Use Of Cangrelor Research Articles

Cangrelor use in ticagrelor-loaded ST-elevation myocardial infarction patients with high residual platelet reactivity: a randomized controlled trial

Abstract Background Despite the use of potent P2Y12 inhibitor, many patients still present with high platelet reactivity (HPR) at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). HPR is associated with impaired myocardial reperfusion and the subsequent poor outcome. Purpose We sought to determine the impact of Cangrelor -a rapid and potent intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor- on myocardial reperfusion in patients with HPR admitted for primary PCI in a randomized trial. Methods Patients pre-treated with ticagrelor and aspirin with residual HPR (baseline platelet reactivity unit (PRU) > 208) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive cangrelor (experimental group) or not (control group) just before PCI. The primary endpoint was optimal myocardial reperfusion defined as a final myocardial blush grade (MBG) 3 assessed by an independent core laboratory. Results After screening of 128 patients, a total of 60 patients were with HPR were enrolled and randomized. The ticagrelor loading dose to PRU measurement times were 83 ± 32 and 90 ± 47 minutes in the experimental and control groups, respectively. Baseline PRU were 245 ± 30 and 252 ± 35 in the experimental and standard group, respectively. A final MBG 3 was observed in 21/30 (55%) and 17/30 (45%) the experimental and standard groups (p=0.29). A final TIMI flow grade 3 was observed in 30/30 (100%) and 27/30 (90%) the experimental and standard groups (p=0.24). Peak troponin levels after PCI were 51381 ± 50047 and 51078 ± 63960 ng/L (p=0.98) in the experimental and standard group, respectively. At the end of the PCI, control PRU were 36 ± 57 and 198 ± 107 (p<0.0001) in the experimental and standard group, respectively. One patient of the experimental group presented an in-hospital major bleeding (BARC 3). Conclusion In ticagrelor-loaded STEMI patients with residual HPR at the time of PCI, cangrelor use was associated with a more effective platelet inhibition but failed to significantly improve the rates of optimal final myocardial blush grades.

Reduction of thrombus burden by cangrelor in ticagrelor-loaded st-elevation myocardial infarction patients with high residual platelet reactivity: the imaging sub-study of the ERMIT randomized trial

Abstract Background Residual high platelet reactivity (HPR) at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) is associated with higher residual thrombus burden and the subsequent suboptimal reperfusion. Purpose We sought to determine the impact of intravenous Cangrelor on the residual post-PCI thrombus burden in patients with HPR admitted for primary PCI in a prespecified intracoronary optical coherence tomography (OCT) sub-study of the ERMIT randomized trial. Methods In the ERMIT trial patients pre-treated with ticagrelor and aspirin with residual HPR (baseline platelet reactivity unit >208) were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive cangrelor on top of standard therapy or standard therapy alone prior to PCI. The primary endpoint of the sub-study was the relative thrombus volume quantified on OCT. Other OCT quantified parameters were predefined as secondary endpoints. Results After screening of 128 patients, a total of 60 patients with HPR were enrolled and randomized. The OCT sub-study included 53 patients, 29 in the cangrelor and 24 in the control group. As reported in the table, baseline characteristics were similar between the groups. The post-PCI PRU was dramatically lower in the cangrelor as compared to the standard group (p<0.001). The primary endpoint was 4.5% [3.4;7.2] versus 6.9% [5.2;8.5], (p=0.03) in the cangrelor and control groups respectively. All other imaging parameters confirmed the significantly lower thrombus burden in patients receiving cangrelor (Table). Conclusion The imaging sub-study of the randomized ERMIT trial shows that cangrelor use is associated with a more effective platelet inhibition and lower post-PCI residual thrombus burden in ticagrelor-loaded STEMI patients with residual HPR. The clinical implications of such finding warrant larger size trials.Table

The Use of Cangrelor in Cardiogenic Shock: Insights from the CAMEO Registry

Little is known about the use of cangrelor in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) presenting with cardiogenic shock (CS). CAMEO (Cangrelor in Acute MI: Effectiveness and Outcomes) is a multicenter observational registry evaluating platelet inhibition in patients with MI. We examined the duration of cangrelor infusion and the amount of time to transition from cangrelor to an oral P2Y12 inhibitor in patients with CS. We also assessed major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and bleeding risks, stratified by dosage duration, time to transition and oral P2Y12 inhibitor potency. Among 2352 cangrelor-treated patients with MI, 249 patients were in CS. Among the patients with CS, 16 (6.4%) received the "bridge" infusion dose, 202 (81.1%) the PCI cangrelor infusion dose, and 30 (12.0%) had a combination of both infusion doses. Patients with CS had a median age of 66 years; 32% were women; 21% were Black patients; 35% had diabetes; 19% received thrombectomy; and 59% received mechanical circulatory support (MCS) (35% intra-aortic balloon pump, 27% Impella). The median duration of infusion was 3.9 (2-21.5 hours) in patients with CS and was 2 (1.6-3.1 hours) for all cangrelor-treated patients. The median duration of transition from cangrelor to oral P2Y12 inhibitor administration was 0.1 (-0.5-21.0 hours) for patients with CS. In multivariable modeling, chronic lung disease and the use of MCS and was associated with longer cangrelor infusions (defined as > 3.9 hours). Among cangrelor-treated patients with CS, 24.1% of these patients had a bleeding event, and 41.8% had a MACE event. After adjustment, a longer cangrelor infusion duration was associated with increased risk of bleeding (P < 0.05). The median duration of cangrelor infusion was longer for patients presenting with CS. Use of MCS was associated with longer cangrelor infusion durations in patients with CS. Further work is needed to understand the pharmacodynamics of antiplatelet agents in patients with CS.

TCT-236 Bailout Use of Cangrelor During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Associated Inpatient Outcomes

TCT-236 Bailout Use of Cangrelor During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention and Associated Inpatient Outcomes

TCT-227 Timing and Indications for Cangrelor Use and Transition Modalities to Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing PCI: Insights From the SMILE Study

TCT-227 Timing and Indications for Cangrelor Use and Transition Modalities to Oral P2Y12 Inhibitors in Patients Undergoing PCI: Insights From the SMILE Study

Rescue Stenting of Isolated Middle Cerebral Artery (MCA) Dissections (MCAD) with Antithrombogenic Coated Stents and Mono-Antiplatelet Therapy (MAPT).

Objective: Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) is a leading cause of death, but isolated middle cerebral artery dissection (MCAD) is rarely reported. The aim of this article is to sum up the current information on this pathology and to explore the technical aspects of its endovascular treatment with emphasis on novel coated, antithrombogenic stents and antiplatelet management. Another part of this article offers our experience with the problematics represented by a small sample group of patients with an MCAD diagnosis who were treated in our center. Methods: We conducted literature research and a retrospective review of patients treated for anterior circulation AIS at our comprehensive stroke center from January 2022 to March 2024. The cohort included 16 patients diagnosed with isolated MCAD, 9 received antithrombogenic coated stents, while 7 received bare metal stents. Pharmacological management of coated stents involved the use of Cangrelor for acute antiplatelet therapy, transitioning to oral Ticagrelor. Results: Among the 16 patients treated, those with antithrombogenic coated stents showed no major complications and had a lower incidence of intracranial hemorrhage compared to the bare metal stent group. The average National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score at discharge improved in both groups. Functional outcomes and mortality rates were slightly better in the coated stent group, but no statistical significance was proven. Conclusions: Antithrombogenic coated stents, in conjunction with MAPT, demonstrated a safe and effective option for treating isolated MCAD. These stents offer promising potential for improved outcomes and reduced complications compared to traditional treatments. Further multicentric studies with larger cohorts are recommended to validate these findings.

D-25 | Cangrelor Use in Cardiogenic Shock - Findings from the CAMEO Registry

D-25 | Cangrelor Use in Cardiogenic Shock - Findings from the CAMEO Registry

Cangrelor for neurointerventional procedures: A systematic review.

Thromboembolism is a complication of neurointerventional procedures that requires patients to be placed under antiplatelet therapy. Current options for antiplatelet therapies have a delayed onset of action that prevents a rapid door to puncture transition for patents presenting in acute settings. Cangrelor (Kengreal, Chiesi, USA) is an intravenous P2Y12 platelet inhibitor approved in percutaneous coronary interventions that has an immediate onset of action and half-life between 2 and 6 min. Thus, the goal of this study is to report on the safety, effectiveness, and indications for using Cangrelor in neurointerventional procedures. A systematic review of studies describing the use of Cangrelor in neurointervention was performed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). The search was conducted on PubMed, Ovid Medline, and Embase databases through June 2023. Seventeen studies with 314 patients met inclusion criteria. The most common indication for Cangrelor use was acute ischemic strokes: 70% followed by aneurysms 27.4%. The Infusion protocol varied from 5 to 30 μg/kg bolus and 1 to 4 µg/kg/min infusion with 30 μg/kg bolus and 4 µg/kg/min infusion being reported in 64.7% of studies. Intra-operative platelet reacting unit levels were below 200 in all the studies that reported it, and the percentage of hemorrhagic, thromboembolic, and deaths occurrence in this patient cohort was respectively 11.1%, 4.8%, and 8.6%. Cangrelor appears to be a promising P2Y12 platelet inhibitor for neurointerventional procedures. However, large, randomized trials are needed to determine the full range of its effects in neurointerventional procedures.

The use of cangrelor in a complex vascular patient: A case report

Medical decision-making surrounding high risk surgical procedures requires extensive consideration about the potential risks and benefits to the patient, including implications for concomitant medications and therapies. Managing cardiovascular risk in patients undergoing non-cardiac surgery is essential for safe and effective patient care. In instances where cardiac revascularization is needed prior to surgery, antiplatelet medication is also needed which can complicate future surgical procedures. This case report describes a patient who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with drug eluting stent placement, who also needed urgent treatment for expanding thoracic abdominal aortic aneurysm (TAAA). Standard practice for endovascular repair of a TAAA includes placement of a lumbar drain to decrease the risk of spinal cord ischemia, however dual antiplatelet therapy is contraindicated. Cangrelor is the only intravenous platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitor currently available. The use of Cangrelor, a short-acting P2Y12 inhibitor, was successfully utilized as a bridge in the setting of a patient requiring dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) and further surgical intervention. This medication may improve outcomes for this subset of patients.

Antithrombotic Stewardship: Evaluation of Platelet Reactivity-Guided Cangrelor Dosing Using the VerifyNow Assay.

Cangrelor may be used as a bridge when temporary interruption of dual antiplatelet therapy is necessary. However, the optimal dose and monitoring of cangrelor in patients remains unknown, especially in the setting of mechanical circulatory support (MCS). We conducted an observational, single-center, retrospective cohort study of patients who had percutaneous coronary intervention within 3 months and received cangrelor while admitted to any intensive care unit. The primary outcome was the incidence of any major adverse cardiovascular event. Secondary outcomes included VerifyNow platelet reactivity units (PRUs) measured while on cangrelor and any bleeding events while on cangrelor. A total of 92 patients were included. The most common reason for cangrelor use was in the periprocedural setting, with or without MCS (42%-45%), followed by NPO status (26%-28%) and MCS alone (22%-24%). The primary outcome of major adverse cardiovascular event occurred in 1 patient (1.1%). Of 92 patients, 77% had a P2Y12 level collected within 24 hours, and 89% of the cohort was able to achieve the goal P2Y12 PRU of <194. The median P2Y12 value within 24 hours of cangrelor initation was 115 PRU (40-168 PRU). We observed a bleed event rate of 23% (21/92). We found a standardized protocol of cangrelor dosing in critically ill patients who received a drug-eluting stent in the past 3 months to be successful in achieving a goal P2Y12 PRU. Although the optimal PRU remains unknown, cardiovascular clinicians may monitor these levels to help guide decisions regarding cangrelor management. Future randomized controlled trials should evaluate the optimal PRU threshold to balance risks of ischemia and bleeding.

Risk of Bleeding Among Cangrelor-Treated Patients Administered Upstream P2Y12 Inhibitor Therapy: The CAMEO Registry

BackgroundLittle is known about the bleeding risk associated with cangrelor use in patients with myocardial infarction (MI) who are exposed to an oral P2Y12 inhibitor before coronary angiography. MethodsCangrelor in Acute MI: Effectiveness and Outcomes (CAMEO) is an observational registry studying platelet inhibition for patients with MI. Upstream oral P2Y12 inhibition was defined as receipt of an oral P2Y12 inhibitor within 24 hours before hospitalization or in-hospital before angiography. Among cangrelor-treated patients, we compared bleeding after cangrelor use through 7 days postdischarge between patients with and without upstream oral P2Y12 inhibitor exposure. ResultsAmong 1802 cangrelor-treated patients with MI, 385 (21.4%) received upstream oral P2Y12 inhibitor treatment. Of these, 101 patients (33.8%) started cangrelor within 1 hour, 103 (34.4%) between 1 and 3 hours, and 95 (31.8%), >3 hours after in-hospital oral P2Y12 inhibitor administration; the remaining received an oral P2Y12 inhibitor before hospitalization. There was no statistically significant difference in rates of bleeding among cangrelor-treated patients with and without upstream oral P2Y12 inhibitor exposure (6.5% vs 8.8%; adjusted odds ratio [OR], 0.62; 95% CI, 0.38-1.01). Bleeding was observed in 5.0%, 10.7%, and 3.2% of patients treated with cangrelor <1, 1 to 3, and >3 hours after the last oral PY12 inhibitor dose, respectively; bleeding rates were not statistically different between groups (1-3 hours vs <1 hour: adjusted OR, 2.70; 95% CI, 0.87-8.32; >3 hours vs <1 hour: adjusted OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.15-2.85). ConclusionsBleeding risk was not observed to be significantly higher after cangrelor treatment in patients with and without upstream oral P2Y12 inhibitor exposure.

ARCANGELO: an observational, prospective study with acute coronary syndrome patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention who receive cangrelor transitioning to oral P2Y12 inhibitors

Abstract Background The use of oral platelet P2Y12 receptor inhibitors, to reduce the risk of thrombotic complications related to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), have some limitations in the acute phase, e.g., the delayed onset of action and lack of bioavailability in critical patients. Cangrelor is the only intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor, which based on its quick onset and offset of action is a valid alternative option for antiplatelet therapy, particularly for patients who are unable to take oral medications or for whom oral administration is not adequate. Notably, during the clinical development program of cangrelor, ticagrelor and prasugrel were not marketed and, therefore, the pivotal studies were conducted only with transitioning to clopidogrel. The aim of ARCANGELO study was the evaluation of the safety and effectiveness of cangrelor when administered to patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS) undergoing PCI in a real-world setting, including patients who received cangrelor transitioning to either clopidogrel, prasugrel, or ticagrelor. Methods Adult patients eligible to PCI for ACS who received cangrelor and who consented to take part in the study in 28 Italian centers, were followed in the 30 days after PCI. Bleedings, major adverse cardiac events (MACEs), and adverse events were recorded. The primary outcome was the incidence of any bleedings, according to BARC (Bleeding Academic Research Consortium) criteria, at 30 days post-PCI. Results A total of 1,004 patients were enrolled and 995 (99.2%) patients were eligible for analysis. Median (IQR) age was 65 (56-73) years, and 771 (77.5%) patients were males. 597 (59.9%) patients had ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction; 509 (51.2%) patients had multi-vessel vessel coronary artery disease. A radial artery access was used in 926 (93.1%) patients and drug-eluting stents were implanted in almost all patients (n=972, 97.7%). All 995 patients included in the analysis received 30 micrograms/kg by intravenous bolus and 4 micrograms/kg/min by intravenous infusion. 730 patients (73.4%) were then transitioned to ticagrelor, 127 (12.8%) to prasugrel, and 138 (13.9%) to clopidogrel. 52 (5.2%) (95% CI 3.9% - 6.8%) patients experienced at least one bleeding event up to 30 days post-PCI. Five patients (0.5%) experienced at least one BARC type 3-5 (moderate-severe) bleeding (all type 3). Fourteen (1.4%) patients presented with at least one MACEs during observation (6 [0.6%] death, 7 [0.7%] myocardial infarction, 2 [0.2%] stent thrombosis). Six (0.6%) patients experienced at least one Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events related to cangrelor. Conclusions The results of this large real-world evidence study confirm that the use of cangrelor in patients with ACS undergoing PCI and transition strategy to the currently used P2Y12 oral inhibitors is safe and effective in daily practice.

Evaluation of Cangrelor Use After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Mechanical Circulatory Support

To describe cangrelor use in patients on concurrent mechanical circulatory support who underwent postpercutaneous coronary intervention. A single-center, retrospective, cohort study. At a quaternary teaching hospital. Included patients were ≥18 years old, admitted to the intensive care unit, underwent percutaneous coronary intervention with stent placement, initiated on mechanical circulatory support, and received cangrelor in the postpercutaneous coronary intervention period. Retrospectively analyzed cangrelor use in patients on mechanical circulatory support. The primary outcome was the incidence of thrombosis and bleeding events during cangrelor administration. Additional outcomes included initial cangrelor dose, number of cangrelor dose adjustments per patient, survival from mechanical circulatory support, and mortality within 30 days. Overall, 19 patients were included in this study. In total, 14 patients (74%) experienced a bleeding event; however, 93% were classified as a minor bleed. There was 1 major bleeding event. There were no thrombotic events observed during cangrelor administration. The median initial cangrelor dose was 0.5 µg/kg/min. There were 10 patients who underwent dose adjustment, with the majority being dose reductions based on antiplatelet monitoring (VerifyNow assay). Survival from mechanical circulatory support occurred in 17 patients (89%), and 30-day mortality occurred in 8 patients (42%). For patients receiving cangrelor as a bridge to oral P2Y12 inhibitor therapy on mechanical circulatory support, the authors observed a low rate of major bleeding and no episodes of thrombosis. Lower starting doses appear feasible with no observed increased risk of thrombotic complications. Future studies are needed to confirm these observations.

Safety of cangrelor and transition to oral P2Y12 inhibitors in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: the ARCANGELO study.

Cangrelor is the only intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor available. Safety, efficacy, and transitioning from cangrelor to oral P2Y12 inhibitors were recorded in patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). The ARCANGELO study aims to assess the safety of cangrelor on bleeding and the effects of the transition to oral P2Y12 inhibitors in a real-world setting according to the European Medical Agency's requirement. Adult patients with ACS undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) receiving cangrelor were included in the study. Patients were followed for 30 days. Incidence of bleeding events, major adverse cardiac events, and transition strategy to oral P2Y12 were recorded. Among 1004 ACS patients undergoing PCI, 995 (99.1%) were eligible for the analysis; 597 (60.0%) of them had ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. A total of 925 (93.1%) patients underwent PCI by radial catheter access, and 972 (97.2%) received drug-eluting stents. All eligible patients received bolus and cangrelor infusion between 2 and 4 h in 95% of the cases. A total of 730 patients (73.4%) received ticagrelor, 127 (12.8%) prasugrel, and 138 (13.9%) clopidogrel as transition therapy. Bleeding, according to Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) criteria, within 30 days post-PCI occurred in 5.2% of patients (95% confidence interval: 3.9-6.8%); 0.5% experienced a moderate (BARC 3), and all others mild (BARC 1-2) bleeding events. Major adverse cardiac events occurred in 14 (1.4%) patients, principally all-cause mortality (n = 6 patients) and myocardial infarction (n = 7 patients). The use of cangrelor in ACS patients undergoing PCI and the transition strategy to P2Y12 inhibitors are confirmed as safe and effective in daily practice.

Comparative effectiveness of Cangrelor in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: an observational investigation from the M.O.Ca. registry

Cangrelor, the first intravenous P2Y12 inhibitor (P2Y12-I), has been approved on the basis of three large RCTs from the CHAMPION program which nevertheless have been criticized for the low bleeding risk of the enrolled patients, the large quote of chronic coronary syndromes, and the use of Clopidogrel as control arm even in the setting of acute coronary syndromes (ACS). We sought to investigate, in the setting of ACS, the comparative performance of Cangrelor in terms of in-hospital ischemic and haemorrhagic outcomes compared with the current gold-standard of oral P2Y12-I. The study retrospectively enrolled 686 consecutive patients admitted to the Divisions of Cardiology of Policlinico of Bari and L. Bonomo Hospital of Andria for ACS and treated with percutaneous coronary intervention. The study population was divided according to the P2Y12-I treatment strategy in two groups: patients given an oral P2Y12-I and patients receiving Cangrelor in the cath lab followed by an oral P2Y12-I. Clinical endpoints included death, ischemic and bleeding events occurring during hospital stay. Cangrelor treated patients presented higher clinical risk profile at presentation and faced higher death rate. However, after PS matching, in-hospital mortality resulted comparable between the groups and Cangrelor use was associated with reduced in-hospital definite stent thrombosis (p = 0.03). Data from our real-world registry highlight that, in the setting of ACS, Cangrelor is prevalently used in patients with very challenging clinical presentations. The adjusted analysis provides for the first time promising data on stent thrombosis reduction associated with Cangrelor use.

Real-World Experience with Cangrelor as Adjuvant to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Single-Centre Observational Study.

Reversible P2Y12 inhibition can be obtained with cangrelor administered intravenously. More experience with cangrelor use in acute PCI with unknown bleeding risk is needed. To describe real-world use of cangrelor including patient and procedure characteristics and patient outcomes. We performed a single-centre, retrospective, and observational study including all patients treated with cangrelor in relation to percutaneous coronary intervention at Aarhus University Hospital during the years 2016, 2017, and 2018. We recorded procedure indication and priority, the indications for cangrelor use, and patient outcomes within the first 48 hours after initiation of cangrelor treatment. We treated 991 patients with cangrelor in the study period. Of these, 869 (87.7%) had an acute procedure priority. Among acute procedures, patients were mainly treated for STEMI (n = 723) and the remaining were treated for cardiac arrest and acute heart failure. Use of oral P2Y12 inhibitors prior to percutaneous coronary intervention was rare. Fatal bleeding events (n = 6) were only observed among patients undergoing acute procedures. Stent thrombosis was observed in two patients receiving acute treatment for STEMI. Thus, cangrelor can be used in relation to PCI under acute circumstances with advantages in terms of clinical management. The benefits and risks, in terms of patient outcomes, should ideally be assessed in randomized trials.

P109 INTRAVENOUS CANGRELOR INFUSION IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING COMPLEX VERSUS NON–COMPLEX PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY INTERVENTION: A SUBANALYSIS OF THE ICARUS REGISTRY

Abstract Aims To compare the clinical characteristics and in–hospital outcomes of patients undergoing complex vs. non–complex percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with peri–procedural use of cangrelor. Methods Consecutive patients treated with cangrelor in 6 Italian institutions were retrospectively enrolled in the ICARUS (“Intravenous CAngrelor in high–bleeding Risk patients Undergoing percutaneouS coronary intervention”, NCT05505591) registry. Complex PCI was defined as any of the following: 3 vessels treated, ≥3 stents implanted, ≥3 lesions treated, bifurcation with 2 stents implanted, total stent length &amp;gt;60 mm, or chronic total occlusion. The primary endpoint was net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as a composite of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, definite or probable stent thrombosis and Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) 2, 3 or 5 bleeding, at 48 hours. Secondary endpoints were assessed at 48 hours and throughout the hospital stay. Results Among 551 patients enrolled in the ICARUS registry and undergoing PCI between January 2019 and August 2022, a total of 534 (97%) patients had complete information on PCI complexity, of whom 173 (32%) underwent complex PCI and 361 (68%) underwent non–complex PCI. In general, patients with complex PCI had similar clinical features compared with non–complex PCI patients, including comparable prevalence of high bleeding risk (HBR) status according to the ARC–HBR definition (35% vs. 30%, p=0.253), but complex PCI patients presented more often with cardiogenic shock (9% vs. 2%, p&amp;lt;0.001). PCI with ≥3 stents implanted was the most frequent criterion of procedural complexity (62%). The incidence of the primary endpoint of 48–hour NACE (10% vs. 7%, p=0.264) and other clinical endpoints occurring at 48 hours or during hospitalization did not differ between complex and non–complex PCI patients. Conclusions Among patients receiving peri–procedural cangrelor, about 30% of cases underwent complex interventions. Notwithstanding higher procedural complexity, short–term clinical outcomes were similar between complex and non–complex PCI patients.

Abstract Number ‐ 98: Intravenous dose‐adjusted cangrelor use for neuroendovascular procedures: An institutional experience

Introduction The optimal antiplatelet therapy regimen for certain neuroendovascular procedures remains unclear. This study investigates the safety and feasibility of intravenous dose‐adjusted cangrelor in patients undergoing neuroendovascular procedures. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review of all consecutive patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures and were placed on intravenous cangrelor between September 1, 2020 and March 13, 2022. Cangrelor was administered as a 15 mcg/kg bolus followed by 2 mcg/kg/min infusion titrated to goal P2Y12reaction unit (PRU) level of 50 to 150, and then transitioned to oral antiplatelet therapy. Demographic characteristics, interventional variables, and clinical outcomes were collected. Results A total of 50 patients were included. The mean age (years) was 56.0±18.6, and 26 (52.0%) were males. Most patients were African American (n = 39/48, 81.3%). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (n = 25/49, 51.0%), active smoking status (n = 14/40, 35.0%), and prior ischemic stroke (n = 13/49, 26.5%). Intravenous thrombolysis was used in 4 patients (8.0%). Cangrelor infusion was used for the following procedures: embolization (n = 10/50, 20.0%), embolization and stent placement (n = 9/50, 18.0%), thrombectomy alone (n = 5/50, 10.0%), thrombectomy and stent placement (n = 10/50, 20.0%), and stent placement only (n = 14/50, 28.0%). Stent placement occurred intracranially beyond petrous segment of the internal carotid artery in 18 patients, remainder of internal or common carotid artery in 12 patients, and both intracranial and carotid arteries in 3 patients. PRU levels were measured in 48 patients (96.0%), with 26 patients (54.2%) achieving a PRU level of 50–150 greater than or equal to 50% of the time. Approximately 51.5% of the patients had a favorable functional outcome with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (n = 17/33).During 1‐year follow up, approximately 4 patients had recurrent or new strokes (9.5%), 1 patient had in‐stent thrombosis (2.9%) and 1 patient with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage [sICH] (2.4%), both while not on antiplatelet therapy, 2 patients with asymptomatic intracranial hemorrhage [ICH] (4.8%), and no gastrointestinal bleeding events were recorded. When stratified by PRU level, there were no significant differences in sICH (p = 0.841) or asymptomatic ICH (p = 0.853). Conclusions To our knowledge, this is the first report to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of intravenous cangrelor use titrated based on platelet function testing in the largest cohort of patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures to date. Further studies, including comparative studies to standard dose maintenance cangrelor, are necessary.

Abstract WP160: Intravenous Dose-adjusted Cangrelor Use For Neuroendovascular Procedures: An Institutional Experience

Introduction: The optimal antiplatelet therapy regimen for neuroendovascular procedures remains unclear. This study investigates the safety and feasibility of intravenous dose-adjusted cangrelor for neurovascular interventions. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of consecutive patients who underwent neuroendovascular procedures and were placed on intravenous cangrelor between September 1, 2020 and March 13, 2022. Demographic characteristics, interventional variables, and clinical outcomes were collected. Results: Fifty patients were included. The mean age (years) was 56.0 ± 18.6, and 26 (52.0%) were males. Most patients were African American (n=39/48, 81.3%). The most common comorbidities were hypertension (n=25/49, 51.0%), active smoking status (n=14/40, 35.0%), and prior ischemic stroke (n=13/49, 26.5%). Intravenous thrombolysis was used in 4 patients (8.0%). Cangrelor infusion was used for the following procedures: embolization (n=10/50, 20.0%), embolization and stent placement (n=9/50, 18.0%), thrombectomy alone (n=5/50, 10.0%), thrombectomy and stent placement (n=10/50, 20.0%), and stent placement only (n=14/50, 28.0%). Stent placement occurred intracranially, remainder of carotid, and both intracranial and carotid arteries in 18, 12, and 3 patients, respectively. PRU levels were measured in 48 patients (96.0%), with 26 patients (54.2%) achieving a PRU level of 50-150 greater than or equal to 50% of the time. Approximately 51.5% of the patients had a favorable functional outcome with modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 0 to 2 at 90 days (n=17/33). During 1-year follow up, approximately 4 patients had recurrent or new strokes (9.5%), 1 patient had in-stent thrombosis (2.9%) and 1 patient with symptomatic sICH (2.4%), both while not on antiplatelet therapy, and 2 patients with asymptomatic ICH (4.8%). When stratified by PRU level, there were no significant differences in sICH (p=0.841) or asymptomatic ICH (p=0.853). Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first report in the largest cohort to date to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of intravenous dose-adjusted cangrelor use for neuroendovascular procedures. Comparative studies to standard dose maintenance cangrelor are necessary.

1156 CANGRELOR IN PATIENTS WITH CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE PRE-TREATED WITH TICAGRELOR: THE SWITCHING ANTIPLATELET (SWAP)-5 STUDY

Abstract Objectives To rule out a drug-drug interaction (DDI) among cangrelor-treated patients who have been pre-treated with ticagrelor. Background There are no studies specifically designed to rule out a DDI when cangrelor is used among patients who have been pre-treated with ticagrelor. Methods In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over, pharmacokinetic (PK) and pharmacodynamic (PD) study, patients with coronary artery disease (n = 20) were pre-treated with a 180-mg ticagrelor loading dose (LD) and after 1 hour randomized to placebo or cangrelor (bolus and infusion for 2 hours). Patients crossed over after 1-4 weeks of washout. PK analysis included ticagrelor plasma levels and its active metabolite. PD assessments included: VerifyNow P2Y12 reaction units (PRU), light transmittance aggregometry vasodilatorstimulated phosphoprotein, and Total Thrombus-Formation Analysis System. PK/PD assessments were performed at 7-time points. Results Compared to placebo, adding cangrelor to patients pre-treated with ticagrelor resulted in a significant reduction in PRU at 30 min and 1 hour after starting infusion. At 2 hours after stopping cangrelor/placebo infusion, PRU was low and similar in both groups (16.9 vs. 12.6; mean difference: 4.3; 95%CI: -28.6; 37.3), meeting the non-inferiority primary endpoint (predefined non-inferiority margin 45 PRU). Consistent findings were shown with all PD assays. PK tracked PD findings with no differences between groups in plasma levels of ticagrelor and its metabolite. Conclusions Compared with placebo, the use of cangrelor in patients pre-treated with ticagrelor results in enhanced platelet inhibition with no differences in PK/PD profiles after discontinuation of drug infusion indicating the absence of a DDI.