Calcitonin Gene-related Peptide Inhibitors Research Articles

MIGRAINE

Background Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder characterized by chronic headaches, significantly impacting the global population. This comprehensive review aims to advance the understanding of migraine pathogenesis and treatment, focusing on molecular markers and novel therapeutic strategies. Material Molecular markers such as calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and their role in migraine development. Traditional medical treatments and emerging therapeutic strategies, including neuromodulation, are analyzed for their effectiveness and limitations. Clinical studies and imaging techniques are leveraged to identify key mechanisms and triggers in migraine pathology. Approximately 95% of people experience a headache at some point, with migraines being a significant contributor. Migraine is recognized by the World Health Organization as one of the top ten causes of disability globally, particularly affecting women. CGRP is identified as a crucial factor in migraine development. Inhibitors targeting CGRP have shown significant effectiveness in managing migraines. Other molecular markers, including proinflammatory cytokines and neurotransmitters, are discussed for their roles in pain transmission and migraine pathophysiology. Traditional treatments, such as triptans and NSAIDs, are evaluated alongside new therapies, including CGRP inhibitors and neuromodulation techniques. Neuromodulation, involving devices like external trigeminal nerve stimulators, shows promise in migraine management. Genetic markers associated with familial hemiplegic migraine (FHM) and common migraine forms are reviewed. Recent genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have identified several genetic variants linked to migraine susceptibility. Conclusion This presentation enhances the understanding of migraine pathogenesis and introduces novel therapeutic possibilities. By focusing on molecular markers like CGRP and exploring advanced treatment options, the study aims to improve migraine management and patient care. The findings underscore the need for continued research and innovation in migraine treatments to reduce the global burden of this debilitating condition.

Novel Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Interfering Migraine Therapies and Stroke-A Review.

Migraine and stroke are neurological disorders with significant global prevalence and impact. Recent advances in migraine therapy have focused on the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway. This review examines the shared pathomechanisms between migraine and stroke, with emphasis on the role of CGRP. We analyze the current literature on CGRP's functions in cerebrovascular regulation, edema formation, neuroinflammation, and neuroprotection. CGRP acts as a potent vasodilator and plays a crucial role in trigeminovascular activation during migraine attacks. In stroke, CGRP has demonstrated neuroprotective effects by improving collateral circulation and reducing ischemia-reperfusion injury. Concerns have been raised about the potential impact of CGRP inhibitors on stroke risk and outcomes. Studies in animals suggest that CGRP receptor antagonists may worsen cerebral ischemia by impairing collateral flow. We discuss the implications of these findings for the use of CGRP-targeting therapies in migraine patients, especially those at increased risk of stroke. Additionally, we explore the complex interplay between CGRP, endothelial function, and platelet activity in both conditions. This review highlights the need for further research to elucidate the long-term cerebrovascular safety of CGRP pathway inhibitors and to identify potential subgroups of migraine patients who may be at higher risk of adverse cerebrovascular events with these novel therapies.

MetaCGRP is a high-precision meta-model for large-scale identification of CGRP inhibitors using multi-view information

Migraine is considered one of the debilitating primary headache conditions with an estimated worldwide occurrence of approximately 14–15%, contributing highly to factors responsible for global disability. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) is a neuropeptide that plays a crucial role in the pathophysiology of migraines and thus, its inhibition can help relieve migraine symptoms. However, conventional process of CGRP drug development has been laborious and time-consuming with incurred costs exceeding one billion dollars. On the other hand, machine learning (ML)-based approaches that are capable of accurately identifying CGRP inhibitors could greatly facilitate in expediting the discovery of novel CGRP drugs. Therefore, this study proposes a novel and high-accuracy meta-model, namely MetaCGRP, that can precisely identify CGRP inhibitors. To the best of our knowledge, MetaCGRP is the first SMILES-based approach that has been developed to identify CGRP inhibitors without the use of 3D structural information. In brief, we initially employed different molecular representation methods coupled with popular ML algorithms to construct a pool of baseline models. Then, all baseline models were optimized and used to generate multi-view features. Finally, we employed the feature selection method to optimize the multi-view features and determine the best feature subset to enable the construction of the meta-model. Both cross-validation and independent tests indicated that MetaCGRP clearly outperforms several conventional ML classifiers, with accuracies of 0.898 and 0.799 on the training and independent test datasets, respectively. In addition, MetaCGRP in conjunction with molecular docking was utilized to identify five potential natural product candidates from Thai herbal pharmacopoeia and analyze their binding affinity and interactions to CGRP. To facilitate community-wide efforts in expediting the discovery of novel CGRP inhibitors, a user-friendly web server for MetaCGRP is freely available at https://pmlabqsar.pythonanywhere.com/MetaCGRP.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Erenumab and Topiramate for Prevention of Chronic Migraine: A Retrospective Cohort Study

Background and Objectives: Migraine is a chronic neurological disorder affecting approximately 14% of the global population. Beyond physical pain, migraines significantly impact individuals’ quality of life, influencing education, employment, and income levels. Topiramate, a second-generation antiepileptic medication, has demonstrated notable efficacy in reducing the occurrence of chronic migraine. Over the past three decades, extensive research has implicated the neuropeptide calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) in migraine pathogenesis. Erenumab, the first FDA-approved CGRP inhibitor, received approval in 2018. This study aims to compare the clinical efficacy of Erenumab and Topiramate for migraine prevention. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of adults with episodic or chronic migraine over a 12-month period, comparing Erenumab (n = 52) and Topiramate (n = 56). Outcomes assessed included changes in the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) scores from baseline over the last three months of treatment and the proportion of patients achieving a ≥50% reduction in MIDAS scores by the end of the study. Results: The Erenumab group showed significant improvement, with nearly 79% of patients achieving a 50% reduction in their MIDAS score, with a mean reduction of 3.76. Notably, only two patients (3.8.5) discontinued treatment due to adverse events. In contrast, the Topiramate group had over 15% of patients achieve a 50% reduction in MIDAS scores, with a mean reduction of 5.89, and a had discontinuation rate of 14.2% due to adverse events. Conclusions: Both Topiramate and Erenumab are effective for migraine prevention. However, Topiramate has lower tolerability and more side effects, while Erenumab offers better tolerability and safety at a higher cost. Treatment decisions should be individualized based on patient needs, efficacy, safety, and cost considerations.

Patient reported outcomes and the real-world use of calcitonin gene-related peptide medications in migraine.

To assess patient reported outcomes of patients with migraine receiving preventative medications, and to compare patient reported outcomes and unplanned care of patients on calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors (CGRPi) with those on other preventative medications. Patient reported outcome measures can be useful in conditions such as migraine with frequent disability. CGRPi are newer migraine preventative medications that can improve patients' quality of life. This was a retrospective cohort analysis of Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) data combined with administrative claims data from a large regional health plan for adult patients (≥18 years) with migraine who were on preventative medications from January 2019 to March 2022. PROMIS scores of patients on CGRPi were compared to scores of patients who switched from other preventative medications to CGRPi (pre vs. post), between patients adherent to CGRPi versus non-adherent, and changes in all-cause/migraine-related unplanned care (emergency department) use by the CGRPi cohort. There were 1245 patients on other preventative medications (antiseizure [532/1245 (43%)], antidepressants [316/1245 (25%)], and beta-blockers [397/1245 (32%)]), 148 who were on CGRPi, and 112 who had switched from other preventative medications to CGRPi. The mean age was 44 years old, 88% were females, 50% were married, and 75% were on commercial insurance. Patients with migraine had higher T-scores in pain, fatigue, anxiety, and sleep disturbance than the general population. Patients on CGRPi had a statistically significant reduction in pain T-scores (60.4 [standard deviation (SD) 7.4] to 58.4 [SD 8.2], p = 0.003) post initiation of medications, especially those who switched from other preventative medications to CGRPi (61.4 [SD 6.9] to 58.7 [SD 8.3], p < 0.001). The pain T-score reduction occurred only among the adherent group. There was a lower proportion of patients with all-cause unplanned care among patients on CGRPi (43% [64/148] to 32% [47/148], p < 0.001), but the reduction in migraine-related unplanned care was not statistically significant (9% [14/148] to 6% [9/148], p = 0.197). Our findings suggest that patients had an improvement in pain reduction scores after initiating CGRPi. PROMIS scores could provide important information about quality-of-life improvement for prescribers.

Effect of CGRP inhibitors on interictal cerebral hemodynamics in individuals with migraine.

Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) plays an important role in cerebral vasodilation, so here we aim to quantify the impact of CGRP monoclonal antibody (mAb) therapy on cerebral hemodynamics. In 23 patients with chronic and episodic migraine, cerebral hemodynamic monitoring was performed (1) prior to and (2) 3-months into CGRP-mAb therapy. Transcranial Doppler monitored cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFv) in the middle cerebral artery (MCA) and posterior cerebral artery (PCA), from which cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR) and cerebral autoregulation (CA; Mx-index) were calculated. CA was similar off and on treatment, in the MCA (p = 0.42) and PCA (p = 0.72). CVR was also unaffected by treatment, in the MCA (p = 0.38) and PCA (p = 0.92). CBFv and blood pressure were also unaffected. The subgroup of clinical responders (>50% reduction in migraine frequency) exhibited a small reduction in MCA-CBFv (6.0 cm/s; IQR: 1.1-12.4; p = 0.007) and PCA-CBFv (8.9 cm/s; IQR: 6.9-10.3; p = 0.04). Dynamic measures of cerebrovascular physiology were preserved after 3 months of CGRP-mAb therapy, but a small reduction in CBFv was observed in patients who responded to treatment. Subgroup findings should be interpreted cautiously, but further investigation may clarify if CBFv is dependent on the degree of CGRP inhibition or may serve as a biomarker of drug sensitivity.

AMPK/MTOR/TP53 Signaling Pathway Regulation by Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Reduces Oxygen-Induced Lung Damage in Neonatal Rats through Autophagy Promotion.

Our previous studies indicated that calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) alleviates hyperoxia-induced lung injury and suggested the possible involvement of autophagy in this process. Herein, we aimed to further explore the potential involvement of tumor protein p53 (TP53) and autophagy in the mode of action of CGRP against hyperoxia-induced lung injury in vitro and in vivo. The study conducted tests on type II alveolar epithelial cells (AECII) and rats that were subjected to hyperoxia treatment or combined treatment of hyperoxia with CGRP, CGRP inhibitor, rapamycin (an autophagy agonist), 3-methyladenine (3-MA, an autophagy inhibitor), TP53 silencing/inhibitor (pifithrin-α), or expression vector/activator (PRIMA-1 (2,2-bis(hydroxymethyl)-3-quinuclidinone)) and their corresponding controls. We found that oxidative stress, apoptosis, and autophagy were all increased by hyperoxia treatment in vitro. However, treating AECII cells with CGRP reversed hyperoxia-induced oxidative stress and apoptosis but further promoted autophagy. In addition, the combined treatment with rapamycin or TP53 silencing with CGRP promoted the effect of CGRP, while contrary results were obtained with combined therapy with 3-MA or TP53 overexpression. In vivo, the number of hyperoxia-induced autophagosomes was promoted in the lung tissue of neonatal rats. Furthermore, hyperoxia increased the expression levels of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) alpha 1 (also known as protein kinase AMP-activated catalytic subunit alpha 1 (PRKAA1)) but inhibited TP53 and mechanistic target of rapamycin (MTOR); these expression trends were regulated by CGRP treatment. In conclusion, we showed that CGRP can attenuate hyperoxia-induced lung injury in neonatal rats by enhancing autophagy and regulating the TP53/AMPK/MTOR crosstalk axis.

CGRP Inhibitor Use In Migraine Treatments

Several possible remedies for migraines have been discovered to date, the most prominent ones include various antiepileptic drugs such as divalproex sodium and topiramate, as well as beta (Amiri et al., 2021)blockers such as propranolol and timolol. However many of these treatments are not entirely effective treatments for patients who face chronic migraines due to their somewhat prosaic success rates. In 1985, researchers noticed the presence of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) in the plasma increased drastically in its levels during the presence of a migraine attack (Deen et al. 2). CGRP is a neuropeptide that is involved in the dilation of both dural and cerebral blood vessels, and this interaction is believed to be the main cause of migraines. Generally, when migraines are treated with triptans (a common symptom relief medication), CGRP levels in the blood generally reduce. It was further found that certain CGRP inhibitors reduced neurogenic inflammation and lead to an increased reduction of pain during the migraine (Deen et al. 4). When faced with a multitude of treatment options for chronic migraines, one must consider inhibitors of the CGRP pathway as a possible alternative. CGRP inhibitors introduce a possible better treatment option than previous medicinal drugs. A few previously used CGRP inhibitors include erenumab, galcanezumab, and fremanezumab, which have recently been used to treat patients of chronic migraines. In this paper we will consider the various CGRP inhibitors and their advantages and disadvantages in the face of conventional chronic migraine treatment options.

Atogepant (Qulipta)

&#x0D; CADTH recommends that Qulipta be reimbursed by public drug plans for the prevention of episodic migraine, if certain conditions are met.&#x0D; Qulipta should only be reimbursed for adults with episodic migraine, according to the criteria used by public drug plans for other calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors for the prevention of episodic migraine.&#x0D; In addition to following the pre-existing criteria for other CGRP inhibitors, Qulipta should not be used in combination with other CGRP inhibitors. Qulipta should only be reimbursed if the cost is reduced such that the total treatment cost of Qulipta does not exceed the total treatment cost of the least costly CGRP inhibitor reimbursed for the preventive treatment of episodic migraine in adults.&#x0D;

Calcitonin gene relating peptide inhibitors in combination for migraine treatment: A mini-review.

The discovery of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its role in migraine pathophysiology has led to advances in the treatment of migraine. Since 2018, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved four monoclonal antibody (mab) therapies targeting either the CGRP ligand or receptor and 3 oral small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists. These targeted therapies have been shown to be safe and effective for either preventive or acute treatment of migraine in adults. Given their efficacy and tolerability profile, CGRP inhibitors have revolutionized the approach to migraine treatment. Theoretically, combining therapies within this therapeutic class could lead to more CGRP blockade and, subsequently, improved patient outcomes. There are providers currently combining CGRP therapies in clinical practice. However, limited data are available regarding the efficacy and safety of this practice. This mini-review provides a summary of available data and poses important considerations when combining CGRP therapies for migraine treatment.

Exploring Novel Therapeutic Targets in the Common Pathogenic Factors in Migraine and Neuropathic Pain

Migraine and neuropathic pain (NP) are both painful, disabling, chronic conditions which exhibit some symptom similarities and are thus considered to share a common etiology. The calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) has gained credit as a target for migraine management; nevertheless, the efficacy and the applicability of CGRP modifiers warrant the search for more effective therapeutic targets for pain management. This scoping review focuses on human studies of common pathogenic factors in migraine and NP, with reference to available preclinical evidence to explore potential novel therapeutic targets. CGRP inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies alleviate inflammation in the meninges; targeting transient receptor potential (TRP) ion channels may help prevent the release of nociceptive substances, and modifying the endocannabinoid system may open a path toward discovery of novel analgesics. There may exist a potential target in the tryptophan-kynurenine (KYN) metabolic system, which is closely linked to glutamate-induced hyperexcitability; alleviating neuroinflammation may complement a pain-relieving armamentarium, and modifying microglial excitation, which is observed in both conditions, may be a possible approach. Those are several potential analgesic targets which deserve to be explored in search of novel analgesics; however, much evidence remains missing. This review highlights the need for more studies on CGRP modifiers for subtypes, the discovery of TRP and endocannabinoid modulators, knowledge of the status of KYN metabolites, the consensus on cytokines and sampling, and biomarkers for microglial function, in search of innovative pain management methods for migraine and NP.

S539 Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Prevalence of Constipation and Nausea Among Adults Using Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide (CGRP) Inhibitors for Preventative Treatment of Cluster Headache or Migraine

Introduction: Constipation and nausea are frequently encountered medication-associated side effects. Calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitor use may be potential cause of constipation and nausea, but the magnitude of this impact in patients with cluster headaches or migraines has not been well characterized. Methods: We conducted a systematic review using PUBMED and ClinicalTrials.Gov to identify randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trials using anti-CGRP antibodies or CGRP receptor antagonists for the prevention of cluster headaches or chronic migraine. We extracted data including CGRP inhibitor dose, dose frequency, and the reported proportions of patients in these trials with constipation and nausea. We compared the prevalence of these symptoms in those on medication to those on placebo, using two-tailed paired t-tests. The risk of a specific adverse event was assessed using odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals. Results: We identified an initial pool of 449 studies to which we applied a priori criteria to yield 27 studies for nausea and 15 studies for constipation analyses. In the anti-CGRP antibody-treated group, the pooled prevalence of constipation was 2.69% (N=3,574) and nausea was 2.03% (N=9,231), compared with 1.39% (N=4,520, p=0.004) and 2.47% (N=11,680, p=0.0095) in placebo-treated groups, respectively. In the CGRP receptor antagonist-treated group, the prevalence of constipation was 5.20% (N=1,847) and nausea was 6.04% (N=1,689), compared to 1.46% (N=1,852, p=0.002) and 3.05% (N=1,967, p=0.0001) in placebo-treated groups, respectively. CGRP receptor antagonist use demonstrated greater risks of constipation (OR=3.71 [2.41, 5.71], p< 0.0001) and nausea (OR=2.04 [1.48, 2.83], p< 0.0001) than anot-CGRP antibody use (constipation: OR=1.96 [1.41, 2.72], p=0.0001; nausea: OR=0.82, [0.68, 0.99], p = 0.0343). Anti-CGRP antibody use did not appear to be associated with an increased risk of nausea. Conclusion: Constipation and nausea are associated with CGRP inhibitor use in those with cluster headache or migraine. With the increased prevalence of CGRP inhibitor use, CGRP inhibitor-associated constipation and nausea cases could grow substantially. Gastroenterologists should consider CGRP inhibitor use as a medication-induced cause of nausea and constipation. CGRP receptor antagonist use is associated with higher rates of these gastrointestinal side effects than the use of anti-CGRP antibodies.

Alopecia signals associated with calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors in the treatment or prophylaxis of migraine: A pharmacovigilance study.

Although rarely observed in clinical trials, alopecia has been reported in migraine patients treated with calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors during the postmarketing period. This study sought to assess whether CGRP inhibitors are associated with disproportionate alopecia reporting relative to other drugs including those indicated for migraine treatment or prophylaxis in a real-world setting. Retrospective disproportionality analysis. Spontaneous adverse events reported to the United States Food and Drug Administration Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) through the fourth quarter of 2021. Thirteen Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities preferred terms were used to define alopecia cases in FAERS. Disproportionality was measured by calculating proportional reporting ratios (PRR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI). A PRR >2.0 with a lower 95% CI >1.0 and ≥3 cases was considered a positive signal. During the study period, CGRP inhibitors were reported as suspect products in 55,994 adverse events including 1827 (3.26%) alopecia cases. Compared with all other drugs across FAERS, alopecia signals were detected for the collective CGRP inhibitor class (PRR 4.06; 95% CI 3.88-4.25) and fremanezumab (PRR 5.42; 95% CI 4.66-6.29), erenumab (PRR 4.29; 95% CI 4.05-4.54), galcanezumab (PRR 4.11; 95% CI 3.78-4.48), and eptinezumab (PRR 2.06; 95% CI 1.25-3.40) individually. CGRP inhibitors were consistently associated with alopecia signals relative to triptans (PRR 12.46; 95% CI 10.22-15.18) and celecoxib (PRR 3.50; 95% CI 3.19-3.83), but not in comparison with anticonvulsants, onabotulinumtoxinA, or beta-blockers across analyses. Within the CGRP inhibitor class, an alopecia signal was observed for biologics relative to drugs (PRR 6.11; 95% CI 3.79-9.87). Significant alopecia signals were identified for CGRP inhibitors relative to all other drugs and certain comparator migraine therapies based on adverse events reported to FAERS, with CGRP-targeting biologics primarily driving disproportionate reporting. Future observational data will be necessary to better characterize the potential association between real-world use of CGRP inhibitors and incident alopecia in patients with migraine.

Management of Migraine: An Overview

Migraine is a disabling type of headache due to a neurovascular disorder characterized by moderate to severe pain and specific associated features. Migraine has a high incidence and prevalence, affecting 20% of people at some point in their lives; women are more affected than men. There have been many pharmacologic options that have been used to treat acute migraine over the last years. Nevertheless, this article aims to point out the new drugs approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitor and review the traditional pharmacologic options and their combination available. There are two classes of CGRP inhibitors: small molecule CGRP receptor antagonists and anti-CGRP monoclonal antibodies. Their indications depend on the patient’s comorbidity, preference, and side effects. Due to their non-vasoconstrictive property, CGRP inhibitors can be considered a treatment option for patients with a contraindication of triptans and ergot alkaloids use. Another strategy to treat migraine attacks after they start is triptans. Therefore, this drug is considered an abortive therapy. However, triptans have many contraindications and drug interactions. Additionally, it should not be used for more than ten days per month to avoid the development of medication overuse headaches. Another classic group of drugs proven to be effective and safe for mild to moderate headache therapy is non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Their easy access and lower cost are the most attractive advantages of this drug. Migraine treatment is not easy, and it might be necessary to use more than one drug. Combination drugs can be used as a first-line or second-line therapy, and they can also be helpful for refractory migraine treatment. Due to the different mechanisms of action, it can enhance the results of another drug or improve its effects. This treatment regimen can be used as the first or second line, depending on the context of the patient. Since migraine is a prevalent condition, all medical professionals must be up to date on migraine treatment methods because studies in this area are lacking.

Erenumab Decreases Headache-Related Sick Leave Days and Health Care Visits: A Retrospective Real-World Study in Working Patients with Migraine.

IntroductionThe prevalence of migraine is highest among working age individuals, and this disease is associated with an increased number of sick leaves and health care visits, as well as lost productivity. Erenumab, the first monoclonal antibody targeting the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) pathway, is effective in decreasing the monthly number of migraine days, but evidence of its impact on the number of sick leave days and health care visits in patients with migraine is limited.MethodsThis retrospective registry study focused on occupationally active patients with migraine treated with erenumab at a Finnish private health care provider, Terveystalo. Erenumab responders, defined as patients who had at least two unique prescriptions of erenumab and no prescription of other CGRP inhibitor (CGRPi), were followed for 12 months prior to and after erenumab treatment initiation (index), and the change in the number of headache-related and all-cause sick leave days, health care visits and prescriptions for other medications during this period were assessed from the registry data. The same outcomes were assessed in an age- and sex-matched control group of migraine patients not receiving CGRPi to control for potential changes in patient behavior and health care practices during the COVID-19 pandemic.ResultsAltogether, 162 patients who were entitled to employer-sponsored health care received erenumab and met the 12-month follow-up requirements. In the responder group (n = 82; 50.1%) headache-related sick leave days were reduced by 73.9% (p = 0.035) and health care visits by 44.6% (p < 0.001) in the 12 months following treatment initiation compared to the period of 12 months prior to treatment. All-cause sick leave days were reduced by 19.4% and all-cause health care visits by 13.5%, but these changes were not statistically significant. Triptan prescriptions decreased by 30.4% (p = 0.012) and other prophylactic treatments by 31.5% (p = 0.004). No significant changes were observed in the corresponding outcomes in the migraine control group during the same period.ConclusionsThe results of this registry study suggest that in addition to the effect on the monthly number of migraine days documented in clinical trials, erenumab can significantly reduce the number of headache-related sick leave days and health care visits in employed patients with migraine managed in routine clinical practice.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40120-021-00303-x.

Biologics for episodic and chronic migraines.

What is the efficacy of calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors in migraine prophylaxis? Treating 5 to 8 patients with CGRP inhibitors will lead to 1 patient having at least a 50% reduction in monthly migraine days (MMD) compared with placebo. From baseline, a decrease of 1 to 2 MMD may

CGRP Inhibitors and Oxidative Stress Biomarkers in Resistant Migraine: A Real-Life Study with Erenumab, Fremanezumab, and Galcanezumab

Patients with high-frequency resistant migraine and medication-overuse headache are still the main clinical challenge in tertiary headache centers. The approval of targeted antibodies against the calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) and its receptor represents a powerful instrument. In this study, we observed how biological and clinical features of resistant migraineurs responded to erenumab, fremanezumab, or galcanezumab. We found a reduction in advanced oxidation protein products (AOPP) as a biomarker of improved redox state after six months of treatment. We also found that treatment efficacy was precocious and maintained with high individual responder rates. In particular, seven out of ten patients achieved a reduction of 50% from the baseline at three months, which was maintained at six months, while about one out of our patients experienced a 75% reduction in headache frequency from the first month of treatment. The migraine disability assessment (MIDAS) and the associated fatigue, anxiety, and sleep quality also significantly improved. The allodynia symptom dropped from moderate/severe to mild/absent as a sign of central sensitization reduction. Our study confirmed the safety and efficacy of CGRP inhibition in real-life, high-challenging patients. Additional evidence is needed to understand the role of oxidative stress as a migraine biomarker.

Effectiveness of dual migraine therapy with CGRP inhibitors and onabotulinumtoxinA injections: case series.

Clinical trials for calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors excluded the concomitant use of onabotulinumtoxinA; thus, there is a lack of efficacy and safety data of the combined therapies. Our study aims to examine the effectiveness of CGRP inhibitors with onabotulinumtoxinA by evaluating migraine reductions in headache days and severity. Seventeen patients with chronic migraines were identified who had a partial or poor response to onabotulinumtoxinA, and were placed on dual therapy with a CGRP inhibitor. Patients' initial headache days and severity ratings were compared to final values taken 1-6months after adding the CGRP inhibitor to their treatment regime. Comparisons between headache days and severity ratings prior to and during dual treatment were performed utilizing the Kruskal-Wallis test. The significance was set at p < 0.05. Of 17 patients (16F/1M), n = 9 were taking fremanezumab, n = 4 were taking erenumab, and n = 4 were taking galcanezumab. Patients' average headache days per month was reduced from 27.6 ± 4.8 initially to 18.6 ± 9.4 post-treatment (p = 0.00651), and their average pain level was reduced from 8.4 ± 1.4 out of 10 to 5.4 ± 2.5 (p = 0.00074). No serious adverse side effects were reported from patients on dual therapy. Patients with suboptimal response to onabotulinumtoxinA may benefit from CGRP inhibitors' addition to their migraine regimens. Placebo-controlled randomized studies are advised to corroborate this finding.

Abstract P643: Incidence of Ischemic Stroke Among Migraineurs on Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Inhibitors

Introduction: Migraine is common and often disabling. Recent research has focused on a new class of treatments targeting the pain-signaling molecule calcitonin-gene-related peptide (CGRP). CGRP inhibitors are the first preventive therapies designed specifically for migraine. However, CGRP also induces vasodilation, and plays a role in cerebral blood flow autoregulation. The clinical cerebrovascular effects of long-term blockade of CGRP are not yet known. Methods: We analyzed a retrospective cohort of migraine patients from a large administrative dataset in the United States (OPTUM) that covers patients with commercial insurance and Medicare Advantage, during 2018 and 2019, using ICD-10 codes for all types of migraines. Migraine patients were divided into two groups based on their use of CGRP inhibitors (erenumab, fremanezumab, galcanezumab). We determined the incidence of stroke during 2018 and 2019 among both groups. For the group of migraine patients who used CGRP inhibitors, we focused on the incidence of stroke after these medications were initiated. Results: We identified 646,404 migraine patients; 18, 692 (2.9%) of them had used a CGRP inhibitor. Among the users of CGRP inhibitors, 86% were females, and 58% of patients were in the 41 to 65-year-old range. The average time of follow-up was 197 days after initiation of the medication. A total of 1.3 % of patients who used CGRP inhibitors had an ischemic stroke during the follow-up period versus 2.4% of patients who did not use CGRP inhibitors. The lower rate of stroke in the CGRP antibody group was found in both sexes and all age groups. Conclusions: These preliminary results suggest that CGRP inhibitors are not associated with a higher frequency of stroke in the initial months of use. This could be related to the avoidance of these medications in patients with known cardiovascular risk factors. Further analyses will be completed on vascular risk factor incidence in these populations as well as multiple regression. Prospective, long term studies are needed to confirm these results.

Understanding the migraine treatment landscape prior to the introduction of calcitonin gene-related peptide inhibitors: Results from the Assessment of TolerabiliTy and Effectiveness in MigrAINe Patients using Preventive Treatment (ATTAIN) study.

BackgroundCalcitonin gene‐related peptide (CGRP) inhibitors were introduced in the United States (US) in 2018. To understand the changing patterns of preventive treatment following the introduction of these new agents, we must first characterize the patterns which preceded their introduction.ObjectiveTo characterize the burden, unmet need, and treatment patterns in patients with migraine initiating preventive migraine medications before the introduction of CGRP inhibitors in the US.MethodsBetween March 2016 and October 2017, we enrolled episodic (EM) and chronic migraine (CM) patients initiating or changing preventive treatment at primary care or neurology clinic visits in the US, in a real‐world observational study using a prospective cohort design. At baseline and monthly thereafter for 6 months, we collected data from study sites and patients on migraine frequency, treatment modifications, migraine impact on functioning, and work productivity for a descriptive analysis of migraine patient experience and treatment patterns.ResultsFrom the sample of 234 completers, 118 had EM (50.4%) and 116 had CM (49.6%). Mean age at enrollment was 41 years (SD = 12) and mean age at first migraine diagnosis was 22 years (SD = 11). Most participants were females (n = 204/234; 87.2%) and white (n = 178/234; 76.1%). The majority (n = 164/234; 70.1%) had not used preventive migraine treatment in the 5 years prior to enrollment (treatment naïve). At baseline, mean monthly migraine days were 9.6 days (SD = 5.0) for the preventive treatment naïve group and 12.4 days (SD = 7.0) for treatment experienced patients. The majority had severe Migraine Disability Assessment (Grade IV, total score ≥21), including 67.1% (n = 110/164) of the preventive treatment naïve and 77.1% (n = 54/70) of the preventive treatment experienced patients. Headache Impact Test total scores indicating severe impairment (score >59) occurred in 88.4% (n = 145/164) of the treatment naïve and 88.6% (n = 62/70) of treatment experienced patients. Mean work productivity loss as measured by the Work Productivity and Activity Impairment questionnaire in the subsample of employed patients was 53.3% loss. The most used acute medications at baseline were nonsteroidal anti‐inflammatory agents (n = 124/234; 53.0%), acetaminophen‐based products (n = 112/234; 47.9%), and triptans (n = 105/234; 44.9%). The most commonly initiated preventive treatments were topiramate (n = 100/234; 42.7%), tricyclic antidepressants (n = 39/234; 16.7%), beta‐blockers (n = 26/234; 11.1%), and onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 24/234; 10.3%). Over the 6‐month follow‐up period, almost half of patients (n = 116/234, 49.6%) modified their preventive treatment and discontinued treatment (n = 88/312 total modifications; 28.2%) or modified their pattern of use by increasing, decreasing, or skipping doses (n = 224/312 total modifications; 71.8%), often without seeking medical advice. Avoiding side effects was the main reason reported among patients who discontinued (n = 52/88; 59.1%), decreased frequency or dose (n = 37/89; 41.6%), and skipped doses (n = 29/86; 33.7%). Perceived lack of efficacy was another frequent reason reported among those who discontinued (n = 20/88; 22.7%), decreased frequency or dose (n = 15/89; 16.9%), and skipped doses (n = 18/86; 20.9%). Despite initiation of preventive treatment and improvements observed in number of headache and migraine days, migraine patients continued to experience substantial disability, headache impact, and reduced productivity throughout the 6‐month follow‐up period.ConclusionsPrior to 2018, the burden of migraine was high for patients initiating preventive treatments. Despite having more than 9 days of migraine per month on average, the majority (70.1%) of patients initiating prevention had been treatment naïve, indicating underuse of preventive treatments. The preventive treatments used in this study were poorly tolerated and were reported by patients to lack efficacy, resulting in suboptimal adherence. The high discontinuation rates suggest that the preventive medications being offered during the period of the study did not meet the treatment needs of patients. In addition, the decisions by about half of patients to alter their prescribed treatment plan without consulting their provider can pose substantial health risks. These findings pertain to the broad set of preventive treatments initiated in this study and do not support inferences about individual preventive treatments, due to limitations in sample size. These findings suggest the need for more effective and better tolerated preventive treatment options.