The low incidence of reported tumours in elasmobranchs has led to the assumption that the group rarely develops cancerous diseases (Loprinzi et al. 2005). This, combined with some studies reporting a therapeutic benefit in cartilage extract (e.g. Cho & Kim 2002), has resulted in a worldwide demand for shark cartilage products for use as alternative therapies (Berzins & Hovland 1999). This demand has, at least in part, increased the pressure on shark populations contributing to their worldwide decline (Ostrander et al. 2004). While reported cases are relatively low, both benign and cancerous proliferative lesions have been reported in 21 species of sharks from over 9 families (Ostrander et al. 2004; National Cancer Institute 2007). Cutaneous neoplasms have been reported in a number of elasmobranchs including the tiger shark, Galeocerdo cuvier (M€ uller and Henle) (Ostrander et al. 2004), the smooth dogfish, Mustelus canis Mitchill (Wolke & Murchelano 1976), and the bull shark, Carcharhinus leucas M€ uller and Henle (Harshbarger 1972). Odontogenic, oral and gingival neoplasms are well documented in bony fish (Harshbarger & Clark 1990; Grizzle & Goodwin 1998) and were reported from sharks including the grey nurse shark, Carcharias taurus Rafinesque, and blue shark, Prionace glauca L. (Borucinska et al. 2004). Various studies and observations suggest a relationship between tumour development and environmental contamination in other species (McAloose & Newton 2009). Rates of reported neoplasm in marine mammals have steadily increased over the past two decades including newly described and resurging diseases, giving rise to concern whether such tumours could be reflective of environmental distress syndrome triggered by human-related activities (Bossart 2007). This study describes the first observations of proliferative, possibly neoplastic, lesions in two elasmobranch species: a great white shark, Carcharodon carcharias L., and a bronze whaler, Carcharhinus brachyurus G€ unther observed at the Neptune Islands in South Australia. Photographic images of white sharks at the Neptune Islands, South Australia, were obtained by still cameras or through the use of a camera mounted on a handheld pole, as part of an ongoing photographic identification database program. Each photograph was categorized based on the sex of the shark; approximate size; pigment patterns from the gill, dorsal, ventral fin and caudal fin regions; and permanent markings such as major scars; notches on the dorsal fin; and amputations or mutilations. In addition to its use for identification, the database is also used to document incidences of white shark injuries and to record resighting rates of sharks from year to year. Correspondence R Robbins, Fox Shark Research Foundation, 73 Ninth Avenue, Joslin, SA 5070, Australia (e-mail: rachel@sharkfoundation.com)