THIS column has been rattling around in my head for several years now, and I think the time has come to write it. I frequently write about the benefits, or payoffs, of technology. But what about the technology penalty? The technology penalty is what happens when you do something using technology that you could do easier, quicker, or more efficiently without using technology. Allowing students to e-mail you their assignments is a good example of paying the technology penalty. If I collect papers in class, I can simply sit at my desk, read the papers, and scribble notes on them. This task usually takes an hour or so. If I allowed 30 students to e-mail me an assignment, I assure you I could not read and respond to 30 e-mails in an hour. Thus it is a rare occasion when I accept e-mailed assignments. Rather, I usually ask students to print out their assignments and give them to me in class or drop them by my office. Why would I want to do the printing for them? Using calendaring and address book software is another example of incurring the technology penalty. Keeping your calendar on a computer or PDA requires that you start--or wake up--the computer or PDA, go to the application, select the view (day, week, month, or year), and scroll or page to the specific date, time, or event. In contrast, I carry a month-at-a-glance paper calendar that I get free from Hallmark every year. Because the previous month's pages are dog-eared, it takes only about a second to find this month's page. The calendar fits in my shirt pocket, so I don't have to drag around any electronics. I also have a small paper address book that fits into the same shirt pocket. Call me old-fashioned if you like, but the systems work for me, and there is no technology penalty. Instructors who teach students how to use powerful software like Photoshop pay an immense technology penalty. Adobe releases a new version of Photoshop every six to 12 months with all kinds of changes and new features. Instructors must then relearn the program and change their syllabus and handouts. Explanatory handouts usually have screen captures in them, so the screen captures from the old version must be updated. If the instructor uses a textbook on Photoshop, that will usually change with each new release of the software as well. A colleague who teaches computer graphics and Photoshop has to go to daylong professional development seminars on Photoshop a couple of times a year just to stay sharp. Fortunately, my colleague has a technician who can upgrade all the computers in his teaching lab, but many teachers have to do their own upgrades. Another example of software that changes rapidly is Web creation software, such as Macromedia's Studio 8. What started out few years ago as simply Dream weaver morphed into Studio MX and is now Studio 8. The current version of Studio 8 contains Dream weaver, Flash Professional, Fireworks, Contribute, and Flash Paper. Each of these programs has its own learning curve that takes a good amount of time to negotiate. Shallow learning curves are certainly technology penalty. High school teachers are not immune to the technology penalty. Not long ago, I received an e-mail from a high school calculus teacher who had just received a Smart board. In order to take advantage of all the things the Smart board could do, the teacher was spending about two hours a day preparing for the next day's lesson. The payoff for his students was great, but so was the technology penalty he was paying. Still another example of paying the technology penalty is using computer grade book software. Many teachers who use grade book software also keep a paper grade book. Doing any job twice, with and without technology, is a definite technology penalty. An inherent penalty in grade book software is the time it takes to scroll up and down the list of students to enter a grade. Visually scanning a paper grade book page is much faster. …