The article reviews structural response of flexural members reinforced with fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) as a sustainable alternative to conventional carbon steel. It overviews experimental studies and code-based models that characterize shear and flexural response of concrete beams and slabs reinforced with FRP bars. Discussion on lower resistance to fire being key limitation of FRP bars is also included. The most commonly used fibers to manufacture FRP bars include carbon, glass, basalt, aramid, or combinations of these materials. Consequently, each material plays its role in contributing to shear and flexure differently. Basalt FRP are characterized by higher tensile capacity and resistance to corrosion, carbon FRP bars can withstand exposure to harsh environments; glass FRP bars possess lower modulus of elasticity that may cause large deflection and wider cracks. FRP bars are generally preferred over carbon steel for use in concrete elements where exposure to chlorides or chemicals is expected, or places where non-magnetic properties are essential. Beams and slabs reinforced with FRP bars are likely to undergo larger deflections due to lower stiffness of FRP bars. The dominant failure mode of FRP-reinforced concrete flexural members is discussed in comparison to conventional steel-reinforced members. The article identifies increasing interest and research in using green concrete reinforced with FRP bars that helps to make construction serviceable and sustainable. However, premature de-bonding of bars remains a concern with more research needed to avoid deterioration of mechanical properties by underutilization of materials. Although concrete is practically fire-resistant, FRP is likely to undergo damage of resin due to the presence of combustible organic polymers. The bulk of research implies that the thermal instability of the resin in FRP reinforcing bars is not a disadvantage that outweighs the possible benefits of its usage in the construction industry.