Emergency Department Capacity Research Articles

Meeting the Needs: Description and Evaluation of an Alcohol Related Brain Damage (ARBD) Residential Rehabilitation Service

ABSTRACT To describe and evaluate a cost-effective, integrated model of service provision for people with Alcohol Related Brain Damage (ARBD). Participants identified by three large acute hospitals as having ARBD and suitable for recovery and rehabilitation were offered a 12-week recovery-focussed program at a residential unit. The unit is a collaboration between an NHS board, the local council, and a 3rd sector organization Participants’ pre-admission and post-admission medical data was gathered to analyze the effectiveness of the unit’s program on Emergency Department (ED) attendance and inpatient bed use. Improvement in cognition was measured by comparing the ACE-III results for all participants at admission and just prior to discharge from the program. Thirty-one participants met the inclusion criteria. Paired t-tests revealed the 12-week program overall significantly reduced attendance at ED, use of in-patient beds after discharge, and improved cognitive functioning. This integrated model of service provision provides clear benefits to residents’ cognitive functioning and to the NHS by freeing up inpatient beds and ED capacity. Therefore, it should be considered by commissioners when addressing the needs of people with ARBD.

Factors Associated With Head and Neck Polytrauma Presentation and Admissions at Emergency Departments of Varying Sizes.

Timely diagnosis of acute head and neck polytrauma presenting to emergency departments (EDs) optimizes outcomes. Since ED capacity influences triage and admission, the authors utilized the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database to understand how ED size and trauma characteristics affect head and neck polytrauma presentation and admissions. Demographics and injury characteristics from the National Electronic Injury Surveillance System database from 2018 to 2021 were analyzed to delineate factors contributing to polytrauma presence and admission through multivariable logistic regressions. The authors' 207,951-patient cohort was primarily females (48.6%), non-Hispanic (62.4%), and white (51.4%) people who averaged 57.2 years old. Nonspecific head injuries were predominant (59.7%), followed by facial trauma (22.6%) with rare substance involvement (alcohol, 6.3%; drugs, 4.1%) presenting to high-volume EDs (48.5%). Of the patients, 20% were admitted, whereas 31.1% sustained polytrauma. Substance use [alcohol, odds ratio (OR) = 4.44; drugs, OR = 2.90] increased polytrauma likelihood; neck (OR = 1.35), face (OR = 1.14), and eye (OR = 1.26) associated with polytrauma more than head injuries. Burns (OR = 1.38) increased polytrauma likelihood more than internal organ injuries. Black patients sustained higher polytrauma when presented to non-small EDs (OR = 1.41-1.90) than white patients showed to small EDs. Admissions were higher for males (OR = 1.51). Relative to small EDs, large EDs demonstrated a higher increase in admissions (OR = 2.42). Neck traumas were more likely admitted than head traumas (OR = 1.71). Fractures (OR = 2.21) and burns (OR = 2.71) demonstrated an increased admission likelihood than internal organ injuries. Polytrauma presence and admissions likelihood are site, injury, and substance dependent. Understanding the impact of factors influencing polytrauma presence or admission will enhance triage to optimize outcomes.

Payment Innovation in Emergency Care: A Case for Global Clinician Budgets

The fee-for-service funding model for U.S. emergency department (ED) clinician groups is increasingly fragile. Traditional FFS payment systems offer no financial incentives to improve quality, address population health, or make value-based clinical decisions. FFS also does not support maintaining ED capacity to handle peak demand periods. In FFS, clinicians rely heavily on cross subsidization where high reimbursement from commercial payors offsets low reimbursement from government payors and the uninsured. While FFS survived decades of steady cuts in government reimbursement rates, it is increasingly strained due to visit volatility and the effects of the No Surprises Act, which is driving down commercial reimbursement. Financial pressures on ED clinician groups, combined with higher hospital boarding and clinical workloads are increasing workforce attrition. Here we propose an alternative model to address some of these fundamental issues: an all-payer-funded, voluntary global budget for ED clinician services. If designed and implemented effectively, the model could effectively support robust clinician staffing over the long-term, ensure stability in clinical workload, and potentially improve the equity in payments. The model could also be combined with population health programs (e.g., pre- and post-ED telehealth, frequent ED use programs, and other innovations) which offer significant payer returns and address both quality and value. A linked program could also change hospital incentives that contribute to boarding. Strategies exist to test and refine ED clinician global budgets through existing government programs in Maryland and potentially through state-level legislation, as a precursor to broader adoption.

The Value of an Emergency Medicine Virtual Observation Unit

We implemented a virtual observation unit in which emergency department (ED) patients receive observation-level care at home. Our primary aim was to compare this new care model to in-person observation care in terms of brick-and-mortar ED length of stay (inclusive of ED observation unit time) as well as secondarily on inpatient admission and 72-hour return visits (overall and with admission). In a retrospective analysis of electronic health record data on ED observation patients from January 1, 2022 to December 29, 2022 from an academic urban ED, we used propensity matching to compare virtual to in-person observation patients on outcomes of interest. Patients were matched 1:1 based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and reason for observation. We also conducted real-time review of all virtual observation cases for potential safety concerns. Of 8,218 observation stays, 361 virtual observation patients were matched with 361 in-person observation patients. Virtual observation patients experienced lower median brick-and-mortar ED + EDOU LOS [14.6 (IQR 10.2, 18.9) versus 33.3 (IQR 28.1, 38.1) hours] and lower inpatient admission rates (10.2% [SD 5.0] versus 24.7% [SD 11.3]). The 72-hour return rate was higher for virtual observation patients (3.6% [SD 3.0] versus 2.5% [SD 3.0]). Among those with return visits, the rate of inpatient admission was higher among virtual observation patients (53.8% [SD 3.2] versus 11.1% [13.0]). There were no significant patient safety events recorded. Virtual observation unit patients used fewer hours in ED and ED observation relative to on-site observation patients. This new care delivery model warrants further study because it has the potential to positively impact ED capacity.

Alternative care sites and resident exposure in pediatric emergency medicine: Who, what, and where.

Emergency medicine (EM) physicians and pediatricians who provide acute pediatric care depend on clinical exposure during residency to learn pediatric EM. Increasing volumes of pediatric patients, especially with behavioral health complaints, have stressed pediatric emergency departments (ED) and prompted clinical operations innovations including alternative care sites outside the main ED. We investigated the impact of these recent trends and resulting alternative care sites on the exposure of residents to core pediatric conditions. This retrospective study reviewed patient encounters between July 1, 2018, and December 31, 2022, at a pediatric ED that hosts one pediatric and three EM residencies. During the study, the hospital employed alternative care sites in response to increased and shifting patient populations. Median patients per resident per academic year were compared before and after the opening of alternative care sites, overall and stratified by patient factors (age, sex, Emergency Severity Index [ESI], and diagnostic category). The study also compared the percentage of residents who saw no patients with a given diagnosis between the two periods. Of 231,101 patient encounters, 199,947 were seen in the main ED and 31,154 in alternative care sites. The median number of patients seen by a single resident in a single academic year ranged from 82 to 136 for pediatric residents and from 128 to 183 for EM residents. The median number of patients per resident per year did not decrease for any age group, sex, ESI level, or diagnosis across the two periods. Residents saw a median of 19 more patients with psychiatric diagnoses (95% CI 15.4-22.7) in the more recent period. Seven diagnoses were not seen by at least 20% of residents during both periods. Current pediatric ED capacity challenges can be addressed with alternative care sites without decreasing volume or variety of patients seen by residents.

A Review of Telepsychiatry for Pediatric Patients in the Emergency Setting.

The purpose of this review is to summarize factors contributing to the current state of pediatric mental health access in ED settings and synthesize the existing literature on the use of telepsychiatry to extend access to care, with particular focus on feasibility and sustainability. Children are presenting to emergency departments (EDs) with mental health concerns at an increasing rate, while ED capacity to treat psychiatric needs in children remains insufficient. This growing problem is compounded by decreased access to outpatient care and inpatient psychiatric beds, resulting in exorbitantly long waiting times, or "boarding," of children in crisis. Telepsychiatry has emerged as a strategy to decrease boarding of pediatric patients in ED settings by utilizing remote psychiatric professionals to provide consultation and assessment. Telepsychiatry in ED settings is an effective strategy to increase access to care and decrease length of stay for pediatric patients.

Changes in low-acuity patient volume in an emergency department after launching a walk-in clinic.

Unscheduled low-acuity care options are on the rise and are often expected to reduce emergency department (ED) visits. We opened an ED-staffed walk-in clinic (WIC) as an alternative care location for low-acuity patients at a time when ED visits exceeded facility capacity and the impending flu season was anticipated to increase visits further, and we assessed whether low-acuity ED patient visits decreased after opening the WIC. In this retrospective cohort study, we compared patient and clinical visit characteristics of the ED and WIC patients and conducted interrupted time-series analyses to quantify the impact of the WIC on low-acuity ED patient visit volume and the trend. There were 27,211 low-acuity ED visits (22.7% of total ED visits), and 7,058 patients seen in the WIC from February 26, 2018, to November 17, 2019. Low-acuity patient visits in the ED reduced significantly immediately after the WIC opened (P=0.01). In the subsequent months, however, patient volume trended back to pre-WIC volumes such that there was no significant impact at 6, 9, or 12 months (P=0.07). Had WIC patients been seen in the main ED, low-acuity volume would have been 27% of the total volume rather than the 22.7% that was observed. The WIC did not result in a sustained reduction in low-acuity patients in the main ED. However, it enabled emergency staff to see low-acuity patients in a lower resource setting during times when ED capacity was limited.

Patterns in Patient Encounters and Emergency Department Capacity in California, 2011-2021

The health care system has undergone major changes in the past decade, and emergency department (ED) crowding has worsened over time; however, the most recent patterns in ED capacity and use in California have yet to be studied. To analyze patterns in ED capacity and utilization in California hospitals from 2011 to 2021. This retrospective cohort study used data from the California Department of Health Care Access and Information and the US Census Bureau to analyze ED facility characteristics from more than 400 general acute care hospitals with more than 320 EDs in California as well as patients who presented to those EDs between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021. Linear patterns (measured by percentage change) in total annual ED capacity (volume of hospital beds, EDs, ED treatment stations, and trauma centers) and ED use (ED visits by disposition and acuity) were assessed as primary outcomes. Patterns in ambulance diversion hours and the number of patients who left the ED without being seen were also examined as secondary outcomes. Visit acuity was categorized into 5 levels by increasing severity (minor, low to moderate, moderate, severe without threat, and severe with threat) based on California Department of Health Care Access and Information descriptions corresponding to Current Procedural Terminology codes. In the prepandemic period (2011-2019), the total population of California increased from 37 638 369 to 39 512 223 (5.0%; 95% CI, 4.1%-5.8%), then decreased to 39 237 836 in 2021 (0.7%; 95% CI, -3.9% to 2.5%). Over the entire study period (2011-2021), the total California population increased by 4.2% (95% CI, 3.3%-5.2%). From 2011 to 2019, the annual number of ED visits increased from 12 054 885 to 14 876 653 (23.4%; 95% CI, 20.0%-26.8%) before decreasing to 12 944 692 in 2021 (-13.0%; 95% CI, -33.1% to 7.1%); from 2011 to 2021, total ED visits increased by 7.4% (95% CI, 5.6%-9.1%). From 2011 to 2021, the total number of EDs decreased from 339 to 326 (-3.8%; 95% CI, -4.4% to -3.2%) and the total number of hospital beds decreased from 75 940 to 74 052 (-2.5%; 95% CI, -3.3% to -1.6%), while the number of ED treatment stations in these fewer EDs increased from 7159 to 8667 (21.1%; 95% CI, 19.7%-22.4%). The number of visits rated as severe with threat also increased, from 2 011 637 in 2011 to 3 375 539 in 2021 (67.8%; 95% CI, 59.7%-75.9%), while visits rated as minor decreased from 913 712 to 336 071 (-63.2%; 95% CI, -75.2% to -51.2%) over the same period. In this cohort study, multiple measures of ED capacity did not proportionally increase with the increasing demand for services; however, the COVID-19 pandemic appears to have substantially affected some of these patterns. These findings may be helpful to policy makers and health care stakeholders when planning resource allocation of limited health care resources.

Emergency Department Overcrowding and Its Potential Impact on Care Processes: A Literature Review

Emergency department overcrowding was a obstacle of providing timely and effective care in emergency department. This condition had negatively impact on many aspect of care proccess. There were different finding related to impact of emergency department overcrowding in care process. The aim of the study was to analyze research articles that discusses emergency department overcrowding and its potential impact on care proccess. The study was literature review using database journal resources from PubMed, Proquest, and ScienceDirect. Emergency department (ED), Overcrowding, and impact we used as keyword. Inclusion criteria of the study were original article, Published at 10 years later (2012-2022), written in english language, focus on patient, staff, or health care system level. Whereas, the exclusion criteria were overcrowding because of other condition (endemic or infection disease), and not focus on patient, staff, or health care system. 9 selected articles that met inclusion criteria were analysed based on author, years, title, and main idea of the study. The finding of the study were emergency department overcrowding had negatively impact on care process including patients, staff, and healthcare system. Impact on patients including increasing mortality and admission rate, impact on staff including increasing workload and non-adherence for practicing best guidelines, meanwhile impact on healthcare system including innapropriate triage proccess and increasing Length of Stay (LOS). Need an effort to decrease impact of ED overcrowding especially on patient, staff, and healthcare system. The result of the study could be used as considering to formulate an effort to reduce impact of ED overcrowding by controlling patient, staff, and healthcare system factors.

Delivery system emergency department capacity and its effect on nonsystem service utilization.

Emergency department (ED) use is often seen as a source of excess health care spending, prompting managers to limit ED capacity in their health systems. However, if limited ED capacity in a delivery system leads patients to seek emergency care elsewhere, then health care quality and efficient management may be compromised within the system. The objective of this study was to explore the effect of the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) in-house ED clinician capacity on VHA community care (CC) ED claims. We used administrative data from the VHA to identify CC ED claims and Department of Veterans Affairs emergency physician (EP) capacity for 2014-2019. We used quasi-experimental instrumental variables approach with two different instruments: percent weekday federal holidays and VHA EP full-time equivalents (FTEs). We controlled for VHA ED variables such as ED wait times (door to triage, door to doctor, and door to admission) and demand variables such as alternative insurance coverage, driving time to VHA care, and demographic variables (employment, age, household income, race, gender, and VHA priority status). After instrumenting for capacity with percent weekday federal holidays, we found that one clinic-day capacity (one 8-h ED shift) per 10,000 enrollees increase at the VHA ED will result in a reduction of 61 CC ED claims per 10,000 enrollees. After instrumenting for capacity with EP FTE, we found that one clinic-day capacity (one 8-h ED shift) per 10,000 enrollees increase at the VHA ED will result in a reduction of 48 CC ED claims per 10,000 enrollees. Both of these results are statistically significant at p< 0.001. Our findings imply that offering more in-house ED care, in the form of clinician capacity, can substantially reduce out-of-system ED use. The results may be of interest to integrated health care system managers who prefer their patients to stay within network.

Evaluation of baseline pediatric readiness of emergency departments in Manitoba, Canada

BackgroundData on the readiness of the general emergency departments (EDs) in Canada to care for children requiring emergency care are limited. Recent evidence suggests an inverse association between pediatric readiness of the general ED and mortality.ObjectivesTo assess the baseline pediatric readiness of the general EDs in the province of Manitoba, Canada, to care for acutely ill and injured children.MethodsThis was a cross-sectional survey study conducted between 2019 and 2020. We used a validated pediatric readiness research checklist to obtain information on the six domains of the general EDs in Manitoba in the fiscal year 2019. A general ED that managed acutely ill patients (0–17th birthday), except for psychiatric cases (up to the 18th birthday), was defined as eligible. We performed a descriptive analysis using the weighted pediatric readiness score (WPRS) based on a 100-point scale. The factors associated with the total WPRS were examined in linear regression models.ResultsOf the 42 eligible general EDs, 34 centers participated with a participation rate of 81%. However, only 27 general EDs plus one specialized children ED (28, 67%) completed the survey. The overall median WPRS (/100) attained by the general EDs was 52.34 (interquartile range [IQR] = 10.44). The only specialized children ED in Manitoba achieved a score of 89.75. Over half (15, 55.6%) of the general EDs scored 50 or more. The mean volume of the general ED that participated was 4010.9 (± SD 2137.2) pediatric general ED visits/year. The average scores attained in the domains such as coordination of patient care, general ED staffing and training, and quality improvement were low across the five Regional Health Authorities. The general ED volume was directly associated with the total WPRS, regression coefficient, β = 0.24 (95% CI 0.04–0.44). Neither the capacity of the general ED to receive pediatric patients from a nursing station, β = − 0.07 (95% CI − 0.28–0.14), nor the capacity to admit pediatric patients that visited the general ED, β = − 0.03 (− 0.23–0.17) was associated with the total WPRS.ConclusionsThe pediatric readiness of the general EDs across Manitoba is comparable to other Canadian region, yet some domains need to be improved.

Retrospective analysis of patterns of opioid overdose and interventions delivered at a tertiary hospital emergency department: impact of COVID-19

BackgroundOpioid-related overdoses cause substantial numbers of preventable deaths. Naloxone is an opioid antagonist available in take-home naloxone (THN) kits as a lifesaving measure for opioid overdose. As the emergency department (ED) is a primary point of contact for patients with high-risk opioid use, evidence-based recommendations from the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia THN practice guidelines include the provision of THN, accompanied by psychosocial interventions. However, implementation of these guidelines in practice is unknown. This study investigated ED opioid-related overdose presentations, concordance of post-overdose interventions with the THN practice guidelines, and the impact, if any, of the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic on case presentations.MethodsA single-centre retrospective audit was conducted at a major tertiary hospital of patients presenting with overdoses involving opioids and non-opioids between March to August 2019 and March to August 2020. Patient presentations and interventions delivered by the paramedics, ED and upon discharge from the ED were collated from medical records and analysed using descriptive statistics, chi square and independent T-tests.ResultsThe majority (66.2%) of patients presented to hospital with mixed drug overdoses involving opioids and non-opioids. Pharmaceutical opioids were implicated in a greater proportion (72.1%) of overdoses than illicit opioids. Fewer patients presented in March to August 2020 as compared with 2019 (26 vs. 42), and mixed drug overdoses were more frequent in 2020 than 2019 (80.8% vs. 57.1%). Referral to outpatient psychology (22.0%) and drug and alcohol services (20.3%) were amongst the most common post-discharge interventions. Naloxone was provided to 28 patients (41.2%) by the paramedics and/or ED. No patients received THN upon discharge.ConclusionsThis study highlights opportunities to improve ED provision of THN and other interventions post-opioid overdose. Large-scale multi-centre studies are required to ascertain the capacity of EDs to provide THN and the impact of COVID-19 on opioid overdose presentations.

Portrait of the Emergency Department at Orotta National Referral and Teaching Hospital in Asmara, Eritrea: A Prospective Observational Study.

BackgroundProvision of high-quality emergency care for acute, life-threatening illnesses can significantly reduce DALY and mortality in sub-Saharan Africa. Here, we present data on the profile of an Emergency Department (ED) in the largest referral hospital in Eritrea and potential gaps for intervention.Patients and MethodsThis was a prospective single-center observational study of 1093 patients who presented to the ED between September and October of 2020. Data were collected using a questionnaire from the patients’ interview, observation and medical record review. The data were summarized using descriptive statistics and where applicable logistic regressions were performed.ResultsThe median age was 45.0 years among the patients. In terms of acuity, 741 (68.5%), 283 (26.2%), 48 (4.4%), 10 (0.9%) patients were triaged as green, yellow, red, and black, respectively. In addition, the number of self-referred patients was 857 (79.1%) and among all the visitors, 376 (34.9%) used Ambulance service. The median ± IQR for ED length of stay (LOS) was 2.7 (1.4–10.0) Hours. Further, 154 (14.4%) patients stayed in the ED for >24 hours. The hospitalization rate was 146 (14.7%). In the multivariate analysis, higher likelihood of prolonged ED LOS was observed in: medical department patients (aOR = 3.53, 95% CI = 2.03–6.14); patients referred from primary health-care centers (aOR = 2.63, 95% CI = 1.10–6.30) and hospital (aOR = 3.70, 95% CI = 2.15–6.37). Prolonged ED LOS was also associated with prior emergency visit (aOR = 1.96, 95% CI = 1.13–3.40); consultation (aOR = 12.27, 95% CI = 6.98–21.56); the need for inpatient admission (aOR = 2.34, 95% CI = 1.38–3.96); and the need for investigation and treatment (aOR = 2.03, 95% CI = 1.07–3.85).ConclusionImprovements regarding ED specialist personnel, inpatient ward capacity, availability of investigations throughout the day and night shifts, amendments in referral system, strengthening ED and critical care capacity in zonal referral hospitals, and access to quality care among the non-communicable disease patients may ameliorate most of the bottlenecks observed in this set-up.

Scientific publication trends of emergency department of International Federation for Emergency Medicine members, 2009 to 2018.

Emergency medicine (EM) is a rapidly developing specialty worldwide. The scientific publications trend is one of the parameters to evaluate national EM developmental milestones. This study was performed to analyze the publication trends from emergency departments (EDs) of International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) full member countries from 2009 to 2018. All data were retrieved from the SciVerse Scopus database. IFEM full member countries where EM was recognized as a specialty before 2009 and annual publication numbers exceeded 12 in 2018 were included. The EM journals list was adopted from the 2017 Journal Citation Reports. Publications with the first author affiliated with EDs were divided into EM or non-EM journal groups according to the publishing journal. The slope (β) of the linear regression was used to assess the trends of publication numbers. The correlation between the 2009 publication number and the trend of publication between 2009 and 2018 was measured by Pearson's correlation coefficient (r). The correlation between funding numbers and publication numbers was analyzed by Spearman's rank correlation coefficient (rs). We identified 30,130 publications with first authors from EDs in 19 countries. The numbers of publications in both EM and non-EM journals showed an increasing trend in 12 countries. Fifteen of the 19 countries had a greater increasing trend in non-EM journals than in EM journals. The 2009 publication numbers were positively correlated with the publication increasing trend between 2009 and 2018 in both EM and non-EM journals (r=0.854 and 0.947, respectively, both p<0.001). The funded publication number was positively correlated with the total national publication amount (rs=0.748, p<0.001). The research capacity of EDs has been increasingly recognized by other medical specialties. The national publication numbers from EDs may predict the academic publication increasing trends in the subsequent 10years.

Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Treatment Efficiency for Traumatic Brain Injury in the Emergency Department: A Multicenter Study in Taiwan.

The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has impacted emergency department (ED) practice, including the treatment of traumatic brain injury (TBI), which is commonly encountered in the ED. Our study aimed to evaluate TBI treatment efficiency in the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic. A retrospective observational study was conducted using the electronic medical records from three hospitals in metropolitan Taipei, Taiwan. The time from ED arrival to brain computed tomography (CT) and the time from ED arrival to surgical management were used as measures of treatment efficiency. TBI treatment efficiencies in the ED coinciding with a small-scale local COVID-19 outbreak in 2020 (P1) and large-scale community spread in 2021 (P2) were compared against the pre-pandemic efficiency recorded in 2019. The interval between ED arrival and brain CT was significantly shortened during P1 and P2 compared with the pre-pandemic interval, and no significant delay between ED arrival and surgical management was found, indicating increased treatment efficiency for TBI in the ED during the COVID-19 pandemic. Minimizing viral spread in the community and the hospital is vital to maintaining ED treatment efficiency and capacity. The ED should retain sufficient capacity to treat older patients with serious TBI during the COVID-19 pandemic.

The Impact of COVID-19 on the Service of Emergency Department.

(1) Introduction: the COVID-19 pandemic significantly impacted the number and acuity of emergency departments (ED) patients, specifically those with non-COVID-19-related health problems. However, the exact impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on ED services is the subject of comprehensive debate. (2) Aim: to gain insight into the consequences of the first wave of the COVID-19 pandemic based on non-COVID-19 presentations and patient acuity using the Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS). (3) Method: in Phase 1, the ED records of one of the main regional non-COVID-19 hospitals in Saudi Arabia were retrospectively audited from August 2020 to February 2021—after the first wave of COVID-19—then compared to information collected for the same period in previous year. Phase 2 included calculating the waiting time to identify delays and issues that may impact the triage effectiveness. (4) Results: a change across all CTAS levels was observed post the 1st wave of COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, there was an increase in the number of patients presenting as higher acuity (CTAS 1 and 2) and a decrease in patients presenting as lower acuity (CTAS 4 and 5). Longer waiting times for patients presenting to ED were also reported. Specifically, 83% of patients presenting as higher acuity experienced a delay. (5) Conclusion: further studies are required to investigate association between the 1st wave of COVID-19 and patient presentations and/or acuity or patient demand and ED capacity.

A Global Survey of Emergency Department Responses to the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IntroductionEmergency departments (ED) globally are addressing the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with varying degrees of success. We leveraged the 17-country, Emergency Medicine Education & Research by Global Experts (EMERGE) network and non-EMERGE ED contacts to understand ED emergency preparedness and practices globally when combating the COVID-19 pandemic.MethodsWe electronically surveyed EMERGE and non-EMERGE EDs from April 3–June 1, 2020 on ED capacity, pandemic preparedness plans, triage methods, staffing, supplies, and communication practices. The survey was available in English, Mandarin Chinese, and Spanish to optimize participation. We analyzed survey responses using descriptive statistics.Results74/129 (57%) EDs from 28 countries in all six World Health Organization global regions responded. Most EDs were in Asia (49%), followed by North America (28%), and Europe (14%). Nearly all EDs (97%) developed and implemented protocols for screening, testing, and treating patients with suspected COVID-19 infections. Sixty percent responded that provider staffing/back-up plans were ineffective. Many sites (47/74, 64%) reported staff missing work due to possible illness with the highest provider proportion of COVID-19 exposures and infections among nurses.ConclusionDespite having disaster plans in place, ED pandemic preparedness and response continue to be a challenge. Global emergency research networks are vital for generating and disseminating large-scale event data, which is particularly important during a pandemic.

Emergency Department Characteristics and Capabilities in Quito, Ecuador.

Background:Emergency care is an essential part of a health system. Ecuador has recognized emergency medicine as a specialty and has two emergency medicine residency training programs. However, little has been published about emergency department characteristics and capabilities in Ecuador.Objective:We described the characteristics and capabilities of emergency departments (EDs) in Quito, Ecuador, in 2017, using the National Emergency Department Inventory (NEDI) survey.Methods:The 23-item survey included questions pertaining to ED characteristics, including: visit volume, physical and administrative structure, clinical capabilities, technological resources, and consult personnel availability. This study included all EDs in Quito operating 24 hours/day, 7 days/week, and serving all patients seeking care. One representative from each ED was asked to complete the survey based on calendar year 2017.Findings:Thirty EDs met the inclusion criteria, and 26 completed the survey (87% response). The median number of ED beds was 17 (range 2–61). Median annual visit volume was 22,580 (range 1,680 to 129,676). All but two EDs provided care for both children and adults. Cardiac monitors were available in 88% of EDs, CT scanners in 68%, and rooms for respiratory isolation in 31%. Most EDs could manage patients with general medicine (92%), general surgery (92%), and gynecology (88%) emergencies 24/7. Fewer were able to provide hand surgery (45%) and dental (28%) care 24/7. Typical length of stay was 1–6 hours in 65% and >6 hours in 31% of EDs. Half of EDs reported operating at full capacity and 27% reported operating over their capacity. When compared to private EDs, government EDs (public and social security) had a higher mean number of visits per year (50,090 government vs. 13,968 private, p < 0.001), higher mean number of ED beds (36 government vs. 9 private, p = 0.002), and higher length of stay (58% of patient stays > 6 hours in government EDs vs. 86% of patient stays 1–6 hours in private EDs, p = 0.009).Conclusions:EDs in Quito varied widely with respect to annual visit volume, ability to treat different pathologies 24/7, and resources. Most EDs are functioning at or over capacity, and a substantial number have long lengths of stay. Further research and investment in emergency care could help increase the capacity and efficiency of EDs in Ecuador.

Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on South Australia's emergency departments: evidence from two lockdowns.

Objective This study assessed the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency departments (EDs) in South Australia, measured by changes in the number and casemix of patients in the system over time. Methods Data from the South Australia Emergency Department Dashboard, updated every 30min, were analysed for the period 4 October-21 December 2020. The Dashboard reports live counts of the number and type of patients in each of the six adult metropolitan public EDs in Adelaide, South Australia. Results There was a significant difference in the mean daily average occupied ED capacity before and during two distinct increases in COVID-19 cases in South Australia. An increase in COVID-19 cases coincided with a decrease in patients in EDs (Pearson's r =-0.93 and -0.67; P Conclusions During the two periods of COVID-19 case growth in South Australia, there was a significant drop in the number of patients presenting to the major public EDs and a change in the casemix of patients over time. What is known about the topic? EDs in Australia often operate at or over capacity, with frequent reports of ambulance ramping, access block and long waiting times. There have been reports internationally of significant declines in ED presentations throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. What does this paper add? This paper uses a novel publicly available data source that is available in real time to contribute a new perspective from South Australia, which has experienced two distinct periods of strict restrictions and lockdown. The research showed that the number of mental health presentations remained consistently high, despite a significant overall decline in ED occupancy. What are the implications for practitioners? This study demonstrates that South Australians are accessing emergency medical treatment differently in response to the COVID-19 pandemic. In the context of an overall decline in presentation numbers, the number of mental health-related presentations has not changed significantly, suggesting that this trend should be closely monitored. The findings corroborate the national concern that unwell people have avoided accessing emergency medical care during the pandemic, leading to worse outcomes and increased need for healthcare resources at a later date. It will be important to monitor and quickly detect further changes in ED usage using real-time data as the pandemic evolves, as well as in any future significant health crises.

Association between Emergency Department Overcrowding and Mortality at a Teaching Hospital in Saudi Arabia

Introduction: Emergency Departments (ED) are highly important in hospital settings because they offer 24-hour professional assistance to patients in need of healthcare. However, ED overcrowding has started to become a global healthcare crisis, such that the patient capacity of EDs is no longer sufficient to meet patient demand. Aim: Thus, this study aimed to determine the relationship between ED overcrowding and the mortality rate of patients to draw the attention of decision makers in Saudi Arabia toward this issue, with the hope of ultimately attaining a solution to this problem. Methods: Using patients’ electronic health records that were stored in the Quadra Med system in 2018, we calculated the occupancy rates of the ED of a target teaching hospital at different quarters and associated those figures with the mortality rates for the same quarters. Results: Our results showed that there was no significant association between mortality rate and crowding status in the ED. Nonetheless, we recommend increasing public awareness and bed capacity at EDs in Saudi Arabia because overcrowded EDs can lead to adverse patient outcomes. Conclusion: The present study showed that the highest percentage (38%) of deaths that occurred during the overcrowded period were mostly of patients between 30 and 44 years of age, while patients between 60 and 74 years of age accounted for 36% of deaths. The current study also assessed patient triaging, revealing that the highest number of patients was associated with level four (62.7% of the total patients in the overcrowded ED) and level five (33.1% in the overcrowded ED) triaging. We also discovered higher levels of admission in the critical care unit during the ED overcrowding period compared with other periods.