Cannabimimetic Indoles Research Articles

The Spicy Story of Cannabimimetic Indoles.

The Sterling Research Group identified pravadoline as an aminoalkylindole (AAI) non-steroidal anti-inflammatory pain reliever. As drug design progressed, the ability of AAI analogs to block prostaglandin synthesis diminished, and antinociceptive activity was found to result from action at the CB1 cannabinoid receptor, a G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) abundant in the brain. Several laboratories applied computational chemistry methods to ultimately conclude that AAI and cannabinoid ligands could overlap within a common binding pocket but that WIN55212-2 primarily utilized steric interactions via aromatic stacking, whereas cannabinoid ligands required some electrostatic interactions, particularly involving the CB1 helix-3 lysine. The Huffman laboratory identified strategies to establish CB2 receptor selectivity among cannabimimetic indoles to avoid their CB1-related adverse effects, thereby stimulating preclinical studies to explore their use as anti-hyperalgesic and anti-allodynic pharmacotherapies. Some AAI analogs activate novel GPCRs referred to as “Alkyl Indole” receptors, and some AAI analogs act at the colchicine-binding site on microtubules. The AAI compounds having the greatest potency to interact with the CB1 receptor have found their way into the market as “Spice” or “K2”. The sale of these alleged “herbal products” evades FDA consumer protections for proper labeling and safety as a medicine, as well as DEA scheduling as compounds having no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse. The distribution to the public of potent alkyl indole synthetic cannabimimetic chemicals without regard for consumer safety contrasts with the adherence to regulatory requirements for demonstration of safety that are routinely observed by ethical pharmaceutical companies that market medicines.

The Synthesis and Pharmacological Evaluation of Adamantane-Derived Indoles: Cannabimimetic Drugs of Abuse

Two novel adamantane derivatives, adamantan-1-yl(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone (AB-001) and N-(adamtan-1-yl)-1-pentyl-1H-indole-3-carboxamide (SDB-001), were recently identified as cannabimimetic indoles of abuse. Conflicting anecdotal reports of the psychoactivity of AB-001 in humans, and a complete dearth of information about the bioactivity of SDB-001, prompted the preparation of AB-001, SDB-001, and several analogues intended to explore preliminary structure-activity relationships within this class. This study sought to elucidate which structural features of AB-001, SDB-001, and their analogues govern the cannabimimetic potency of these chemotypes in vitro and in vivo. All compounds showed similar full agonist profiles at CB1 (EC50 = 16-43 nM) and CB2 (EC50 = 29-216 nM) receptors in vitro using a FLIPR membrane potential assay, with the exception of SDB-002, which demonstrated partial agonist activity at CB2 receptors. The activity of AB-001, AB-002, and SDB-001 in rats was compared to that of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC) and cannabimimetic indole JWH-018 using biotelemetry. SDB-001 dose-dependently induced hypothermia and reduced heart rate (maximal dose 10 mg/kg) with potency comparable to that of Δ(9)-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ(9)-THC, maximal dose 10 mg/kg), and lower than that of JWH-018 (maximal dose 3 mg/kg). Additionally, the changes in body temperature and heart rate affected by SDB-001 are of longer duration than those of Δ(9)-THC or JWH-018, suggesting a different pharmacokinetic profile. In contrast, AB-001, and its homologue, AB-002, did not produce significant hypothermic and bradycardic effects, even at relatively higher doses (up to 30 mg/kg), indicating greatly reduced potency compared to Δ(9)-THC, JWH-018, and SDB-001.

Identification and quantitation of JWH-213, a cannabimimetic indole, as a designer drug in a herbal product

In our survey of designer drugs in the Japanese market, a cannabimimetic indole was identified as a new active compound in a herbal product. The structure of this compound was elucidated by liquid chromatography–photodiode array–mass spectrometry (LC–PDA–MS), gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS), high-resolution MS, and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) analyses. The compound was finally identified as (4-ethyl-1-naphthalenyl)(2-methyl-1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone (JWH-213), an indole-based cannabinoid receptor ligand. To our knowledge, this is the first finding of JWH-213 as a designer drug in a herbal product. The quantitative LC–PDA analysis showed that the JWH-213 content in the product was 252 mg/pack.

Application of mass spectrometry to the structural identification of the metabolites of the synthetic cannabinoid JWH-018 and the determination of them in human urine

Smoking mixtures containing cannabimimetic indoles may still be illegally sold in Russia. Although a method for their analysis is required for forensic toxicology authorities, the detection of synthetic cannabinoids is a complicated analytical task because of low anticipated concentrations in urine and the lack of in vivo data on their metabolism. Here, the urinary metabolites of 1-pentyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-018) and a procedure for determining them in urine are reported. Using gas and high-performance liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry, two main monohydroxylated metabolites were identified in urine. Based on differences in their electron ionization MS/MS spectra, it is supposed that one of them is formed by the hydroxylation of an indole ring and the other, by the hydroxylation of a pentyl side chain. The main metabolites are almost completely excreted as conjugates with glucuronic acid. The structure of minor metabolites was proposed. The parent compound was not detected in urine at a level of 50 pg/mL 12 h after administration.

Identification and quantitation of a benzoylindole (2-methoxyphenyl)(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone and a naphthoylindole 1-(5-fluoropentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-(naphthalene-1-yl)methanone (AM-2201) found in illegal products obtained via the Internet and their cannabimimetic effects evaluated by in vitro [35S]GTPγS binding assays

During our careful surveillance of unregulated drugs in January to February 2011, we found two new compounds used as adulterants in herbal products obtained via the Internet. These compounds were identified by liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, accurate mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The first compound identified was a benzoylindole (2-methoxyphenyl)(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone (1), which is a positional isomer of (4-methoxyphenyl)(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone (RCS-4, 4). The second compound was 1-(5-fluoropentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)-(naphthalene-1-yl)methanone (AM-2201, 2). The compound 2 has been reported to be a cannabinoid receptor agonist. Because the cannabimimetic effects of compounds 1 and 4 have not been reported to date, their biological activities were evaluated by measuring the activation of [35S] guanosine-5′-O-(3-thio)-triphosphate binding to guanine nucleotide-binding proteins, together with those of other synthetic cannabimimetic compounds. For quantitation of the above two compounds (1 and 2) and previously identified compounds (AM-694, 3; JWH-122, 5; RCS-4, 4), each product was extracted with methanol under ultrasonication to prepare a sample solution for analysis by liquid chromatography with ultraviolet detection. Each of four commercial products contained some of cannabimimetic indoles 1–5; their contents ranged from 14.8 to 185 mg per pack.

Identification and quantitation of two cannabimimetic phenylacetylindoles JWH-251 and JWH-250, and four cannabimimetic naphthoylindoles JWH-081, JWH-015, JWH-200, and JWH-073 as designer drugs in illegal products

Six cannabimimetic indoles have been identified as adulterants in herbal or chemical products being sold illegally in Japan, with four of the compounds being new as adulterants to our knowledge. The identifications were based on analyses using gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, high-resolution mass spectrometry, and nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The first two compounds were identified as phenylacetyl indoles JWH-251 (2-(2-methylphenyl)-1-(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)ethanone; 1) and its demethyl-methoxylated analog JWH-250 (2-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)ethanone; 2). Compound 2 was identical to that found as an adulterant in the UK and in Germany in 2009. The third compound was naphthoylindole JWH-081 (1-(4-methoxynaphthalenyl)-(1-pentyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone; 3), and the fourth was JWH-073 (1-naphthalenyl(1-butyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone; 4), which had been identified as an adulterant in our previous study. Two additional compounds were JWH-015 (1-naphthalenyl(2-methyl-1-propyl-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone; 5) and JWH-200 (1-naphthalenyl(1-(2-(4-morpholinyl)ethyl)-1H-indol-3-yl)methanone; 6). Compounds 1–4 and 6 were reported to be synthetic cannabinoids with selective affinity for cannabinoid CB1 receptors, while compound 5 was reported to be a selective CB2 receptor agonist causing immunosuppressive effects without psychotropic affects. One product contained both CB1 and CB2 receptor agonists in our collection. Quantitative analyses of the six cannabimimetic compounds in 20 products revealed that there was large variation in concentrations of the detected compounds among products; for herbal cutting products, the total amounts of these cannabinoids ranged from 26 to 100 mg.

How globalization and market innovation challenge how we think about and respond to drug use: ‘Spice’ a case study

How globalization and market innovation challenge how we think about and respond to drug use: ‘Spice’ a case study

Detection of JWH-018 metabolites in smoking mixture post-administration urine

Smoking mixtures containing the cannabimimetic indoles may still be available over-the-counter in several countries. Due to the high affinity of these compounds to the cannabinoid receptors, their effective dose is lower than that of the marijuana products resulting in a low concentration of the excreted metabolites accompanied by a higher psychoactive potency. Up to now the in vivo metabolism of the cannabimimetic indoles seems to be insufficiently investigated and no data have been published on an assay of JWH-018 in urine. In this publication the urinary metabolites of JWH-018 are reported. Using gas and liquid chromatography combined with tandem mass spectrometry two main monohydroxylated metabolites were identified in the forensic urine samples. Based on the differences in their electron ionization MS/MS spectra it is supposed that one is formed by hydroxylation of the indole ring whilst the other by hydroxylation of the N-alkyl chain. The main metabolites are almost completely glucuroconjugated, whereas minor ones ( N-despentyl hydroxy-, carboxy-, dihydroxy-, and reduced di- and trihydroxy metabolites) were also present in the free fraction. The parent compound was not detected in urine.

Identification of a cannabimimetic indole as a designer drug in a herbal product

A cannabimimetic indole has been identified as a new adulterant in a herbal product being sold illegally in Japan for its expected narcotic effect. Liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry analyses indicated that the product contained two major compounds. One was identified as a cannabinoid analog (1RS,3SR)-3-[4-(1,1-dimethyloctyl)-2-hydroxyphenyl]cyclohexan-1-ol (1) by direct comparison with the authentic compound, which we reported previously. The other compound (2) showed a molecular weight of 341 daltons, and accurate mass spectral measurements showed its elemental composition to be C24H23NO. Both mass and nuclear magnetic resonance spectrometric data revealed that 2 was 1-pentyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole [or naphthalen-1-yl-(1-pentylindol-3-yl)methanone] being identical to JWH-018, which was synthesized by Wiley and coworkers in 1998. This compound was reported as a potent cannabinoid receptor agonist possessing a pharmacological cannabimimetic activity.

Recent Advances in the Development of Selective Ligands for the Cannabinoid CB2 Receptor

Two subtypes of the mammalian cannabinoid receptor have been identified and successfully cloned since 1990. The CB(1) receptor is primarily located in the central nervous system and the CB(2) receptor is almost exclusively expressed in cells of the immune system. The CB(1) and CB(2) receptors are both G-protein coupled receptors and are involved in the inhibition of adenylate cyclase. The CB(2) receptor is of particular importance due to its involvement in signal transduction in the immune system, making it a potential target for therapeutic immune intervention. A number of these selective ligands are derivatives of traditional dibenzopyran based cannabinoids. These include the very recently synthesized (2'R)-1-methoxy-3-(2'-methylbutyl)- Delta (8)-THC (JWH-359) which has a 224 fold selectivity for the CB(2) receptor, readily comparable to the well known 1-deoxy-3-(1',1'-dimethylbutyl)- Delta (8)-THC (JWH-133) which has 200 fold selectivity for the CB(2) receptor. Several 9-hydroxyhexahydrocannabinols have also been synthesized and are found to be selective high affinity ligands for the CB(2) receptor. These are 1-deoxy-9beta-hydroxy-dimethylhexylhexahydrocannabinol (JWH-361, K(i) = 2.7 nM) and 1-deoxy-9beta-hydroxy-dimethylpentylhexahydrocannabinol (JWH-300, K(i) = 5.3 nM). CB(2) selective cannabi-mimetic indoles include 1-(2,3-dichlorobenzoyl)-2-methyl-3-(2-[1-morpholine]ethyl)-5-methoxyindole (L768242), (R)-3-(2-Iodo-5-nitrobenzoyl)-1-(1-methyl-2-piperidinylmethyl)-1H-indole (AM1241) and 1-propyl-2-methyl-3-(1-naphthoyl) indole (JWH-015), which exhibit significant selectivity for the CB(2) receptor coupled with weak affinity for the CB(1) receptor. Bristol-Meyer Squibb has produced a phenylalanine derived cannabimimetic indole which possesses high CB(2) affinity (K(i) = 8 nM) and very low affinity for the CB(1) receptor (K(i) = 4000 nM). This review will discuss the current advances and recent results in the structure-activity relationships (SAR) of selective ligands for the cannabinoid CB(2) receptor.

Targeting the cannabinoid CB2 receptor: modelling and structural determinants of CB2 selective ligands

Recent developments indicate that CB2 receptor ligands have the potential to become therapeutically important. To explore this potential, it is necessary to develop compounds with high affinity for the CB2 receptor and little affinity for the CB1 receptor. This review will discuss structure-activity relations at both receptors for classical cannabinoids and cannabimimetic indoles. Examples of CB2 selective ligands from both classes of compounds are presented and the structural features leading to selectivity are described. Two approaches, receptor mutations and molecular modelling, have been employed to investigate the interaction of ligands with both cannabinoid receptors. These results obtained from these techniques are discussed.

1‐Pentyl‐3‐phenylacetylindoles, a New Class of Cannabimimetic Indoles.

AbstractFor Abstract see ChemInform Abstract in Full Text.

1-Pentyl-3-phenylacetylindoles, a new class of cannabimimetic indoles

A new class of cannabimimetic indoles, with 3-phenylacetyl or substituted 3-phenylacetyl substituents, has been prepared and their affinities for the cannabinoid CB 1 and CB 2 receptors have been determined. In general those compounds with a 2-substituted phenylacetyl group have good affinity for both receptors. The 4-substituted analogs have little affinity for either receptor, while the 3-substituted compounds are intermediate in their affinities. Two of these compounds, 1-pentyl-3-(2-methylphenylacetyl)indole (JWH-251) and 1-pentyl-3-(3-methoxyphenylacetyl)indole (JWH-302), have 5-fold selectivity for the CB 1 receptor with modest affinity for the CB 2 receptor. GTPγS determinations indicate that both compounds are highly efficacious agonists at the CB 1 receptor and partial agonists at the CB 2 receptor.

CB2 Receptor Ligands

The CB(1) receptor is found principally in the central nervous system and is responsible for the overt physiological effects of cannabinoids. In contrast, the CB(2) receptor is expressed primarily in the immune system and is responsible for few, if any, obvious behavioral effects. Although many cannabinoid receptor ligands show little, or at best modest, selectivity for either receptor, a number of synthetic compounds are known which have significant selectivity for the CB(2) receptor. These include cannabimimetic indoles, such as 1-propyl-2-methyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-015) and 1-(2,3-dichlorobenzoyl)-2-methyl-3-(2-[1-morpho-lino]ethyl)-5-methoxyindole (L768242), both of which have good affinity for the CB(2) receptor, but weak affinity for the CB(1) receptor. Efforts have been made to develop structure-activity relationships (SAR) at CB(2) for cannabimimetic indoles, but with limited success. Several derivatives of traditional dibenzopyran based cannabinoids have also been found to have significant selectivity for the CB(2) receptor. These include 1-methoxy-Delta(8)-THC derivatives, 1-methoxy-Delta(8)-THC-DMH (L759633), 1-methoxy-Delta(9(11))-THC-DMH (L759656), and 1-methoxy-3-(1',1'-dimethylhexyl)-Delta(8)-THC (JWH-229), plus a number of 1-deoxy-Delta(8)-THC analogues. In particular, 1-deoxy-3-(1',1'-dimethylbutyl)-Delta(8)-THC (JWH-133) shows two hundred-fold selectivity for the CB(2) receptor. Very recently several compounds belonging to other structural groups have also shown selectivity for the CB(2) receptor. This review will describe the current status of the results of these studies and discuss the SAR for these classes of ligands.

Recent Developments in the Medicinal Chemistry of Cannabimimetic Indoles, Pyrroles and Indenes

During the development of new nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents, it was discovered that 1-aminoalkyl-3-aroylindoles have affinity for the cannabinoid brain (CB(1)) receptor. This has led to the development of over 100 cannabimimetic aminoalkylindoles, and the development of SAR for these compounds. Later work demonstrated that the aminoalkyl moiety was not necessary, and could be replaced by a four- to six-membered alkyl chain without loss of affinity. Investigation of these indoles led to the discovery of a CB(2) selective ligand, 3-(1-naphthoyl)-N-propylindole. Subsequent work has provided several additional CB(2) selective indoles. On the basis of a proposed pharmacophore for the cannabimimetic indoles, a series of pyrroles and indenes were developed, some of which are potent cannabinoids. SAR for several series of pyrroles have been developed. Two groups have described cannabimimetic indenes, which have been employed as rigid models for the receptor interactions of cannabimimetic indoles with the CB(1) receptor. There is some evidence that the indoles bind to a somewhat different site on the receptor than traditional cannabinoids, and interact with the receptor primarily by aromatic stacking.

3-Indolyl-1-naphthylmethanes: new cannabimimetic indoles provide evidence for aromatic stacking interactions with the CB 1 cannabinoid receptor

A series of 1-pentyl-1 H-indol-3-yl-(1-naphthyl)methanes ( 9– 11) and 2-methyl-1-pentyl-1 H-indol-3-yl-(1-naphthyl)methanes ( 12– 14) have been synthesized to investigate the hypothesis that cannabimimetic 3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles interact with the CB 1 receptor by hydrogen bonding to the carbonyl group. Indoles 9– 11 have significant ( K i=17–23 nM) receptor affinity, somewhat less than that of the corresponding naphthoylindoles ( 5, 15, 16). 2-Methyl-1-indoles 12– 14 have little affinity for the CB 1 receptor, in contrast to 2-methyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles 17– 19, which have affinities comparable to those of 5, 15, 16. A cannabimimetic indene hydrocarbon ( 26) was synthesized and found to have K i=26±4 nM. Molecular modeling and receptor docking studies of naphthoylindole 16, its 2-methyl congener ( 19) and indolyl-1-naphthylmethanes 11 and 14, combined with the receptor affinities of these cannabimimetic indoles, strongly suggest that these cannabinoid receptor ligands bind primarily by aromatic stacking interactions in the transmembrane helix 3-4-5-6 region of the CB 1 receptor.

The search for selective ligands for the CB2 receptor.

Following the identification of the CB2 receptor several groups explored the development of selective ligands for this receptor which occurs principally in the periphery. This led to the discovery that two cannabimimetic indoles, 1-(2, 3-dichlorobenzoyl)-2-methyl-3-(2-[1-morpholino]ethyl)-5-methoxyind ole (L768242) and 2-methyl-1-propyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole (JWH-015) have high affinity for the CB2 receptor with low affinity for the CB1 receptor. Shortly thereafter two 1-methoxy-delta8-THC analogues, 1-methoxy-delta8-THC-DMH (L759633) and 1-methoxy-delta9(11)-THC-DMH (L759656), were also found to have high affinity for the CB2 receptor and very little affinity for the CB1 receptor. Almost simultaneously two 1-deoxy-delta8-THC analogues, 1-deoxy-11-hydroxy-delta8-THC-DMH (JWH-051) and 1-deoxy-delta8-THC-DMH (JWH-057) were reported to have high affinity for the CB1 receptor, but even greater affinity for the CB2 receptor. These discoveries gave rise to a concerted effort by Huffman and co-workers to explore the structure-activity relationships (SAR) at CB2 of cannabimimetic indoles and 1-deoxy-delta8-THC analogues. These efforts have resulted in the synthesis and pharmacological evaluation of a number of derivatives of 3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles and 1-deoxy-delta8-THC analogues with various side chains. This review will describe the current status of the results of these studies and discuss the SAR for both these classes of ligands.

Influence of the N-1 alkyl chain length of cannabimimetic indoles upon CB 1 and CB 2 receptor binding

The N-1 alkyl side chain of the aminoalkylindole analogues (AAI) has been implicated as one of a three-point interaction with the cannabinoid CB 1 receptor. In this study, the morpholinoethyl of WIN 55,212-2 was replaced with carbon chains of varying lengths ranging from a methyl to heptyl group. Additional groups were added to the naphthoyl and the C2 positions of the molecule. These structural changes revealed that high affinity binding to the CB 1 and CB 2 receptors requires an alkyl chain length of at least three carbons with optimum binding to both receptors occurring with a five carbon side chain. An alkyl chain of 3–6 carbons is sufficient for high affinity binding; however, extension of the chain to a heptyl group results in a dramatic decrease in binding at both receptors. The unique structure of the cannabimimetic indoles provides a useful tool to define the ligand-receptor interaction at both cannabinoid receptors and to refine proposed pharmacophore models.

Cannabimimetic lndoles, Pyrroles and lndenes

In the course of efforts to develop new nonsteroidal antiinflammatory agents, it was discovered that 1-aminoalkyl-3-aroylindoles have affinity for the cannabinoid brain (CB1 ) receptor. This led to the synthesis of well over 100 cannabimimetic aminoalkylindoles by the group at Sterling Winthrop, and to the development of structure-activity relationships (SAR) for these compounds. These SAR require a heterocyclic aminoethyl group attached to the indole nitrogen, and a 1-naphthoyl group at C-3 for significant receptor affinity. Other workers subsequently demonstrated that an aminoalkyl group was not necessary for cannabinoid activity, but that an N-alkyl group of four to six carbons was sufficient. This led to the discovery that 1-propyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indole is a selective ligand for the peripheral cannabinoid (CB2) receptor, and to the development of a series of cannabimimetic pyrroles. Comprehensive SAR for this group of cannabinoids have been developed. Two groups have described cannabimimetic indenes, which have been employed as rigid models for the receptor interactions of cannabimimetic indoles with the CB1 receptor. There is some evidence that the indoles interact at a somewhat different site on the receptor than traditional cannabinoids.

Design, Synthesis and Pharmacology of Cannabimimetic Indoles

Molecular modeling has been employed to design a new group of cannabimimetic 1-alkyl-2-methyl-3-(1-naphthoyl)indoles. Cannabinoid activity was evaluated in vivo in the mouse and in vitro by determining the binding to the cannabinoid receptor. Maximum activity was found for the 1-butyl, pentyl and hexyl analogs. A rationalization for the alignment of these indoles with traditional cannabinoids is presented.