From a paleoecological point of view, it is very difficult to recognize marine pelagic biocoenoses or communities in comparison with benthic ones; but paleoecological work is much more difficult than research of “actual-marine ecologists” due to the lack of fossilizing species, allochtons species mixed with the species really living in the ancient biotope, etc. To achieve a sound knowledge of a fossil stocking, microbenthos is generally insufficient. Paleoecologists must be well aware of the ecological and ethological characteristics of the most important groups of marine invertebrates. For instance, the discrimination between suspension-feeding fossils (pelecypods: Cardiidae, Veneridae, Mactridae, etc.; ophiuroids: Gorgonocephalidae, Ophiothrix, Amphiuridae; crinoids) and detritus-feeding fossils (pelecypods: Tellinidae, Scrobicularidae, etc.; ophiuroids: Ophiuridae, etc.), combined with the characteristics of the deposit, may give interesting information on abiotic factors which were dominant when the animal community was living. Paleoecologists must also have a sufficient knowledge of the marine benthic biocoenoses and communities, especially of the neritic ones which are most diversified because of the great differences in environment, i.e., temperature, salinity, sea-water motions and nature of substratum. It is often possible to find, in the Quaternary and Cenozoic, homologies between present biocoenoses and some ancient ones because the percentage of still living families and genera is rather important for both these periods; it is, however, much more difficult in the Mesozoic and Paleozoic, except where the stocking is particularized by one strongly dominant environmental factor, for instance, brackish waters, or by a prevailing group such as reef corals. A few examples of the uncertainty of paleoecological reconstitution of the coral reeds are given, namely calcareous seaweeds of different biotopes, building and epibiontic corals and the degree of stenohalinity of corals. Also, it is apparently very difficult to come to a conclusion with regard to the depth of a fossil biocoenose. Finally, one must emphasize the efficiency of a mixed working group comprising, on the same research, paleoecologists and ecologists, who will certainly benefit by this collaboration.