C4-2 Human Prostate Cancer Cells Research Articles

CD117/c-kit defines a prostate CSC-like subpopulation driving progression and TKI resistance

Cancer stem-like cells (CSCs) are associated with cancer progression, metastasis, and recurrence, and may also represent a subset of circulating tumor cells (CTCs). In our prior study, CTCs in advanced prostate cancer patients were found to express CD117/c-kit in a liquid biopsy. Whether CD117 expression played an active or passive role in the aggressiveness and migration of these CTCs remained an open question. In this study, we show that CD117 expression in prostate cancer patients is associated with decreased overall and progression-free survival and that activation and phosphorylation of CD117 increases in prostate cancer patients with higher Gleason grades. To determine how CD117 expression and activation by its ligand stem cell factor (SCF, kit ligand, steel factor) alter prostate cancer aggressiveness, we used C4-2 and PC3-mm human prostate cancer cells, which contain a CD117+ subpopulation. We demonstrate that CD117+ cells display increased proliferation and migration. In prostaspheres, CD117 expression enhances sphere formation. In both 2D and 3D cultures, stemness marker gene expression is higher in CD117+ cells. Using xenograft limiting dilution assays and serial tumor initiation assays, we show that CD117+ cells represent a CSC population. Combined, these data indicate that CD117 expression potentially promotes tumor initiation and metastasis. Further, in cell lines, CD117 activation by SCF promotes faster proliferation and invasiveness, while blocking CD117 activation with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) decreased progression in a context-dependent manner. We demonstrate that CD117 expression and activation drives prostate cancer aggressiveness through the CSC phenotype and TKI resistance.

Abstract 5344: Treatment efficacy of 212Pb-RM2 targeted alpha therapy in human prostate cancer cell lines: An in vitro investigation

Abstract Introduction: Receptor targeted alpha therapy (TAT) has garnered attention with isotopes such as Pb-212, Bi-213, and Ac-225 due to the receptor specific and potentially lethal damage caused by the in vivo alpha decay of these isotopes when linked to small peptides. We are investigating Pb-212-RM2, a BB2 receptor (BB2r) antagonist as a potential TAT agent for use in BB2r positive prostate cancer. This in vitro study evaluates Pb-212-RM2 at 3 dose levels in a panel of human prostate cancer cell lines assessing cell viability (MTT), DNA damage (53BP1), and clonogenic potential. Methods: Pb-212-RM2 was evaluated in the PC3, LNCAP, C42, C42B, DU-145, VCAP, and 22Rv1 human prostate cancer cell lines. Cells were plated the day before treatment. Pb-212-RM2 was prepared using an automated radiosynthesizer and QC was performed by HPLC. Cells were exposed to 3, 6, 13, or 25uCi/mL of Pb-212 RM2. Cell viability was evaluated at 24, 48, 72, 96, 120, and 144hrs after treatment. DNA damage was evaluated at 24hrs post treatment using the 53BP1 marker. Media in clonogenic plates was refreshed every 5-7 days until colonies of ≥50 cells were present. All assays were conducted in triplicate on different days. Results: LNCAP, C42, 22Rv1, and C42B cell lines were ≤50% viable at all dose levels by 72hrs. PC3 and DU-145 did not show a decrease to 50% viability until 96-144hrs post administration. At 144hrs post treatment, only the 25uCi/mL treated VCAP cells showed less than 50% viability (43.9%±4.1%). Observed DNA damage was highest in the PC3 and LNCAP cell lines with a range of 5.4±0.7 to 26.6±1.7 and 2.4±0.5 to 19.7±1.2 avg 53BP1 foci/cell at 3 and 25uCi/mL, respectively. Clonogenic potential was lowest in PC3 and LNCAP lines with <20% surviving fraction (SF) at 3uCi/mL and decreasing to <5% SF at 6uCi/mL. DU-145, C42B, 22Rv1, and C42 showed a SF of 71.4±11.8%, 57.1±8.8%, 55.5±2.8%, and 41.5±6.5% at 3uCi/mL. Conclusions: Targeted alpha therapy (TAT), in the form of 212Pb-RM2, was evaluated in the PC3, LNCAP, C42, C42B, DU-145, VCAP, and 22Rv1 human prostate cancer cell lines representing the spectrum of human prostate cancer in relation to androgen dependence and sensitivity. At dose levels of 3, 6, 13, or 25uCi/mL, treatment response does not appear to be related to androgen dependence or sensitivity. Cell viability decreased with increasing time and dose level in all cell lines treated with 212Pb-RM2. The VCAP cell line demonstrated the most resistance to Pb-212-TAT. DNA damage, using the 53BP1 marker, was highest in the PC3 and LNCAP cell lines. As expected, this sensitivity was also demonstrated in clonogenic response with the PC3 and LNCAP cell lines exhibiting the lowest surviving fraction. These studies provide the foundation for further exploration of the therapeutic efficacy of 212Pb-RM2 for the treatment of BB2r positive prostate cancer. This work was supported by USVA IK6BX004856, USVA IO1BX001699, and NCI RO1CA222293. Citation Format: Tammy L. Rold, Nkemakonam C. Okoye, Thomas P. Quinn, Timothy J. Hoffman. Treatment efficacy of 212Pb-RM2 targeted alpha therapy in human prostate cancer cell lines: An in vitro investigation [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research 2020; 2020 Apr 27-28 and Jun 22-24. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(16 Suppl):Abstract nr 5344.

In situ Generated 212Pb-PSMA Ligand in a 224Ra-Solution for Dual Targeting of Prostate Cancer Sclerotic Stroma and PSMA-positive Cells.

Background: New treatments combating bone and extraskeletal metastases are needed for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. The majority of metastases overexpress prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), making it an ideal candidate for targeted radionuclide therapy.Objective: The aim of this study was to test a novel liquid 224Ra/212Pb-generator for the rapid preparation of a dual-alpha targeting solution. Here, PSMA-targeting ligands are labelled with 212Pb in the 224Ra-solution in transient equilibrium with daughter nuclides. Thus, natural bone-seeking 224Ra targeting sclerotic bone metastases and 212Pb-chelated PSMA ligands targeting PSMA-expressing tumour cells are obtained.Methods: Two PSMA-targeting ligands, the p-SCN-Bn-TCMC-PSMA ligand (NG001), specifically developed for chelating 212Pb, and the most clinically used DOTA-based PSMA-617 were labelled with 212Pb. Radiolabelling and targeting potential were investigated in situ, in vitro (PSMA-positive C4-2 human prostate cancer cells) and in vivo (athymic mice bearing C4-2 xenografts).Results: NG001 was rapidly labelled with 212Pb (radiochemical purity >94% at concentrations of ≥15 µg/ml) using the liquid 224Ra/212Pb-generator. The high radiochemical purity and stability of [212Pb]Pb-NG001 were demonstrated over 48 hours in the presence of ascorbic acid and albumin. Similar binding abilities of the 212Pb-labelled ligands were observed in C4-2 cells. The PSMA ligands displayed comparable tumour uptake after 2 hours, but NG001 showed a 3.5-fold lower kidney uptake than PSMA-617. Radium-224 was not chelated and, hence, showed high uptake in bones.Conclusion: A fast method for the labelling of PSMA ligands with 212Pb in the 224Ra/212Pb-solution was developed. Thus, further in vivo studies with dual tumour targeting by alpha-particles are warranted.

Coexpression Analysis of the EZH2 Gene Using The Cancer Genome Atlas and Oncomine Databases Identifies Coexpressed Genes Involved in Biological Networks in Breast Cancer, Glioblastoma, and Prostate Cancer.

BackgroundThis study aimed to perform coexpression analysis of the EZH2 gene using The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and the Oncomine databases to identify coexpressed genes involved in biological networks in breast cancer, glioblastoma, and prostate cancer, with functional analysis of the EZH2 gene in the C4-2 human prostate cancer cell line in vitro.Material/MethodsData from TCGA and Oncomine databases were analyzed to determine the expression of EZH2 and the top five coexpressed genes in breast cancer, glioblastoma, and prostate cancer and the clinical significance the coexpressed genes. Gene Ontology (GO) analysis was performed to predict the functions and pathways of EZH2 using pathway annotation. The role of EZH2 in the C4-2 human prostate cancer cell line was studied in vitro.ResultsAnalysis of 16 micro-arrays identified 185 genes that were coexpressed with EZH2. The top five coexpressed genes were MCM4, KIAA0101, MKI67, RRM2, and CDC25a. Increased expression of these genes and EZH2 were associated with reduced survival. Coexpressed genes were involved in biological networks associated with the cell cycle, mitosis, and DNA damage. The effects of EZH2 on prostate cancer cell was validated in vitro as knockdown of EZH2 resulted in a G2/M cell cycle arrest, increased DNA damage, and reduced colony number.ConclusionsCoexpression analysis of EZH2 identified its role in the cell cycle, mitosis, and DNA repair. The molecular mechanisms involved in EZH2 gene expression in the cell response to DNA damage requires further study to determine whether EZH2 is a potential human cancer biomarker.

Preparation of the alpha-emitting prostate-specific membrane antigen targeted radioligand [212 Pb]Pb-NG001 for prostate cancer.

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is the most promising target for radioligand therapy of prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to prepare a small molecular ligand p-SCN-Bn-TCMC-PSMA (NG001) and compare it with the commonly used DOTA-based PSMA-617. The PSMA-targeting ability of the 212 Pb-labelled ligands was evaluated using PSMA-positive C4-2 human prostate cancer cells. Lead-212 is an in vivo generator of alpha particles by its daughter nuclides 212 Bi and 212 Po. NG001 was synthesized by conjugating the isothiocyanato group of p-SCN-Bn-TCMC to the amino group of a glutamate-urea-based PSMA-binding entity. Molecular size, chelator unit and chelator linking method are different in NG001 and PSMA-617. Both ligands were efficiently labelled with 212 Pb using a 224 Ra/212 Pb-solution generator in transient equilibrium with progeny. Lead-212-labelled NG001 was purified with a yield of 85.9±4.7% and with 0.7±0.2% of 224 Ra. Compared with [212 Pb]Pb-PSMA-617, [212 Pb]Pb-NG001 displayed a similar binding and internalization in C4-2 cells, with comparable tumour uptake in mice bearing C4-2 tumours, but almost a 2.5-fold lower kidney uptake. Due to the rapid normal tissue clearance and tumour cell internalization, any significant translocalization of 212 Bi was not detected in mice. In conclusion, the obtained results warrant further preclinical studies to evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of [212 Pb]Pb-NG001.

Paxillin regulated genomic networks in prostate cancer

Paxillin is extensively involved in focal adhesion signaling and kinase signaling throughout the plasma membrane and cytoplasm. However, recent studies in prostate cancer suggest that paxillin also plays a critical role in regulating gene expression within the nucleus, serving as a liaison between cytoplasmic and nuclear MAPK and Androgen Receptor (AR) signaling. Here we used RNA-seq to examine the paxillin-regulated transcriptome in several human prostate cancer cell lines. First, we examined paxillin effects on androgen-mediated transcription in control or paxillin-depleted AR-positive LNCaP and C4-2 human prostate cancer cells. In androgen-dependent LNCaP cells, we found over 1000 paxillin-dependent androgen-responsive genes, some of which are involved in endocrine therapy resistance. Most paxillin-dependent AR-mediated genes in LNCaP cells were no longer paxillin-dependent in androgen-sensitive, castration-resistant C4-2 cells, suggesting that castration-resistance may markedly alter paxillin effects on genomic AR signaling. To examine the paxillin-regulated transcriptome in the absence of androgen signaling, we performed RNA-seq in AR-negative PC3 human prostate cancer cells. Paxillin enhanced several pro-proliferative pathways, including the CyclinD/Rb/E2F and DNA replication/repair pathways. Additionally, paxillin suppressed pro-apoptotic genes, including CASP1 and TNFSF10. Quantitative PCR confirmed that these pathways are similarly regulated by paxillin in LNCaP and C4-2 cells. Functional studies showed that, while paxillin stimulated cell proliferation, it had minimum effect on apoptosis. Thus, paxillin appears to be an important transcriptional regulator in prostate cancer, and analysis of its transcriptome might lead to novel approaches toward the diagnosis and treatment of this important disease.

The Androgen Receptor Regulates PPARγ Expression and Activity in Human Prostate Cancer Cells.

The peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) is a ligand‐activated transcription factor that regulates growth and differentiation within normal prostate and prostate cancers. However the factors that control PPARγ within the prostate cancers have not been characterized. The goal of this study was to examine whether the androgen receptor (AR) regulates PPARγ expression and function within human prostate cancer cells. qRT‐PCR and Western blot analyses revealed nanomolar concentrations of the AR agonist dihydrotestosterone (DHT) decrease PPARγ mRNA and protein within the castration‐resistant, AR‐positive C4‐2 and VCaP human prostate cancer cell lines. The AR antagonists bicalutamide and enzalutamide blocked the ability of DHT to reduce PPARγ levels. In addition, siRNA mediated knockdown of AR increased PPARγ protein levels and ligand‐induced PPARγ transcriptional activity within the C4‐2 cell line. Furthermore, proteasome inhibitors that interfere with AR function increased the level of basal PPARγ and prevented the DHT‐mediated suppression of PPARγ. These data suggest that AR normally functions to suppress PPARγ expression within AR‐positive prostate cancer cells. To determine whether increases in AR protein would influence PPARγ expression and activity, we used lipofectamine‐based transfections to overexpress AR within the AR‐null PC‐3 cells. The addition of AR to PC‐3 cells did not significantly alter PPARγ protein levels. However, the ability of the PPARγ ligand rosiglitazone to induce activation of a PPARγ‐driven luciferase reporter and induce expression of FABP4 was suppressed in AR‐positive PC‐3 cells. Together, these data indicate AR serves as a key modulator of PPARγ expression and function within prostate tumors. J. Cell. Physiol. 231: 2664–2672, 2016. © 2016 The Authors. Journal of Cellular Physiology Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Inhibitor of p52 NF-κB subunit and androgen receptor (AR) interaction reduces growth of human prostate cancer cells by abrogating nuclear translocation of p52 and phosphorylated AR(ser81).

Accumulating evidence shows that androgen receptor (AR) activation and signaling plays a key role in growth and progression in all stages of prostate cancer, even under low androgen levels or in the absence of androgen in the castration-resistant prostate cancer. Sustained activation of AR under androgen-deprived conditions may be due to its interaction with co-activators, such as p52 NF-κB subunit, and/or an increase in its stability by phosphorylation that delays its degradation. Here we identified a specific inhibitor of AR/p52 interaction, AR/p52-02, via a high throughput screen based on the reconstitution of Gaussia Luciferase. We found that AR/p52-02 markedly inhibited growth of both castration-resistant C4-2 (IC50 ∼6 μM) and parental androgen-dependent LNCaP (IC50 ∼4 μM) human prostate cancer cells under low androgen conditions. Growth inhibition was associated with significantly reduced nuclear p52 levels and DNA binding activity, as well as decreased phosphorylation of AR at serine 81, increased AR ubiquitination, and decreased AR transcriptional activity as indicated by decreased prostate-specific antigen (PSA) mRNA levels in both cell lines. AR/p52-02 also caused a reduction in levels of p21(WAF/CIP1), which is a direct AR targeted gene in that its expression correlates with androgen stimulation and mitogenic proliferation in prostate cancer under physiologic levels of androgen, likely by disrupting the AR signaling axis. The reduced level of cyclinD1 reported previously for this compound may be due to the reduction in nuclear presence and activity of p52, which directly regulates cyclinD1 expression, as well as the reduction in p21(WAF/CIP1), since p21(WAF/CIP1) is reported to stabilize nuclear cyclinD1 in prostate cancer. Overall, the data suggest that specifically inhibiting the interaction of AR with p52 and blocking activity of p52 and pARser81 may be an effective means of reducing castration-resistant prostate cancer cell growth.

Abstract B23: Cysteine (C)-X-C receptor 4 induces oxidative stress through NADPH oxidase-2 in prostate cancer cells

Abstract Reactive oxygen species (ROS), and the coupled oxidative stress, have long been implicated in the onset and progression of many cancers, including prostate cancer (PCa). One of the mechanisms by which ROS contributes to cancer is by acting as a second messenger, relaying signals from the cell surface to important signaling proteins, thereby regulating a variety of cellular processes. We have demonstrated that ROS increased the expression and activity of the chemokine (CXC) receptor, type 4 (CXCR4), which resulted in proliferation, invasion and trans-endothelial migration of PCa cells. Similarly, a study in human hepatoma cells revealed that CXCR4, and its ligand, stromal cell derived factor 1 alpha (SDF-1α), promoted ROS accumulation; however, the source (s) of ROS following growth factor stimulation have not been investigated. Identifying the sources of ROS that leads to oxidative stress in the tumor microenvironment remain areas of intense research. A recent study demonstrated that the increased ROS generation observed in PCa cell lines of varying aggressiveness was largely contributed by the NADPH oxidase family of enzymes. Herein, we observed that SDF-1α promoted ROS accumulation in C4-2 human PCa cells. We also established that NOX, an extramitochondrial ROS-generating system, was the primary source of ROS instead of the mitochondria. Moreover, expression of the isoform, NOX2, was preferentially regulated by CXCR4 at transcriptional and post-transcriptional levels. Finally, NOX2 expression correlated with PCa aggressiveness in microarray datasets. Therefore, we hypothesize that the SDF-1α /CXCR4 signaling axis mediates ROS production in PCa through NADPH-oxidases, resulting in oxidative stress that encourages tumor progression. Results generated from this study will further elucidate the mechanism (s) by which growth factor signaling promotes oxidative stress to enhance tumor development. Understanding the relationship between known cancer promoting elements, such as CXCR4, ROS and NOX, will facilitate the development of more comprehensive therapeutics to enhance current clinical strategies to combat cancer metastasis. Citation Format: Kia J. Jones, Mahandranauth A. Chetram, Danaya A. Bethea, Cimona V. Hinton. Cysteine (C)-X-C receptor 4 induces oxidative stress through NADPH oxidase-2 in prostate cancer cells. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Third AACR International Conference on Frontiers in Basic Cancer Research; Sep 18-22, 2013; National Harbor, MD. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(19 Suppl):Abstract nr B23.

Abstract 1688: Autophagy inhibition enhances the antitumor effects of combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P).

Abstract Vascular disruptive agents such as CA4P cause an acute shutdown of the tumor vasculature resulting in metabolic stress and central tumor necrosis. However, tumor recurrence may ensue from peripheral tissue that survives the vascular insult because of less severe metabolic conditions (i.e, viable rim). Autophagy is an evolutionarily conserved cellular response to stress that is either enabling cell survival or mediating cell death, depending on the circumstances. During cancer therapy, autophagy is usually thought to contribute to cell survival and thus to therapeutic resistance. Hence, we hypothesized that autophagy inhibition would amplify the antitumor effects of CA4P by lowering the threshold of peripheral tumor cells to withstand the metabolic stress due to CA4P administration. Since available pharmacological autophagy inhibitors lack specificity, we established pairs of isogenic autophagy-defective (ATG4BC74A) and autophagy-competent (vector control, i.e., mstr) prostate cancer cells by means of retrovirally transducing PC-3 and C4-2 human prostate cancer cells with ATG4BC74A (an inactive and dominant-negative mutant of the autophagy related gene atg4B). These paired cell lines were characterized in vitro (autophagy and proliferation assays in cells exposed to CA4P), and PC-3 xenograft tumors were grown subcutaneously in mice subjected to CA4P (100 mg/kg ip). We collected tumors after 24 hours and 1 week for cryosectioning and preparation of protein lysates. To document the autophagy status in tumors, lysates were analysed by LC-3 Western blotting. The degree of necrosis and senescence in tissue sections was measured by H&E and senescence-associated β-galactosidase histochemistry, respectively. Microvessel density was assessed by CD31 immunofluorescence. CA4P associated inhibition of proliferation was not influenced by the autophagy status of PC-3 and C4-2 (CA4 IC50 ∼7 nmol/L for both PC-3 and C4-2). We also observed similar growth kinetics of PC-3 ATG4BC74A and mstr tumors in control and CA4P treated mice. Furthermore, we documented a comparable decrease in CD31 microvessel density 24 hours after C4AP administration in PC-3 ATG4BC74A and mstr xenografts, a change that was reversed 1 week following C4AP treatment. However, CA4P caused more extensive central tumor necrosis as well as a larger number of senescent cells in autophagy-deficient PC-3 tumors both 24 hours and 1 week following CA4P therapy. In summary, autophagy inhibition amplifies the necrosis- and senescence-inducing properties of CA4P. Further investigations are aiming at assessing the impact of the autophagy status of PC-3 tumors on CA4-mediated apoptosis and hypoxia. We also plan to expand our analyses to the C4-2 model. Finally, we are currently studying if combined CA4P therapy and autophagy inhibition results in improved long-term tumor control. Such combination therapy could be rapidly translated into the clinic. Citation Format: Van C. Hoang, Annabelle Chow, Urban Emmenegger. Autophagy inhibition enhances the antitumor effects of combretastatin A4 phosphate (CA4P). [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 104th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2013 Apr 6-10; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2013;73(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 1688. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2013-1688

The PPAR Gamma Agonist Troglitazone Regulates Erk 1/2 Phosphorylation via a PPARγ-Independent, MEK-Dependent Pathway in Human Prostate Cancer Cells

Thiazolidinediones (TZDs) dramatically reduce the growth of human prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. To determine whether the antitumor effects of TZDs were due in part to changes in the MEK/Erk signaling pathway, we examined the regulation of Erk phosphorylation by the TZD troglitazone within the PC-3 and C4-2 human prostate cancer cell lines. Western blot analysis revealed troglitazone-induced phosphorylation of Erk in both PC-3 and C4-2 cells. Troglitazone-induced increases in Erk phosphorylation were suppressed by the MEK inhibitor U0126 but not by the PPARγ antagonist GW9662. Pretreatment with U0126 did not alter the ability of troglitazone to regulate expression of two proteins that control cell cycle, p21, and c-Myc. Troglitazone was also still effective at reducing PC-3 proliferation in the presence of U0126. Therefore, our data suggest that troglitazone-induced Erk phosphorylation does not significantly contribute to the antiproliferative effect of troglitazone.

Paclitaxel-loaded iron platinum stealth immunomicelles are potent MRI imaging agents that prevent prostate cancer growth in a PSMA-dependent manner

Background and methods:Problems with the clinical management of prostate cancer include the lack of both specific detection and efficient therapeutic intervention. We report the encapsulation of superparamagnetic iron platinum nanoparticles (SIPPs) and paclitaxel in a mixture of polyethyleneglycolated, fluorescent, and biotin-functionalized phospholipids to create multifunctional SIPP-PTX micelles (SPMs) that were conjugated to an antibody against prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) for the specific targeting, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and treatment of human prostate cancer xenografts in mice.Results:SPMs were 45.4 ± 24.9 nm in diameter and composed of 160.7 ± 22.9 μg/mL iron, 247.0 ± 33.4 μg/mL platinum, and 702.6 ± 206.0 μg/mL paclitaxel. Drug release measurements showed that, at 37°C, half of the paclitaxel was released in 30.2 hours in serum and two times faster in saline. Binding assays suggested that PSMA-targeted SPMs specifically bound to C4-2 human prostate cancer cells in vitro and released paclitaxel into the cells. In vitro, paclitaxel was 2.2 and 1.6 times more cytotoxic than SPMs to C4-2 cells at 24 and 48 hours of incubation, respectively. After 72 hours of incubation, paclitaxel and SPMs were equally cytotoxic. SPMs had MRI transverse relaxivities of 389 ± 15.5 Hz/mM iron, and SIPP micelles with and without drug caused MRI contrast enhancement in vivo.Conclusion:Only PSMA-targeted SPMs and paclitaxel significantly prevented growth of C4-2 prostate cancer xenografts in nude mice. Furthermore, mice injected with PSMA-targeted SPMs showed significantly more paclitaxel and platinum in tumors, compared with nontargeted SPM-injected and paclitaxel-injected mice.

Prostate cancer targeting motifs: Expression of ανβ3, neurotensin receptor 1, prostate specific membrane antigen, and prostate stem cell antigen in human prostate cancer cell lines and xenografts

Membrane receptors are frequent targets of cancer therapeutic and imaging agents. However, promising in vitro results often do not translate to in vivo clinical applications. To better understand this obstacle, we measured the expression differences in receptor signatures among several human prostate cancer cell lines and xenografts as a function of tumorigenicity. Messenger RNA and protein expression levels for integrin α(ν) β(3), neurotensin receptor 1 (NTSR1), prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA), and prostate stem cell antigen (PSCA) were measured in LNCaP, C4-2, and PC-3 human prostate cancer cell lines and in murine xenografts using quantitative reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction, flow cytometry, and immunohistochemistry. Stable expression patterns were observed for integrin α(ν) and PSMA in all cells and corresponding xenografts. Integrin β(3) mRNA expression was greatly reduced in C4-2 xenografts and greatly elevated in PC-3 xenografts compared with the corresponding cultured cells. NTSR1 mRNA expression was greatly elevated in LNCaP and PC-3 xenografts. PSCA mRNA expression was elevated in C4-2 xenografts when compared with C4-2 cells cultured in vitro. Furthermore, at the protein level, PSCA was re-expressed in all xenografts compared with cells in culture. The regulation of mRNA and protein expression of the cell-surface target proteins α(ν) β(3), NTSR1, PSMA, and PSCA, in prostate cancer cells with different tumorigenic potential, was influenced by factors of the microenvironment, differing between cell cultures and murine xenotransplants. Integrin α(ν) β(3), NTRS1 and PSCA mRNA expression increased with tumorigenic potential, but mRNA expression levels for these proteins do not translate directly to equivalent expression levels of membrane bound protein.

Troglitazone suppresses c-Myc levels in human prostate cancer cells via a PPARγ-independent mechanism

Troglitazone is a ligand for the peroxisome proliferator activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) that decreases growth of human prostate cancer cells in vitro and in vivo. However, the mechanism by which troglitazone reduces prostate cancer cell growth is not fully understood. To understand the signaling pathways involved in troglitazone-induced decreases in prostate cancer growth, we examined the effect of troglitazone on androgen-independent C4-2 human prostate cancer cells. Initial experiments revealed troglitazone inhibited C4-2 cell proliferation by arresting cells in the G0/G1 phase of the cell cycle and inducing apoptosis. Since the proto-oncogene product c-Myc regulates both apoptosis and cell cycle progression, we next examined whether troglitazone altered expression of c-Myc. Troglitazone decreased c-Myc protein levels as well as expression of downstream targets of c-Myc in a dose-dependent manner. In C4-2 cells, troglitazone-induced decreases in c-Myc protein involve proteasome-mediated degradation of c-Myc protein as well as reductions in c-Myc mRNA levels. It appears that troglitazone stimulates degradation of c-Myc by increasing c-Myc phosphorylation, for the level of phosphorylated c-Myc was elevated in prostate cancer cells exposed to troglitazone. While troglitazone dramatically decreased the amount of c-Myc within C4-2 cells, the PPARγ ligands ciglitazone, rosiglitazone and pioglitazone did not reduce c-Myc protein levels. Furthermore the down-regulation of c-Myc by troglitazone was not blocked by the PPARγ antagonist GW9662 and siRNA-mediated decreases in PPARγ protein. Thus, our data suggest that troglitazone reduces c-Myc protein independently of PPARγ.

1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D 3 regulates PTHrP expression via transcriptional, post-transcriptional and post-translational pathways

Parathyroid hormone-related protein (PTHrP) increases the growth and osteolytic potential of prostate cancer cells, making it important to control PTHrP expression. PTHrP expression is suppressed by 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D 3 (1,25D). The aim of this study was to identify the pathways via which 1,25D exerts these effects. Our main findings are that 1,25D regulates PTHrP levels via multiple pathways in PC-3 and C4-2 (human prostate cancer) cell lines, and regulation is dependent on VDR expression. The human PTHrP gene has three promoters (P); PC-3 cells preferentially utilize P2 and P3, while C4-2 cells preferentially utilize P1. 1,25D regulates PTHrP transcriptional activity from both P1 and P3. The 1,25D-mediated decrease in PTHrP mRNA levels also involves a post-transcriptional pathway since 1,25D decreases PTHrP mRNA stability. 1,25D also suppresses PTHrP expression directly at the protein level by increasing its degradation. Regulation of PTHrP levels is dependent on VDR expression, as using siRNAs to deplete VDR expression negates the 1,25D-mediated downregulation of PTHrP expression. These results indicate the importance of maintaining adequate 1,25D levels and VDR status to control PTHrP levels.

The antiandrogenic effect of finasteride against a mutant androgen receptor

Finasteride is known to inhibit Type 2 5α-reductase and thus block the conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestosterone (DHT). The structural similarity of finasteride to DHT raises the possibility that finasteride may also interfere with the function of the androgen receptor (AR). Experiments were carried out to evaluate the antiandrogenic effect of finasteride in LNCaP, C4-2 and VCaP human prostate cancer cells. Finasteride decreased DHT binding to AR, and DHT-stimulated AR activity and cell growth in LNCaP and C4-2 cells, but not in VCaP cells. LNCaP and C4-2 (derived from castration-resistant LNCaP) cells express the T877A mutant AR, while VCaP cells express the wild type AR. When PC-3 cells, which are AR-null, were transfected with either the wild type or the T877A mutant AR, only the mutant AR-expressing cells were sensitive to finasteride inhibition of DHT binding. Peroxiredoxin-1 (Prx1) is a novel endogenous facilitator of AR binding to DHT. In Prx1-rich LNCaP cells, the combination of Prx1 knockdown and finasteride was found to produce a greater inhibitory effect on AR activity and cell growth than either treatment alone. The observation suggests that cells with a low expression of Prx1 are likely to be more responsive to the antiandrogenic effect of finasteride. Additional studies showed that the efficacy of finasteride was comparable to that of bicalutamide (a widely used non-steroidal antiandrogen). The implication of the above findings is discussed in the context of developing strategies to improve the outcome of androgen deprivation therapy.

1,4-Phenylenebis(Methylene)Selenocyanate, but Not Selenomethionine, Inhibits Androgen Receptor and Akt Signaling in Human Prostate Cancer Cells

The lack of treatment for worried-well patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia combined with issues of recurrence and hormone resistance in prostate cancer survivors remains a major public health obstacle. The long latency of prostate cancer development provides an opportunity to intervene with agents of known mechanisms at various stages of disease progression. A number of signaling cascades have been shown to play important roles in prostate cancer development and progression, including the androgen receptor (AR) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt signaling pathways. Crosstalk between these two pathways is also thought to contribute to progression and hormone-refractory prostate disease. Our initial investigations show that the naturally occurring organoselenium compound selenomethionine (SM) and the synthetic 1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)selenocyanate (p-XSC) can inhibit human prostate cancer cell viability; however, in contrast to SM, p-XSC is active at physiologically relevant doses. In the current investigation, we show that p-XSC, but not an equivalent dose of SM, alters molecular targets and induces apoptosis in androgen-responsive LNCaP and androgen-independent LNCaP C4-2 human prostate cancer cells. p-XSC effectively inhibits AR expression and transcriptional activity in both cell lines. p-XSC also decreases Akt phosphorylation as well as Akt-specific phosphorylation of the AR. Inhibition of Akt, however, does not fully attenuate p-XSC-mediated downregulation of AR activity, suggesting that inhibition of AR signaling by p-XSC does not occur solely through alterations in the phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase/Akt survival pathway. Our data suggest that p-XSC inhibits multiple signaling pathways in prostate cancer, likely accounting for the downstream effects on proliferation and apoptosis.

Abstract 574: 1,4-phenylenebis(methylene)selenocyanate (p-XSC) inhibits mammalian target of rapamycin complex 2 (mTORC2) signaling in prostate cancer cells

Abstract The lack of treatment for worried-well patients with high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia combined with issues of recurrence and hormone resistance in prostate cancer survivors remains a major public health obstacle. The long latency of prostate cancer development provides an opportunity to intervene with mechanistically-based agents at various stages of disease progression. Preclinical studies and immunohistochemical analyses of human prostate adenocarcinoma tissues have implicated the mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) signaling pathway in the progression of prostate cancer and its transition to androgen independence, suggesting mTOR as a potential target for new therapies. Preclinical studies in human prostate cancer cells also show that there is cross-talk between mTOR and androgen receptor signaling, a process critical for prostate cancer growth and survival. We have previously shown that the synthetic organoselenium compound p-XSC effectively inhibits cell viability and down-regulates androgen receptor expression and transcriptional activity in androgen responsive (AR) and androgen independent (AI) human prostate cancer cells; the naturally occurring selenomethionine was either ineffective or weakly active at non-physiological levels. Therefore, we focused our study on the effects of p-XSC and we hypothesized that it inhibits prostate cancer cell growth by interfering with mTOR signaling and that inhibition of this pathway may be linked to down-regulation of androgen receptor signaling in these cells. Here we show that p-XSC inhibits phosphorylation of mTOR in both AR LNCaP and AI LNCaP C4-2 human prostate cancer cells. This inhibition is attenuated by stimulation with androgens in AR LNCaP but not AI C4-2 cells, emphasizing a cross-talk between the two pathways. p-XSC also decreases mTOR binding to mTOR complex 2 (mTORC2) protein Rictor in AR LNCaP and AI C4-2 cells and inhibits the phosphorylation of mTORC2 downstream target Akt. Since p-XSC appears to be inhibiting mTORC2 as well as androgen signaling, we further hypothesized that the combination of p-XSC with rapamycin, which primarily targets mTORC1, may be a superior approach to inhibit prostate cancer cell growth than either agent alone. Our data clearly support this hypothesis. Validation of mTOR as a target of selenium in prostate cancer will provide evidence for its potential role against advanced and hormone refractory prostate disease either individually or in combination with therapies that target other signaling pathways. Support: NIH CA111842, DOD W81XWH-08-1-0297 Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 101st Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2010 Apr 17-21; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2010;70(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 574.

D,l-Sulforaphane causes transcriptional repression of androgen receptor in human prostate cancer cells

D,L-Sulforaphane (SFN), a synthetic analogue of cruciferous vegetable-derived L-isomer, inhibits the growth of human prostate cancer cells in culture and in vivo and retards cancer development in a transgenic mouse model of prostate cancer. We now show that SFN treatment causes transcriptional repression of androgen receptor (AR) in LNCaP and C4-2 human prostate cancer cells at pharmacologic concentrations. Exposure of LNCaP and C4-2 cells to SFN resulted in a concentration-dependent and time-dependent decrease in protein levels of total AR as well as Ser(210/213)-phosphorylated AR. The SFN-mediated decline in AR protein level was accompanied by a decrease in intracellular as well as secreted levels of prostate-specific antigen, an AR-regulated gene product. The decrease in AR protein level resulting from SFN exposure was not reversed in the presence of the protein synthesis inhibitor cycloheximide. Reverse transcription-PCR analysis revealed a dose-dependent decrease in AR mRNA levels, indicating transcriptional repression of this ligand-activated transcription factor. The SFN treatment inhibited AR promoter activity as revealed by luciferase reporter assay. Synthetic androgen (R1881)-stimulated nuclear translocation of AR was markedly suppressed in the presence of SFN in both cell lines. The SFN treatment also inhibited R1881-stimulated proliferation of LNCaP cells. Naturally occurring thio analogues (iberverin, erucin, and berteroin), but not the sulfonyl analogues (cheirolin, erysolin, and alyssin sulfone), of SFN were also effective in reducing protein levels of AR in LNCaP cells. In conclusion, the present study shows for the first time that SFN treatment causes transcriptional repression of AR and inhibition of its nuclear localization in human prostate cancer cells.

Lentiviruses with trastuzumab bound to their envelopes can target and kill prostate cancer cells

In this study, we took advantage of the overexpression of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER-2) in prostate cancers to design lentiviruses with modified envelope proteins that bind antibodies to specific cell-surface antigens. When bound to trastuzumab (Herceptin, Genentech, CA), lentiviruses were able to selectively infect androgen-sensitive LNCaP and castration-resistant C4-2 human prostate cancer cell lines, both of which express high levels of HER-2. To test for a therapeutic effect, we engineered our antibody-binding lentiviruses to express thymidine kinase, which can convert the non-toxic pro-drug ganciclovir (GCV) into a cytotoxic form. LNCaP and C4-2 cells infected by these viruses were sensitive to GCV killing. In vivo, C4-2 xenograft tumors treated either intratumorally or i.v. with trastuzumab-bound lentivirus expressed luciferase, although the latter route was less tumor specific. When a prostate-specific promoter for governing luciferase expression was combined with trastuzumab-mediated delivery, there was a further enrichment in targeting viral gene expression in prostate tumors. In conclusion, we found that although prostate cancers that express high levels of HER-2 are resistant to the killing effects of trastuzumab, they can be targeted for selective gene expression and destruction by viruses with envelope proteins engineered to bind this antibody.