Research Article| March 01 2017 Depressive Disorders in Preadolescent Children AAP Grand Rounds (2017) 37 (3): 34. https://doi.org/10.1542/gr.37-3-34 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Depressive Disorders in Preadolescent Children. AAP Grand Rounds March 2017; 37 (3): 34. https://doi.org/10.1542/gr.37-3-34 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All PublicationsAll JournalsAAP Grand RoundsPediatricsHospital PediatricsPediatrics In ReviewNeoReviewsAAP NewsAll AAP Sites Search Advanced Search Topics: depressive disorders, pre-teen, major depressive disorder Source: Korczak DJ, Ofner M, LeBlanc J, et al. Major depressive disorder among preadolescent Canadian children: rare disorder or rarely detected? In Press. Academic Pediatr. 2016; doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acap.2016.10.011Google Scholar Researchers from multiple institutions in Canada conducted a nationwide, prospective study to identify preadolescent children who were newly diagnosed with major depressive disorder (MDD). For the study, 2,500 pediatricians in the Canadian Pediatric Surveillance Program (CPSP) were surveyed monthly over 3 years to report new cases of MDD, as defined by DSM-IV, among children aged 5–12 years. To meet diagnostic criteria for MDD, children had to have depressive symptoms or markedly diminished interest or pleasure in most activities almost daily and for most of the day, and impairment in at least 4 of 7 functional domains (ie, significant weight change, insomnia, psychomotor agitation or retardation, fatigue, feelings of worthlessness or excessive guilt, diminished ability to concentrate, and recurrent thoughts of death). Children whose symptoms were related to substance use, were due to acute bereavement, or who had a previous diagnosis of a bipolar disorder were excluded. For each child with MDD identified, the physician was asked to complete a case report that included the patient’s demographic data, clinical characteristics and treatment, presence of medical or psychiatric comorbidities, and family history of mental illness in a first-degree relative. During the study period, 29 children met study criteria for having newly identified MDD. Among the 29 participants with confirmed MDD, median age was 11.1 years (range, 7.3–12.9), 55% were boys, and 23 (79%) had been experiencing depressive symptoms for >6 months. Eighteen children (62%) were globally impaired in all functional domains at the time of presentation. Comorbid medical conditions were present in 5 children (17%): 2 children had asthma, while 1 child each had a seizure disorder, migraine headaches, and type 1 diabetes. Among comorbid psychiatric disorders, attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and anxiety were the most common, each occurring in 13 children (45%) with MDD; 8 (28%) had all 3 disorders. Twenty-three children (79%) had a history of a psychiatric disorder in a first-degree relative, with parental depression or anxiety present in 21 (72%). Additionally, 22 children (76%) reported suicide ideation, and 6 (21%) had attempted suicide. Most study children with MDD were treated with medication (n=23; 79%), and 13 (45%) were treated with ≥2 medications. The researchers conclude that preadolescent children with physician-identified MDD often have long-standing symptoms present and high levels of functional impairment before presentation. Psychiatric comorbidity is common in these patients. Dr. Phillipi has disclosed no financial relationship relevant to this commentary. This commentary does not contain a discussion of an unapproved/investigative use of a commercial product/device. Screening for depression in adolescents and adults, including pregnant and postpartum women, is recommended by the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) (Grade B).1,2 Screening recommendations are based on “high certainty that the net benefit is moderate or there is moderate certainty that the net benefit is moderate to substantial.” The USPSTF goes... You do not currently have access to this content.
Read full abstract