Kidney Transplant Candidates Research Articles

Management and Outcomes of Kidney Transplant Candidates With Severe Pulmonary Hypertension: A Single-center Strategy and Experience.

Severe pulmonary hypertension (PH) is associated with high mortality posttransplant and thus is considered a contraindication to kidney transplantation. In this study, we describe the pretransplant management and posttransplant outcomes in patients with severe PH using a multidisciplinary approach. Between 11 of 2013 and 8 of 2022, we identified all patients with severe PH on initial pretransplant workup who underwent ultrafiltration (UF) or medical therapy for PH before transplant. Posttransplant we evaluated the perioperative course, renal function, graft, and patient survival. We compared survival to those who remained waitlisted or were delisted. Three-two patients (mean age = 55.03 ± 10.22 y) diagnosed with severe PH on pretransplant screening echocardiogram. Thirty patients (94%) were subjected to a median of 4 (range, 3-8) UF sessions with an average weight loss of 4.33 ± 2.6 kg. Repeat assessment of PH revealed a decline in mean pulmonary artery systolic pressure from 67 ± 12 mm Hg to 43 ± 13 mm Hg (P < 0.0001). Seventeen patients (53%) received a kidney transplant. The mean estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate at 3, 6, 9, and 12 mo was 72 ± 27, 72 ± 28, 75 ± 29, and 75 ± 29 mL/min/1.73 m2. Among, those who underwent transplantation both graft and patient survival was 100% at 1-y posttransplant. Overall, since the UF intervention, at a median follow-up of 88 ± 12 mo those transplanted had a patient survival of 88% while those who remained on dialysis had a survival of 53% (P = 0.0003). In this single-center study, we report postcapillary PH can be a significant contributor to elevations in pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Using a multidisciplinary approach, PH can improve with volume removal and phosphodiesterase 5 inhibitors therapy leading to a successful posttransplant outcome.

Sequential administration of anti-complement component C5 eculizumab and type-2 anti-CD20 obinutuzumab for the treatment of early antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: A proof of concept

Kidney transplant (KT) candidates with donor-specific antibodies (DSA) exhibit exceedingly high antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and allograft loss rates. Currently, treatment of ABMR remains an unmet clinical need. We report the use of the anti-C5 eculizumab and the type-2 anti-CD20 obinutuzumab in two patients with early ABMR. Eculizumab (900 mg IV) led to complete inhibition of the terminal complement cascade (unremarkable AP50 and CH50 activity) and prompt stoppage of complement-dependent antibody-mediated allograft injury (clearance of intra-graft C4d and C5b-9 deposition). Despite complement inhibition, obinutuzumab (1000 mg IV) determined full and long-lasting peripheral B-cell depletion, with significant reduction in all DSA. Graft function improved, remaining stable up to three years of follow-up. No signs of active ABMR and rebound DSA were detected. Obinutuzumab B-cell depletion and inhibition of DSA production were not affected by complement blockage. Further studies are needed to confirm the potential benefit of obinutuzumab in association with complement inhibitors.

Kidney transplant candidates' perspectives on the implementation of a Canadian Willingness to Cross program: A strategy to increase access to kidney transplantation for highly sensitized patients.

Kidney transplantation is the optimal treatment for end-stage renal disease. However, highly sensitized patients (HSPs) have reduced access to transplantation, leading to increased morbidity and mortality on the waiting list. The Canadian Willingness to Cross (WTC) program proposes allowing transplantation across preformed donor specific antibodies (DSA) determined to be at a low risk of rejection under the adaptive design framework. This study collected patients' perspectives on the development of this program. Forty-one individual interviews were conducted with kidney transplant candidates from three Canadian transplant centers in 2022. The interviews were digitally recorded and transcribed for subsequent analyses. Despite limited familiarity with the adaptive design, participants demonstrated trust in the researchers. They perceived the WTC program as a pathway for HSPs to access transplantation while mitigating transplant-related risks. HSPs saw the WTC program as a source of hope and an opportunity to leave dialysis, despite acknowledging inherent uncertainties. Some non-HSPs expressed concerns about fairness, anticipating increased waiting times and potential compromise in kidney graft longevity due to higher rejection risks. Participants recommended essential strategies for implementing the WTC program, including organizing informational meetings and highlighting the necessity for psychosocial support. The WTC program emerges as a promising strategy to enhance HSPs' access to kidney transplantation. While HSPs perceived this program as a source of hope, non-HSPs voiced concerns about distributive justice issues. These results will help develop a WTC program that is ethically sound for transplant candidates.

Indices of Nutrition Status of Kidney and Pancreas Transplant Candidates

Nutritional assessment is used to implement early nutritional interventions and reduce complications associated with malnutrition, which plays a crucial role in improving postoperative outcomes for patients undergoing pancreas and/or kidney transplantation. ObjectiveThe aim of this study was to analyze the nutritional status (NS) in patients eligible for kidney transplantation (KTx) and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation (SPKTx). MethodsWe analyzed the database of hospitalized patients from 2020 to 2023 to identify preoperative parameters of NS in patients eligible for KTx and SPKTx. A total of 59 patients participated in the study, all of whom were candidates for KTx-23 or SPKTx-36. The study population consisted of 35 women (W) and 24 men (M), with an overall mean age of 44.8 ± 10.2 years (43.5 ± 10.2 years for W and 46.2 ± 10.9 years for M). Both groups included patients on hemodialysis (n = 34) and peritoneal dialysis (n = 12), and patients in the predialysis period (pre-emptive, n = 13). The examined parameters included Onodera's prognostic nutritional index (PNIO), the nutritional risk index (NRI), proper body mass calculated using the Lorenz formula, and the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR). All patients were assessed according to the NRS 2002 scale. ResultsAnalysis of the obtained results revealed that the NLR was only one differentiating parameter between Ktx and SPKtx group. Multivariate analysis adjusted for patients’ age and gender, comparing quantitative NS indicators was performed. Albumin serum concentration was not dependent on patients’ group (KTx/SPKTx) neither age nor gender P = .382. BMI was dependent on patients’ age and gender, but not a group (KTx/SPKTx) P = .008. PNIO, NRI, and NRL were not dependent on patients’ group (KTx/SPKTx) neither age nor gender. ConclusionsAdditional effort should be devoted to the development of a proper nutrition plan for SPKTx a especially in peritoneal dialysis patients. Toward patients on the waiting list, the regular assessment of nutritional status should be performed which is not a rule in dialysis centers. SPKTx candidates in the perioperative period should receive proper nutrition taking into account their caloric and protein needs.

Cognitive decline related to chronic kidney disease as an exclusion factor from kidney transplantation: results from an international survey.

There seems to be a lack of consensus on the necessity and the modality of psychological and specifically cognitive assessment of candidates for kidney transplantation. Both points are often delegated to individual hospitals/centres, whereas international guidelines are inconsistent. We think it is essential to investigate professionals' opinions to advance towards a consistent clinical practice. This paper presents the results of an international survey among clinical professionals, mainly nephrologists from the CONNECT (Cognitive decline in Nephro-Neurology: European Cooperative Target) network and beyond (i.e. from personal contacts of CONNECT members). The survey investigated their opinions about the question of whether cognitive decline in patients with chronic kidney disease may affect their eligibility for kidney transplantation. Our results show that most clinicians working with patients affected by chronic kidney disease think that cognitive decline may challenge their eligibility for transplantation despite data that suggest that, in some patients, cognitive problems improve after kidney transplantation. We conclude that three needs emerge as particularly pressing: defining agreed-on standards for a multifaceted and multifactorial assessment (i.e. including both clinical/medical and psychosocial factors) of candidates with chronic kidney disease to kidney transplantation; further investigating empirically the causal connection between chronic kidney disease and cognition; and further investigating empirically the possible partial reversibility of cognitive decline after kidney transplantation.

Enhancing Kidney Transplant Outcomes: The Impact of Living Donor Programs.

The protocol for deceased donor kidney transplants has been standardised. The procedure for a living donor has peculiarities derived from the differences in the graft. When a living kidney donor program is implemented, changes occur in both the profile of the kidney transplant candidate and in the postoperative treatments. To discover whether a living donor program influences the functional outcomes of kidney grafts in a longstanding classical deceased donor kidney transplant program and to identify the factors associated with transplant outcomes. Retrospective observational multicentre study. Kidney transplant patients in two urology referral centres for renal transplant in Spain between 1994 and 2019. Groups: TV (living transplant): patients given kidney transplants from living donors (n = 150); TCpre11 (deceased transplant previous to 2011): patients given kidney transplants from deceased donors before the living donor program was implemented (n = 650); and TCpost11 (deceased transplant after 2011): patients given kidney transplants from deceased donors after the living donor program was implemented (n = 500). Mean age was 55.75 years (18-80 years), higher in TCpre11. There were 493 female patients (37.92%) and 1007 male patients (62.08%). Mean body mass index (BMI) was 26.69 kg/m2 (17.50-42.78 kg/m2), higher in TCpre11. Mean ischemia time was 17.97 h (6-29 h), higher in TCpost11. Median duration of urethral catheter: 8 days (6-98 days), higher in TCpost11. Median duration of double-J ureteral stent: 58 days (24-180 days), higher in TCpost11. Pretransplant UTIs: 17.77%, higher in TCpre11 (25.69%) than in TV (12%), higher in TV (12%) than TCpost11 (9.2%), and higher in TCpre11 (25.69%) than TCpost11 (9.2%). Acute renal rejection in 9.33% of TV, 14.77% of TCpre11, and 9.8% of TCpost11. Multivariate analysis: TCpost11 featured higher BMI, more smoking, and chronic renal failure progression time. Lower use of nonantibiotic prophylaxis to prevent recurrent urinary tract infections, increased duration of urethral catheters due to obstructive problems, and favoured deterioration of kidney function was observed in the deceased donor program. The living donor (LD) program had a strong influence on deceased donor transplants in the prelysis phase. Implementation of a LD program was associated with a decrease in the likelihood of acute rejection in TCpost11 and an increase in the tendency towards normal kidney function. Implementing living donor transplant programs affects functional outcomes in deceased donor transplants, reducing the probability of acute rejection and increasing the tendency towards normal kidney function. Preventing recurrent urinary tract infections with measures other than antibiotics, smoking cessation, delaying the removal of the double-J stent from the graft, and pre-emptive transplant (transplant prior to dialysis) are associated with improved renal function of the graft.

Pretransplant, Th17 dominant alloreactivity in highly sensitized kidney transplant candidates.

Sensitization to donor human leukocyte antigen (HLA) molecules prior to transplantation is a significant risk factor for delayed access to transplantation and to long-term outcomes. Memory T cells and their cytokines play a pivotal role in shaping immune responses, thereby increasing the risk of allograft rejection among highly sensitized patients. This study aims to elucidate the precise contribution of different CD4+ memory T cell subsets to alloreactivity in highly sensitized (HS) kidney transplant recipients. Stimulation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) with various polyclonal stimulating agents to assess non-specific immune responses revealed that HS patients exhibit elevated immune reactivity even before kidney transplantation, compared to non-sensitized (NS) patients. HS patients' PBMC displayed higher frequencies of CD4+ T cells expressing IFNγ, IL4, IL6, IL17A, and TNFα and secreted relatively higher levels of IL17A and IL21 upon stimulation with PMA/ionomycin. Additionally, PBMC from HS patients stimulated with T cell stimulating agent phytohemagglutinin (PHA) exhibited elevated expression levels of IFNγ, IL4 and, IL21. On the other hand, stimulation with a combination of resiquimod (R848) and IL2 for the activation of memory B cells demonstrated higher expression of IL17A, TNFα and IL21, as determined by quantitative real-time PCR. A mixed leukocyte reaction (MLR) assay, employing third-party donor antigen presenting cells (APCs), was implemented to evaluate the direct alloreactive response. HS patients demonstrated notably higher frequencies of CD4+ T cells expressing IL4, IL6 and IL17A. Interestingly, APCs expressing recall HLA antigens triggered a stronger Th17 response compared to APCs lacking recall HLA antigens in sensitized patients. Furthermore, donor APCs induced higher activation of effector memory T cells in HS patients as compared to NS patients. These results provide an assessment of pretransplant alloreactive T cell subsets in highly sensitized patients and emphasize the significance of Th17 cells in alloimmune responses. These findings hold promise for the development of treatment strategies tailored to sensitized kidney transplant recipients, with potential clinical implications.

Non-compliance as ethical dilemma for kidney transplantation

IntroductionAllocating a kidney transplant to a non-compliant recipient could present a triple damage: to the donor (and family of a deceased donor), for the recipient (who will experience rejection) and for another potential recipient on the waiting list (who missed the chance for the transplant). Having in mind that kidney transplantation (TX) is the best choice of renal replacement therapy, a thorough individual endeavor to predict the outcome of a TX in a non-compliant candidate is necessary to avoid a worse option. Non-compliance could origin from maladaptation, psychological limitations or a psychiatric condition.ObjectivesHere we present a 46 years old male patient on chronic hemodialysis (HD) for 4 years due to end stage diabetic kidney disease. He is extremely non-adherent to HD related recommendations, occasionally skipping the sessions, gaining up to 10 kg weight overload between the sessions and avoided visiting psychiatrist, so far. Our objectives were to explore the presence and severity of non-compliance as ethical dilemma for kidney transplantation.MethodsReviewing the patient’s medical data.ResultsUnlike to non-obedience to dietary and behavioral medical advice, this patient is very much adherent to pharmacological medication. Staying on HD he is constantly on the edge of vital danger, risking pulmonary edema or hyperkalemia related cardiac events. The most important compliance in a kidney transplant patient is adherence to immunosuppressive therapy. In this particular patient we could predict adherence to immunosuppressive medication after a TX and getting rid of volume overload and hyperkalemia once restoring kidney transplant function.ConclusionsPretransplant non-compliance in kidney transplant candidate is not always an obstacle for kidney TX. In some cases, as in the one here described, a TX is better option than staying on HD, avoiding the previously described triple ethical damage - to the donor, the recipient and patients waiting on list, while we could predict a good outcome of the TX. Including psychiatrist into the work up and management should not be skipped.Disclosure of InterestNone Declared

Calibration of Priority Points for Sensitization Status of Kidney Transplant Candidates in the United States.

A primary change to the national organ allocation system in 2014 for deceased donor kidney offers was to weight candidate priority based on sensitization (i.e. calculated panel reactive antibody percentage [CPRA%]) using a sliding scale. Increased priority for sensitized patients could improve equity in access to transplantation for disadvantaged candidates. We sought to evaluate the effect of these weights using a contemporary cohort of adult US kidney transplant candidates. We used the national Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients to evaluate factors associated with sensitization using multivariable logistic models and rates of deceased donor transplantation using cumulative incidence models accounting for competing risks and multivariable Cox models. We examined 270,912 adult candidates placed on the waiting list between Jan,2016-September,2023. Six-year cumulative incidence of deceased donor transplantation for candidates with cPRA%=[80-85) and [90-95) was 48% and 53% respectively, as compared to 37% for candidates with cPRA%=[0-20). In multivariable models, candidates with high cPRA% had the highest adjusted hazards for deceased donor transplantation. There was significant effect modification such that the association of high cPRA% with adjusted rates of deceased donor transplantation varied by region of the country, gender, race/ethnicity, prior dialysis time and blood type. Results indicate that the weighting algorithm for highly sensitized candidates may overinflate the need for prioritization and lead to higher rates of transplantation. Findings suggest re-calibration of priority weights for allocation is needed to facilitate overall equity in access to transplantation for prospective kidney transplant candidates. However, priority points should also account for subgroups of candidates who are disadvantaged for access to donor offers.

Effect of a Hispanic outreach program on referral and liver transplantation volume at a single center

BackgroundAlthough Hispanic patients have high rates of end-stage liver disease and liver cancer, for which liver transplantation (LT) offers the best long-term outcomes, they are less likely to receive LT. Studies of end-stage renal disease patients and kidney transplant candidates have shown that targeted, culturally relevant interventions can increase the likelihood of Hispanic patients receiving kidney transplant. However, similar interventions remain largely unstudied in potential LT candidates. MethodsReferrals to a single center in Texas with a large Hispanic patient population were compared before (01/2018–12/2019) and after (7/2021–6/2023) the implementation of a targeted outreach program. Patient progress toward LT, reasons for ineligibility, and differences in insurance were examined between the two eras. ResultsA greater proportion of Hispanic patients were referred for LT after the implementation of the outreach program (23.2% vs 26.2%, p = 0.004). Comparing the pre-outreach era to the post-outreach era, more Hispanic patients achieved waitlisting status (61 vs 78, respectively) and received a LT (971 vs 82, respectively). However, the proportion of Hispanic patients undergoing LT dropped from 30.2% to 20.3%. In the post-outreach era, half of the Hispanic patients were unable to get LT for financial reasons (112, 50.5%). ConclusionsA targeted outreach program for Hispanic patients with end-stage liver disease effectively increased the total number of Hispanic LT referrals and recipients. However, many of the patients who were referred were ineligible for LT, most frequently for financial reasons. These results highlight the need for additional research into the most effective ways to ameliorate financial barriers to LT in this high-need community.

Survival Advantage Comparing Older Living Donor Versus Standard Criteria Donor Kidney Transplants.

The aim of this analysis was to explore mortality outcomes for kidney transplant candidates receiving older living donor kidneys (age ≥60years) versus younger deceased donors or remaining on dialysis. From 2000 to 2019, all patients on dialysis listed for their first kidney-alone transplant were included in a retrospective cohort analysis of UK transplant registry data. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, with survival analysis conducted by intention-to-treat principle. Time-to-death from listing was modelled using nonproportional hazard Cox regression models with transplantation handled as a time-dependent covariate. A total of 32,978 waitlisted kidney failure patients formed the primary study cohort, of whom 18,796 (58.5%) received a kidney transplant (1,557 older living donor kidneys and 18,062 standard criteria donor kidneys). Older living donor kidney transplantation constituted only 17.0% of all living donor kidney transplant activity (overall cohort; n = 9,140). Recipients of older living donor kidneys had reduced all-cause mortality compared to receiving SCD kidneys (HR 0.904, 95% CI 0.845-0.967, p = 0.003) and much lower all-cause mortality versus remaining on the waiting list (HR 0.160, 95% CI 0.149-0.172, p < 0.001). Older living kidney donors should be actively explored to expand the living donor kidney pool and are an excellent treatment option for waitlisted kidney transplant candidates.

Böbrek Nakli Adaylarinin Organ Teklif Listesinden Dışlanma Nedenlerinin Belirlenmesi

Objective: The study aims to determine why kidney transplantation candidates are excluded from the organ offer list. &#x0D; Materials and Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective screening of archived records. The data of 228 patients who met the study criteria were included. Evaluations were made concerning sociodemographic characteristics, blood group, dialysis type and time, panel reactive antibody results, duration of waiting for an organ, and the recipient's current status (on the active waiting list, transplanted, or deceased). &#x0D; Results: Of the candidates on the organ transplantation waiting list, 14.9% could not be contacted at the telephone number in the records, and 6.1% could not attend the centre because of transport problems. A statistically significant difference was determined between the age range, the time since starting dialysis, and the candidate's current status according to the waiting duration. &#x0D; Conclusion: Through collaboration with dialysis and transplantation centres and the Regional Health Authority, nurses can update the contact telephone numbers and resolve transplant candidates' transport problems, thereby allowing those receiving dialysis treatment to be added to the organ transplantation waiting list without losing time.

Association of Coronary Calcium Score on Cardiac PET During Pre-Kidney Transplant Assessment with Persistent Hyperparathyroidism: A Retrospective Study.

BACKGROUND Secondary hyperparathyroidism and coronary calcifications are common complications in chronic kidney disease. However, the relation between coronary calcium score (CCS) and persistent hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) after kidney transplantation (KT) remains unknown. MATERIAL AND METHODS This was a single-center retrospective study of KT candidates from January 2017 to May 2020. We collected patients' demographics, cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, and the findings of pre-KT CV imaging. We also collected parathyroid hormone (PTH) values before KT, at 1-6 months, 6-12 months, and 12-24 months after KT. We defined pHPT as PTH ≥25.5 pmol/L after 12 months post-KT. RESULTS A total of 111 KT recipients (KTRs) with a mean age of 50.4 years were included, of which 62.2% were men and 77.5% were living-donor KTRs. Dialysis modality used before KT was peritoneal dialysis in 9.9% and hemodialysis in 82.9%. Dialysis vintage was 3±2.9 years. The prevalence of pHPT was 24.3% (n=27), and the prevalence of severe coronary calcifications (CCS >400 Agatston units) was 19.8% (n=22). PTH values at baseline, 1-6 months, 6-12 months, and 12-24 months were not different among between CCS >400 or CCS <400 groups. However, pHPT after KT was significantly more prevalent in KTRs with severe CCS (37% vs 14.3%, p=0.014). Severe CCS was associated with less improvement of PTH values after KT (r=0.288, p=0.020). Otherwise, the findings of cardiac PET and coronary angiogram were not significantly different between pHPT and non-pHPT patients. CCS >400 was independently associated with pHPT after transplant (aOR=18.8, P=0.012). CONCLUSIONS Severe CCS on pre-KT cardiac assessment is associated with pHPT after KT.

Neighborhood Segregation and Access to Live Donor Kidney Transplantation

Identifying the mechanisms of structural racism, such as racial and ethnic segregation, is a crucial first step in addressing the persistent disparities in access to live donor kidney transplantation (LDKT). To assess whether segregation at the candidate's residential neighborhood and transplant center neighborhood is associated with access to LDKT. In this cohort study spanning January 1995 to December 2021, participants included non-Hispanic Black or White adult candidates for first-time LDKT reported in the US national transplant registry. The median (IQR) follow-up time for each participant was 1.9 (0.6-3.0) years. Segregation, measured using the Theil H method to calculate segregation tertiles in zip code tabulation areas based on the American Community Survey 5-year estimates, reflects the heterogeneity in neighborhood racial and ethnic composition. To quantify the likelihood of LDKT by neighborhood segregation, cause-specific hazard models were adjusted for individual-level and neighborhood-level factors and included an interaction between segregation tertiles and race. Among 162 587 candidates for kidney transplant, the mean (SD) age was 51.6 (13.2) years, 65 141 (40.1%) were female, 80 023 (49.2%) were Black, and 82 564 (50.8%) were White. Among Black candidates, living in a high-segregation neighborhood was associated with 10% (adjusted hazard ratio [AHR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.84-0.97]) lower access to LDKT relative to residence in low-segregation neighborhoods; no such association was observed among White candidates (P for interaction = .01). Both Black candidates (AHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.89-1.00]) and White candidates (AHR, 0.92 [95% CI, 0.88-0.97]) listed at transplant centers in high-segregation neighborhoods had lower access to LDKT relative to their counterparts listed at centers in low-segregation neighborhoods (P for interaction = .64). Within high-segregation transplant center neighborhoods, candidates listed at predominantly minority neighborhoods had 17% lower access to LDKT relative to candidates listed at predominantly White neighborhoods (AHR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.75-0.92]). Black candidates residing in or listed at transplant centers in predominantly minority neighborhoods had significantly lower likelihood of LDKT relative to White candidates residing in or listed at transplant centers located in predominantly White neighborhoods (65% and 64%, respectively). Segregated residential and transplant center neighborhoods likely serve as a mechanism of structural racism, contributing to persistent racial disparities in access to LDKT. To promote equitable access, studies should assess targeted interventions (eg, community outreach clinics) to improve support for potential candidates and donors and ultimately mitigate the effects of segregation.

Comprehensive geriatric assessment predicts listing for kidney transplant in patients with end-stage renal disease: a retrospective cohort study

BackgroundComprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) involves a formal broad approach to assess frailty and creating a plan for management. However, the impact of CGA and its components on listing for kidney transplant in older adults has not been investigated.MethodsWe performed a single-center retrospective study of patients with end-stage renal disease who underwent CGA during kidney transplant candidacy evaluation between 2017 and 2021. All patients ≥ 65 years old and those under 65 with any team member concern for frailty were referred for CGA, which included measurements of healthcare utilization, comorbidities, social support, short physical performance battery, Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), and Physical Frailty Phenotype (FPP), and estimate of surgical risk by the geriatrician.ResultsTwo hundred and thirty patients underwent baseline CGA evaluation; 58.7% (135) had high CGA (“Excellent” or “Good” rating for transplant candidacy) and 41.3% (95) had low CGA ratings (“Borderline,” “Fair,” or “Poor”). High CGA rating (OR 8.46; p < 0.05), greater number of CGA visits (OR 4.93; p = 0.05), younger age (OR 0.88; p < 0.05), higher MoCA scores (OR 1.17; p < 0.05), and high physical activity (OR 4.41; p < 0.05) were all associated with listing on transplant waitlist.ConclusionsThe CGA is a useful, comprehensive tool to help select older adults for kidney transplantation. Further study is needed to better understand the predictive value of CGA in predicting post-operative outcomes.

Hyperparathyroidism in kidney transplant candidates and postoperative parathyroid gland function in recipients

Objective: to evaluate the effects of secondary hyperparathyroidism (HPT) in kidney transplantation (KT) candidates on recipients’ parathyroid gland function in the first postoperative year.Materials and methods. The retrospective cohort study included 210 patients (103 women, 107 men, age 45 ± 9 years) with stage 5 chronic kidney disease (stage 5 CKD, including dialysis-dependent patients), who had undergone cadaveric KT. Biochemical screening before kidney transplantation and in the postoperative period at 3 and 12 months determined serum levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH), calcium, phosphorus, alkaline phosphatase activity, albumin and creatinine using standard methods. PTH levels of 130–595 pg/mL and ≤130 pg/mL were taken as the target level in the pre- and post-transplant periods, respectively.Results. Fifty-six KT candidates (group 1) had HPT and 154 (group 2) had the target PTH levels. PTH level was 897 (722; 1136) and 301 (229; 411) pg/mL, respectively, p &lt; 0.001. PTH decreased in all recipients at 3 months after KT: by 595 (420; 812) in group 1 and 148 (77; 230) pg/ mL in group 2, p &lt; 0.001, to 254 (180; 455) and 150 (118; 212) pg/mL, respectively, p &lt; 0.001; the target level was detected in 10.7% and 42.2% of recipients, respectively, p &lt; 0.001. At 12 months, blood PTH was 171 (94; 239) pg/mL in group 1 and 112 (90; 135) pg/mL in group 2, p = 0.004; target level was found in 48.2% and 73.4% of recipients, respectively, p &lt; 0.001. Kidney graft function was identical in both recipient groups: acute tubular necrosis in 41.1% and 54.5%; at 3 months, median glomerular filtration rates (GFR) of 60 and 65 mL/min (n.d.); at 12 months, 56 and 54 mL/min (n.d.). Post-transplant PTH levels correlated directly with preoperative levels in both groups and inversely with renal graft function in group 2 recipients.Conclusion. HPT in kidney transplant candidates is a major, graft function-independent predictor of excess PTH secretion in recipients, increasing the risk of persistent HPT 1.9-fold, one year after KT.

The Minimisation of Cardiovascular Disease Screening for Kidney Transplant Candidates.

Background: There is increasing evidence that cardiac screening prior to kidney transplantation does not improve its outcomes. However, risk aversion to perioperative events means that, in practice, testing remains common, limiting the availability of 'real-world' data to support any change. Our objective was to assess perioperative and 1-year post-transplant cardiovascular events in a kidney transplant candidate cohort who received minimal cardiovascular screening. Methods: The retrospective cohort study included all adult kidney-only transplant recipients in a single UK region between January 2015 and December 2021. Kidney transplant recipients asymptomatic of cardiac disease, even those with established risk factors, did not receive cardiac stress testing. The perioperative and 1-year post-transplant cardiovascular event incidences were examined. Logistic regression was used to identify variables of statistical significance that predicted cardiovascular or cerebrovascular events. Results: A total of 895 recipients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Prior to transplantation, 209 (23%) recipients had an established cardiac diagnosis, and 193 (22%) individuals had a diagnosis of diabetes. A total of 18 (2%) patients had a perioperative event, and there was a 5.7% incidence of cardiovascular events 1 year post-transplantation. The cardiovascular mortality rate was 0.0% perioperatively, 0.2% at 3 months post-transplant, and 0.2% at 1 year post-transplant. Conclusions: This study demonstrates comparable rates of cardiovascular events despite reduced screening in asymptomatic recipients. It included higher risk individuals who may, on the basis of screening results, have been excluded from transplantation in other programmes. It provides further evidence that extensive cardiac screening prior to kidney transplantation is unlikely to be offset by reduced rates of cardiovascular events.

Aortobifemoral Bypass in Kidney Transplant Candidates: A Ten-Year Experience.

In patients with severe aorto-iliac calcifications, vascular reconstructions can be performed in order to allow kidney transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyze the outcomes of kidney transplant candidates who underwent an aortobifemoral bypass (ABFB) for aorto-iliac calcifications. A retrospective study including all kidney transplant candidates who underwent an ABFB between 2012 and 2022 was performed. Primary outcome was 30-day morbidity-mortality after ABFB. Secondary outcome was accessibility to kidney transplant waiting list. Twenty-two ABFBs were performed: 10 ABFBs in asymptomatic patients presenting severe aorto-iliac circumferential calcifications without hemodynamic consequences, and 12 ABFBs in symptomatic patients in whom aorto-iliac calcifications were responsible for claudication or critical limb threatening ischemia. Overall 30-day mortality was 0%. Overall 30-day morbidity was 22.7%: 1 femoral hematoma and 1 retroperitoneal hematoma requiring surgical drainage in the asymptomatic group, and 2 digestive ischemia requiring bowel resection and 1 femoral hematoma requiring surgical drainage in the symptomatic group. Among the 22 patients, 20 patients could access to kidney waiting list and 8 patients underwent a kidney transplantation, including 3 living-donor transplantations. Aorto-iliac revascularization can be an option to overcome severe calcifications contraindicating kidney transplantation.

Impact of race-neutral eGFR calculations on African American kidney transplant candidate wait time: A single center retrospective analysis.

Race-inclusive estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) could contribute to racial disparity in access to kidney transplantation. The Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) issued a policy allowing waiting time modification for candidates affected by race-inclusive eGFR calculations. Implementation of the new OPTN policy at the kidney transplant program of the Mount Sinai Hospital involved review of 921 African American candidates, of whom 240 (26%) candidates gained a median of 1year and 10months. The duration of time candidates gained varied from a minimum of 5days to a maximum of 12years and 3months; 45.4% gained at least 2years, and 12% gained at least 4years of wait time. Among those who gained wait time, 20 (8.3%) candidates received deceased donor kidney transplants. Candidates who gained wait time had similar sociodemographic characteristics as those who did not, except that the median age for the former was higher by 3years (59 vs. 56). Our early data suggest that the current policy on waiting time modification for candidates affected by race-inclusive estimation of GFR has the potential to improve racial disparity in access to kidney transplantation. However, the generalizability of our findings to other centers requires further study.

Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on transplant laboratories: How to mitigate?

A positive flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) due to donor specific antibodies (DSA) constitutes a risk for kidney transplantation; such a finding may indicates an unacceptable donor for this patient. However, positive FCXM in the absence of DSA is considered discordant and need further investigations. During COVID-19 pandemic, we observed 22% discordant results out of 445 FCXM performed during eight months period in our laboratory and another 7% were invalid due to high background negative control (NC). No study has addressed the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on FCXM and the overall pre-kidney transplant workups or described a solution to deal with these non-specific reactivities. Herein, we analyzed all FCXM results in SARS-CoV-2 seropositive patients and addressed how this pandemic affected significantly the pre-kidney transplant workups, highlighting both technical and financial implications. We also shared our modified FCXM procedures using dithiotheritol (DTT) sera treatment or blocking donor cells with negative control human serum (NCS) which we found to be successful to abrogate 98% of all discordant FCXM results and to validate all invalid results due to high background NC.In conclusion, COVID-19 pandemic has affected our HLA laboratory significantly by creating many false positive or invalid crossmatch results. Transplant laboratories must consider this before test interpretations and immune risk assessments. We recommend the use of DTT serum treatment to remove nonspecific bindings in the sera of kidney transplant candidates and the use of NCS-blocked donor cells to correct high background when performing FCXM in transplant candidates or donors with recent history of SARS-CoV-2 immunization respectively.