Unlike classical amine or amino acid transmitters, which are synthesized close to their sites of release, neuropeptides such as the 37-amino-acid calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) are synthesized in the neuronal soma and transported through the axon to sites of release in the nerve terminals. The transport process is time- and energy-consuming, and an intense stimulation could deplete releasable pools of neuropeptides rendering the nerve terminals unresponsive (in terms of release) until this pool has been replenished by newly synthesized and transported peptide. Uptake mechanisms that remove neurotransmitters from the synaptic cleft and spare the synthesis of new molecules of neurotransmitters have been described for small amine or amino acid neurotransmitters. Now, Sams-Nielsen et al. 1xPharmacological evidence for CGRP uptake into perivascular capsaicin sensitive nerve terminals. Sams-Nielsen, A. et al. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2001; 132: 1145–1153Crossref | PubMedSee all References1 provide indirect evidence for a reuptake mechanism for CGRP into capsaicin-sensitive afferent neurones and suggest that this mechanism might have functional relevance for the refilling of a releasable neuropeptide pool in nerve terminals following CGRP release.Isolated segments of the guinea-pig basillary artery, precontracted with prostaglandin F2α (PGF2α), were challenged with capsaicin (10 μm), which caused a CGRP-dependent (blocked by the antagonist CGRP8–37), capsazepine-sensitive relaxation. When the capsaicin challenge was repeated twice again, the relaxation underwent a significant fading (from ∼60% to 20% of PGF2α contraction). At this point, preparations were incubated with CGRP (100 nm) for 20 min and the capsaicin challenges repeated another three times. Following this protocol, the fourth capsaicin challenge (the first after the CGRP incubation) caused a significant relaxation (capsazepine-resistant, but still CGRP-dependent), which showed a significant fading during the fifth and sixth capsaicin challenge. Control experiments showed that repeated challenges with exogenous CGRP induced reproducible relaxations, thus excluding the possibility that desensitization occurs at the smooth-muscle level. In another series of experiments, arterial segments were incubated with [125I]CGRP and [125I] outflow was monitored following relaxation induced by capsaicin in PGF2?-precontracted preparations. Capsaicin induced a significant radioactivity release, which suggests that [125I]CGRP had been taken up by capsaicin-sensitive nerve terminals, even in the absence of a previous capsaicin challenge. Intriguingly, the restoration of capsaicin-induced relaxation was inhibited when CGRP was co-incubated with its antagonist CGRP8–37, suggesting that prejunctional CGRP receptors are involved in the refilling of the neuropeptide in nerve terminals.These results provide indirect evidence for a CGRP reuptake mechanism in capsaicin-sensitive perivascular nerve terminals, possibly mediated through the activation of prejunctional CGRP receptors. Thus, following the activation of prejunctional CGRP receptors and the consequent internalization of the complex peptide ligand–receptor, the peptide ligand might be spared from metabolism and recycled locally for the preservation of physiological functions. In addition, these results highlight a novel role for peptide prejunctional receptors in neurones, as well as in the modulation of neurotransmitter release. Other examples for the transport of relatively large peptides across biological barriers include those mediated by multi-drug resistance protein, other peptide transporters, or specific peptide receptors located at the blood–brain barrier or the choriod plexus epithelium; however, this uptake mechanism for CGRP is the first example of a neuronal uptake of peptides. It will be interesting to assess whether this process represents an exception or similar mechanisms spare other neuropeptides.
Read full abstract