Cabazitaxel Treatment Research Articles

The role of Cabazitaxel in Patients With Castration-Resistant and Osseous Metastases Prostate Cancer. A Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group Phase II Study: Cabazitaxel in mCRPC patients with osseous metastases

BackgroundCabazitaxel is an effective treatment in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients previously exposed to docetaxel and novel hormonal treatments. Understanding the molecular biology of mCRPC disease and taking into account the several approved treatment options, biomarkers are needed to guide decision making including cabazitaxel treatment. MethodsCababone was a phase II translational study that attempted to identify predictors of cabazitaxel efficacy. mCRPC with documented bone metastases were enrolled prospectively and treated with cabazitaxel 25mg/m2 every 3 weeks. Prostate cancer biopsies, bone marrow aspirates and blood samples were collected for translational research. ResultsSixty patients were enrolled and 59 received treatment according to protocol. Six-month progression free survival (PFS) rate was 47% (95% CI: 33% - 59%) and 12-month Overall Survival (OS) rate was 70% (95% CI: 56% - 80%). Patients with reactive hematopoiesis had improved PFS and OS with cabazitaxel treatment. Mutations in HRR genes were detected in 7 patients. ConclusionsNo differences in cabazitaxel efficacy were noted according to mutational status of HRR genes analyzed. No new safety issues were detected. In conclusion, CabaBone confirmed efficacy of cabazitaxel in mCRPC patients including the subgroup of patients with HRR mutations. Reactive hematopoiesis in bone marrow biopsies was related to improved survival warranting further investigation of bone biomarkers as predictors of cabazitaxel efficacy.

Effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer, Japanese clinical guideline for appropriate use of G-CSF: clinical practice guidelines for the use of G-CSF 2022.

Docetaxel (DTX) is commonly used as a primary chemotherapy, and cabazitaxel (CBZ) has shown efficacy in patients who are DTX resistant. Primary prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulating factor (G-CSF) therapy is currently used with CBZ treatment in routine clinical care in Japan. In this study, we performed a systematic review following the Minds guidelines to investigate the effectiveness and safety of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during chemotherapy for prostate cancer and to construct G-CSF guidelines for primary prophylaxis use during chemotherapy. A comprehensive literature search of various electronic databases (PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Ichushi) was performed on January 10, 2020, to identify studies published between January 1990 and December 31, 2019 that investigate the impact of primary prophylaxis with G-CSF during CBZ administration on clinical outcomes. Ultimately, nine articles were included in the qualitative systematic review. Primary G-CSF prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer was difficult to assess in terms of correlation with overall survival, mortality from infection, and patients' quality of life. These difficulties were owing to the lack of randomized controlled trials comparing patients with and without primary prophylaxis of G-CSF during CBZ administration. However, some retrospective studies have suggested that it may reduce the incidence of febrile neutropenia. G-CSF may be beneficial as primary prophylaxis during CBZ administration for metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer, and we made a "weak recommendation to perform" with an annotation of the relevant regimen.

Combined Cabazitaxel and Carboplatin Treatment of Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients, With Innate or Acquired Resistance to Cabazitaxel Monotherapy

BackgroundThere is new interest in platinum-based treatment of patients with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), to which a subgroup responds. Although platinum sensitivity is suggested to be associated with aggressive disease features and distinct molecular profiles, identification of responders is a clinical challenge. In this study, we selected patients who displayed PSA progression during cabazitaxel monotherapy, for combined cabazitaxel and carboplatin treatment. MethodsIn this retrospective study, mCRPC patients received carboplatin and cabazitaxel after biochemical progression following at least 2 cabazitaxel monotherapy cycles. We assessed PSA response, Time to PSA Progression (TTpsa) and Time to Radiographic Progression (TTrad). For a subset of patients, mutational analysis of BRCA-1, BRCA-2, ATM, PTEN, P53 and RB1 was performed. ResultsForty-five patients were included, after a median of 4 (3-6) cycles of cabazitaxel monotherapy. Patients received a median of 3 (2-5) cycles of combined cabazitaxel and carboplatin, on which 12 (26.6%) patients had a PSA decline ≥ 50% from baseline. TTpsa was 2 (1-5) months and TTrad 3 (2-6) months. Adverse events were predominantly grade 1-2. Of the 29 (64.4%) patients evaluable for molecular signature, 6 (13.3%) had BRCA1, BRCA2 or ATM mutations and 12 (26.7%) had a PTEN, P53 or RB1 mutations. The occurrence of these mutations was not associated with any clinical outcome measure. ConclusionsIn this study we showed that patients with PSA progression during cabazitaxel monotherapy could benefit from the addition of carboplatin to cabazitaxel, while prospective identification of these patients remains a clinical challenge.

Baseline characteristics may impact treatment duration of cabazitaxel in patients with mCRPC: a subanalysis of data from a post-marketing surveillance.

Cabazitaxel has demonstrated improvements in overall survival among patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the pivotal comparison clinical trials TROPIC, PROSELICA and CARD. However, these trials include mCRPC patients with similar characteristics, and there are limited data on how baseline characteristics affect treatment discontinuation in the patient population. To assess individual factors that may impact the discontinuation rate of cabazitaxel treatment, we conducted a post hoc analysis of data from a nationwide all-case, post-marketing surveillance of cabazitaxel in Japan. Patients were grouped according to the number of cabazitaxel treatment cycles received (1-2 and≥3cycles). Predictive factors were identified through multivariate logistic regression analysis. Across 660 patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, 70.2% received ≥3cycles of cabazitaxel treatment. Those receiving 1-2cycles of cabazitaxel had a greater proportion of patients with poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status, presence of lung and liver metastases, higher prostate-specific antigen level and prior radiation therapy at baseline. Regardless of the number of cabazitaxel cycles received, the primary reason for discontinuation was progression of disease rather than adverse events. Compared with those receiving 1-2cycles, a lower proportion of patients receiving 3-10 and≥11cycles of cabazitaxel treatment experienced adverse events. Multivariate analysis showed a significant association between early discontinuation and presence of liver lesions, poorer Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status and higher prostate-specific antigen level at baseline. Post-marketing surveillance data suggest physicians should individualize cabazitaxel treatment based on certain patient characteristics at baseline.

Tumor Volume on PSMA PET as a Prognostic Biomarker in Prostate Cancer Patients Treated With Cabazitaxel.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the prognostic value of 68 Ga-labeled prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) PET/CT in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients receiving second-line chemotherapy with cabazitaxel. All patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer who underwent a PSMA PET/CT within 8 weeks before initiating the cabazitaxel treatment were retrospectively evaluated. The whole-body PSMA total tumor volume (PSMA-TV) was measured for each patient. Other factors such as prostate-specific antigen, hemoglobin, lactate dehydrogenase, and alkaline phosphatase were recorded. A log-rank cutoff finder was used to define the PSMA-TV optimal cutoff. Survival analyses were performed using Cox regression and Kaplan-Meier methods. In total, 32 patients were included, receiving a median of 6 cycles of cabazitaxel (range, 2-10). After a median follow-up of 12 months, 28 patients presented disease progression, and 18 died. Baseline PSMA-TV presented a significant association with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS; P = 0.035 and P = 0.002, respectively). Optimal PSMA-TV cutoffs were 515 mL for PFS and 473 mL for OS. Patients with low volume presented longer PFS and OS than those with high volume: median PFS, 21 versus 12 weeks, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.33; P = 0.017); and median OS, 24 versus 8.5 months, respectively (hazard ratio, 0.21; P = 0.002). On the multivariable analyses, PSMA-TV remained an independent predictor of OS ( P = 0.016). Our results show that total tumor volume measured on PSMA PET/CT is a prognostic biomarker in patients treated with cabazitaxel. High PSMA-TV before treatment initiation is associated with shorter PFS and OS.

Investigation of enzalutamide, docetaxel, and cabazitaxel resistance in the castration resistant prostate cancer cell line C4 using genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 screening

Enzalutamide, docetaxel, and cabazitaxel treatment resistance is a major problem in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but the underlying genetic determinants are poorly understood. To identify genes that modulate treatment response to these drugs, we performed three genome-wide CRISPR/Cas9 knockout screens in the mCRPC cell line C4. The screens identified seven candidates for enzalutamide (BCL2L13, CEP135, E2F4, IP6K2, KDM6A, SMS, and XPO4), four candidates for docetaxel (DRG1, LMO7, NCOA2, and ZNF268), and nine candidates for cabazitaxel (ARHGAP11B, DRG1, FKBP5, FRYL, PRKAB1, RP2, SMPD2, TCEA2, and ZNF585B). We generated single-gene C4 knockout clones/populations for all genes and could validate effect on treatment response for five genes (IP6K2, XPO4, DRG1, PRKAB1, and RP2). Altered enzalutamide response upon IP6K2 and XPO4 knockout was associated with deregulation of AR, mTORC1, and E2F signaling, and deregulated p53 signaling (IP6K2 only) in C4 mCRPC cells. Our study highlights the necessity of performing individual validation of candidate hits from genome-wide CRISPR screens. Further studies are needed to assess the generalizability and translational potential of these findings.

Pretreatment of prostate cancer cells with salinomycin and Wnt inhibitor increases the efficacy of cabazitaxel by inducing apoptosis and decreasing cancer stem cells.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are associated with metastasis and recurrence in prostate cancer as well as other cancers. We aimed to enhance the sensitivity of cabazitaxel in prostate cancer cell therapy by targeting CSCs with a Wnt inhibitor and salinomycin pretreatment. PC3, DU-145, and LNCaP human prostate cancer cells were exposed to Wnt/β-catenin pathway inhibitor CCT036477 (iWnt) with salinomycin for 48h, followed by cabazitaxel treatment for 48h. Cell viability, mRNA, and protein expression changes were evaluated by MTT, RT-qPCR, and Western blot assays, respectively. Apoptosis was determined by image-based cytometry, and cell migration was assessed by wound healing assay. Three-dimensional culture was established to assess the malignant phenotype and stemness potential of transformed or cancer cells. CD44 + CSCs were isolated using magnetic-activated cell sorting system. Pretreatment of PC3, DU-145, and LNCaP cells with salinomycin iWnt significantly sensitized the cells to cabazitaxel therapy. Spheroid culture confirmed that the treatment modality was more effective than a single administration of chemotherapy. The pretreatment of PC3 cells increased the rate of apoptosis compared to single administration of cabazitaxel, which downregulated Bcl-2 and upregulated caspase 3, caspase 8 expressions. The pretreatment suppressed cell migration, downregulated the expression of Sox2 and Nanog, and significantly reduced CD44 + CSC numbers. Notably, the treatment modality reduced pAKT, p-P38 MAPK, and pERK1/2. The data suggest that pretreatment of prostate cancer cells with salinomycin and Wnt inhibitor may increase the efficacy of cabazitaxel therapy by inhibiting cell proliferation and migration, and eliminating cancer stem cells.

The CCL2-CCR2 Axis Contributes to Migration of Cabazitaxel-resistant Prostate Cancer Cells.

Developing resistance to cabazitaxel is a major challenge in patients with docetaxel- and castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) since it is frequently administered as a last resort. We have previously reported that CCL2 induces resistance to the antiproliferative effect of cabazitaxel in DU145-TxR/CxR prostate cancer cell lines. However, how CCL2 induces resistance to the antimigration effect of cabazitaxel remains unclear. We established a cabazitaxel-resistant cell line, DU145-TxR/CxR, from a previously established paclitaxel-resistant cell line, DU145-TxR, which was confirmed to show docetaxel resistance. We performed migration assay and analyzed the expression of epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers using DU145-TxR/CxR with or without CCL2 silencing with small interfering RNA (siRNA) transfection. Cabazitaxel inhibited the migration of DU145 cells through the inactivation of STAT3. A CCR2 (a specific receptor of CCL2) antagonist suppressed the migration of DU145-TxR and DU145-TxR/CxR cells under cabazitaxel treatment. Western blotting revealed that the CCR2 antagonist inhibited STAT3 phosphorylation in DU145-TxR and DU145-TxR/CxR cells under cabazitaxel treatment. CCL2 silencing with siRNA in DU145-TxR and DU145-TxR/CxR cells decreased migration through STAT3 and p38 inactivation. Furthermore, CCL2 activated AKT, and CCR2 antagonist inhibited AKT phosphorylation in DU145-TxR and DU145-TxR/CxR cells with recovery of sensitivity to cabazitaxel under cabazitaxel treatment. The CCL2-CCR2 axis is a key contributor to resistance to the antimigration effect of cabazitaxel in prostate cancer cells. CCL2-CCR2 axis inhibition may be a potential therapeutic target against chemoresistant CRPC in combination with cabazitaxel.

Transcriptomic analysis of plasma exosomes provides molecular information of response to cabazitaxel treatment in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Prostate cancer is the second most common cancer type and the second most common cancer-related cause of death in men. Cabazitaxel, a next-generation taxane, shows favorable toxicity profile and is effective in docetaxel-resistant tumors. Despite initial responses, in most cases, prostate cancer patients acquire resistance to cabazitaxel. There is a need to identify molecular markers that can monitor and predict treatment response. We performed transcriptional exosome profiling (Human Transcriptome Array-HTA 2.0) from the plasma of 19 patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer at baseline and in patients after one cycle of cabazitaxel (C1). The patients were stratified in two groups (responders and nonresponders) according to their clinical response to cabazitaxel. Gene set enrichment analysis and ingenuity pathway analysis platforms were used for gene and pathway analysis. We detected molecular differences in the exosomes from two groups of patients (nonresponders vs. responders) at baseline in pathways related to prostate cancer, oncogenic signaling, cytoskeleton, and immune system. In nonresponders, we found enrichment of cytoskeleton related gene (Stathmin-1 and ITSN1) that have been associated with resistance to cabazitaxel. Monitoring of exosomal transcripts after the first cycle of treatment revealed changes in pathways associated with response to treatment. Sequential transcriptional profiling of plasma-derived exosomes reveals differential expression of genes that may reflect resistance to cabazitaxel treatment and therapy response.

STEAP1 Knockdown Decreases the Sensitivity of Prostate Cancer Cells to Paclitaxel, Docetaxel and Cabazitaxel.

The Six Transmembrane Epithelial Antigen of the Prostate 1 (STEAP1) protein has been indicated as an overexpressed oncoprotein in prostate cancer (PCa), associated with tumor progression and aggressiveness. Taxane-based antineoplastic drugs such as paclitaxel, docetaxel, or cabazitaxel, have been investigated in PCa treatment, namely for the development of combined therapies with the improvement of therapeutic effectiveness. This study aimed to evaluate the expression of STEAP1 in response to taxane-based drugs and assess whether the sensitivity of PCa cells to treatment with paclitaxel, docetaxel, or cabazitaxel may change when the STEAP1 gene is silenced. Thus, wild-type and STEAP1 knockdown LNCaP and C4-2B cells were exposed to paclitaxel, docetaxel or cabazitaxel, and STEAP1 expression, cell viability, and survival pathways were evaluated. The results obtained showed that STEAP1 knockdown or taxane-based drugs treatment significantly reduced the viability and survival of PCa cells. Relatively to the expression of proliferation markers and apoptosis regulators, LNCaP cells showed a reduced proliferation, whereas apoptosis was increased. However, the effect of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or cabazitaxel treatment was reversed when combined with STEAP1 knockdown. Besides, these chemotherapeutic drugs may stimulate the cell growth of PCa cells knocked down for STEAP1. In conclusion, this study demonstrated that STEAP1 expression levels might influence the response of PCa cells to chemotherapeutics drugs, indicating that the use of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or cabazitaxel may lead to harmful effects in PCa cells with decreased expression of STEAP1.

Efficacy of cabazitaxel and androgen splicing variant-7 status in circulating tumor cells in Asian patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

Androgen receptor splice variant-7 (AR-V7) expression in circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is associated with abiraterone and enzalutamide resistance. We determine whether cabazitaxel (CBZ) is equally effective in AR-V7-positive and -negative CRPC and whether AR-V7-positive patients retain CBZ sensitivity. This is the first prospective, open-label, Asian validation study of CBZ in Japanese patients with mCRPC after docetaxel (n = 48; four CBZ cycles; 2017–2020, Juntendo University Hospitals). Primary endpoint was prostate-specific antigen response rate (PSA-RR); secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), bone scan index (BSI) PSA-RR (≥ 50% decline from baseline) for CTC−/ARV7−, CTC+ /ARV7−, and CTC +/ARV7+ groups. PSA-RR ≥ − 30% was 38% (18/48) and ≥ − 50% was 26% (12/48). BSI-change rate ≥ − 30% was 19% (9/41) and ≥ − 50% was 17% (8/41). Median OS was 13.7(12.2–18.9) months. PSA decline in early CBZ treatment associated with OS (p = 0.00173). BSI decline associated with OS (p = 0.0194). PSA-RR(≥ 50%) was 43%(6/14) in CTC−/ARV7−, 19%(5/26) in CTC+ ARV7−, and 12%(1/8) in CTC+/ARV7+ ( p > 0.05). AR-V7 in CTCs at baseline not associated with OS. AR-V7 was not associated with CBZ resistance in CTCs. Reductions in BSI and PSA in early stages of CBZ treatment may predict OS.

CABA-V7: a prospective biomarker selected trial of cabazitaxel treatment in AR-V7 positive prostate cancer patients

BackgroundMetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with positive AR-V7 expression in their circulating tumour cells (CTCs) rarely derive benefit from abiraterone and enzalutamide. DesignWe performed a prospective, multicenter, single arm phase II clinical trial (CABA-V7) in mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel and androgen deprivation therapy. ObjectiveIn this trial, we investigated whether cabazitaxel treatment resulted in clinically meaningful PSA response rates in patients with positive CTC-based AR-V7 expression and collected liquid biopsies for genomic profiling. ResultsCabazitaxel was found to be modestly effective, with only 12% of these patients obtaining a PSA response. Genomic profiling revealed that CTC-based AR-V7 expression was not associated with other known mCRPC-associated alterations. CTC-based AR-V7 status and dichotomised CTC counts were observed as independent prognostic markers at baseline. ConclusionsAR-V7 positivity predicted poor overall survival (OS). However, cabazitaxel-treated AR-V7 positive patients and those lacking AR-V7 positivity, who received cabazitaxel as standard of care, appeared to have similar OS. Therefore, despite the low response rate, cabazitaxel may still be an effective treatment in this poor prognosis, AR-V7 positive patient population.

Efficacy of cabazitaxel in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: A single-center study in Japan.

Cabazitaxel is a next-generation taxane that can prolong overall survival after docetaxel treatment in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. However, the efficacy of cabazitaxel varies among these patients. The clinical indicators of the prognosis after cabazitaxel treatment were analyzed. A retrospective review of patients who received cabazitaxel between February 2015 and June 2021 was performed. All patients had metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Prognostic factors for prostate-specific antigen progression-free and overall survival were analyzed by Cox proportional-hazards analysis and the log-rank test. The study comprised 57 patients who received cabazitaxel (median 4 cycles, range 1-27) at a starting dose of 15-25 mg/m2 . The median age and follow-up duration were 70 years and 9.2 months. The median prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival and overall survival were 2.6 and 10.5 months, respectively. Univariate analysis showed that previous androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy before cabazitaxel treatment was the only significant risk factor (hazard ratio 2.784, p = 0.022) for prostate-specific antigen progression-free survival. Multivariate analysis for overall survival revealed that poor performance status (≥1) (hazard ratio 2.107, p = 0.039), low hemoglobin (hazard ratio 0.142, p = 0.010), and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (hazard ratio 9.150, p = 0.032) at baseline were significantly associated with a poor prognosis. Previous androgen receptor-axis-targeted therapy was the only risk factor for biochemical progression. Poor performance status, anemia, and high neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio were risk factors for poor prognosis in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel. These risk factors seem useful for identifying patients with survival benefit from cabazitaxel treatment.

The Relationship between Sarcopenia and Survival after Cabazitaxel Treatment for Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Sarcopenia is a known predictor of overall survival in several diseases. We investigated the relationship between sarcopenia and outcome of treatment with cabazitaxel (CBZ) for castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) by a retrospective analysis of 37 patients, who were given cabazitaxel at our hospital, from December 2014 to November 2020. The skeletal muscle mass was evaluated using the Psoas Muscle Mass Index (PMI: psoas major muscle area at the level of the third lumber vertebra (cm²)/height x height (m²)) through computed tomography images. The severe sarcopenia group (PMI＜4.96) showed lower levels of serum albumin, in comparison with the non-severe sarcopenia group (PMI≥4.96). Multivariate analysis identified PMI (odds ratio＝3.7; P＝0.023) as an independent factor associated with prostate specific antigen response to CBZ therapy. However, there was no significant difference in the overall survival between the severe and the non-severe sarcopenia groups (P＝0.1). Skeletal muscle mass might be closely correlated to the therapeutic response to CBZ, but not to the prognosis of patients with CRPC. Nutritional rehabilitation and exercises targeting sarcopenia for patients with prostate cancer should be considered.

Abstract 646: Liquid biopsy transcriptomics identify pathways associated with poor outcomes and immune phenotypes in men with mCRPC

Abstract Androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSi) and taxanes are mainstays for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, patient response is heterogeneous, and the molecular underpinnings of treatment resistance are not well elucidated. To identify clinically meaningful mechanisms of treatment resistance, we performed transcriptome analysis of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) isolated from mCRPC patients enrolled in two independent prospective clinical trials: PROPHECY, a clinical study of patients (n=118) treated with abiraterone or enzalutamide followed by docetaxel; and TAXYNERGY where patients were randomized to docetaxel or cabazitaxel treatment. CTCs were obtained at baseline (before treatment), on treatment and at progression and their comprehensive transcriptomic analysis was correlated with clinical outcomes. To uncover potential involvement of the circulating immune macroenvironment (CIME) in treatment resistance, we performed transcriptomic analysis of matching peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) using an established, rigorous, blood-derived transcriptional modular framework. In PROPHECY, CTC RNA-seq identified that RB loss concurrently with enhanced E2F signaling networks were associated with intrinsic ARSi resistance. Using single sample GSEA (ssGSEA) score, we identified that the RB/E2F common signature at baseline was associated with short PFS (median PFS=6.5 months) and OS (median OS=24.5 months) (hazard ratio (HR) = 3.5; 95% CI 1.5-8.2) in men with mCRPC. We further developed a BRCA-loss transcriptional signature, and validated it in the SU2C mCRPC patient cohort, expanding the identification of patients with BRCA-loss phenotypes beyond genomic loss. Applying this signature to PROPHECY baseline samples, we showed that men with high BRCA-loss scores experienced shorter OS (HR=2.42; 95% CI=1-5.9). Through the comparison of CTC transcriptomic profiles at progression with baseline, we identified an inflammatory response signature in CTCs which was significantly associated with acquired ARSi resistance. Transcriptomic PBMC analysis further identified enrichment of inflammasome gene signatures at progression, with concurrent downregulation of CD8+ T and NK cells. Furthermore, preliminary data from both clinical trials, showed a significant upregulation of TGF-β1 and corresponding TGFβ-Receptor signaling pathway in CTCs from patients at progression following taxane treatment, suggesting a role for TGFβ pathway in clinical response to taxane chemotherapy. Taken together, these data demonstrate that liquid biopsy transcriptomics of both tumor cells and immune cells can identify molecular pathways associated with treatment resistance paving the way for treatment optimization and the development of novel precision therapies in patients with mCRPC. Citation Format: Jiaren Zhang, Bob Zimmermann, Giuseppe Galletti, Susan Halabi, Ada Gjyrezi, Qian Yang, Santosh Gupta, Akanksha Verma, Andrea Sboner, Monika Anand, Daniel J. George, Simon G. Gregory, Prerna Mahtani, Seunghee Hong, Virginia Pascual, Clio P. Mavragani, Emmanuel S. Antonarakis, David M. Nanus, Scott T. Tagawa, Olivier Elemento, Andrew J. Armstrong, Paraskevi Giannakakou. Liquid biopsy transcriptomics identify pathways associated with poor outcomes and immune phenotypes in men with mCRPC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 646.

Real-world evidence of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer treated with cabazitaxel: comparison with the randomized clinical study CARD

BackgroundThe CARD study demonstrated superiority of cabazitaxel over abiraterone/enzalutamide in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who received prior docetaxel and progressed ≤12 months on the alternative androgen-receptor-targeted agent (ARTA). The objective was to compare characteristics and treatment patterns of patients from a real-world dataset with the CARD population.MethodsReal-world data were collected from Medimix Live TrackerTM, a retrospective, global oncology database of healthcare professional-reported electronic patient medical forms (2001–2019), with data from patients from Europe, USA, Brazil and Japan. The database contained patient, tumor and treatment information for 12,140 patients who received ≥1 line of treatment for mCRPC. A CARD-like cohort included patients treated with docetaxel, prior abiraterone/enzalutamide and cabazitaxel.ResultsA large proportion of patients received ≥2 lines of ARTA (35.1%) with 42% of patients who received a first-line ARTA receiving another ARTA in second line. Of the total patients, 452 were eligible for the CARD-like cohort. Median age of the CARD-like cohort was comparable to CARD (73 vs 70 years). The CARD-like cohort had unfavorable disease characteristics vs CARD: ECOG PS ≥ 2 (45% vs 4.7%); metastasis at diagnosis (46% vs 38%) and Gleason 8–10 (65% vs 57%). More patients in the CARD-like cohort received ARTA before docetaxel (48% vs 39%) and received the first ARTA for >12 months (30% vs 17%) compared with CARD. Despite more patients in the CARD-like cohort receiving the lower 20 mg/m2 dose of cabazitaxel (55% vs 21%), cabazitaxel treatment duration was similar (21.9 vs 22.0 weeks).ConclusionsSequential use of ARTA was frequent. Results indicate the CARD population is reflective of routine clinical practice and duration of response to cabazitaxel was similar in a real-world population.

The Activation of PI3K/AKT/mTOR Signaling Pathway in Response to Cabazitaxel Treatment in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Cells

Objective: Despite advances in treatment approaches, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a clinical challenge to treat. Cabazitaxel (Cab), a third-line chemotherapy option for mCRPC, exhibits limited efficiency due to the activation of different signaling pathways associated with drug resistance. The PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation has led to mCRPC progression, and long-term acquired Cab resistance. However, we aimed to assess the association of apoptotic efficiency of Cab with the PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation in mCRPC cells in the present study. Materials and Methods: Cell viability, cell death, morphological analysis, PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway activation by PI3K/MAPK dual activation assay, mRNA and miRNA expression analysis and immunofluorescence staining were performed in the Cabtreated PC3 cells. Results: Cab caused a significant reduction in PC3 cell viability and triggered apoptotic death at 1 and 5 nM for 72 h. Cab significantly induced PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation, and increased mRNA and activated protein levels of AKT and mTOR in PC3 cells, despite its increased apoptotic effect. Furthermore, the expressions of miR-205 and miR-579, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR targeted miRNAs, were upregulated after Cab treatment. Our findings have shown that the Cab treatment activated PI3K/ AKT/mTOR pathway is associated with its apoptotic effect in mCRPC cells. Conclusion: Although further studies are required to investigate the molecular mechanisms accompanying the Cab response in detail, the PI3K/AKT/mTOR activation, as an alteration related to the apoptotic effect of the drug, may play a role in Cab resistance in mCRPC cells, suggesting that combined therapy with PI3K/AKT/mTOR inhibitors may improve the Cab therapeutic efficiency.

Immunotherapeutic role of cabazitaxel treatment in the activation of TLR3 signalling in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in vitro.

The activation of toll like receptors (TLR) potentially affect the inflammatory tumor microenvironment and thus is associated with tumor growth or inhibition. Cabazitaxel (CAB) has been effectively used for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). However, the immune regulatory role of CAB in the tumor microenvironment is not clear. In this context, we for the first time assessed the immunotherapeutic role of CAB in the TLR3 signalling following activation of Poly I:C in mCRPC cells. The cytotoxic and apoptotic effects of CAB with the induction of Poly I:C were determined by WST-1, Annexin V, acridine orange, RT-PCR analysis, ELISA assay and immunofluorescence staining in DU-145 mCRPC and HUVEC control cells. Our findings showed that CAB treatment with Poly I:C significantly suppressed the proliferation of DU-145 cells through the induction of apoptosis and caspase activation. Additionally, higher concentration of CAB mediated the activation of TLR3 via increased cytoplasmic and nuclear expression of TLR3, TICAM-1 and IRF-3 in mCRPC cells. Co-treatment of CAB and Poly I:C was more effective in mCRPC cells with less toxicity in control cells. However, further investigations are required to elucidate the molecular mechanisms of TLRs signalling upon CAB treatment at the molecular level to further validate the immunotherapeutic efficacy of CAB in mCRPC.

Akt inhibition improves the efficacy of cabazitaxel nanomedicine in preclinical taxane-resistant cancer models

Drug resistance remains a major challenge in achieving cures in cancer patients. Cabazitaxel has shown the ability to overcome drug resistance induced by paclitaxel and docetaxel; however, substantially high toxicity has been observed in patients receiving this agent, which compromises its efficacy. We have previously demonstrated that a polymeric platform (termed cabazitaxel-NPs) encapsulating the oligolactide-cabazitaxel conjugate exhibits desired antitumor efficacy and improved in vivo tolerability. However, we found that upon cabazitaxel treatment, cancer cells adapted to activate Akt signaling, which potentially discounts the drug efficacy. We therefore hypothesized that combing cabazitaxel nanotherapeutics with a pan-Akt inhibitor MK-2206 would synergistically sensitize the resistant cancer. In this study, we confirmed that nanoparticle formulation reduced the systemic toxicity, with higher tolerance than solution-based free cabazitaxel agent in animals. Interestingly, the activation of Akt signaling in the resistant cancer was reversed by the addition of MK-2206. In particular, the collaboration of these two ingredients was demonstrated to maximize the efficacy in vitro and in a xenograft model bearing paclitaxel-resistant tumors. Mechanistically, Akt inhibition increased the microtubule-stabilizing effect of cabazitaxel nanomedicine. Collectively, this report introduced a binary platform composed of cytotoxic nanotherapeutics and inhibitors with certain targets to combat multidrug resistance, and such a combined regimen has the potential for the clinical treatment of patients with resistant cancer.

Cabazitaxel multiple rechallenges in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

IntroductionCabazitaxel multiple rechallenges may be a treatment option in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who had a good initial response to cabazitaxel and who are still fit to receive it. Our objective was to assess the efficacy and toxicity of multiple rechallenges.Patients and methodsWe retrospectively identified 22 mCRPC patients previously treated with docetaxel and/or androgen receptor‐targeted agents who received multiple cabazitaxel rechallenges in 9 French centers. Cabazitaxel was initiated at a dose of 25 mg/m2 q3week. A reduced dose (20 mg/m2 q3w) or an alternative schedule (mainly 16 mg/m2 q2w) was increasingly used for subsequent rechallenges. Progression‐free survival, prostate‐specific antigen (PSA) response, best clinical response, and grade ≥3 toxicities were collected. Overall survival was calculated from various time points.ResultsTwenty‐two patients with an initial response to cabazitaxel were rechallenged at least twice. The median number of cabazitaxel cycles was 7 at first cabazitaxel treatment, 6 at first rechallenge, and 5 at subsequent rechallenges. Median progression‐free survival at first rechallenge was 9.6 months and 5.6 months at second rechallenge. Median overall survival was 50.9 months from the first cabazitaxel dose, 114.9 months from first life‐extending therapy initiation in mCRPC, and 105 months from mCRPC diagnosis. There was no cumulative grade ≥3 neuropathy or nail disorder and one case of febrile neutropenia.ConclusionCabazitaxel multiple rechallenges may be a treatment option without cumulative toxicity in heavily pretreated patients having a good response to first cabazitaxel use and still fit to receive it.Novelty & Impact StatementsPatients with metastatic castration‐resistant prostate cancer can be treated with Cabazitaxel after docetaxel and androgen receptor‐targeted agent. This chemotherapy can be used multiple times with efficacy and manageable toxicity.