Cannabinoid 1 Agonists Research Articles

The Peripheral Cannabinoid Receptor Type 1 (CB1) as a Molecular Target for Modulating Body Weight in Man.

The cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptor regulates appetite and body weight; however, unwanted central side effects of both agonists (in wasting disorders) or antagonists (in obesity and diabetes) have limited their therapeutic utility. At the peripheral level, CB1 receptor activation impacts the energy balance of mammals in a number of different ways: inhibiting satiety and emesis, increasing food intake, altering adipokine and satiety hormone levels, altering taste sensation, decreasing lipolysis (fat break down), and increasing lipogenesis (fat generation). The CB1 receptor also plays an important role in the gut–brain axis control of appetite and satiety. The combined effect of peripheral CB1 activation is to promote appetite, energy storage, and energy preservation (and the opposite is true for CB1 antagonists). Therefore, the next generation of CB1 receptor medicines (agonists and antagonists, and indirect modulators of the endocannabinoid system) have been peripherally restricted to mitigate these issues, and some of these are already in clinical stage development. These compounds also have demonstrated potential in other conditions such as alcoholic steatohepatitis and diabetic nephropathy (peripherally restricted CB1 antagonists) and pain conditions (peripherally restricted CB1 agonists and FAAH inhibitors). This review will discuss the mechanisms by which peripheral CB1 receptors regulate body weight, and the therapeutic utility of peripherally restricted drugs in the management of body weight and beyond.

Low-Frequency Stimulation Prevents Kindling-Induced Impairment through the Activation of the Endocannabinoid System.

Background Cannabinoid system affects memory and has anticonvulsant effects in epileptic models. In the current study, the role of cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptors was investigated in amelioration of the effects of low-frequency stimulation (LFS) on learning and memory impairments in kindled rats. Methods Electrical stimulation of the hippocampal CA1 area was employed to kindle the animals. LFS was applied to the CA1 area in four trials following the last kindling stimulation. One group of animals received intraperitoneal injection of AM251 (0.1 μg/rat), a CB1 receptor antagonist, before the LFS application. Similarly, CB1 agonist WIN55-212-2 (WIN) was administrated to another group prior to LFS. The Morris water maze (MWM) and the novel object recognition (NOR) tests were executed 48 h after the last kindling stimulation to assess learning and memory. Results Applying LFS in the kindled+LFS group restored learning and memory impairments in the kindled rats. There was a significant difference between the kindled and the kindled+LFS groups in learning and memory. The application of AM251 reduced the LFS effects significantly. Adversely, WIN acted similarly to LFS and alleviated learning and memory deficits in the kindled+WIN group. In addition, WIN did not counteract the LFS enhancing effects in the KLFS+WIN group. Conclusions Improving effects of LFS on learning and memory impairments are mediated through the activation of the endocannabinoid (ECB) system.

Behavioral effects of chronic WIN 55,212-2 administration during adolescence and adulthood in mice.

Marijuana, a psychoactive drug that activates cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptors in the brain, is the most prevalently abused illicit drug among American adolescents and young adults. However, the long-term consequences of adolescent exposure to cannabinoids on the brain and behavior remain poorly understood. In both humans and nonhumans, adolescence is characterized by the maturation of the endocannabinoid neurotransmitter system in the prefrontal cortex and striatum-brain regions that underlie choice and decision making and are densely packed with CB1 receptors. In the current study, the effects of chronic WIN 55,212-2 (a CB1 agonist) exposure during adolescence on reversal learning and delay discounting were compared with those of adult-onset exposure using mice. Mice were administered 3.0 mg/kg/day WIN 55,212-2 or vehicle for 21 days beginning in adolescence (postnatal days 28-49) or adulthood (postnatal days 90-111). For the reversal-learning task, there was no difference in errors or omissions to criterion following a reversal in adolescent-exposed mice but adult-exposed mice showed a delay in beginning the reversal, suggesting that adolescents, but not adults, are resilient to this drug. Adult mice given WIN 55,212-2 in adolescence displayed greater impulsivity in the form of preference for smaller-sooner reinforcers over larger-delayed ones in the delay-discounting procedure, but this was seen to a lesser extent with adult-onset exposure. These data underscore the importance of variables related to the timing and duration of exposure as well as the specific and persistent behavioral endpoints affected by chronic cannabinoid administration. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Adolescent chronic mild stress alters hippocampal CB1 receptor-mediated excitatory neurotransmission and plasticity

Endocannabinoids (eCBs) are involved in the stress response and alterations in eCB signaling may contribute to the etiology of mood disorders. Exposure to chronic mild stress (CMS), a model of depression, produces downregulation of the cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptor in the hippocampus of male rats. However, it is unknown how this stress-induced change in CB1 levels affects eCB-mediated neurotransmission. In vitro, field potential recordings from CMS-exposed (21-days) rats were performed to assess the effects of stress on eCB-regulated glutamatergic neurotransmission in/on hippocampal area CA1. We observed that application of the CB1 agonist, WIN 55,212-5 (1μM), in stress animals resulted in a ∼135% increase in excitatory neurotransmission, whereas CB1 activation in non-stress animals leads to a ∼30% decrease. However, during blockade of GABA(A) neurotransmission with picrotoxin, CB1 activation yielded a ∼35% decrease in stress animals. These findings indicate that CMS does not directly affect glutamatergic neurotransmission. Rather, CMS sensitizes CB1 function on GABAergic terminals, leading to less inhibition and an increase in excitatory neurotransmission. This finding is reinforced in that induction of weak long-term-potentiation (LTP) is enhanced in CMS-exposed animals compared to controls and this enhancement is CB1-dependent. Lastly, we observed that the LTP-blocking property of WIN 55,212-5 shifts from being glutamate-dependent in non-stress animals to being GABA-dependent in stress animals. These results effectively demonstrate that CMS significantly alters hippocampal eCB-mediated neurotransmission and synaptic plasticity.

Endocannabinoids limit excessive mast cell maturation and activation in human skin

Mast cells (MCs) crucially contribute to many inflammatory diseases. However, the physiological controls preventing excessive activities of MCs in human skin are incompletely understood. Since endocannabinoids are important neuroendocrine MC modifiers, we investigated how stimulation/inhibition of cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptors affect the biology of human skin MCs in situ. This was investigated in the MC-rich connective tissue sheath of organ-cultured human scalp hair follicles by quantitative (immuno)histomorphometry, ultrastructural, and quantitative PCR techniques with the use of CB1 agonists or antagonists, CB1 knockdown, or CB1 knockout mice. Kit+ MCs within the connective tissue sheath of human hair follicles express functional CB1 receptors, whose pharmacological blockade or gene silencing significantly stimulated both the degranulation and the maturation of MCs from resident progenitor cells in situ (ie, enhanced the number of tryptase+, FcεRIα, or chymase+ connective tissue sheath-MCs). This was, at least in part, stem cell factor-dependent. CB1 agonists counteracted the MC-activating effects of classical MC secretagogues. Similar phenomena were observed in CB1 knockout mice, attesting to the invivo relevance of this novel MC-inhibitory mechanism. By using human hair follicle organ culture as an unconventional, but clinically relevant model system for studying the biology of MCs in situ, we show that normal skin MCs are tightly controlled by the endocannabinoid system. This limits excessive activation and maturation of MCs from resident progenitors via "tonic" CB1 stimulation by locally synthesized endocannabinoids. The excessive numbers and activation of MCs in allergic and other chronic inflammatory skin diseases may partially arise from resident intracutaneous MC progenitors, for example, because of insufficient CB1 stimulation. Therefore, CB1 stimulation is a promising strategy for the future management of allergy and MC-dependent skin diseases.

Cannabinoid 1 (CB1) Receptor - Pharmacology, Role in Pain and Recent Developments in Emerging CB1 Agonists

Cannabinoids are antinociceptive in animal models of acute pain, tissue injury and nerve injury induced nociception and act via their cognate receptors, cannabinoid receptor 1 and 2. This review examines the underlying biology of the endocannabinoids and behavioural, neurophysiological, neuroanatomical evidence supporting the notion of pain modulation by these ligands with a focus on the current evidence encompassing the pharmacological characterization of CB1 agonists in this therapy. Separating the psychotropic effects of CB1 agonists from their therapeutic benefits is the major challenge facing researchers in the field today and with the discovery of peripherally acting agonists there seems to be a ray of hope emerging for the diverse potential therapeutic applications of this class of ligands.

Characterization of active and inactive states of CB1 receptor and the differential binding state modulation by cannabinoid agonists, antagonists and inverse agonists

Cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptors have the ability to change conformation between active (R*) and inactive (R) receptor states. Herein, we further characterize these receptor states using series of saturation radioligand binding studies and their differential displacement binding by various CB1 receptor ligands. Binding experiments were carried out in naïve rat/dog whole brain membranes using radioligands [(3)H]CP55,940 (for R* state) & [(3)H]SR141716A (both R* and R states) and various agonist, antagonist & inverse agonist ligands at CB1 receptors. In the saturation binding experiments, of the total number of CB1 receptor binding sites (R* + R) in the rat and dog whole brain membranes, only about 18.3 and 11.6% were in the active (R*) state recognized by [(3)H]CP55,940, respectively. In the competitive binding studies, all the CB1 receptor agonists investigated had significantly very high affinity for the active R* state recognized by [(3)H]CP55,940 and lower affinity for the inactive R state mainly recognized by [(3)H]SR141716A in the presence of a non-hydrolyzable analogue of GTP [Gpp(NH)p]. In contrast, various CB1 receptor antagonists/inverse agonists had similar nanomolar affinities at both [(3)H]CP55,940 and [(3)H]SR141716A recognized binding states. These results clearly characterize the significant differences between the active R* and inactive R binding states of CB1 receptors in naive rat and dog brain. In addition, these results also demonstrates that the CB1 agonists and antagonists/inverse agonists can be differentiated by their relative affinities at active (R*) and inactive (R) binding states of the CB1 receptor.

Cannabinoid 1 receptors modulate intestinal sensory and motor function in rat

Cannabinoid receptors are involved in visceral pain perception and control of intestinal motility in vivo. The underlying mechanisms are not well characterized. We aimed to determine whether the cannabinoid-1 (CB(1)) receptor modulates intestinal afferent nerve discharge and the peristaltic reflex. Rats were anesthetized and intestinal segments were removed. Afferent nerve discharge from a mesenteric nerve was investigated in vitro in the presence of the CB(1) antagonist SR 141716A or the CB(1) agonist WIN 55212-2. The myenteric peristaltic reflex was induced by electrical field stimulation and influence of SR 141716A or WIN 55212-2 was recorded. Afferent nerve discharge to the algesic mediator bradykinin was reduced to 11 +/- 5.1 imp s(-1) following pretreatment with SR 141716A and unchanged after WIN 55212-2 compared to 63 +/- 15.4 imp s(-1) in controls. At maximum distension pressure (80 cmH(2)O) during ramp distension, 92 +/- 12.4 imp s(-1) were reached following SR 141716A compared to 260 +/- 13.2 in vehicle controls and 227 +/- 15.4 in WIN 55212-2 pretreated animals. In contrast, afferent discharge to 5-HT (500 micromol L(-1)) was increased to 75 +/- 24.6 imp s(-1) following WIN 55212-2 compared to 18 +/- 5.9 imp s(-1) in controls, whereas SR 141716A had no effect. Ascending neuronal contractions were dose-dependently attenuated in the presence of SR 141716A and latency of these contractions was reduced. WIN 55212-2 had opposite effects that were abolished by SR 141716A. Activation of the CB(1) receptor differentially alters afferent intestinal nerve sensitivity to bradykinin, 5-HT, and noxious mechanical distension, while it strengthens ascending neuronal contractions. Further studies are needed to determine the physiological relevance of these observations.

Central cannabinoid signaling mediating food intake: a pharmacological-challenge magnetic resonance imaging and functional histology study in rat

Endocannabinoids have a variety of effects by acting through cannabinoid 1 (CB1) receptors located throughout the brain. However, since CB1 receptors are located presynaptically, and because the strength of downstream coupling varies with brain region, expression studies alone do not provide a firm basis for interpreting sites of action. Likewise, to date most functional studies have used high doses of drugs, which can bias results toward non-relevant adverse effects, and which mask more behaviourally-relevant actions. Here we use a low, orexigenic dose of the full CB1 agonist, CP55940, to map responsive brain regions using the complementary techniques of pharmacological-challenge functional magnetic resonance imaging (phMRI) and immediate-early gene activity. Areas of interest demonstrate a drug interaction when the CB1 receptor inverse agonist, rimonabant, is co-administered. This analysis highlights the corticostriatal–hypothalamic pathway, which is central to the motivational drive to eat.

Pharmacological Inhibition of CB1Cannabinoid Receptor Protects Against Doxorubicin-Induced Cardiotoxicity

We aimed to explore the effects of pharmacologic inhibition of cannabinoid-1 (CB1) receptor in in vivo and in vitro models of doxorubicin (DOX)-induced cardiotoxicity. Doxorubicin is one of the most potent antitumor agents available; however, its clinical use is limited because of the risk of severe cardiotoxicity. Endocannabinoids mediate cardiodepressive effects through CB1 receptors in various pathophysiological conditions, and these effects can be reversed by CB1 antagonists. Left ventricular function was measured by Millar pressure-volume system. Apoptosis markers, CB1/CB2 receptor expression, and endocannabinoid levels were determined by immunohistochemistry, Western blot, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction, real-time polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, fluorescent microscopy, and liquid chromatography/in-line mass spectrometry techniques. Five days after the administration of a single dose of DOX (20 mg/kg intraperitoneally) to mice, left ventricular systolic pressure, maximum first derivative of ventricular pressure with respect to time (+dP/dt), stroke work, ejection fraction, cardiac output, and load-independent indexes of contractility (end-systolic pressure-volume relation, preload-recruitable stroke work, dP/dt-end-diastolic volume relation) were significantly depressed, and the myocardial level of the endocannabinoid anandamide (but not CB1/CB2 receptor expression) was elevated compared with vehicle-treated control mice. Treatment with the CB1 antagonists rimonabant or AM281 markedly improved cardiac dysfunction and reduced DOX-induced apoptosis in the myocardium. Doxorubicin also decreased cell viability and induced apoptosis in the H9c2 myocardial cell line measured by flow cytometry and fluorescent microscopy, which were prevented by the preincubation of the cells with either CB1 antagonist, but not with CB1 and CB2 agonists and CB2 antagonists. These data suggest that CB1 antagonists may represent a new cardioprotective strategy against DOX-induced cardiotoxicity.

Editorial???Behavioural Pharmacology of Cannabinoids

Editorial???Behavioural Pharmacology of Cannabinoids