Cancer Clinical Trials Research Articles

Targeted Degradation of SOS1 Exhibits Potent Anticancer Activity and Overcomes Resistance in KRAS-Mutant Tumors and BCR-ABL-Positive Leukemia.

SOS1 is an essential guanine nucleotide exchange factor for RAS that also plays a critical role in the activation of the small GTPase RAC mediated by BCR-ABL in leukemogenesis. Despite this, small molecule inhibitors targeting SOS1 have shown limited efficacy in clinical trials for KRAS mutant cancers, and their potential as a therapeutic approach for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) remains largely unexplored. In this study, we developed a potent SOS1 PROTAC SIAIS562055, which was designed by connecting a CRBN ligand to an analogue of the SOS1 inhibitor BI-3406. SIAIS562055 exhibited sustained degradation of SOS1 and inhibition of downstream ERK pathways, resulting in superior anti-proliferative activity compared to small molecule inhibitors. SIAIS562055 also potentiated the activity of both KRAS inhibitors in KRAS-mutant cancers and ABL inhibitors in BCR-ABL+ CML. In KRAS-mutant xenografts, SIAIS562055 displayed promising antitumor potency as a monotherapy and enhanced ERK inhibition and tumor regression when combined with KRAS inhibitors, overcoming acquired resistance. In CML cells, SIAIS562055 promoted the active uptake of BCR-ABL inhibitors by upregulating the carnitine/organic cation transporter SLC22A4. SIAIS562055 and BCR-ABL inhibitors synergistically enhanced inhibition of ABL phosphorylation and downstream signaling, demonstrating robust antitumor activities in both mouse xenografts and primary CML patient samples. In summary, this study suggests that PROTAC-mediated SOS1 degradation represents an effective therapeutic strategy for treating not only KRAS-mutant cancers but also BCR-ABL-harboring leukemia.

Data set for the reporting of lung cancer: recommendations from the International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR).

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer related deaths worldwide, although some patients with early-stage disease can be cured with surgical resection. Standardised reporting of all clinically relevant pathological parameters is essential for best patient care and is also important for ongoing data collection and refinement of important pathological features that impact patient prognosis, staging and clinical care. Using the established International Collaboration on Cancer Reporting (ICCR) procedure, a representative international expert panel of nine lung pathologists as well as an oncologist was convened. Essential core elements and suggested non-core elements were identified for inclusion in the resected lung cancer pathology data set based on predetermined levels of evidence as well as consensus expert opinion. A lung cancer histopathology reporting guide was developed that includes relevant clinical, macroscopic, microscopic and ancillary testing. Critical review and discussion of current evidence was incorporated into the new data set including changes from the 2021 World Health Organisation (WHO) Classification of Thoracic Tumours, fifth edition, new requirements for grading invasive non-mucinous adenocarcinomas, assessment of response to neoadjuvant therapy and requirements for molecular testing in early-stage resected lung carcinomas. This ICCR data set represents incorporation of all relevant parameters for histology reporting of lung cancer resection specimens. Routine use of this data set is recommended for all pathology reporting of resected lung cancer and it is freely available worldwide on the ICCR website (https://www.iccr-cancer.org/datasets/published-datasets/). Widespread implementation will help to ensure consistent and comprehensive pathology reporting and data collection essential for lung cancer patient care, clinical trials and other research.

Unraveling the potential biomarkers of immune checkpoint inhibitors in advanced ovarian cancer: a comprehensive review.

The ongoing research on the role of immunotherapy in advanced ovarian cancer (OC) and current clinical trials indicate that patients shown limited response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) monotherapy. When combined with other treatments or drugs, the efficacy of immunotherapy will be significantly improved. Biomarkers can be used to identify patients with better responses, thereby improving the precision and efficacy of immunotherapy. Key biomarkers for advanced OC include homologous repair deficiency, programmed death-ligand (PD-L) 1 expression, chemokines, and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes. These biomarkers could be applied in the future to select the most suitable patient populations. This review comprehensively examines the research and development of biomarkers in OC immunotherapy from three omics perspectives: genomics, transcriptomics, and proteomics, which may provide guidance for the effectiveness of OC immunotherapy strategies.

"First, Trust Needs to Develop": Hematologists' Perspectives on Factors Influencing Black Persons' Participation in Clinical Trials.

Cancer clinical trials are crucial for treatment standards and innovation but lack racial-ethnic diversity. Understanding physician perspectives on recruiting participants is critical due to their role in decision-making about trial candidacy and enrollment. From August 2021 to January 2022 we recruited 13 Academic hematologists experienced with treating blood cancers and enrolling clinical trial participants. Each hematologist participated in a 60-75-minute semistructured interview and completed a sociodemographic survey. Using the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities multilevel model as a framework, we characterized hematologists' perceived barriers to clinical trial participation among Black persons. ATLAS.ti v9 and later v 23.2.1 was used for project management and to facilitate data analysis using the Sort and Sift, Think and Shift approach (ResearchTalk Inc). All hematologists were White, with 70% being male. Three factors influenced their perspectives on enrolling Black individuals in clinical trials: individual attitudes and beliefs, such as perceptions that Black or socioeconomically disadvantaged persons will be less willing or less compliant with the requirements for trial participation and follow-up. The need to build trusting relationships between themselves and patients prior to discussing clinical trials and the prevailing legacy of medical mistrust among the Black community. Trust was found to be the underlying factor in determining communication between hematologists and Black persons about clinical trials across all three levels. This study highlights how hematologists' attitudes, beliefs, biases, and views on trust in patient relationships influence their communication with Black individuals about clinical trials. It emphasizes the need for further research to develop interventions that address the lack of racial and ethnic diversity in trials.

Utidelone plus pembrolizumab as the fourth-line combination treatment in non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR mutation: a case report.

Utidelone is an ebomycin derivative chemotherapeutic drug, which can promote tubulin polymerization and stabilize microtubule structure, so as to induce apoptosis. The drug is an innovative drug independently developed by China with independent intellectual property rights. Phase II clinical trials for advanced breast cancer are being approved by National Medical Products Administration for the treatment of advanced breast cancer. However, there is no report on the application in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. This case is a patient with EGFR mutant stage IV NSCLC who has progressed after third-line targeted therapy. The fourth line was treated with utidelone combined with pabolizumab. The patient had progressed after targeted therapy with oxitinib, ametinib, and vometinib. Due to the patient's physical reasons, the traditional platinum drugs were not suitable, so the patient was treated with utidelone combined with pabolizumab. The curative effect was evaluated as SD after two cycles and progesterone receptor after four cycles. At present, it is still in the maintenance of reduction of utidelone combined with pabolizumab, and the tumor continues to shrink. Although peripheral neurotoxicity occurred during treatment, it improved after symptomatic treatment. The treatment of EGFR mutant stage IV NSCLC with utidelone combined with pabolizumab has good effect and mild adverse reactions.

Bedside to bench and back again-translational research in interventional pulmonology.

Translational research in Interventional Pulmonology has made significant advances in recent years, ranging from novel biomarkers and imaging to practice-changing clinical trials in lung cancer and pleural disease. This review article aims to summarize key research studies in the field to understand the latest published evidence and to highlight areas of growing academic interest. In lung cancer, the role of novel imaging and biomarkers and their potential utility in early lung cancer diagnosis will be highlighted. In pleural disease, less invasive/conservative treatment in pneumothorax, early aggressive treatment in pleural infection along with novel biomarkers, and the shift beyond drainage strategies in malignant pleural effusion and mesothelioma will be discussed. This overview of translational research in the field of interventional pulmonology will ultimately help to highlight the gaps in current evidence to promote research in areas of clinical significance.

Palbociclib plus aromatase inhibitors in patients with metastatic breast cancer and cardiovascular diseases: real-world effectiveness.

Patients with cardiovascular disease (CVD) comorbidities are often excluded from participating in breast cancer clinical trials. Consequently, data to inform treatment decisions for patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HR+/HER2-) metastatic breast cancer (mBC) and CVD are limited. We compared the effectiveness of first-line palbociclib plus an aromatase inhibitor (AI) vs an AI alone and evaluated palbociclib treatment patterns in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD in routine clinical practice. Data from the Flatiron Health Analytic Database were captured for patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD who initiated first-line treatment with palbociclib plus an AI or an AI alone between February 2015 and March 2020 (data cutoff: September 30, 2020). Overall survival (OS), real-world progression-free survival (PFS), and treatment patterns were evaluated. Of the 469 patients with identifiable CVD, 160 received palbociclib plus an AI, and 309 received an AI alone. After stabilized inverse probability treatment weighting, both median OS (40.7 vs 26.5 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.732 [95% CI, 0.537-0.997]; P = .048) and median real-world PFS (20.0 vs 12.5 months; HR, 0.679 [95% CI, 0.512-0.900]; P = .007) were significantly prolonged in patients treated with palbociclib plus an AI vs an AI alone. Among patients with a documented palbociclib starting dose, 78.5% started palbociclib at 125mg/day, and 38.6% experienced dose adjustment. In this real-world analysis, first-line palbociclib plus an AI was associated with improved effectiveness compared with an AI alone in patients with HR+/HER2- mBC and CVD. NCT05361655 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Successful completion of large, low-cost randomized cancer trials at an academic cancer center.

Concerns about low accrual have long been a standard part of the discourse on cancer clinical trials, reaching even as far as the news media. Indeed, so many trials are closed before completing accrual that a cottage industry has recently developed creating statistical models to predict trial failure. We previously proposed four methodologic fixes for the current crisis in clinical trials: (1) dramatically reducing the number of eligibility criteria, (2) using data routinely collected in clinical practice for trial endpoints; then lowering barriers to accrual by (3) cluster randomization or (4) staged consent. We report our practical experience of applying these fixes to randomized trials at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center. We have completed seven single-center randomized trials, with several more underway and accruing rapidly, with a total accrual approaching 10,000. Many of the trials have compared surgical interventions, an area where trials have traditionally been hard to complete. Only one of these trials was externally funded. While low costs were possible due to the existing research infrastructure at our institution, such infrastructure is common at major cancer centers. Further research on innovative clinical trial designs is warranted, particularly in higher-stakes settings, and in trials of medical and radiotherapy interventions.

Optimizing assessments of quality of life in contemporary prostate cancer clinical trials.

Optimizing assessments of quality of life in contemporary prostate cancer clinical trials.

Diversity in U.S. Clinical Trials for Head and Neck Cancer: Are We Improving?

This study assesses whether national initiatives undertaken to improve diversity in clinical trial enrollment have been successful within head and neck cancer (HNC) trials. A retrospective analysis was conducted of HNC trials published on clinicaltrials.gov with start dates between 2000 and 2023. Demographic data for 8998 HNC trial enrollees was abstracted and analyzed to investigate potential demographic shifts. In the past 20 years, the percentage of White patients increased 6.1%, Asian patient population decreased 3.1%, and Black patient population increased 0.8%. Compared with previously published SEER data, HNC trials have significantly more White patients, fewer Black patients, and fewer Asian/Native-Hawaiian patients than HNC patients at large. Despite efforts to increase diversity in HNC clinical trials in the United States, diversity has significantly decreased in the past 10 years. As current approaches are failing to show improvement, novel approaches to improving representation in clinical trials are necessitated.

Correction to “Muscle wasting in cancer: opportunities and challenges for exercise in clinical cancer trials”

Correction to “Muscle wasting in cancer: opportunities and challenges for exercise in clinical cancer trials”

Financial toxicity in early-phase cancer clinical trial participants.

Little is known about financial toxicity in early-phase clinical trial (EP-CT) participants. This study sought to describe financial toxicity in EP-CT participants and assess associations with patient characteristics and patient-reported outcomes (PROs). Prospectively enrolled EP-CT participants from were followed from April 2021 through January 2023. Participants completed the Comprehensive Score for Financial Toxicity (<26=financial toxicity) at time of treatment. Quality of life (QOL), symptoms, coping, and resource concerns were surveyed. Associations of financial toxicity with patient characteristics, PROs, and clinical outcomes were explored. Of 261 eligible patients, 197 completed baseline assessments (75.5%, median age=63.4 years [31.8-88.6], 57.4% female). Most common cancers were gastrointestinal (33.0%) and breast (20.8%). More than one third (34.0%) of patients reported financial toxicity. Patients with financial toxicity were more likely to be<65 years (70.2% vs 48.5%, p=.004), unemployed (45.5% vs 16.9%, p<.001), not have attended college (53.1% vs 26.4%, p=.002), and have income <$60,000 (59.7% vs 25.4%, p<.001). In adjusted models, patients with financial toxicity reported lower QOL (B=-6.66, p=.004) and acceptance (B=-0.78, p=.002), and increased self-blame (B=0.87, p<.001). They were more likely to have concerns regarding housing (10.6% vs 2.3%, p=.025), bills (31.8% vs 3.8%, p<.001), food (9.1% vs 0.8%, p=.006), and employment (21.2% vs 1.5%, p<.001). There was no difference in time on trial (hazard ratio, 1.03; p=.860) or survival (hazard ratio, 1.16; p=.496). More than one third of EP-CT participants reported financial toxicity. Factors associated with financial toxicity and demonstrated novel associations among financial toxicity with QOL, coping, and resource concerns were identified, highlighting the need to address financial toxicity among this population.

From the Beginning of the Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group to the Present and Next Steps.

The Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group (KGOG) was established in 2002 and is the only organization in Korea conducting multi-center clinical trials for gynecologic cancers. Since its re-establishment as a non-profit organization in 2021, KGOG has grown significantly, now including 207 gynecologic oncology specialists from 76 hospitals. This growth is a testament to the dedication and hard work of all those involved in the organization. KGOG is committed to maximizing the activation of multi-center clinical research through policies that support patients with rare diseases and gynecologic cancer research, focusing on strengthening institutional capacity, equalizing participation opportunities, and enhancing information sharing. A significant milestone for KGOG was becoming a member of the US Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) in 2005, allowing participation in GOG clinical trials. KGOG later joined the Gynecologic Cancer InterGroup (GCIG) and strengthened its capabilities by hosting the first Endometrial Cancer Consensus Conference-Clinical Research (ECCC-CR) in 2023. KGOG holds biannual meetings and symposia, as well as 224 operating committee meetings annually to review the discussions of the Tumor Site Committee. KGOG has conducted 156 investigator-initiated trial (IIT) or sponsor-initiated trial (SIT) studies as KGOG-led or participated in research. Currently, 18 studies are registered, and 10 are in preparation. To date, 68 papers have been published. KGOG conducts six national projects and collaborates with external organizations such as the NRG Oncology Foundation, Gynecologic Oncology Group Partners (GOG-P), GCIG, East Asian Gynecologic Oncology Trial group (EAGOT), and the Japanese Gynecologic Oncology Group (JGOG). Through collaboration with renowned international research institutions, KGOG has significantly expanded the scope of its research, achieving noteworthy clinical outcomes. This report not only introduces the history and recent status of KGOG but also presents the exciting future direction of the organization, filled with potential breakthroughs and advancements in gynecologic oncology research.

Silmitasertib in Combination With Cabozantinib Impairs Liver Cancer Cell Cycle Progression, Induces Apoptosis, and Delays Tumor Growth in a Preclinical Model.

The rising incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a global problem. Several approved treatments, including immune therapy and multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, are used for treatment, although the results are not optimum. There is an unmet need to develop highly effective chemotherapies for HCC. Targeting multiple pathways to attack cancer cells is beneficial. Cabozantinib is an orally available bioactive multikinase inhibitor and has a modest effect on HCC treatment. Silmitasertib is an orally bioavailable, potent CK2 inhibitor with a direct role in DNA damage repair and is in clinical trials for other cancers. In this study, we planned to repurpose these existing drugs on HCC treatment. We observed a stronger antiproliferative effect of these two combined drugs on HCC cells generated from different etiologies as compared to the single treatment. Global RNA-seq analyses revealed a decrease in the expression of G2/M cell cycle transition genes in HCC cells following combination treatment, suggesting G2 phase cell arrest. We observed G2/M cell cycle phase arrest in HCC cells upon combination treatment compared to the single-treated or vehicle-treated control cells. The downregulation of CCNA2 and CDC25C following combination therapy further supported the observation. Subsequent analyses demonstrated that combination treatment inhibited 70 kDa ribosomal protein S6 kinase (p70S6K) phosphorylation, and increased Bim expression. Apoptosis of HCC cells were accompanied by increased poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage and caspase-9 activation. Next, we observed that a combination therapy significantly delayed the progression of HCC xenograft growth as compared to vehicle control. Together, our results suggested combining cabozantinib and silmitasertib would be a promising treatment option for HCC.

Patient interest in clinical trials and remote technology among a diverse oncology patient population.

389 Background: Existing research describes a number of barriers limiting cancer clinical trial enrollment, including time constraints and financial burden, particularly among under-represented populations. In this study, we sought to assess the relationship between the use of remote technology in clinical trials and patient interest in trial participation amongst oncology patients at an urban academic medical center. Methods: We administered a 60-question, cross-sectional, in-person survey to adult patients with a solid tumor or hematological malignancy diagnosis on active treatment at Columbia University Irving Medical Center between 1/2023 and 2/2024. The survey assessed patient demographics, telehealth access, and interest in using telehealth as part of routine care and clinical trials. Demographics including age, gender, race/ethnicity, marital status, income, insurance type, education level, and cancer type were self-reported. Results: The survey was administered to 100 oncology patients. The mean age was 61 years; 51% were female; 45% non-White and 23% identified as Hispanic. The majority (87%) reported having access to a computer or electronic device; 99% of those having internet access and 81% being somewhat or very comfortable using the internet. Forty seven percent of patients had been offered a cancer clinical trial by their oncology provider, and 19% had participated or were currently participating in a clinical trial. Of the 53% of patients who had not been offered a clinical trial or did not know, 64% reported they would consider participating in a trial recommended by their oncologist. Among all respondents, 52% of patients reported it would make no difference in their decision to participate in a trial if they learned about the risks and benefits remotely (phone or video), 28% were somewhat more or much more likely to participate learning about the risks and benefits remotely, and 20% were somewhat less or much less likely to participate under these conditions. Seventy five percent of respondents would be willing to sign consent for a trial remotely. Sixty four percent of respondents were not willing to spend over an hour traveling to a trial site, citing time, cost, family, and work obligations as reasons for limiting travel. The majority of respondents (&gt;50%) indicated that they would be more likely to participate if the trial used remote technology to decrease the need to travel to a trial site. Conclusions: In this cross-sectional study amongst a diverse patient population, we found that the majority of oncology patients on active treatment have access to telehealth, express interest in clinical trials despite barriers to participation, and would be more likely to enroll in trials if remote communication reduced the amount of travel time for trial participation. Decreasing the logistical burden of cancer clinical trials may increase patient access and diversity in trial participation.

Most Common Symptomatic Adverse Reactions of Cancer Treatments From US Drug Labels (2015-2021) to Inform Selection of Patient-Reported Outcomes

ObjectivesIncorporating patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to assess symptomatic adverse events (AEs) in cancer clinical trials (CTs) is important to characterize treatment tolerability. Cancer therapies approved over the past decade have expanded the types of expected toxicities. To inform future symptomatic AE PRO item selection, we identified the most common symptomatic adverse reactions from recently approved products. MethodsWe reviewed approvals from 2015 to 2021 for lung, breast, and hematologic cancer indications. Using United States Prescribing Information safety data, we recorded symptomatic adverse reactions reported in ≥20% of patients in the experimental arm of CTs supporting approvals. We calculated the proportion of arms reporting each symptomatic adverse reaction. ResultsIn total, 130 experimental arms were included (lung = 30, breast = 10, hematologic = 90). For all cancer types, fatigue and diarrhea were reported in >50% of the arms. Nausea was reported in ≥50% of the arms for all except lung. Vomiting, decreased appetite, and alopecia, were reported in ≥50% of breast cancer arms. Rash, musculoskeletal pain, and cough were reported in >50% of leukemia/lymphoma arms. Cough was common (50%) in multiple myeloma arms. ConclusionsHeterogeneity in symptomatic adverse reactions across CTs supports the use of item libraries when building a PRO strategy to assess tolerability. Fatigue, diarrhea, and nausea were the most frequent symptomatic adverse reactions reported in contemporary cancer CTs and could provide a starting point when selecting PRO symptomatic AE items. Additional symptomatic AE PRO items should be selected based on the mechanism of action, early clinical data, published literature, and patient and clinician input.

Time Burdens for Participants With Advanced Cancer in Phase I Trials: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Participating in phase I cancer clinical trials often entails extra visits and procedures. We describe the planned time and procedures associated with phase I trial participation. We searched ClinicalTrials.gov for phase I cancer trials of new drugs with assessment schedules and results posted between 2020 and 2022. Trials were included if participants had advanced or metastatic disease. Our primary analysis measured the number of planned research days (PRDs; each day a clinic visit is required) per participant up to the first month of trial participation and for the entire trial duration. Secondarily, we estimated the number of research procedures. Our sample included 71 phase I trials comprising 302 cohorts. These trials enrolled 3,904 participants; the median participation duration was 2.5 months. During screening and up to the first month of participation, the median PRDs per participant was 7 (IQR, 7-10). Across the entire trial, the median PRDs per participant was 4.5 days per month (IQR, 3.30-6.20). Participants spent 15% of trial days attending planned appointments. Per trial cohort, participants were given a median of 8 (IQR, 7-11) physical examinations, 6 (IQR, 3-10) infusions, 6 (IQR, 3-12) electrocardiograms, and 1 (IQR, 1-3) biopsy. Participants commit a substantial amount of time to planned visits in phase I cancer trials, especially in the first month. Overall, they invest 15% of trial days attending planned research activities. These estimates provide a lower bound to the time participants in phase I trials donate to drug development, as our analysis excluded unplanned visits.

P2.16C.01 Awareness, Stigma, and Fatalism Towards Cancer Clinical Trials Among Black Individuals Diagnosed with Lung Cancer

P2.16C.01 Awareness, Stigma, and Fatalism Towards Cancer Clinical Trials Among Black Individuals Diagnosed with Lung Cancer

Racial representation in multicenter clinical trials leading to drug approvals for gynecological cancer indications by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

66 Background: Enrollment disparities in gynecologic (Gyn) cancer clinical trials in the United States (US) are well-documented. However, there is limited data evaluating how recruitment sites in international clinical trials contribute to racial representation, specifically in Gyn cancers. Here, we examined racial enrollment and geographic location in clinical trials that have led to approval for Gyn cancer applications. Methods: Agents approved by the FDA for Gyn cancer treatment and corresponding clinical trials were identified from the FDA Drug Approvals and Databases. Enrollment data were abstracted from ClinicalTrials.gov then cross-checked with published manuscripts and FDA labels. Using Gyn disease site prevalence from the 2021 SEER database, we calculated expected enrollment proportions by race and compared these to actual clinical trial enrollment data. The binomial test was used to compare expected vs. observed proportions with White patients as the reference group. Results: From 2014 to 2024, 9 drugs received 22 FDA approvals for ovarian (n=13), endometrial (n=4), or cervical cancer (n=5). These approvals were based on 28 clinical trials enrolling a total of 13,763 patients (75.7% White, 3.4% Black, 12.0% Asian, 8.9% Other/Unknown). These trials included 1 (3.6%) US only study, 3 (10.7%) non-US, primarily Europe-based studies (PAOLA-1, AURELIA, STUDY42 [Europe + Australia]), and 24 (85.7%) international studies across the US and 46 other countries. Considering the distribution of race (White: 86.3%, Black: 8.4%, Asian: 4.9%) of Gyn cancers in the US, Black patients had lower enrollment (45% of expected enrollment) vs. White patients (95% of expected enrollment, P&lt;0.0001). African countries were rarely included among the recruitment sites. Two international trials reported patient recruitment from South Africa (3.2% Black, 6/188 patients, 38% of expected enrollment).However, Asian patients had higher enrollment (269% of expected enrollment, P&lt;0.0001) compared to White patients. In 13 trials that included study sites in East Asia, Asian patients comprised 16% of the trial population (1310/8205 patients; 327% of expected enrollment) vs. 3.2% in trials that did not open in Asia (n=15) (181/5558 patients; 67% of expected enrollment). Conclusions: Black patients were underrepresented in pivotal trials that led to FDA approvals for Gyn cancers. Overrepresentation of Asian patients was likely due to international enrollment from East Asia. Post-marketing retrospective studies or additional studies focused on underrepresented groups are needed to assess true drug efficacy and safety in US populations that are disproportionately affected by Gyn cancer mortality.

Delta-like ligand 4 inhibitor drug treatment induces pulmonary hypertension in cancer clinical trials.

Delta-like ligand 4 (DLL-4) inhibitor drugs are an emerging cancer treatment. In clinical trials for solid organ malignancies, intravenous administration of monoclonal antibodies that inhibit DLL-4 is associated with development of pulmonary hypertension, in the absence of left ventricular dysfunction. Analysis of 13 clinical trials showed that pulmonary hypertension is a complication of DLL-4 inhibition.