This paper engages the issue of trust in contemporary societies, where data and computing are a defining condition of public life, with the framework of constitutionalism from the field of Science, Technology and Society. The framework of constitutionalism, extending and generalizing from Sheila Jasanoff’s original formulation of “bioconstitutionalism,” says that transformations to understandings of what it means to be human in the age of ubiquitous computing require rethinking of law at the constitutional level – at the level of the most basic relations between states and citizens. These refashionings of the human, however, take place on terrain already steeped in the norms of constitution with a small “c,” that is, the written rules as well as unwritten norms generated by institutional practices that make up the daily hum of a society. The framework draws attention to three aspects of trust in the contemporary sociotechnical condition: 1) trust is not only a narrowly human or social quality separate from the technological systems, but the very condition of the technology’s existence and the specific form that the technology takes; 2) the present day state of trust is the result of a long, gradual, and incomplete process of publics becoming constituted with computing; and 3) trust today is a result and context of “constitutional moments,” moments of rupture in constitutional orders that are the result of interplay between legal, technical, and anthropological factors. These aspects point to sites of intervention that people can activate to shape the current state of trust and they suggest research agendas that scholars of law, society, and technology can pursue to make sense of this crucial area of sociotechnical relations today.
 
 
Read full abstract