Cancer Of Unknown Primary Patients Research Articles

Development and validation of a bedside score to predict early death in cancer of unknown primary patients.

BackgroundWe have investigated predictors of 90-day-mortality in a large cohort of non-specific cancer of unknown primary patients.MethodsPredictors have been identified by univariate and then logistic regression analysis in a single-center cohort comprising 429 patients (development cohort). We identified four predictors that produced a predictive score that has been applied to an independent multi-institutional cohort of 409 patients (validation cohort). The score was the sum of predictors for each patient (0 to 4).ResultsThe 90-day-mortality-rate was 33 and 26% in both cohorts. Multivariate analysis has identified 4 predictors for 90-day-mortality: performance status>1 (OR = 3.03, p = 0.001), at least one co-morbidity requiring treatment (OR = 2.68, p = 0.004), LDH>1.5×the upper limit of normal (OR = 2.88, p = 0.007) and low albumin or protein levels (OR = 3.05, p = 0.007). In the development cohort, 90-day-mortality-rates were 12.5%, 32% and 64% when the score was [0–1], 2 and [3]–[4], respectively. In the validation cohort, risks were 13%, 25% and 62% according to the same score values.ConclusionsWe have validated a score that is easily calculated at the beside that estimates the 90-days mortality rate in non-specific CUP patients. This could be helpful to identify patients who would be better served with palliative care rather than aggressive chemotherapy.

Docetaxel and carboplatin combination chemotherapy as outpatient palliative therapy in carcinoma of unknown primary: A multicentre Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group phase II study

Introduction. Taxane/platinum combinations exhibit synergistic cytotoxicity and activity against a broad range of solid tumours. We sought to optimise the regimen as a suitable outpatient palliative treatment for cancer of unknown primary (CUP). Patients and methods. Eligible CUP patients with adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma, performance status of 0-2, adequate organ function and assessable disease were treated with docetaxel 75 mg/m2 and carboplatin at an area under the concentration time-curve (AUC) of 5, both as 30-minute intravenous infusions, every three weeks. Patients with isolated axillary adenopathy, squamous cell cervical or inguinal adenopathy and PSA or germ-cell serum tumour markers were excluded. Results. Forty-seven patients entered the trial, 24 with predominantly nodal disease or non-mucinous peritoneal carcinomatosis (favourable risk) and 23 with visceral metastases (unfavourable risk). A median of 6 cycles of chemotherapy were administered, with relative dose intensities of both drugs >90%. Response rates were 32% (46% in favourable risk, 17% in unfavourable), comparable to the activity of paclitaxel/platinum regimes, though complete remissions were seen only in favourable risk patients. Granulocyte-colony stimulating factor support was used in a third of treatment cycles. Toxicity was mild and manageable, with grade 3–4 neutropenia in 26% of patients, febrile neutropenia in 7% and severe non-hematologic side-effects in less than 8% of patients. No toxic deaths or severe neurotoxicity were seen. Median time to progression (TTP) and overall survival (OS) were 5.5 and 16.2 months respectively. Survival was driven mainly by favourable-risk patients (22.6 months), as those with visceral metastases had a poor median survival of only 5.3 months. Good performance status and low-volume disease predicted for superior outcome, while docetaxel relative dose-intensity was a positive prognosticator only in favourable-risk patients. Conclusions. One-hour docetaxel/carboplatin is a convenient, safe and effective outpatient palliative treatment for CUP patients, providing meaningful survival prolongation only in favourable-risk patients. Insights in the molecular biology of CUP are needed for the development of targeted therapeutic manipulations of malignant resistance and progression.

Targeting c-KIT, PDGFR in cancer of unknown primary: a screening study for molecular markers of benefit

In view of available targeted therapies, we investigated the presence of c-kit, PDGFR gene mutations and protein expression in cancer of unknown primary (CUP) in order to study their contribution in pathogenesis, their prognostic value and potential as therapeutic targets. Mutations in hot spots c-kit exon 11 and PDGFR exons 12 and 18 were studied in paraffin-embedded tumour samples from 50 patients with CUP by means of PCR-based single-strand conformational polymorphism and protein expression by means of streptavidin-biotin immunoperoxidase assays. Molecular markers were screened for possible correlations with patient outcome. No shifted band was detected in any of the polyacrylamide gel electrophoreses, indicating absence of c-kit exon 11 and PDGFR exon 12, 18 mutations. Immunohistochemical analysis in 37 tumours revealed positive membranous CD117 expression in 30 samples (81%) of which five exhibited strong (+3), four moderate (+2) and 21 weak (+1) staining. PDGFRa protein staining was seen in 15 out of 30 (50%) cases, mostly weak (13) and rarely moderate (1) or strong (1). The expression of KIT or PDGFRa protein did not correlate with the clinical outcome of the patients in our cohort. In a moderate-sized CUP patient cohort, KIT or PDGFRa protein overexpression is rare, does not have gross prognostic significance for survival and is not associated with presence of activating mutations.

Whole-Brain Radiotherapy with 20 Gy in 5 Fractions for Brain Metastases in Patients with Cancer of Unknown Primary (CUP)

Whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) is the most common treatment for brain metastases. Survival of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) presenting with brain metastases is extremely poor. A radiation program with a short overall treatment time (short-course RT) would be preferable to longer programs if it provides similar outcomes. This study compares short-course RT with 20 Gy in 5 fractions (5 x 4 Gy) given over 5 days to longer programs in CUP patients. Data regarding 101 CUP patients who received either short course WBRT (n=34) with 5 x 4 Gy or long-course WBRT (n=67) with 10 x 3 Gy given over 2 weeks or 20 x 2 Gy given over 4 weeks for brain metastases were analyzed retrospectively. Six additional potential prognostic factors were investigated: age, gender, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), number of brain metastases, extracranial metastases, RPA-(Recursive Partitioning Analysis-)class. On univariate analysis, the radiation program was not associated with survival (p=0.88) nor intracerebral control (p=0.36). Improved survival was associated with KPS >or= 70 (p<0.001), absence of extracranial metastases (p<0.001), and RPA-class 1 (p<0.001). On multivariate analyses, KPS (risk ratio [RR]: 4.55; p<0.001), extracranial metastases (RR: 1.70; p=0.018), and RPA-class (RR: 2.86; p<0.001) maintained significance. On univariate analysis, KPS (p<0.001) and RPA-class (p<0.001) were significantly associated with intracerebral control. On multivariate analyses, KPS (RR: 2.72; p<0.001) and RPA-class (RR: 2.09; p<0.001) remained significant. Short-course WBRT with 5 x 4 Gy provided similar intracerebral control and survival as longer programs for the treatment of brain metastases in CUP patients. 5 x 4 Gy appears preferable because it is more convenient for patients.

Switching benchmarks in cancer of unknown primary: From autopsy to microarray

Introduction Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is associated with unknown biology and dismal prognosis. Information on the primary site of origin is scant and has never been analysed. We systematically reviewed all published evidence on the CUP primary site identified by two different approaches, either autopsy or microarray gene expression profiling. Methods Published reports on identification of CUP primary site by autopsy or microarray-based multigene expression platforms were retrieved and analysed for year of publication, primary site, patient age, gender, histology, rate of primary identification, manifestations and metastatic deposits, microarray chip technology, training and validation sets, mathematical modelling, classification accuracy and number of classifying genes. Results From 1944 to 2000, a total of 884 CUP patients (66% males) underwent autopsy in 12 studies after presenting with metastatic or systemic symptoms and succumbing to their disease. A primary was identified in 644 (73%) of them, mostly in the lung (27%), pancreas (24%), hepatobiliary tree (8%), kidneys (8%), bowel, genital system and stomach, as a small focus of adenocarcinoma or poorly differentiated carcinoma. An unpredictable systemic dissemination was evident with high frequency of lung (46%), nodal (35%), bone (17%), brain (16%) and uncommon (18%) deposits. Between the 1944–1980 and the 1980–2000 series, female representation increased, ‘undetermined neoplasm’ diagnosis became rarer, pancreatic primaries were found less often while colonic ones were identified more frequently. Four studies using microarray technology profiled more than 500 CUP cases using classifier set of genes (ranging from 10 to 495) and reported strikingly dissimilar frequencies of assigned primary sites (lung 11.5%, pancreas 12.5%, bowel 12%, breast 15%, hepatobiliary tree 8%, kidneys 6%, genital system 9%, bladder 5%) in 75–90% of the cases. Conclusions Evolution in medical imaging technology, diet and lifestyle habits probably account for changing epidemiology of CUP primaries in autopsies. Discrepant assignment of primary sites by microarrays may be due to the presence of ‘sanctuary sites’ in autopsies, molecular misclassification and the postulated presence of a pro-metastatic genetic signature. In view of the absence of patient therapeutic or prognostic benefit with primary identification, gene expression profiling should be re-orientated towards unraveling the complex pathophysiology of metastases.

Cancer of unknown primary site: review of consecutive cases at the National Cancer Center Hospital of Japan

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is not a rare clinical entity, accounting for 3%-5% of all solid malignancies. We retrospectively reviewed 86 (38 male/48 female) patients with a diagnosis of CUP (exclusive of female patients with adenocarcinoma involving the axillary lymph nodes alone and patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the cervical lymph nodes) who were referred to the National Cancer Center Hospital between April 1996 and October 2002. The median interval between the first visit to a local community hospital and referral to our hospital was 1 month (range, 1 to 45 months). The histological diagnosis was adenocarcinoma in 61 patients (71%), poorly differentiated carcinoma in 18 patients (21%), and squamous cell carcinoma in 4 patients (5%). Twenty-three female patients had peritoneal carcinomatosis of adenocarcinoma. Seventy-eight patients (91%) received platinum-containing chemotherapy. Sixty-one of the 86 patients (71%) were categorized as a subgroup of CUP without a specific therapy, and 55 of these 61 patients (90%) received platinum-containing regimens. The median survivals of all 86 patients and the 61 patients in the subgroup without a specific therapy in this series were 13 months and 11 months, respectively. In this series, the survival of the patients in the CUP subgroup without a specific therapy did not seem worse than that in previous reports. Empirical chemotherapy with platinum-containing regimens may benefit some CUP patients in a subgroup without a specific chemotherapy.

Functional outcome and survival after radiotherapy of metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with cancer of unknown primary

Patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) account for about 10% of patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC). This study aims to define the appropriate radiation regimen for these patients. Data of 143 CUP patients irradiated for MSCC were retrospectively evaluated. Short-course radiotherapy (RT) (1x8 Gy, 5x4 Gy, n = 68) and long-course RT (10x3 Gy, 15x2.5 Gy, 20x2 Gy, n = 75) plus 8 further potential prognostic factors (age, gender, performance status, visceral metastases, other bone metastases, number of involved vertebrae, ambulatory status, time of developing motor deficits before RT) were compared for functional outcome and survival. Improvement of motor function occurred in 10% of patients, no further progression of motor deficits in 57%, and deterioration in 33%. On multivariate analysis, functional outcome was positively associated with slower development of motor deficits (p < 0.001), absence of visceral metastases (p = 0.008) and other bone metastases (p = 0.027), and ambulatory status (p = 0.054), not with the radiation regimen (p = 0.74). Recurrence of MSCC in the irradiated region occurred in 7 patients after median 6 months. Median survival was 4 months. On multivariate analysis, better survival was significantly associated with absence of visceral metastases (p < 0.001), absence of other bone metastases (p = 0.005), ambulatory status (p = 0.001), and slower development of motor deficits (p = 0.030). For MSCC treatment in patients with CUP, no significant difference was observed between short-course and long-course RT regarding functional outcome and survival. Short-course RT appears preferable, at least for patients with a poor predicted survival, as it is more patient convenient and more cost-effective.

Patient survival and health care utilization in Medicare beneficiaries diagnosed with cancer of unknown primary

6064 Background: For patients presenting with cancer of unknown primary (CUP), identifying the site of origin can improve survival and treatment outcomes. We analyzed outcomes in patients who present with an initial diagnosis of malignant neoplasm without specification of site (ICD-9 199.0 and 199.1). Methods: Based on a 5% Medicare beneficiary sample from 2002 through 2004, we conducted a retrospective claims data analysis identifying patients who were cancer free in 2002 and who subsequently had a claim with a CUP diagnosis (ICD-9 199.0 or 199.1) in 2003. We evaluated survival and Medicare charges by procedure and diagnosis code for four consecutive quarters following CUP diagnosis. We assigned patients to one of two groups. The “differential” group consisted of CUP patients having a subsequent claim with a differential diagnosis code (ICD-9 140–229, excluding 199.0 and 199.1). The “unknown” group consisted of CUP patients with no later change in diagnosis. We applied chi-square and t-tests to examine differences in survival, resource utilization, and Medicare charges between groups. We developed Cox survival and linear regression models for multivariate analyses. Results: Of the 388 patients, 277 (71%) did not have a claim with a differential diagnosis during the follow-up period. Both groups were similar in race (80% white) gender (60% female) and age (range 70–79). The one-year mortality of the unknown group was 32.9% compared to 19.8% in the differential group (p=0.01). First quarter charges were higher for the unknown group: $2,549 vs. $1,683 (p &lt; 0.001). Total allowed charges were higher for the differential group over the one-year follow up period: $7,493 vs. $5,540 (p &lt; 0.05), even when adjusted for survival. Conclusions: Following a diagnosis of CUP, patients who obtain a differential diagnosis live longer and incur higher charges over time as a result of ongoing management and intervention. Improved diagnostic tests may affect patient survival and how Medicare resources are applied. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase II study to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of oxaliplatin in combination with gemcitabine (GEMOX) in cancer of unknown primary (CUP)

4140 Background: CUP patients (3–5% of all cancers) show response rates with combination chemotherapy ranging from 20–30% with little impact on median survival. We are evaluating GEMOX in this population since the combination shows synergy in preclinical studies, is well tolerated and is active in pancreatic and lung cancer (common primaries in CUP). Methods: Patients with a metastatic CUP diagnosis who were chemo naive or had received one previous therapy were eligible. Women with axillary only nodes were excluded. Results: 16 patients are enrolled in the study so far. All are evaluable for toxicity and 14 patients who have had at least one post-treatment CT scan are evaluable for response. Median age is 56 yrs. 63% of patients have adenocarcinoma, 6% squamous carcinoma and rest have undifferentiated tumors. 93% of patients have an ECOG performance status of 0–1. 4/16 patients (25%) of the patients have 4 or more organs involved in the metastatic process. 11 patients have received GEMOX first line and 5 ...

Localised disease in cancer of unknown primary (CUP): The value of positron emission tomography (PET) for individual therapeutic management

Two to four percent of cancer patients present with CUP syndrome. Median survival for localised disease is 20 and for disseminated disease, seven months. For localised disease, curative treatment is more likely and individual therapeutic strategies become more important. After conservative diagnostic procedures including MRI, the primary is detected in less than 25%. The diagnostic value of PET and its influence on therapeutic strategies was evaluated. Forty-two patients with localised CUP were investigated from 5 of 98 to 10 of 2000. The presenting site was lymph node metastasis in 34 and visceral metastasis in 8 patients. After a median of 7 (3-11) diagnostic procedures without detection of the primary, but evidence of localised disease, PET was performed with fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose. In 26 of 42 patients (62%), a primary was suggested by PET and confirmed in 18 (43%). In 5 of 18 patients beyond localised disease, additional dissemination, not detected by previous diagnostic measures, was diagnosed by PET. Overall, dissemination was only detected only by PET in 16 of 42 patients (38%). In29 of 42 patients (69%), the PET result influenced selection of the definitive treatment. In CUP patients, PET has a certain impact on detection of the primary as well as of the disseminated disease. and may also have a certain impact on therapeutic management.

Combination Regimen with Carboplatin, Epirubicin and Etoposide in Metastatic Carcinomas of Unknown Primary Site: A Hellenic Co-Operative Oncology Group Phase II Study

The encouraging results that have been reported for cisplatin combination chemotherapy in a minority of patients with cancer of unknown primary (CUP) together with the previously shown equal activity of carboplatin in this setting, prompted us to investigate the effectiveness of a carboplatin-containing regimen in a phase II clinical trial.Sixty-two evaluable CUP patients entered the protocol. The chemotherapy regimen consisted of carboplatin 300 mg/m² IV D₁, epirubicin 45 mg/m² IV D₁ and etoposide 120 mg/m² IV D_1–3 (CEE regimen) administered every 3 weeks. The median age of the patients was 61 years and 36 were male. Thirty-one diagnosed as poorly differentiated carcinomas (pdc) and the rest as adenocarcinomas. By clinicopathological criteria, 14 patients had a predominately nodal disease with pdc or poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas (pda), 3 women peritoneal carcinomatosis, and the remaining 46 patients had a predominately splanchnic involvement (24 pdc, 22 pda). Twenty-three patients responded to chemotherapy with 4 (6.5%) complete and 19 (30.5%) partial responders (RR 37%, 95% CI 25–49%). An equal activity of the regimen was observed between the two major histopathological types, the pdc and the adenocarcinomas. Nevertheless, significant differences were seen when the CEE regimen was assessed for its activity in the distinct clinicopathological subsets of CUP. Patients with predominately nodal disease of midline distribution with pdc or pda, and women with peritoneal carcinomatosis, achieved a response rate of 64 and 62% respectively, as compared with a 26% response rate for those with predominately splanchnic involvement. Overall median survival was 10 months and for patients with midline distribution 15 months. The regimen was well tolerated. It is concluded that CEE is a relatively nontoxic chemotherapy regimen and easily administered on an outpatient basis. This prospective phase II study confirmed the activity of carboplatin in the chemosensitive subsets of the predominately nodal disease of midline distribution and peritoneal carcinomatosis in women in the CUP syndrome.