I begin by asserting that a vegetarian, even a vegan diet, from a nutritional standpoint, is at least as healthy as, and in all probability healthier than, one which centers on or includes meat. Scientific evidence supporting this claim is beginning to accumulate, and abundant material is available for those who wish to pursue the issue (Anonymous 1988a; Anonymous 1988b; Barnard 1993; Chen 1990; Melina, Davis, and Harrison 1994; White and Frank 1994). In addition, every good bookshop today has several vegetarian and/or vegan cookbooks, and many titles currently on the market contain excellent chapters on the fundamentals of vegetarian nutrition as well as references to contemporary nutritional research. For these reasons I shall not attempt to summarize here the evidence in favor of a vegetarian diet. My second preliminary claim is that meat-eating in general is, and in particular certain kinds of meat-eating are, unhealthy. The statistical correlation between high meat consumption and increased probability of colon, breast, and other cancers, heart disease, and atherosclerosis far and away the leading causes of death in North America has been well established by many independent researchers (Barnard 1990; Fiddles 1991; Mitra 1991; National Research Council 1989; Robbins 1987). This realization prompted Health and Welfare Canada (a federal government department) to issue a new version of Canada 's Food Guide to Healthy Eating, which appeared in 1992. Alternatives to meats (such as tofu and legumes) are accentuated, as are 5-10 servings per day of vegetables and fruits and 5-12 servings per day of grain products. Critics maintain that an even greater shift toward a vegetarian diet might have been endorsed in the Guide had it not been for the extraordinary (and entirely predictable) behind-the-scenes lobbying efforts of the livestock industry (Industry Forced Changes 1993).
Read full abstract