interaction was prevented as an intermittent solution. Final therapy consisted of explanting the pulse generator of the abdominal pacemaker. Conclusion We present a patient with a deactivated abandoned cardiac pacemaker, which self-activated after reaching end-of-life mode and triggered an interaction with his active pacemaker. This case emphasizes the importance of explanting old devices to avoid potential interaction.

Long-term clinical outcomes of remote monitoring for implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in Singapore.

Remote monitoring (RM) for cardiac implantable electronic devices is on the rise and has been shown to reduce the burden of in-clinic follow-up visits. We aimed to investigate the long-term clinical outcomes of RM versus no RM. This was a prospective, single-centre cohort study of consecutive patients with an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or cardiac resynchronisation therapy-defibrillator (CRT-D) followed up from 2018 to 2023. Patients who received non-ICD devices were excluded. In general, RM was offered to all patients, but uptake depended on patient preference. For data analysis, patients were stratified according to whether RM was used. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality; secondary outcomes were hospitalisation for heart failure and device therapy (shocks and electrical storm). Of 551 patients, 284 (51.5%) received RM and 267 (49.5%) did not. Baseline demographics were similar between the two arms. All-cause mortality was significantly lower in RM versus non-RM patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.45, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.33-0.60, P <0.001), as was hospitalisation for heart failure (HR 0.39, 95% CI 0.25-0.59, P <0.001); these remained significant after adjustment for baseline covariates. More patients on RM received appropriate antitachycardia pacing (ATP) (17.6% vs. 10.7%, P = 0.035) and appropriate shocks (24.1% vs. 14.7%, P = 0.017). The incidences of inappropriate ATP, inappropriate shocks and electrical storm were similar. More patients on RM underwent pulse generator change (34.1% vs. 10.1%, P <0.001). Remote monitoring was associated with significantly lower mortality in both ICDs and CRT-Ds and in primary and secondary indications, as well as fewer heart failure hospitalisations. This supports current guidelines recommending the use of RM in all patients with ICD or CRT-D.

Magnetic Resonance Myocardial Imaging in Patients With Implantable Cardiac Devices: Challenges, Techniques, and Clinical Applications.

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in patients with cardiac implants, such as pacemakers and defibrillators, has gained importance in recent years with the development of modern cardiac implantable electronic devices. The increasing clinical need to perform MRI examinations in patients with cardiac implants has driven the development of new advanced MRI sequences to mitigate image artifacts associated with cardiac implants. More specifically, advances in imaging techniques, such as wideband late gadolinium enhancement imaging, wideband T1 mapping, and wideband perfusion, have been designed to improve image quality and examinations in patients with cardiac implants, enabling a comprehensive and more reliable diagnosis, which was previously unattainable in these patients. This review article explores recent developments and applications of wideband techniques in the field of cardiovascular MRI, offering insights into their transformative potential. Clinical applications of wideband cardiovascular MRI are highlighted, particularly in assessing myocardial viability, guiding ventricular tachycardia ablation, and characterizing myocardial tissue.

Pain management following cardiac implantable electronic device procedures in a single center out of the U.S.: Emphasis on opioid prescription.

Pain management following cardiac implantable electronic device procedures in a single center out of the U.S.: Emphasis on opioid prescription.

Editorial comment to “Utility of cardiac implantable electronic device algorithm for detecting severe sleep‐disordered breathing in cardiomyopathy”

Editorial comment to “Utility of cardiac implantable electronic device algorithm for detecting severe sleep‐disordered breathing in cardiomyopathy”

Novel technique and assessment of available three-dimensional delivery sheath for endomyocardial biopsy during cardiac device implantation

Novel technique and assessment of available three-dimensional delivery sheath for endomyocardial biopsy during cardiac device implantation

Ultrasound-Guided Axillary Access Using a Micropuncture Needle Versus Conventional Cephalic Venous Access for Implantation of Cardiac Devices: A Single-Center Randomized Trial

(1) Background: Ultrasound-guided axillary (USAX) vein puncture is a relatively new method to obtain venous access for the implantation of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). However, its use is limited as most of the operators are not familiar with this technique. Our aim was to investigate the safety and efficacy of the USAX compared with the traditional cephalic vein dissection for venous access in CIED implantation. (2) Methods: This was a single-center, randomized, controlled, superiority trial. A total of 114 patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) to either USAX (u/s axillary group; 59 patients) or cephalic vein access (cephalic group; 55 patients). The primary study endpoint was defined as successful placement of all leads via the chosen access. Secondary study endpoints included time from local anesthetic injection to lead advancement in the SVC, total procedure time (skin to skin), procedure-related complications and pain perception. (3) Results: USAX was superior to cephalic access in terms of primary endpoint (OR: 4.3, 95% CI: 1.3, 14.0; p = 0.012). Total procedure duration was higher in the cephalic group (55.15 ± 16.62 vs. 48.35 ± 12.81 min, p = 0.017) but there was neither a significant difference in fluoroscopy time (p = 0.872) nor in total radiation dose (p = 0.815). The level of pain was higher in the cephalic group (p = 0.016), while the rates of complications were similar in both groups (p &gt; 0.05). (4) Conclusion: USAX was superior to cephalic access regarding success rate, total procedure duration and level of pain, while having no difference in complication rates.

Keeping People in Rhythm Electronically – An Overview of Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices

Keeping People in Rhythm Electronically – An Overview of Cardiac Rhythm Management Devices

Clinical features of infective endocarditis affecting cardiac implantable electronic devices

Abstract Introduction Infective endocarditis (IE) is a serious condition with high rates of serious complications and mortality. Furthermore, implantation of cardiac electronic devices (peacemakers, ICD, CRT) has been increasing in recent years, with technique-associated infections being one of the main adverse events. Our goal was to analise clinical features of IE as associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (IE-CIED) and its prognostic impact. Methods Prospective study of a cohort of patients diagnosed with IE in our centre from 1987 to 2022. A comparative analysis was performed between patients with IE not associated with cardiac implantable electronic devices (group 1) and those who did (group 2). Clinical, microbiological, echocardiographic and therapeutic variables were analysed and the prognostic impact was evaluated in terms of mortality. Results 569 patients were analysed, of which 540 (94,9%) belonged to group 1, while 29 (5,1%) belonged to group 2. The mean age was higher in group 2 (65,1 years ±12,9 vs 55,7 years ± 18,7; p=0,011) with male predominance in both populations (67.5% overall). Patients with IE-CIED had a higher proportion of staphylococcus aureus (48.3% vs 19.7%; p&amp;lt;0.001) and staphylococcus epidermidis (34.5% vs 15.6%; p&amp;lt;0.001) infections; nosohusial endocarditis (56.5% vs 20.9%; p&amp;lt;0.001); and underlying heart disease (89.7% vs 67.3%; p=0.012). Furthermore, these patients had a higher proportion of tricuspid valve involvement (18.2% vs 81.8%; p&amp;lt;0.001). Regarding the approach, a higher percentage of surgery was performed in patients with IE-CIED (75.9% vs52.7%; p=0.015). On the other hand, patients with IE not associated to cardiac implantable electronic devices had a higher prevalence of cardiac complications (51.5%vs25.7%;p=0.003), defined as valvular rupture or perforation, pseudoaneurysm, abscess or intracardiac fistula; and central nervous system complications (17.2%vs2.9%;p=0.29). No significative differences were found in terms of echocardiographic findings compatibles with IE, nor were there any differences in severe complications or early, late or total mort ality. Conclusions Infective endocarditis affecting cardiac implantable electronic devices is associated to higher prevalence of staphylococci, underlying heart disease and less involvement of the left heart chambers. Surgery was used to a greater extent in this patients. This entity does not imply a worse prognosis in terms of severe complications or mortality.Table 1.Proportion of IE-CIEDTable 2.Microbiology, mortality

Early discharge following cardiac implantable electronic device implantation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Background As the demand for cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) placement rises, healthcare expenses, including the post-procedure hospital stay costs, have been on the increase. This systematic review and meta-analysis were undertaken to evaluate the safety and viability of same-day discharge (SDD) following cardiac device implantations. Methods We conducted a systematic searched of PubMed, Embase and Cochrane database during November 2023 for studies comparing SDD versus discharge after overnight stay (OS) after CIED. Outcomes included all-cause mortality and complications after the procedure (lead/device dislodgment, re-hospitalization, pneumothorax, local hematoma and wound complications). Data from each study were combined using the random-effects model to calculate pooled odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Eleven studies, including two randomized clinical trials, were incorporated, with a total of 64,646 patients, providing 918 pooled death events (74 in SDD and 844 in OS). The meta-analysis revealed that SDD was associated with a significantly lower risk of all-cause mortality compared to OS (pooled HR 0.72; 95% CI: 0.55-0.93; I2=0%) and no difference was found regarding re-hospitalization (pooled HR 0.96; 95% CI: 0.88-1.05; I2 55%). SSD was not associated with higher lead/device dislodgement (pooled HR 0.93; 95% CI: 0.50-1.71; I2=0%), pneumothorax (pooler HR 1.04; 95% CI: 0.31-3.50; I2 0%) and wound complications (pooled HR 0.65; 95% CI 0.22-1.01; I2 0%). SSD was associated with more episodes of local hematoma (pooled HR 0.31; 95% CI 0.09-1.05; I2 0%). Conclusion Our meta-analysis suggests that SDD is associated with a decreased all-cause mortality compared to OS. Although associated with more episodes of local hematoma, SDD was not significantly different regarding lead/device dislodgment, pneumothorax, re-admissions and wound complications. SDD after CIED appears to be a safe and feasible alternative.

Relapse of infective endocarditis after cardiac implantable electronic device removal compared to a conservative strategy

Abstract Background According to current guidelines, complete removal of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) should be considered in patients with valvular infective endocarditis (IE), accounting for the identified pathogen and need for valve surgery (Class IIa recommendation). Unselected longitudinal data are needed to assess this strategy. Purpose To examine IE readmission after IE discharge according to status of CIED removal in patients with conservatively treated IE. Methods Using Danish nationwide registries, we identified patients aged ≥18 years with first-time IE from 2010-2021. We included patients with conservatively treated IE and a CIED, who were alive at IE discharge. Patients who underwent CIED removal during IE admission were compared to those without removal, examining the study outcome of IE readmission within six months after IE discharge. An initial blanking period of 14 days was applied after IE discharge. The Aalen-Johanson estimator and multivariable Cox regression models were used to determine cumulative incidences and adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) of IE readmission according to status of CIED removal, respectively. Results Among 6,843 patients with first-time IE, 5,731 (83.7%) were conservatively treated. Of these, 1,201 (21.0%) had a CIED, of which 205 (17.1%) died during IE admission. Thus, the final study population comprised 996 patients alive at IE discharge. The median age of the study population was 75.5 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 67.9-82.0), and 753 (75.6%) were males. In total, 574 (57.6%) patients underwent CIED removal during IE admission. Patients who underwent CIED removal were younger, compared to patients without CIED removal, 73.1 years (IQR: 65.7-79.1) versus 79.0 years (IQR: 71.3-85.1), respectively. The six-month cumulative incidence of IE readmission was 2.0% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.1-3.5%) in patients who underwent CIED removal versus 6.1% (95% CI: 4.0-8.9%) in patients without CIED removal (P-value=0.001) (Figure 1). CIED removal was associated with a significantly lower six-month rate of IE readmission, compared to no CIED removal (HR: 0.36 [95% CI: 0.17-0.77]). Relapse bacteraemia (including IE) with the same microorganism as first-time IE occurred in 2.2% of patients who underwent CIED removal and in 5.4% of patients without CIED removal. Staphylococcus aureus was the most common microorganism in 33.3% of patients with relapse bacteraemia who underwent CIED removal. Conclusions In this nationwide study, the six-month rate of infective endocarditis (IE) readmission was three-fold lower in patients who underwent cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) removal, compared to patients without CIED removal. The current findings suggest that CIED removal is associated with lower risk of relapse of IE in patients with conservatively treated IE. These results are in line with current guideline recommendations. However, more randomized clinical trial data are needed.

Cost impact of the use of a universal cardiac implantable electronic devices remote monitoring solution: results of the Evidence RM study

Abstract Background Remote monitoring (RM) is considered the standard of care for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED). In 2023 the HRS/EHRA/APHPRS/LAHRS expert consensus highlighted the potential interest of alert-based monitoring and the use of a third-party platform for RM management. By lightening the RM workload for clinical staff, valuable time and resources can be redirected towards patient care. Purpose This study aims to assess the impact on healthcare expenditures of the adoption of a Universal, vendor-neutral, and alert-focused remote monitoring (RM) platform for CIED in France, as opposed to the Conventional RM conducted via device specific manufacturers' platforms. Methods This study utilizes the French National Health Database (SNDS) to evaluate the effectiveness of RM solutions among patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD), including cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators (CRT-D). All patients under RM were categorized based on the type of monitoring, either the Universal RM or the Conventional RM. The analysis was conducted on year 2019 and included only patients maintaining consistent RM solutions and device types throughout the entirety of the study period. To mitigate potential biases, costs were adjusted according to age, gender, device type, year of first implantation, year of RM initiation, medical center experience with RM, and Elixhauser score for comorbidities. Results Study cohort consisted of 36,401 patients (age 67.3 ± 13.0 years / male 78.4% / CRT-D 40.1%), 1,482 patients followed using the Universal RM platform and 34,419 patients monitored with the Conventional RM solutions. The study findings revealed a 4% decrease in corrected total costs and a notable 17.8% reduction in hospital costs among patients utilizing the Universal RM. Analysis further identified that this decrease in hospital expenses was primarily influenced by a reduction of the costs associated with cardiovascular diseases. Conversely, the group utilizing the Universal RM experienced a 7.9% increase in total outpatient costs compared to Conventional RM, while ambulatory visit costs remained unchanged. As costs incurred by patients were not included, total costs may however be underestimated. Patients under the Universal RM solution may benefit of more proactive preventive measures delivered through outpatient care. By addressing issues preemptively, critical conditions may be averted, enhancing overall patient management, and diminishing hospital costs. The adoption of a third-party Universal platform may thus yield to cost savings, exemplified by a negative Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER) of -103€ per Day Alive and Out of Hospital (DAOH) as observed in this study. Conclusions The use of a third-party Universal RM platform showed a positive impact in terms of costs reduction for the French healthcare system on this ICD population.

Remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices using smart device interface versus radiofrequency-based interface: a systematic review

Abstract Background Guidelines recommended remote monitoring (RM) in managing patients with Cardiac Implantable Electronic Devices (CIED). In recent years, smart device (phone or tablet) monitoring-based RM (SM-RM) was introduced. SM-RM is a specifically developed application (app) which can be downloaded from app stores using smart devices. The app uses Bluetooth low-energy to communicate automatically and securely with the patient’s CIED. The app then uses a cellular or Wi-Fi internet connection to transfer the data securely to the manufacturer’s repository. Purpose This study aims to systematically review SM-RM versus bedside monitor RM (BM-RM) using radiofrequency in terms of compliance, connectivity, and episode transmission time. Methods We conducted a systematic review, searching three international databases from inception until July 2023 for studies comparing SM-RM (intervention group) versus BM-RM (control group). Results Two propensity score-matched studies with a total of 21978 patients were retrieved (9642 patients in the SM-RM arm and 12336 patients in the BM-RM arm) (1, 2). There is significantly higher compliance among patients using SM-RM compared with patients using BM-RM in both pacemaker and defibrillator patients. There were higher enrolment rates and completed scheduled transmissions among SM-RM compared to BM-RM. Higher connectivity was also seen in patients with SM-RM, and more SM-RM patients transmitted at least once compared to BM-RM patients. Additionally, SM-RM patients had more patient-initiated transmissions compared to BM-RM patients. Younger patients (aged &amp;lt;75) had more patient-initiated transmissions, and a higher proportion had ≥10 such transmissions compared with older patients (aged ≥75) in both SM-RM and BM-RM groups. The episode transmission time of SM-RM patients was also shorter than that of BM-RM patients. Conclusion SM-RM is a step in the right direction, with good compliance, connectivity, and shorter episode transmission time. It allows patients to feel empowered and in control of their health. Further research on cost-effectiveness and long-term clinical outcomes can be carried out in the future.

Comparison of interrupted and uninterrupted anticoagulation strategies for cardiac implantable electronic device insertion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Introduction Up to 35% of patients who are candidates for a cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) receive chronic anticoagulation. However, guidelines on anticoagulant management in the perioperative period of CIED insertion differ worldwide. It is uncertain whether interrupting or continuing anticoagulation in these settings provides optimal outcomes. Purpose To assess the effects of interrupting versus continuing chronic anticoagulation with either warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant (DOAC) in the perioperative setting of CIED insertion. Methods CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and two trial registries were searched from inception to 26 November 2021. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing interrupting chronic warfarin or DOAC therapy, with or without heparin bridging, versus continuing anticoagulation in adults undergoing CIED insertion were included. Comparisons were divided into two categories: interrupted versus uninterrupted warfarin and interrupted versus uninterrupted DOAC. Outcomes were expressed as risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Inverse variance random-effects models were used for the meta-analyses. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using the Cochrane RoB2 tool, and certainty of evidence (CoE) per outcome was assessed with GRADE methods. Results Ten RCTs (n=2221) were included: five RCTs (n=1267) used warfarin; four RCTs (n=954) used DOACs. One additional RCT using warfarin was ongoing without any outcome data available. Bleeding events included device-pocket haematoma, haemothorax, cardiac tamponade, and non-tamponade pericardial effusion. Interrupted versus uninterrupted warfarin: The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of interrupted warfarin on device-pocket haematoma (RR 1.89, 95%CI 0.85 to 4.20, 5 RCTs, very low CoE) and bleeding events (RR 1.94, 95%CI 0.86 to 4.41, 5 RCTs, very low CoE). Interrupted warfarin may result in little to no difference in thromboembolic events (RR 0.85, 95%CI 0.18 to 4.11, 5 RCTs, low CoE) and ischaemic stroke (RR 1.01, 95%CI 0.11 to 9.61, 2 RCTs, low CoE). Interrupted warfarin may reduce all-cause mortality (RR 0.35, 95%CI 0.04 to 2.93, 3 RCTs, low CoE). Interrupted versus uninterrupted DOAC: The evidence is very uncertain on the effect of interrupted DOAC on device-pocket haematoma (RR 1.15, 95%CI 0.58 to 2.28, 4 RCTs, very low CoE) and bleeding events (RR 1.14, 95%CI 0.58 to 2.21, 4 RCTs, very low CoE). Interrupted DOAC may result in little to no difference in thromboembolic events (RR 0.98, 95%CI 0.06 to 15.63, 3 RCT, low CoE) and ischaemic stroke (RR 0.98, 95%CI 0.06 to 15.63, 2 RCTs, low CoE). Interrupted DOAC may reduce all-cause mortality slightly (RR 0.49, 95% CI 0.04 to 5.39, 2 RCTs, low CoE). Conclusion Interrupting anticoagulation with either warfarin or DOACs in patients undergoing CIED insertion produced similar outcomes as uninterrupted anticoagulation.Figure 1.Figure 2.

Clinical outcomes of atrial high-rate episodes: an updated meta-analysis

Abstract Background Atrial high-rate episodes (AHRE) are commonly detected in individuals with cardiac implantable electronic devices. Outcomes of atrial high-rate episodes remain unclear in those without a prior history of atrial fibrillation. Purpose This study aims to evaluate clinical outcomes of atrial high-rate episodes in patients who have no prior history of atrial fibrillation. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were searched through February 2024 for studies evaluating clinical outcomes in individuals with cardiac implantable electronic devices who experienced atrial high-rate episodes, compared to those who did not. Individuals who had a prior history of atrial fibrillation were excluded. Outcomes assessed were clinical atrial fibrillation, thromboembolic events, and all-cause mortality. A fixed-effects model was used to calculate risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A subgroup analysis of thromboembolic events was conducted based on the duration of atrial high-rate episodes. Results A total of 9 studies met inclusion criteria with a combined enrollment of 7440 patients. Compared to those who did not experience atrial high-rate episodes, those who did had significantly increased risks of clinical atrial fibrillation (RR 3.33; 95% CI 1.99 - 5.57; P &amp;lt; 0.0001) and thromboembolic events (RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.72 -2.85; P &amp;lt; 0.0001). The risk of all-cause mortality was similar between both groups (RR 1.19; 95% CI 0.95 – 1.49; P = 0.13). Subgroup analysis revealed an increased risk of thromboembolic events among atrial high-rate episodes ≥ 24 hours (RR 12.34; 95% CI 2.70 – 56.36) while atrial high-rate episodes lasting &amp;lt; 24 hours were insignificantly associated with thromboembolic events (RR 0.83; 95% CI 0.12 – 5.58). Conclusions Our study indicates a heightened risk of clinical atrial fibrillation and thromboembolic events among patients with atrial high-rate episodes, with no observed increase in mortality risk. Furthermore, our findings suggest that the duration of atrial high-rate episodes influences the risk of thromboembolism. Further studies are warranted to confirm our findings.

Mortality and patient stratification 30 days after Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices - a Danish nationwide cohort study

Abstract Background Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia (SAB) is a high-risk condition with a reported 30-day mortality of up to 25% even with timely and correct treatment. Patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are at increased risk of a complicated course of disease due to the risk of device infection. Purpose We aimed to estimate the 30-day mortality rate following SAB among adult Danish patients with a de novo CIED. Furthermore, we aimed to identify patients with low, intermediate, and high mortality risk following SAB. Methods Using The National Danish Staphylococcus Aureus Bacteriemia Database and The Danish Pacemaker and ICD Register, we identified all Danish patients aged 18 to 99 years with a de novo CIED implantation between 2000 and 2020, and subsequently positive Staphylococcus aureus blood culture. The primary outcome was 30-day all-cause mortality from date of SAB. Clinical variables significantly associated with increased 30-day mortality following SAB were identified (p&amp;lt;0.05 and 95% CI not including 1) using adjusted multivariable Cox regression modelling. We tested variables related to age, sex, calendar year of SAB, device type, timing of infection, previous SAB, concomitant medication, and clinically relevant pre-existing co-morbidities including valvular replacement, recent surgery, and renal dialysis. Patients were awarded 1 point for each of the significant variables present, and the sum was used to stratify into low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups. The cut-offs between the groups were set at 0 and 2 points (0 points = low risk, 1-2 points = intermediate risk, ≥3 = high risk). Results We identified 1,393 patients with de novo CIED (pacemaker: n=983, implantable cardioverter defibrillator: n=230, cardiac resynchronization therapy w/wo defibrillator capacity: n=180) and subsequent SAB (median time to SAB from CIED implantation: 679 days [IQR 168-1,525]). Median age at the time of SAB diagnosis was 77 years [IQR 68-84] with 72.4% being males. In total, 469 patients died within the first 30 days from SAB, equivalent to an overall 30-day mortality rate of 33.7% (95% CI 31.2-36.2). We identified high age, left sided valvular disease, use of systemic corticosteroids, and SAB occurring &amp;gt;6 months from CIED implantation to be associated with an increased hazard of 30-day mortality following the SAB diagnosis (Fig. 1). The median total sum obtained from the stratification model was 2 points [IQR 1-2]. 30-day all-cause mortality was estimated to 16.2%, 31.6% and 54.9% for the low-, intermediate- and high-risk groups, respectively (Fig. 2). Conclusions In patients with a de novo cardiac implantable electronic device and subsequent Staphylococcus aureus bacteraemia the overall 30-day mortality from date of SAB was 33.7%. Patients with high age, recent surgery, left sided valvular disease, and use of systemic corticosteroids were particularly at risk.Fig. 1.Simplified stratification modelFig. 2.30-day mortality following SAB

Predictive value of cardiac 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography for fatal ventricular arrhythmic events in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis

Abstract Background Patients with cardiac sarcoidosis (CS) face an elevated risk of fatal ventricular arrhythmic events (FVAE), including sudden cardiac death. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) from contrast-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance is used for diagnosis of CS and estimation of FVAE risk. However, its application is limited in cases with cardiac devices, renal failure or contrast agent allergies. 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) emerges as a diagnostic tool for CS, even in cases where LGE is not feasible. Purpose This study aimed to investigate the potential utility of FDG-PET in predicting FVAE in patients with CS by hypothesizing that higher or lower percent FDG uptake could predict the FVAE risk. Methods Cardiac FDG-PET data from 121 patients with CS, acquired at our university hospital between March 2008 and November 2020, were analyzed. A polar-map model was used to calculate percent uptake relative to maximal cardiac FDG uptake in each of the American Heart Association (AHA) 17 segments (Figure A). Percent uptakes of the AHA 17 segments were compared between groups with and without future FVAE. LGE information was available in 82 patients and was used to assess the presence of LGE in regions where percent FDG uptake differed between the two groups. Results Among enrolled patients (mean age 59.5 ± 10.0 years, 67.8% women), 43 experienced FVAE following FDG-PET image acquisition. The group with future FVAE had a higher history of FVAE (7.7% vs. 37.2%) and beta-blocker administration (38.5% vs. 60.5%), larger left ventricular diastolic diameter (LVDd) (49.3 ± 7.3 mm vs. 57.4 ± 9.5 mm) and lower ejection fraction (LVEF) (56.6 ± 13.6% vs. 42.0 ± 15.2%) compared to the group without it (P &amp;lt; 0.05 all). Percent FDG uptake in the basal interventricular septum part (segment 3) (Figure A) was lower in patients with future FVAE compared to those without it (54.4 ± 13.8% vs. 41.8 ± 15.2%, P &amp;lt; 0.001 corrected for multiple comparisons). Kaplan-Meier analysis with a median split of percent FDG uptake in segment 3 showed that patients with lower uptake (&amp;lt;49%, N= 62) had lower FVAE-free survival compared to those with higher uptake (≥49%, N = 59) (P = 0.007) (Figure B). A Cox hazard model also demonstrated an association between percent FDG uptake in segment 3 and FVAE onset (hazard ratio 0.972 [95% CI 0.951, 0.995], P = 0.015) after adjusting for previous FVAE, beta-blocker administration, LVDd and LVEF. Similarly, analysis within the subgroup with LGE in the septum (N = 58) revealed a higher risk of FVAE in the group with lower percent FDG uptake compared to those with higher uptake (P = 0.020) (Figure C(a)). However, this association was not evident in patients without LGE in the septum (N = 24) (P = 0.821) (Figure C(b)). Conclusions Reduced percent FDG uptake with LGE in the basal intraventricular septum may serve as a valuable predictor of future FVAE occurrence in patients with CS.

Ethnic minorities who complete cardiac rehabilitation achieve equivalent functional capacity outcomes after cardiac rehabilitation but only half complete

Abstract Background Cardiac rehabilitation (CR) reduces the risk of death and repeat cardiac events and improves multiple patient outcomes. Ethnic minority backgrounds experience significant health disparities, often due to lack of fluency in dominant language and higher rates of cardiovascular disease risk factors. Despite these issues, outcomes for ethnic minorities from CR are rarely differentiated and participation in CR programs infrequently reported. Purpose To compare participation in and exercise outcomes from CR programs for patients from ethnic minorities versus the majority. Methods A secondary analysis from a national CR audit including 2335 CR participants. Ethnic minority was defined as having poor English language fluency requiring an interpreter for CR assessment. Functional capacity was assessed using 6-minute walk test (6MWT) or metabolic equivalent of tasks (METs). Binary logistic regression model was created to identify independent predictors of completion, accounting for baseline variables. Multiple linear regression models were used to determine if ethnic minority status was an independent predictor of change in 6MWT and METs after adjusting for baseline characteristics. Results Of the 2335 participants, 326 (14%) were from ethnic minorities. The mean age was 66.3±12.4 years and 70% males. There were no differences between minority and majority groups in relation to baseline characteristics. The most common referral diagnosis was myocardial infarction (27%), angina (25%), other – arrhythmias, cardiac devices, valve diseases/procedures (24%), and cardiac surgery (24%). Ethnic minorities were half as likely to complete CR (OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.38, 0.65) adjusted for age, sex, diagnosis, minority status, smoking, referral site and wait time (Table 1). Other factors that increase completion likelihood included all other cardiac diagnoses (compared to myocardial infarction as reference) and non-smokers, whereas major referral centre and female sex negatively impacted completion. Patients from ethnic minority backgrounds had less functional capacity at CR entry compared to the majority (379.9±118 versus 430.7±103 metres, p&amp;lt;0.001), though METs were comparable (6.69±2.73 versus 6.46±2.28 mg/kg/min, p=0.69). However, improvements were equivalent for 6MWT: minority 71.03±58.57 versus majority 71.37±61.16 (p=0.96), and for METs: minority 3.01±1.66 versus majority 3.13±1.74 mg/kg/min (p=0.77). Ethnic minority status was not an independent predictor of change in 6MWT and METs after accounting for age, sex, diagnosis, smoking, referral site, and wait time. Conclusion For patients from ethnic minority groups who completed CR, exercise/functional capacity outcomes were equivalent to majority participants, however less than one-in-two completed. CR programs should consider the needs of ethnic minority groups, particularly in relation to language and tailor content and delivery to promote participation and ensure more equitable access.