Introduction: Acute antibody mediated rejection (AMR) post liver transplaniont (LT) is uncommon and characterized by histopathologic features on liver biopsy, positive c4d stain, and elevated human leucocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSA). There is a paucity of literature on the use of Bortezomib for acute AMR in LT. Herein, we present our experience with Bortezomib for management of acute AMR post LT. Methods: Patients who underwent LT and developed acute AMR at a single center from January, 2014 to present were reviewed. Those treated with Bortezomib were included. Results: Two patients developed acute AMR post LT and both patients received Bortezomib for management of acute AMR. Patient 1: 62-year-old female who underwent LT for cirrhosis secondary to hepatitis C. 124 days after LT, patient developed abnormal liver function tests (LFT). Liver biopsy demonstrated acute on chronic rejection and c4d stain was positive. DSA was very high for HLA class II antibodies. DSA remained elevated after pulse steroids. Patient underwent 6 cycles of plasmapheresis (PP) and IVIG with persistently elevated DSA. 145 days after LT, she began Bortezomib (1.3mg/m2 IV) and PP. She received 6 cycles of therapy. DSA 6 days after completion of therapy showed trace HLA class II DSA. Liver biopsy performed 6 days after completion of therapy showed changes of chronic rejection however no cellular infiltrate and C4d stain was negative. Patient 2: 18-year-old male who underwent LT for chronic rejection in a liver graft. 2 days after LT, HLA class II DSA was elevated. Liver biopsy demonstrated a mixed inflammatory infiltrate and c4d stain was positive. He received pulse dose steroids and repeat DSA was elevated. 8 days after OLT, patient received Bortezomib (1.3mg/m2 IV) and PP. He received 4 cycles of therapy. 9 days after last dose of Bortezomib, liver biopsy showed decreased, yet persistent, inflammatory infiltration and c4d stain was positive. Class II DSA remains persistently elevated. Conclusion: Bortezomib appears to have a role in the management of acute AMR in LT recipients. While patient #2 continued to have persistent AMR, he only received 4 cycles of Bortezomib and PP as compared to 6 cycles for patient #1. The literature on the use of Bortezomib in this setting is limited to a single case series of 3 patients. While additional research is required, our study suggests that Bortezomib may be considered as salvage therapy in select patients with acute AMR.