Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Candidates Research Articles

Right ventricular mechanics and its association with symptoms in transcatheter aortic valve replacement candidates: a three-dimensional echocardiography study

Abstract Aortic valve stenosis is one of the most prevalent valvular disease with significant clinical burden. While it is initially a disorder of the left ventricle (LV), long-term effects of the disease also affect the right ventricle (RV) as well. Nevertheless, data are scarce regarding the changes of RV mechanics and their association with symptomatic status of the patients. 3D echocardiography allows a more detailed assessment of the RV, which may unveil distinct changes of its morphology and function in this clinical setting. Accordingly, our aim was to examine LV and RV mechanics in TAVR candidate patients with severe aortic stenosis using three-dimensional (3D) echocardiography. Seventy patients (51% male, age: 80±6 years) were enrolled. Detailed medical history and symptomatic status were obtained. Beyond conventional transthoracic echocardiographic protocol, 3D loops were also acquired. We measured 3D LV and RV end-diastolic volume indexed to body surface area (EDVi), ejection fraction (EF) and global longitudinal (GLS) using dedicated software. Furthermore, we have determined 3D RV global longitudinal (RV GLS) and circumferential strain (RV GCS) using the ReVISION method. LV EF (r=0.28, p<0.05) and LV GLS (r=−0.26, p<0.05) significantly correlated with age, while RV EF (r=0.21, p=0.11), RV GLS (r=−0.17, p=0.19) and RV GCS (r=−0.07, p=0.61) did not show association with it. 41% (n=29) of the patient population mentioned angina or had syncope. Patients with these symptoms had comparable LV EDVi (73±23 vs. 69±25 mL/m2, p=0.47), LV EF (47±15 vs. 51±10%, p=0.14) and LV GLS (−13.6±4.8 vs. −14.8±2.6%, p=0.25) to those who did not mention these complaints. On the other hand, patients with angina or syncope in their medical history had significantly lower RV EDVi (58±13 vs. 70±23 mL/m2, p<0.05), while having significantly higher RV EF (46±10 vs. 52±7%, p<0.05). Moreover, symptomatic patients had significantly lower RV GCS (−15.7±5.6 vs. −19.6±5.3%, p<0.01), while RV GLS did not differ (−15.8±4.8 vs. −17.4±4.1%, p=0.17). Patients with severe aortic stenosis have marked changes in not only the LV, but the RV mechanics as well. While the symptomatic status does not seem to be associated with LV morphology and function, patients with angina or syncope had distinct changes in RV size and the contraction pattern of the chamber. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

The impact of frailty on adverse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement in older adults: A retrospective cohort study.

BackgroundTranscatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) is an effective alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement for patients who are at increased surgical risk. Consequently, frailty is common in patients undergoing TAVR.ObjectivesThis study aims to investigate the impact of frailty on outcomes following TAVR.MethodsA retrospective cohort study was conducted, including all TAVR candidates who visited the geriatric outpatient clinic for preoperative screening. Frailty status was assessed according to the Groningen Frailty Indicator. The primary outcome of the study was defined as the occurrence of postoperative complications, and this was evaluated according to the Clavien–Dindo classification. An additional analysis was performed to assess the impact of frailty on 1‐year all‐cause mortality and complications within 30 days of TAVR according to the Valve Academic Research Consortium (VARC‐2) criteria. The VARC‐2 criteria provide harmonized endpoint definitions for TAVR studies.ResultsIn total, 431 patients with a mean age of 80.8 ± 6.2 years were included, of whom 56% were female. Frailty was present in 36% of the participants. Frailty was associated with a higher risk of the composite outcome of complications [adjusted odds ratio (OR): 1.55 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.03–2.34)], 30‐day mortality [adjusted OR: 4.84 (95% CI: 1.62–14.49)], 3‐month mortality [adjusted OR: 2.52 (95% CI: 1.00–6.28)] and 1‐year mortality [adjusted OR: 2.96 (95% CI: 1.46–6.00)].ConclusionsFrailty is common in TAVR patients and is associated with an increased overall risk of postoperative complications, particularly mortality. Increased optimization of screening and treatment of frailty in the guidelines for valvular heart diseases is recommended.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Pre-TAVR: Current State of the Evidence.

This review intends to give an up-to-date overview of the current state of evidence in the treatment of coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), focusing on percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) pre-TAVR. The recently published ACTIVATION trial is the 1st randomized trial comparing coronary revascularization (PCI) versus medical treatment in patients with significant CAD undergoing TAVR. With the caveat of several major limitations of the trial, the results of this study raised the question about the appropriateness of the common practice to routinely revascularize coronary stenosis before TAVR. Aortic valve stenosis is the most common valvular heart disease among the elderly and it often co-occurs with CAD. TAVR is increasingly considered an alternative to surgical aortic valve replacement not only in the elderly population but also in younger and lower-risk patients. The impact of co-existing CAD on clinical outcomes as well as the optimal timing of PCI in TAVR candidates is still unclear and the subject of ongoing randomized trials. Meanwhile, it is common practice in many centers to routinely perform invasive coronary angiography and PCI for significant coronary disease as part of the TAVR workup. While computed tomography angiography has emerged as a possible alternative to the invasive coronary angiography in patients with low pre-test probability for CAD, the value of functional invasive assessment of coronary lesions in the pre-TAVR setting has still to be clarified. Also, there is an increasing interest in the clinical relevance and optimal management of the potentially challenging coronary access post-TAVR, requiring further research.

Minimally Invasive versus Full Sternotomy SAVR in the Era of TAVR: An Institutional Review.

In the era of advancing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) technology, traditional open surgery remains a valuable intervention for patients who are not TAVR candidates. We sought to compare perioperative variables and postoperative outcomes of minimally invasive and full sternotomy surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) at a single institution. A retrospective analysis of 113 patients who underwent isolated SAVR via full sternotomy or upper hemi-sternotomy between January 2015 and December 2019 at the University of Utah Hospital was performed. Preoperative comorbidities and demographic information were not different among groups, with the exception of diabetes, which was significantly more common in the full sternotomy group (p = 0.01). Median procedure length was numerically shorter in the minimally invasive group but was not significant following the Bonferroni correction (p = 0.047). Other perioperative variables were not significantly different. The two groups showed no difference in the incidence of postoperative adverse events (p = 0.879). As such, minimally invasive SAVR via hemi-sternotomy remains a safe and effective alternative to full sternotomy for patients who meet the criteria for aortic valve replacement.

Commissural Versus Coronary Optimized Alignment During Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement.

The aims of this study were to determine the rate of noncentered coronary ostia and their risk for coronary overlap (CO) and to develop an improved orientation strategy for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) devices taking into account anatomical cues to identify patients at risk for CO regardless of commissural alignment and compute an alternative, CO-free TAVR rotation angle for those patients. Commissural alignment during TAVR reduces CO risk. However, eccentricity of coronary ostia from the center of the sinus of Valsalva may result in CO even after perfect alignment of TAVR commissures. Baseline computed tomography from TAVR candidates helped identify distance from commissures to the right coronary artery (RCA) and the left coronary artery (LCA). Then, for each case, a virtual valve was simulated with ideal commissural or coronary alignment, and the degree of CO was determined. On the basis of the potential BASILICA (bioprosthetic or native aortic scallop intentional laceration to prevent iatrogenic coronary artery obstruction) efficacy, 3 groups were defined: no risk for CO (>35° from neocommissure to coronary ostia), moderate risk (20°-35°), and severe risk (≤20°). Computed tomographic studies from 107 patients were included. After excluding 7 patients (poor quality or bicuspid valve), 100 patients were analyzed. The RCA showed greater eccentricity compared with the LCA (18.5° [IQR: 3.3°-12.8°] vs 6.5° [IQR: 3.3°-12.8°]; P< 0.001). The mean intercoronary angle was 140.0° ± 18.7° (95% CI: 136.3°-143.7°). Thirty-two patients had moderate to severe risk for CO (≤35°) despite ideal commissural alignment. Greater coronary eccentricity (cutoff for RCA, 24.5°; cutoff for LCA, 19°) and intercoronary angle >147.5° or<103° were associated with greater risk for moderate to severe CO despite commissural alignment (area under the curve: 0.97; 95% CI: 0.91-0.99). If optimal coronary alignment was simulated, this prevented severe CO in all cases and reduced moderate CO from 27% to 5% (P< 0.001). One third of patients would have CO during TAVR-in-TAVR despite commissural alignment; a 6-fold decrease in this risk was achieved with optimized coronary alignment. Coronary eccentricity and intercoronary angle were the main predictors.

Shockwave and Non-transfemoral Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a widely adopted treatment modality for severe aortic stenosis. Transfemoral access is the approach of choice; however, approximately 25% of patients undergoing TAVR also have concomitant peripheral arterial disease. The recent advent of intravascular lithotripsy has enabled preservation of transfemoral access in some patients; although, a proportion still require alternative, non-femoral access. Alternative access sites can be broadly categorized into transthoracic and peripheral, facilitated by surgical or percutaneous techniques. In this review, the technical details and clinical outcomes of various TAVR accesses are discussed. Initially, transthoracic approaches were most common, but recently, the trend has been toward alternative peripheral access due to superior outcomes. Although there are no randomized data to support all the alternative access sites, the experiences reported provide available options for a large portion of patients to be candidates for TAVR. The intervention site should be selected by a multidisciplinary heart team based on patient anatomical factors and institutional expertise.

Characteristics and outcomes following transcatheter aortic valve replacement in China: a report from China aortic valve transcatheter replacement registry (CARRY).

Background:The past decade has witnessed an ever-increasing momentum of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and a subsequent paradigm shift in the contemporary management of severe aortic stenosis (AS). We conducted a multi-centric TAVR registry based on Chinese patients (the China Aortic valve tRanscatheter Replacement registrY [CARRY]) to delineate the clinical characteristics and outcomes of Chinese patients who underwent TAVR and compare the results between different valve types in different Chinese regions.Methods:CARRY is an all-comer registry of aortic valve disease patients undergoing TAVR across China and was designed as an observational study that retrospectively included all TAVR patients at each participating site. Seven hospitals in China participated in the CARRY, and 1204 patients from April 2012 to November 2020 were included. Categorical variables were compared using the chi-squared test, and continuous variables were analyzed using a t test or analysis of variance (ANOVA) test. The Kaplan–Meier curve was used to estimate the risk of adverse events during follow-up.Results:The mean age of the patients was 73.8 ± 6.5 years and 57.2% were male. The median Society of Thoracic Surgeon-Predicted Risk of Mortality score was 6.0 (3.7–8.9). Regarding the aortic valve, the proportion of bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) was 48.5%. During the hospital stay, the stroke rate was 0.7%, and the incidence of high-degree atrioventricular block indicating permanent pacemaker implantation was 11.0%. The in-hospital all-cause mortality rate was 2.2%. After 1 year, the overall mortality rate was 4.5%. Compared to patients with tricuspid aortic valve (TAV), those with BAV had similar in-hospital complication rates, but a lower incidence of in-hospital mortality (1.4% vs. 3.3%) and 1 year mortality (2.3% vs. 5.8%).Conclusions:TAVR candidates in China were younger, higher proportion of BAV, and had lower rates of post-procedural complications and mortality than other international all-comer registries. Given the use of early generation valves in the majority of the population, patients with BAV had similar rates of complications, but lower mortality than those with TAV. These findings further propel the extension of TAVR in low-risk patients.Trial Registration:https://www.chictr.org.cn/ (No. ChiCTR2000038526).

Predictors of left ventricular ejection fraction recovery after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR)

Abstract Introduction Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has proven benefits in patients with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). A significant proportion of them shows recovery of systolic function Objective To analyse the main baseline, electrocardiographic and echocardiographic characteristics that may predict LVEF recovery after TAVR. Methods A cohort study was conducted. Consecutive patients undergoing TAVR in our center from January 2012 to December 2020 were included. Baseline clinical profile, electrocardiographic (EKG), echocardiographic (ECH) parameters were recorded, as well as MACE during follow-up (major adverse cardiovascular events including: all-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident and heart failure hospitalization). Reduced systolic function was defined as LVEF &amp;lt;50%. We considered recovery of systolic function as LVEF ≥50% at follow-up. Results A total of 292 patients were included. 48% were women and the median age was 81.07 years (77.63–86.22). 22.6% (66 patients) had reduced LVEF at baseline. Half of them showed recovered systolic function during follow-up. Patients who did not recovered LVEF had a higher prevalence of dyslipidemia and peripheral artery disease. History of cardiac surgery was more frequently found in this group, and they showed a higher surgical risk estimated by EuroScore II. They had lower LVEF and aortic valve mean gradient, and more frequently presented non-synus rhythm (NSR), left bundle branch block and right ventricular dysfunction (RVD). These characteristics are shown in figure 1. In univariate analysis lower Euroscore II, presence of synus rhythm, absence of LBBB and RVD, as well as higher aortic valve mean gradient were predictors of LVEF recovery. In multivariate analysis RVD and mean aortic gradient were independent predictors. Among all patients included in our study, those presenting with RV dysfunction were significantly associated with lower LVEF mean values (46,0% vs 57,2%; p&amp;lt;0,01) After a median follow-up of 21.3 (8.52–38.94) months, MACE were lower in recovered LVEF group (HR 0.25 95% CI: 0.05–1.21). There were no statistically significant differences in all-cause mortality, nevertheless there was a trend towards a higher non-cardiovascular mortality in this group, essentially at the expense of deaths from malignant neoplasms and SARS-COV-2 infections. Survival curves for MACE are represented in figure 2. Conclusion In our study, half of the patients with impaired ventricular function undergoing TAVR showed recovery of ejection fraction. Right ventricular function and aortic valve mean gradient at baseline were independent predictors of recovery. Identifying predictors of LVEF recovery is fundamental in the evaluation of potential candidates for TAVR, and can help clinicians assess risks and benefits, as well as long-term prognosis of these patients. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Characteristics and analysisSurvival curves for MACE

Horizontal Aorta in Transcatheter Self-Expanding Valves: Insights From the HORSE International Multicentre Registry.

[Figure: see text].

Prophylactic permanent pacemaker strategy in patients with right bundle branch block undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

To report on the experience with a selective prophylactic permanent pacemaker (PPx-PPM) implantation strategy in patients with pre-existing right bundle branch block (RBBB) undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Pre-existing RBBB is an independent predictor for PPM after TAVR and has been linked to increased mortality. Hospital patient flow and longer-term clinical endpoints were compared for TAVR patients with pre-existing RBBB treated in a period with and without selective PPx-PPM strategy (2013-2020). A total of 260 patients were included: 170 in the early period without PPx-PPM strategy and 90 patients in the late period with selective PPx-PPM strategy. A PPx-PPM was implanted in 44% of patients in the late period. Overall, 69% versus 80% of all patients in the early versus late period ended up with a PPM (p=.06). Streamlined transfemoral TAVR was routinely used from 2017-in this series of patients, both TAVR procedural time and hospital length of stay (LoS) were significantly shorter in the late versus early period (mean procedural time: 70 vs. 83 min and LoS ≥5 days: 15% vs. 40%; p < .05). No difference in all-cause/cardiovascular mortality was observed between both strategies, whereas cardiac rehospitalization was significantly higher for patients treated in the early versus late period (hazard ratio 2.33 [1.04-5.26]; p=.042)-this mainly due to (sub)acute PPM-implantation early after discharge. Selective prophylactic PPM implantation in TAVR candidates with pre-existing RBBB results in shorter TAVR procedural time and hospital LoS and prevents early cardiac rehospitalization related to complete heart block.

Temporal Trends and Drivers of Heart Team Utilization in Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Population-Based Study in Ontario, Canada.

BackgroundThe multidisciplinary Heart Team (HT) is recommended for management decisions for transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) candidates, and during TAVR procedures. Empiric evidence to support these recommendations is limited. We aimed to explore temporal trends, drivers, and outcomes associated with HT utilization.Methods and ResultsTAVR candidates were identified in Ontario, Canada, from April 1, 2012 to March 31, 2019. The HT was defined as having a billing code for both a cardiologist and cardiac surgeon during the referral period. The procedural team was defined as a billing code during the TAVR procedure. Hierarchical logistical models were used to determine the drivers of HT. Median odds ratios were calculated to quantify the degree of variation among hospitals. Of 10 412 patients referred for TAVR consideration, 5489 (52.7%) patients underwent a HT during the referral period, with substantial range between hospitals (median odds ratio of 1.78). Utilization of a HT for TAVR referrals declined from 69.9% to 41.1% over the years of the study. Patient characteristics such as older age, frailty and dementia, and hospital characteristics including TAVR program size, were found associated with lower HT utilization. In TAVR procedures, the procedural team included both cardiologists and cardiac surgeons in 94.9% of cases, with minimal variation over time or between hospitals.ConclusionsThere has been substantial decline in HT utilization for TAVR candidates over time. In addition, maturity of TAVR programs was associated with lower HT utilization.

Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

BackgroundHorizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifying HA. Moreover, patient characteristics predicting HA are under-investigated. MethodsThis was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 16 heart valve centers in Europe. The study utilized a common dataset with a priori agreed-upon definitions and variables. Eligible patients underwent TAVR between 2014 and 2020 and had multidetector computed tomographic imaging data available for determining the AA. The analysis described the distribution of AA and potential predictors of HA. Inter-center variability was also explored. ResultsFor 4022 patients analyzed, the mean AA ± standard deviation was 49.4° ± 9.4° (median 49°, inter-quartile range [IQR] 12°, range 18–90°). There was no significant difference in mean AA between men and women (49.4° ± 9.1° vs. 49.6° ± 9.3°, respectively; p = 0.53); therefore, 49.4° was accepted as the cutoff value for HA in subsequent analyses. Covariates significantly associated with HA included age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.04, p < 0.001), body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.08, p < 0.01), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.75, p < 0.001), and porcelain aorta (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85, p = 0.001). Some inter-center variability was observed. ConclusionsWe defined 49.4° as the mean AA, and also associated predictors of HA in a large case series of patients with severe aortic stenosis candidates for TAVR.

Outcomes of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with cognitive dysfunction.

The impact of pre-existing cognitive dysfunction on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) remains unclear. To study the association between dementia and post-TAVR outcomes. Cohort study with propensity-score matching was conducted using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample. History of dementia at the time of undergoing TAVR. All-cause in-hospital mortality, stroke, bleeding requiring transfusion, acute kidney injury, post-procedural vascular complications, post-procedural pacemaker implantation, length of stay, in-hospital delirium, and discharge disposition in patients with and without dementia undergoing TAVR. Of 57,805 patients undergoing TAVR, 2910 (5.0%) had a diagnosis of dementia. Propensity-score matching yielded 2895 matched pairs of patients. TAVR was associated with an increased risk of bleeding requiring transfusion (14.7% vs 8.6%, odd ratio (OR) 1.82 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.26-2.63]; p < 0.01), discharge to a rehabilitation facility (45.8% vs 31.6%, OR 2.27 [95% CI 1.67-3.08]; p < 0.001), in-hospital delirium (7.4% vs 3.6%, OR 2.13 [95% CI 1.26-3.61]; p < 0.01), increased length of stay (6.75 ± 0.07 days vs 6.11 ± 0.06 days, slope=1.11 [95% CI 1.03-1.19]; p < 0.01), but comparable in-hospital mortality (2.1% vs 2.6%, OR 1.26 [95% CI 0.57-2.79]; p=0.57] in patients with dementia compared with patients without dementia. This study found that patients with dementia undergoing TAVR had a longer hospital stay as well as higher rates of discharge to a rehabilitation facility and in-hospital delirium, which may indicate debility and functional decline during hospitalization; however, in-hospital mortality and other outcomes were comparable between the two groups. TAVR candidates should be subjected to a comprehensive geriatric and cognitive assessment to help risk-stratify them for potential post-procedural functional decline. Prospective studies aimed at standardizing cognitive scoring and evaluating the post-procedural quality of life are needed.

Paravalvular leak prediction after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with self-expandable prosthesis based on quantitative aortic calcification analysis.

Paravalvular leak (PVL) is one of the most common complications of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) and affects short- and long-term outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify the computed tomography (CT) imaging biomarkers that allow PVL after TAVR to be predicted. Patients were included who had severe aortic valve stenosis, had undergone TAVR with a self-expanding valve, and had undergone a pre-procedural CT scan. Data on baseline characteristics, procedural and long-term outcomes were collected retrospectively. We used MATLAB software with a self-developed algorithm for CT scan analysis and found parameters that quantified aortic valve calcifications (AVC) in detail. Fifty patients were included. The identified CT-derived parameters included AVC size, volume, thickness and density, as well as calcium radial distribution. The volume of the largest calcium block, calcium perimeter and calcium size (assessed by Feret's diameter) showed a strong association with PVL occurrence after TAVR (P=0.012, P=0.001 and P=0.045, respectively). The prognostic model showed that a 10 mm2 increase in the local AVC amount in each valve section was associated with a 9.8% (95% CI: 2-18%; P=0.019) increase in the risk of PVL occurrence in the corresponding area after TAVR. ROC analysis revealed that the cut-off point of the AVC area was 96.5 mm2 in the polar coordinate system presentation. Kaplan-Meier curves showed worse PVL-free survival in patients with more than 96.5 mm2 of calcium area (P=0.013; log-rank). Quantitative AVC assessment for PVL prediction may play an important role in screening before TAVR. In future, the use of quantitative AVC assessment as an imaging biomarker in TAVR candidates and the creation and extension of an online database containing quantitative AVC parameters may help to identify high PVL risk patients.

Predicting Permanent Pacemaker Implantation after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement Based on Pre-Procedural 24-Hours Holter Monitoring; a Pilot Study

ABSTRACT Background: Little is known about the occurrence of unknown preexisting conduction disturbances/sinus node dysfunction (CDs/SND) in transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) patients. Preexisting CDs/SND could be a possible predictor for permanent pacemaker (PPM) implantation post-TAVR. In this pilot study, we aimed to investigate the additive value of pre-TAVR 24-hour Holter monitoring (HM) to diagnose unknown preexisting CDs/SND for predicting PPM implantation post- TAVR. Methods: This single-center and retrospective pilot study included 164 patients. 24-hour HM and a 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) were performed within a month prior to TAVR. All HM and ECG data were analyzed for CDs/SND events. Results: HM identified in 33 patients (20%) unknown preexisting events of CDs/SND in addition to baseline ECG. Among these patients, only four required a PPM implantation post-TAVR (2% of all patients). No difference in PPM rate was observed between patients with and without new CDs/SND events on HM (11% vs. 12%, p = 1.00). Conclusions: Unknown preexisting CDs and SND are prevalent on HM in 20% of TAVR patients. No difference in PPM rate between patients with and without these newly diagnosed CDs/SND was observed. Therefore, the clinical benefit of 24-hour HM in TAVR candidates has not been convincingly demonstrated. Abbreviations: AF: atrial fibrillation/flutter; AMI: acute myocardial infarction; AV: atrioventricular; AVA: aortic valve area; AVB: atrioventricular block; CD: conduction disturbance; ECG: electrocardiogram; HM: Holter monitoring; IV: intraventricular; LBBB: left bundle branch block; LVF: left ventricular function; NSIVCD: nonspecific intraventricular conduction disturbance; NYHA: New York Heart Association; TAVR: transcatheter aortic valve replacement; PPM: permanent pacemaker; RBBB: right bundle branch block; SR: sinus rhythm; SND: sinus node dysfunction; TIA: transient ischemic attack

Abstract 16529: Frailty in Fontan Patients - A Sign of Premature Aging?

Introduction: Patients submitted to a Fontan operation sustain a lifelong state of reduced cardiac output and increased venous pressure potentially inducing premature aging. We hypothesize that Fontan patients, despite their young age, resemble more elderly patients compared to age-matched controls. Methods: At a tertiary care center, we evaluated 17 Fontan patients who had a recent abdominal CT scan for Fontan associated liver disease follow-up. Psoas muscle area (PMA), a recognized marker of frailty, was measured on the axial plane at the level of L4. The distributions of PMA scores were compared between Fontan and 1) patients undergoing a transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR); and 2) an age-matched healthy cohort, separately with Kruskal-Wallis test. Results: The Fontan group comprised six males and 11 females aged 19-40. The proportions of systemic left ventricle and heterotaxy syndrome were 82% and 18% respectively in females and 33% and 33% respectively in males. The TAVR cohort included 241 males and 184 females aged 70-99. The healthy cohort enrolled 59 males and 66 females age-matched to the Fontan group. Among the Fontan patients, median and interquartile range of PMA were 18.1, 14.85-21.12 cm2 in females and 23.41, 22.25-30.21 cm2 in males. The comparison between the groups for males (Panel A) and females (Panel B) are illustrated in the Figure. Conclusions: Males Fontan appear to have reduced muscle mass that resembles more patients who are candidates for TAVR than aged-matched controls, an observation that, interestingly, was not seen in females in this small well-characterized cohort. To our knowledge, this is the first study to document a direct comparison of Fontan patients to other subgroups illustrating a mismatch between chronological and biological age in Fontan. Further studies are needed to elucidate the possible protective effect of female sex.

Procedural Characteristics and Late Outcomes of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in the Workup Pre-TAVR.

This study sought to determine, in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the work-up pre-transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR): 1) the clinical and peri-procedural PCI characteristics; 2) the long-term outcomes; and 3) the clinical events in those patients with complex coronary features. A PCI is performed in about 25% of TAVR candidates, but procedural features and late outcomes of pre-TAVR PCI remain largely unknown. Multicenter study including 1197 consecutive patients who had PCI in the work-up pre-TAVR. A total of 1,705 lesions (1.5 ± 0.7 lesions per patient) were included. Death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were recorded, as well as target lesion failure (TLF) and target vessel failure (TVF). One-half of patients exhibited a multivessel disease and the mean SYNTAX (SYNergy between PCI with TAXUS and Cardiac Surgery) score was 12.1 ± 9.1. The lesions were of B2/C type, calcified, bifurcation, and ostial in 49.9%, 45.8%, 21.4%, and 19.3% of cases, respectively. After a median follow-up of 2 (interquartile range: 1 to 3) years, a total of 444 (37.1%) patients presented an MACCE. Forty patients exhibited TVF (3.3%), with TLF identified in 32 (2.7%) patients. By multivariable analysis, previous peripheral artery disease (p<0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (p=0.002), atrial fibrillation (p=0.003), diabetes mellitus (p=0.012), and incomplete revascularization (p=0.014) determined an increased risk of MACCE. In patients with unprotected left main or SYNTAX score >32 (n=128), TLF, TVF, and MACCE rates were 3.9%, 6.3%, and 35.9%, respectively (p=0.378; p=0.065, and p=0.847, respectively, vs. the rest of the population). Patients undergoing PCI in the work-up pre-TAVR frequently exhibited complex coronary lesions and multivessel disease. PCI was successful in most cases, and TLF and TVF rates at 2-year follow-up were low, also among patients with high-risk coronary features. However, overall MACCE occurred in about one-third of patients, with incomplete revascularization determining an increased risk. These results should inform future studies to better determine the optimal revascularization strategy pre-TAVR.

Preoperative multidetector computed tomography for isolated surgical aortic valve replacement: Planning for future transcatheter options.

Valve-in-valve (ViV) transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become a valuable option in patients with bioprosthetic failure. However, potential issues with ViV TAVR may occur in patients with high-risk anatomy for coronary obstruction and patients with baseline smaller bioprosthetic valves at risk for patient prosthesis mismatch. The purpose of this study was, therefore, to use preoperative electrocardiography-gated, multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in patients undergoing isolated surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) to (1) identify which would be high risk for coronary occlusion with ViV TAVR, and (2) predict intraoperative SAVR sizing. Among 223 patients from our institutions' database that underwent SAVR for aortic insufficiency (AI) or aortic stenosis (AS) between January 2012 and January 2020, 48 patients had MDCT imaging before surgery (AI; n = 31, AS; n = 17). Of all patients, 67% (n = 32) were bicuspid morphology. With the use of virtual valve implantation, all patients with AI and bicuspid AS had feasible anatomy for ViV TAVR, while 38% of patients with tricuspid AS were high risk for coronary obstruction. There was a strong correlation between actual valve size implanted and preoperative MDCT measurements using annulus average diameter, area, and/or perimeter. Preoperative MDCT in patients undergoing SAVR is a useful tool for lifetime management, particularly in patients with tricuspid AS. Decisions for surgical management may change based on MDCT's ability to predict intraoperative SAVR size and determine which patients may be high-risk candidates for future ViV TAVR due to coronary artery obstruction.

Current Anesthetic Care of Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Europe: Results of an Online Survey

Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has become an alternative treatment for patients with symptomatic aortic stenosis not eligible for surgical valve replacement due to a high periprocedural risk or comorbidities. However, there are several areas of debate concerning the pre-, intra- and post-procedural management. The standards and management for these topics may vary widely among different institutions and countries in Europe. Structured web-based, anonymized, voluntary survey. Distribution of the survey via email among members of the European Association of Cardiothoracic Anaesthesiology working in European centers performing TAVR between September and December 2018. Physicians. The survey consisted of 25 questions, including inquiries regarding number of TAVR procedures, technical aspects of TAVR, medical specialities present, preoperative evaluation of TAVR candidates, anesthesia regimen, as well as postoperative management. Seventy members participated in the survey. Reporting members mostly performed 151-to-300 TAVR procedures per year. In 90% of the responses, a cardiologist, cardiac surgeon, cardiothoracic anesthesiologist, and perfusionist always were available. Sixty-six percent of the members had a national curriculum for cardiothoracic anesthesia. Among 60% of responders, the decision for TAVR was made preoperatively by an interdisciplinary heart team with a cardiothoracic anesthesiologist, yet in 5 countries an anesthesiologist was not part of the decision-making. General anesthesia was employed in 40% of the responses, monitored anesthesia care in 44%, local anesthesia in 23%, and in 49% all techniques were offered to the patients. In cases of general anesthesia, endotracheal intubation almost always was performed (91%). It was stated that norepinephrine was the vasopressor of choice (63% of centers). Transesophageal echocardiography guiding, whether performed by an anesthesiologist or cardiologist, was used only ≤30%. Postprocedurally, patients were transferred to an intensive care unit by 51.43% of the respondents with a reported nurse-to-patient ratio of 1:2 or 1:3, to a post-anesthesia care unit by 27.14%, to a postoperative recovery room by 11.43%, and to a peripheral ward by 10%. The results indicated that requirements and quality indicators (eg, periprocedural anesthetic management, involvement of the anesthesiologist in the heart team, etc) for TAVR procedures as published within the European guideline are largely, yet still not fully implemented in daily routine. In addition, anesthetic TAVR management also is performed heterogeneously throughout Europe.

Prolonged Continuous Electrocardiographic Monitoring Prior to Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: The PARE Study

ObjectivesThis study sought to determine, using continuous electrocardiographic monitoring (CEM) pre–transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR), the incidence and type of unknown pre-existing arrhythmic events (AEs) in TAVR candidates, and to evaluate the occurrence and impact of therapeutic changes secondary to the detection of AEs pre-TAVR. BackgroundScarce data exist on the arrhythmic burden of TAVR candidates (pre-procedure). MethodsThis was a prospective study including 106 patients with severe aortic stenosis and no prior permanent pacemaker screened for TAVR. A prolonged (1 week) CEM was implanted within the 3 months pre-TAVR. Following heart team evaluation, 90 patients underwent elective TAVR. ResultsNew AEs were detected by CEM in 51 (48.1%) patients, leading to a treatment change in 14 of 51 (27.5%) patients. Atrial fibrillation or tachycardia was detected in 8 of 79 (10.1%) patients without known atrial fibrillation or tachycardia, and nonsustained ventricular arrhythmias were detected in 31 (29.2%) patients. Significant bradyarrhythmias were observed in 22 (20.8%) patients, leading to treatment change and permanent pacemaker in 8 of 22 (36.4%) and 4 of 22 (18.2%) patients, respectively. The detection of bradyarrhythmias increased up to 30% and 47% among those patients with pre-existing first-degree atrioventricular block and right bundle branch block, respectively. Chronic renal failure, higher valve calcification, and left ventricular dysfunction determined (or tended to determine) an increased risk of AEs pre-TAVR (p = 0.028, 0.052, and 0.069, respectively). New onset AEs post-TAVR occurred in 22.1% of patients, and CEM pre-TAVR allowed early arrhythmia diagnosis in one-third of them. ConclusionsProlonged CEM in TAVR candidates allowed identification of previously unknown AEs in nearly one-half of the patients, leading to prompt therapeutic measures (pre-TAVR) in about one-fourth of them. Pre-existing conduction disturbances (particularly right bundle branch block) and chronic renal failure were associated with a higher burden of AEs.