C2 Fractures Research Articles

DISTAL FEMORAL FRACTURES FROM HIGH-ENERGY TRAUMA: A RETROSPECTIVE REVIEW OF COMPLICATION RATE AND RISK FACTORS.

Determine complications' incidence and risk factors in high-energy distal femur fractures fixed with a lateral locked plate. Forty-seven patients were included; 87.2% were male, and the average age was 38.9. The main radiographic parameters collected were distal lateral femoral angle (DFA), distal posterior femoral angle (DPLF), comminution length, plate length, screw working length, bone loss, and medial contact after reduction and plate-bone contact, location of callus formation, and implant failure. The complications recorded were nonunion, implant failure, and infection. Complex C2 and C3 fractures accounted for 85.1% of cases. Open fractures accounted for 63.8% of cases. The mean AFDL and AFDP were 79.8 4.0 and 79.3 6.0, respectively. The average total proximal and distal working lengths were 133.3 42.7, 60.4 33.4, and 29.5 21.8 mm, respectively. The infection rate was 29.8%, and the only risk factor was open fracture (p = 0.005). The nonunion rate was 19.1%, with longer working length (p = 0.035) and higher PDFA (p = 0.001) as risk factors. The site of callus formation also influenced pseudoarthrosis (p = 0.034). High-energy distal femoral fractures have a higher incidence of pseudoarthrosis and infection. Nonunion has greater working length, greater AFDL, and absence of callus formation on the medial and posterior sides as risk factors. The risk factor for infection was an open fracture. Level of Evidence III; Retrospective Cohort Study .

Use of Intraoperative Imaging to Preserve C1-C2 Mobility in Complex Atlas-Hangman Fractures.

Combination fractures of the C1-C2 complex especially atlas and hangman are relatively uncommon and management usually compromises C1-C2 mobility. To evaluate the treatment of combined C1- hangman's fracture with and without intraoperative O- arm based navigation system, and its outcome in terms of preserving C1-C2 mobility. This was a case series of patients with combined C1 and hangman's fracture, managed at a tertiary care hospital during February 2009 to December 2016. Neurological function assessed with American Spine Injury Association (ASIA) impairment scale. Radiological fusion of the operated segment assessed with computed tomographic scan, criteria used for successful fusion included formation of callus across the fracture. Preservation of rotational motion between C1 and C2 was assessed by cervical flexion rotation (CFR) test. We included 10 patients (male/female: 9/1; mean 47.7 ± 17.5 years) in our study. Operative intervention was performed in 9 patients. We used intraoperative computed tomogram (CT) scan with navigation in 5 patients. The mean follow-up period was 28.7 months (range 6 to 70 months). Neurological recovery occurred in all 4 patients with preoperative neurological deficits. Radiological fusion occurred in all cases. Rotation at C1-2 was preserved in all 5 cases operated under O-arm guidance and in one patient with type 1 fracture who was managed conservatively. The goals in treating these complex fractures are to achieve early maximum stability and preserving maximum range of motion. These are often competing phenomena, which can be achieved by using intra operative CT scan and navigation system.

Percutaneous O-arm guided navigated screw implantation for C2 fractures: the technique adaptation according to Magerl and Judet

Percutaneous O-arm guided navigated screw implantation for C2 fractures: the technique adaptation according to Magerl and Judet

Diagnosis and management of isolated C1 fractures: A systematic review.

ObjectiveAtlas fractures are a common craniocervical injury, often resulting from trauma. However, diagnosis and management of atlas fractures continues to be the subject of controversy. We aimed to characterize the factors related to diagnosis of atlas fractures, delineate important considerations in selecting the optimal management for a patient with an atlas fracture, and compare outcomes of surgical and conservative management.Methods:We performed a systematic review using PubMed, Embase, and Scopus to identify articles that analyzed diagnosis and management of isolated atlas fractures published between 2013 and 2020. Titles and abstracts were screened. Studies meeting prespecified inclusion criteria were reviewed in full.Results:Of 305 resultant articles, 13 were included. C1:C2 ratio and lateral mass displacement (LMD) were used to predict transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury. Surgery promoted high fusion rates overall. Stable atlas fractures achieved high fusion rates with conservative management, while spinal fusion promoted greater fusion rates than halo vest immobilization management for unstable fractures. Visual Analog Scale scores, range of motion, and/or LMD improved after surgery. LMD increased for unilateral sagittal split fractures with TAL injury after conservative treatment.Conclusion:Stable atlas fractures can be sufficiently treated conservatively. Unstable atlas fractures can be managed both conservatively and surgically, while surgery is associated with favorable outcomes for unstable isolated atlas fractures. Future studies are necessary to further guide risk stratification and treatment approaches in management of the patients with isolated atlas fractures.

Cervical spine injury response to direct rear head impact

BackgroundDirect rear head impact can occur during falls, road accidents, or sports accidents. They induce anterior shear, flexion and compression loads suspected to cause flexion-distraction injuries at the cervical spine. However, post-mortem human subject experiments mostly focus on sled impacts and not direct head impacts. MethodsSix male cadavers were subjected to a direct rear head impact of 3.5 to 5.5 m/s with a 40 kg impactor. The subjects were equipped with accelerometers at the forehead, mouth and sternum. High-speed cameras and stereography were used to track head displacements. Head range of motion in flexion-extension was measured before and after impact for four cadavers. The injuries were assessed from CT scan images and dissection. FindingsMaximum head rotation was between 43 degrees and 78 degrees, maximum cranial-caudal displacement between −12 mm and − 196 mm, and antero-posterior displacement between 90 mm and 139 mm during the impact. Four subjects had flexion-distraction injuries. Anterior vertebral osteophyte identification showed that fractures occurred at adjacent levels of osteophytic bridges. The other two subjects had no anterior osteophytes and suffered from C2 fracture, and one subject also had a C1-C2 subluxation. C6-C7 was the most frequently injured spinal level. InterpretationAnterior vertebral osteophytes appear to influence the type and position of injuries. Osteophytes would seem to provide stability in flexion for the osteoarthritic cervical spine, but to also lead to stress concentration in levels adjacent to the osteophytes. Clinical management of patients presenting with osteophytes fracture should include neck immobilization and careful follow-up to ensure bone healing.

The relationship between radiologic parameters and transverse atlantal ligament injury obtained from MRI scans in patients with an isolated atlas burst fracture: A retrospective observational study.

The treatment of an atlas burst fracture depends on whether transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury is present. We compared the radiologic parameters associated with the presence of a TAL injury as detected using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and verified whether the lateral mass displacement (LMD) criteria currently used to diagnose TAL injuries in atlas burst fractures are reliable or need revision.Thirty patients who presented with isolated atlas burst fractures were included in this retrospective observational study. We measured radiologic parameters, including LMD, atlanto-dental interval, basion-dens interval, internal lateral mass displacement, and external lateral mass displacement, in each patient at the time of initial presentation. The presence of TAL injury was evaluated using MRI. We compared the radiologic parameters and characteristics of patients who presented with TAL injury. We also determined the sensitivity and specificity of an LMD test to accurately diagnose TAL injury based on MRI. Finally, we compared the radiologic parameters according to the presence of surgical treatment and patient union status.Twenty patients presented with an intact TAL, while 10 patients had a TAL injury on MRI. LMD was significantly higher in patients with TAL injury (9.61 vs 3.73 mm, P < .001). In multivariable logistic regression analysis, LMD was also significantly higher in patients with TAL injury. The sensitivity and specificity of LMD for diagnosing TAL injury based on MRI in patients with isolated C1 fractures were 90% and 100%, respectively. The incidence of an LMD greater than 8.1 mm was statistically higher in patients than in those without TAL injury (90% vs 0%, P < .001).Nine patients underwent surgery for isolated atlas burst fractures, and 21 did not. LMD (9.56 vs 4.03 mm, P < .001) and fracture gap (7.96 vs 4.01 mm, P < .001) were significantly higher in patients who underwent surgery.Among the various radiologic parameters, LMD closely correlated with the presence of TAL injury, as patients with an LMD greater than 8.1 mm were more likely to have a TAL injury in the case of atlas burst fractures. LMD is a good method for predicting the presence of TAL injury if MRI is not available.

Bilateral triceps tendon approach is flexible and efficient in the treatment of type C distal humerus fractures

PurposeThe purpose of this study was to assess and compare elbow range of motion, triceps extension strength and functional results of type C (AO/OTA) distal humerus fractures treated with bilateral triceps tendon (BTT) approach and olecranon osteotomy (OO). At the same time, we are also trying to know whether BTT approach can provide sufficient vision for comminuted intra-articular fractures of the distal humerus, and whether it is convenient to convert to the treatment to total elbow arthroplasty (TEA) or OO. MethodsPatients treated with OO and BTT approaches for type C distal humerus fractures between July 2014 and December 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Inclusion criteria include: (1) patients' age were more than 18 years old, (2) follow-up was no less than 6 months, and (3) patients were diagnosed with type C fractures (based on the AO/OTA classification). Exclusion criteria include: (1) open fractures (Gustillo type 2 or type 3), (2) treated by other approaches, and (3) presented with combined injuries of ipsilateral upper extremities, such as ulnar nerve. Elbow range of motion and triceps extension strength testing were completely valuated, when the fractures had healed. Assessment of functional results using the Mayo elbow performance score and complications were conducted in final follow-up. The data were compared using the two tailed Student's t-test. All data were presented as mean ± standard deviation. ResultsEighty-six patients of type C distal humerus fractures, treated by OO and BTT approach were retrospectively reviewed between July 2014 and December 2017. Fifty-five distal humerus fractures (23 males and 32 females, mean age 52.7 years) treated by BTT approach or OO were included in this study. There were 10 fractures of type C1, 16 type C2 and 29 type C3 according to the AO/OTA classification. Patients were divided into two surgical approach groups chosen by the operators: BTT group (28 patients) and OO group (27 patients). And the mean follow-up time of all patients was 15.6 months (range, 6–36 months). Three cases in BTT group were converted to TEA, and one converted to OO. Only one case in BTT group presented poor articular reduction with a step more than 2 mm. There were not significantly different in functional outcomes according to the Mayo elbow performance score, operation time and extension flexion motion are values between BTT group and OO group (p > 0.05). Complications and reoperation rate were also similar in the two groups. Triceps manual muscle testing were no significant difference in the two groups, even subdivided in elder patients (aged >60 years old). ConclusionBTT is a safe approach to achieve similar functional result comparing with OO. BTT were not suitable for every case with severe comminuted pattern, but it avoids the potential complications related to OO, and has no complications concerning with triceps tendon. It is convenient for open reduction internal fixation and flexible to be converted to OO, as well as available to be converted to TEA in elder patients.

Неосложненные переломы шейных позвонков у детей и подростков

Introduction Various aspects of uncomplicated fractures of the cervical vertebrae in children and adolescents remain topical. Purpose To study incidence, character and type of uncomplicated fractures of the vertebrae of the cervical spine in children and adolescents. Materials and methods Out of 1000 children who had uncomplicated vertebral fractures, 27 (2.7 %) people were diagnosed with fractures at the cervical level. There were more boys among the injured – 77.77 % of the injured. 29.63 % of the patients were under the age of 12, and 70.37 % of – aged 12–17. Traditional methods for emergency traumatology were used for clinical diagnostics. Results In 17 (62.96 %) of the patients only the cervical vertebrae were compressed, in 10 (37.04 %) patients – both the thoracic vertebrae and the cervical vertebrae. Among the cervical vertebrae, compression of C7 vertebral body was most often observed – in 30.64 % of cases, less often – the body of C3 – in 4.08 % of cases. The main mechanism of injury was falling on head from a height of 2 m and more – 25.98 % of cases. Analysis of the character of C2 fractures showed that four patients had fractures of the odontoid process (three patients – type I, one – type III), one patient – fractures of the arches of this vertebra corresponding to type I. Fractures of subaxial location mainly corresponded to group "A" (subgroup I (36 compressed vertebrae), subgroup II (6 injured vertebrae)). In 2 cases, vertebral fractures were referred to group "B" (subgroup I). In 25 (92.59 %) clinical cases conservative treatment was used, in 2 (7.41 %) – there were indications for surgical treatment. The average duration of in-patient treatment for fractures of the cervical vertebrae was 9.4 days. Evaluation of long-term treatment results showed "good" results in 83.33 % of cases, satisfactory – in 16.67 % of clinical observations. Discussion The results that we have received are mainly comparable with the literature data on the main aspects of cervical trauma in children. At the same time, it is necessary to mention some differences. For example, many authors report that younger children most often get fractures of the C2 vertebra. According to our data, the average age of patients with these fractures was 14.8 years.

Comparison of Computed Tomography, Traction, and Inverted Grayscale Radiographs for Understanding Pilon Fracture Morphology.

There have been no studies evaluating the usefulness of grayscale radiographs in extremity fractures. We aimed to compare the ability and reliability of traction radiographs vs traction grayscale inversion radiographs to detect fracture fragment and comminution zones in comminuted tibia pilon fractures. Plain radiographs and grayscale inversion images of 60 patients with Orthopaedic Trauma Association/AO Foundation type C3 fracture were evaluated by 20 observers (15 orthopaedic surgeons and 5 radiologists) after traction had been applied. The anterolateral, posterolateral, and medial malleolar fragments, as well as the lateral, central, and medial column comminution zones, were identified by all physicians. Computed tomography scan images were used as the "gold standard" against which plain radiographs and grayscale inversion image interpretation were measured. Intra- and interobserver reliability and correct identification of fracture fragments and comminution zones were evaluated. The interobserver reliability for 3 of the fracture fragments and comminution zones on the traction plain radiographs was moderate, whereas it was substantial on traction grayscale inversion radiographs. The lateral comminution zones (P = .001) and presence or absence of posterolateral fragments (P < .001) were significantly better identified in grayscale inversion radiographs compared to standard radiographs. After traction was applied, we found grayscale inversion radiographs are superior to plain radiographs in the identification of posterolateral fragment and lateral zone of comminution in comminuted intraarticular pilon fractures. Level III, retrospective case series.

537 Open vs Closed Pilon Fractures: Comparison of Management, Outcomes, and Complications

Abstract Aim Despite the low incidence of pilon fractures, their high impact nature presents difficulties in surgical management/recovery. Current literature is varied, with no universal treatment algorithm. We aim to highlight differences in treatment, outcomes, complications between open and closed pilon fractures. Method This retrospective study was conducted at a major trauma centre, including patients over 5-year period. 135 patients were included (open:48, closed:87). Primary outcome was AOFAS score at 3-, 6- and 12-months post-injury. Secondary outcomes include time to partial weight-bear (PWB) and full weight-bear (FWB), bone union time, follow-up time. Post-operative complications were collected. Results Open fractures had lower AOFAS score 3 months post-injury, longer bone union time, and time to FWB. For both open and closed fractures, compared to ORIF patients, those treated with fine wire fixator (FWF) had lower AOFAS scores 3- and 6-months post-injury. Closed fracture patients treated with ORIF had shorter bone union time, time to PWB and FWB. Patients with AO/OTA 43A fractures needed shorter time to PWB and FWB than those with 43C fractures. Common complications (closed:open) were superficial infection (22%:54%), post-traumatic arthritis (25%:16%), non-union (11%:24%). Conclusions Open fractures, with more extensive soft tissue damage, were likely more suited for FWF, rather than ORIF (18% of open vs 72% of closed were treated with ORIF). Due to greater associated trauma, more frequent complications, and delayed definitive fixation, open fractures had lower AOFAS scores. Nevertheless, use of staged approach involving temporary external fixation, followed with ORIF or FWF achieved low complication rates and good functional recovery.

Dorsal Plate Osteosynthesis in Simple and Complex Fractures of the Distal Radius: A Radiological Analysis of 166 Cases.

Background To report the radiologic outcome and rate of complications of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) using a dorsal plate fixation of simple and complex distal radius fractures in adult patients. Methods Patients treated with dorsal ORIF of simple and complex distal radius fractures between December 2008 and April 2013 were included in this single-center retrospective study. Type of fracture, radiographic measurements, and complications were documented. Results One-hundred and sixty-six patients/fractures were included. Restoration of radial inclination (22° ± 3°) was achieved in 38%. Radial height (14 ± 1 mm) was least likely to be restored to normal values postoperative in 25%. Normal ulnar variance (0.7 ± 1.5 mm) could be observed in 60% and adequate volar tilt (11° ± 5°) was achieved in 50% at final follow-up. We observed one loss of reduction in an AO type C2 fracture and a total of 15 nonimplant-related minor clinical complications. Conclusion Our radiographic findings after dorsal plating are comparable to those published on volar plating. The changes in radial height and volar tilt could be attributed to projection-related differences in the radiographs and did not signify a loss of reduction in all cases. Clinical Relevance Dorsal plating of distal radius fractures is safe and remains an important approach in the treatment of complex distal radius fractures. Complications in our study were even less compared to those reported in the literature. Type of Study/Level of Evidence This is a Type IV study. Level of Experience of Surgeons The level of experience of surgeons is III–V.

Treatment of Upper Cervical Spinal Cord Injury (Unstable C1-C2) by Direct Visualization and Nailing Technique and the Advantages of Early MRI.

Background The treatment of C1-C2 fractures mainly depends on fracture type and the stability of the atlantoaxial joint. Disruption of the C1-C2 combination is a big challenge, especially in avoiding vertebral artery, nerve, and vein sinus injury during the operation. Purpose This study aims to show the benefit of using the posterior approach and pedicle screw insertion by nailing technique and direct visualization to treat unstable C1-C2 and, moreover, to determine the advantages of performing early MRI in patients with limited neck movement after trauma. Method Between Jan 2017–Feb 2019, we present 21 trauma patients who suffered from C1, C2, or unstable atlantoaxial joint. X-ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance image (MRI) were performed preoperatively. All the patients underwent our surgical procedure (posterior approach and pedicle screw placement by direct visualization and nailing technique). Result The mean age was 41.1 years old, 8 females and 14 males. The average follow-up time was 2.6 years. Four patients were with C1 fracture, seven with C2 fracture, six with atlantoaxial dislocation, and four with C1 and C2 fractures. The time of MRI was between 12 hours and 48 hours; neck movement symptoms appeared between 2 days and 2 weeks. Conclusion The posterior approach to treat the C1 and C2 fractures or dislocation by direct visualization and nailing technique can reduce the risk of the vertebral artery, vein sinus, and nerve root injuries with significant improvement. It can show a better angle view while inserting the pedicle screws. An early MRI (12–48 hours) is essential even if no symptoms appear at the time of admission, and if it is normal, it is necessary to repeat it. The presence of skull bleeding can be associated with upper neck instability.

English

BACKGROUND Intercondylar humerus fractures and low transcondylar type fractures of distal humeral often require surgical exposure and anatomical reduction of the articular surface as well as stabilization of the medial and lateral columns of the distal humerus. Traditionally, these injuries have been treated surgically with various extensor mechanism-disrupting surgical approaches. These approaches have often led to delayed union or non-union of the olecranon, triceps weakness, and osteotomy-related prominent implants. To avoid these problems, various extensor mechanism-sparing approaches that provide bicolumnar exposure of the distal part of the humerus have been described, including triceps-splitting and reflecting techniques. The paratricipital approach was developed to avoid the problems of olecranon osteotomy approach for non comminuted distal humerus fractures. The purpose of this study was to compare the paratricipital approach with olecranon osteotomy and evaluate their effects on the functional outcomes of intercondylar fractures of the distal humerus managed with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) by reviewing 38 cases of intercondylar distal humerus fractures surgically managed with either of the approaches during 2015 - 2017. METHODS The retrospective study was conducted at our institution, R.G. Kar Medical College, Kolkata from May 2015 to May 2017. OA type C1 and C2 fractures were included in the study. Type C3 fractures were excluded from the study. Distal humeral open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) was performed with either orthogonal or parallel plate constructs in 38 patients, where paratricipital approach was used in 21 patients and olecranon osteotomy was done for 17 patients. RESULTS Patients in the paratricipital approach group seems to have better range of motion in terms of flexion and extension. Moreover, mayo elbow performance score (MEPS) of the paratricipital group is better than that of olecranon osteotomy group, even more so in younger age groups. CONCLUSIONS We found that ORIF via the paratricipital approach would confer better functional outcomes for simple intra-articular distal humerus fractures in patients of all age groups. KEYWORDS Distal Humerus Fracture, Paratricipital, Olecranon Osteotomy

Proposal of Treatment Strategy for Pedicle Fractures of the C2: An Analysis of 49 Cases.

Spine surgeons often confuse C2 pedicle fractures (PFs) with pars interarticularis fractures. In addition, little information is available about the characteristics and treatment strategies for C2 PFs. We sought to investigate the characteristics of C2 PFs and to propose an appropriate treatment strategy. A total of forty-nine patients with C2 PFs were included in this study. We divided these patients into unilateral and bilateral C2 PF groups. The incidence rates and characteristics of other associated C2 and C2-3 injuries, and other cervical injuries, were evaluated. In addition, treatment methods and outcomes were analyzed. Twenty-two patients had unilateral C2 PFs and twenty-seven patients had bilateral C2 PFs. Among the cases of unilateral C2 PFs, all patients had one or more other C2 fractures, and twenty patients (90.9%) had one or two C2 body fractures. Meanwhile, among the cases of bilateral C2 PF, all patients had two or more other C2 fractures and one or two C2 body fractures. In unilateral C2 PFs, three patients with C2-3 anterior slip or adjacent cervical spine (C1-3) injury underwent surgery and nineteen patients (86.4%) were treated with conservative methods. In bilateral C2 PFs, three patients with C2-3 anterior slip or SCI at C2-3 underwent surgery and twenty-four patients (88.9%) were treated with conservative methods. Our results showed that C2 PFs do not occur alone and are always accompanied by other associated C2 injuries. C2 PFs should, generally, be thought of as a more complex fracture type than hangman’s fracture or dens fracture. Despite the complex fracture characteristics, most C2 PFs can be managed with conservative treatment. However, surgical treatments should be considered if the C2 PFs are accompanied by the C2-3 anterior slip and adjacent cervical spine injury.

Anterior reduction and C1-ring osteosynthesis with Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) via transoral approach for unstable atlas fractures

BackgroundTo introduce a novel transoral instrumentation in the treatment of unstable fractures of the atlas.MethodsFrom January 2008 to May 2018, 22 patients with unstable C1 fractures who received Jefferson-fracture reduction plate (JeRP) via transoral approach were retrospectively analyzed. The case history and the radiographs before and after surgery were noted. The type of fracture, the reduction of the fracture, and position of the internal fixation were assessed through preoperative and postoperative CT scans.ResultsAll 22 patients successfully underwent anterior C1-ring osteosynthesis using the JeRP system, with a follow-up of 26.84 ± 9.23 months. Among them, 9 patients had transverse atlantal ligament (TAL) injury, including 3 in Dickman type I and 6 in type II. The preoperative lateral mass displacement (LMD) decreased from 7.13 ± 1.46 mm to 1.02 ± 0.65 mm after the operation. Bone union was achieved in all patients without implant failure or loss of reduction. There were no surgery-related complications, such as wound infection, neurological deficit, or vertebral artery injury. However, atlantoaxial dislocation occurred in 3 patients with Dickman type I TAL injury 3 months postoperatively without any neurological symptoms or neck pain.ConclusionsTransoral C1-ring osteosynthesis with JeRP is an effective surgical strategy to treat unstable atlas fractures with a safe, direct, and satisfactory reduction. The primary indication for the JeRP system is an unstable fracture (Gehweiler type I/III) or/ and TAL injury (Dickman type II).

RETRACTED ARTICLE: Single volar locking plating for the intra- and extra-articular distal radius fractures with dorsal metaphyseal comminution

BackgroundVolar locking plating remains a popular method for the surgical management of distal radius fractures. Dorsal metaphyseal comminution (DMC) is a common fracture pattern which weakens the stability during fracture fixation. In this study, we aimed to compare the radiographic and functional outcome of the intra- and extra-articular distal radius fractures with DMC following single volar locking plate fixation.Materials and methodsPatients suffered from a distal radius fracture with DMC were reviewed in the clinical database of the authors’ institution between Jan 2016 and Jan 2020. The included patients were classified into the extra-articular (A3) group or the intra-articular (C2 and C3) group according to the AO/OTA system. The radiological parameters, wrist range of motion, and functional outcomes were evaluated following open reduction and volar locking plate fixation.ResultsA total of 130 patients were included in this study with a mean follow-up length of 17.2 months. Compared with the A3 fracture group, no significant fracture re-displacement or reduced wrist ROMs was observed in the C2 fractures after 12-month’s follow-up. However, significantly decreased volar tilt (P = 0.003) as well as the extension/flexion ROMs were observed in the C3 fractures comparing to the A3 fractures. Most of the patients achieved an excellent (n = 75) or good (n = 51) Gartland and Werley wrist score. Four patients with C3 fractures resulted in a fair functional outcome due to a significant loss of volar tilt during follow-up.ConclusionsThe single volar locking plate fixation provided sufficient stability for distal radius fractures with DMC, and resulted in similar radiological and functional outcomes in the intra-articular distal radius fractures with a simple articular component (C2 fractures) as those in the extra-articular fractures. Considering the intra-articular fractures with multifragmentary articular component (C3 fracture), despite of the subsequent loss of volar tilt, the majority of the patients achieved good to excellent wrist function following single volar locking plating.Trial registrationThis study has been registered on the ClinicalTrials.gov.

C1-C2 Wiring With Timed Self-Obsolescence for Complex C2 Body Fracture.

Fractures of C2 are typically managed nonoperatively with good rates of healing. Management decisions are complicated, however, when there are additional fractures in the axis possibly leading to increased instability. Additionally, the techniques used for treating these unstable axis fractures can have either significant complications or permanent loss of range of motion. Here, we present a novel technique for the reduction and stabilization of complex C2 body fracture. A 34-yr-old woman with a complex C2 body fracture, which included a right pars and left lateral mass fracture, presented after a water slide accident. It was felt that this fracture was both unstable and would not heal in an anatomically acceptable way so an open surgical reduction was needed. After consideration of more traditional fusion and osteosynthesis techniques, we chose to perform a C1-C2 internal stabilization with C1 sublaminar and C2 spinous process wiring. The patient was then instructed to wear a Miami J collar for 3 mo. The outcome was favorable with good approximation and healing with preserved range of motion.

OUTCOMES IN DOUBLE TENSION BAND OSTEOSYNTHESIS IN DISTAL HUMERUS FRACTURES AO TYPE C1

Introduction: Distal humeral fractures accounts for approximately 2% of all fractures and nearly onethird of humeral fractures in adults. In this regard, Double Tension Band Wiring (DTBW) technique was used for the xation of the distal humeral fractures type C1 (AO) to evaluate the early movement and complications of the patients. Methodology: This study was conducted on 38 patients of C1 (AO type)who were subjected to open reduction and internal xation using DTBW techniques, to evaluate the incidence of complications and to evaluate intraoperative parameters and postoperative functional outcomes over a period of 12 months. Results: The mean age of the participants was 43.7 years. The mean tourniquet time was 76 minutes. The mean union time was 11.4 weeks and the mean duration of the follow-ups was 13.72 months. The mean values for the lack of extension, exion, and range of motion were 12.24o, 120.9o, and 108.2o respectively. Neuropraxia was observed in 1 patient who was treated with conservative treatment. Mean MEPS score was 80.15. 17 patients had excellent scores , 12 had good scores and 9 had fair scores. None had poor scores. Hardware prominence was observed in 1 case which was treated with hardware removal after union was achieved. Hardware removal was performed 6 months after the surgery. Moreover, patients were diagnosed with no serious complications, such as the nonunion of fracture site, malunions, and deep infection. The radiological examination of the patients revealed the success of their treatment. Conclusions: Based on the obtained results, it can be concluded that DTBW is an effective technique in AO type C1 fracture xation, which allows gentle early motion. Moreover, this cost-effective technique decreased the surgery duration, tourniquet time, and damage caused by soft tissue stripping.

Spinal alignment shift between supine and prone CT imaging occurs frequently and regardless of the anatomic region, risk factors, or pathology

Computer-assisted spine surgery based on preoperative CT imaging may be hampered by sagittal alignment shifts due to an intraoperative switch from supine to prone. In the present study, we systematically analyzed the occurrence and pattern of sagittal spinal alignment shift between corresponding preoperative (supine) and intraoperative (prone) CT imaging in patients that underwent navigated posterior instrumentation between 2014 and 2017. Sagittal alignment across the levels of instrumentation was determined according to the C2 fracture gap (C2-F) and C2 translation (C2-T) in odontoid type 2 fractures, next to the modified Cobb angle (CA), plumbline (PL), and translation (T) in subaxial pathologies. One-hundred and twenty-one patients (C1/C2: n = 17; C3-S1: n = 104) with degenerative (39/121; 32%), oncologic (35/121; 29%), traumatic (34/121; 28%), or infectious (13/121; 11%) pathologies were identified. In the subaxial spine, significant shift occurred in 104/104 (100%) cases (CA: *p = .044; T: *p = .021) compared to only 10/17 (59%) cases that exhibited shift at the C1/C2 level (C2-F: **p = .002; C2-T: *p < .016). The degree of shift was not affected by the anatomic region or pathology but significantly greater in cases with an instrumentation length > 5 segments (“∆PL > 5 segments”: 4.5 ± 1.8 mm; “∆PL ≤ 5 segments”: 2 ± 0.6 mm; *p = .013) or in revision surgery with pre-existing instrumentation (“∆PL presence”: 5 ± 2.6 mm; “∆PL absence”: 2.4 ± 0.7 mm; **p = .007). Interestingly, typical morphological instability risk factors did not influence the degree of shift. In conclusion, intraoperative spinal alignment shift due to a change in patient position should be considered as a cause for inaccuracy during computer-assisted spine surgery and when correcting spinal alignment according to parameters that were planned in other patient positions.

260. Comparing outcomes and mortality of upper cervical and subaxial cervical spine trauma in elderly patients

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> In contrast to younger patients, the elderly are more likely to sustain severe cervical spine trauma from relatively low energy mechanisms of injury. The presence of preexisting spine pathology such as osteoporosis, cervical stenosis, ankylosis, spondylosis, and degenerative changes can predispose elderly patients to fractures and neurologic injury in both the upper and subaxial cervical spine. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To date, there has been little research comparing outcomes and mortality rates of patients with upper cervical (occiput-C2) versus subaxial (C3-C7) cervical spine injuries. Given the paucity of data on this subject, this current study compares mortality rates and outcomes between elderly patients with upper cervical and subaxial cervical spine injuries using our prospective trauma database. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Using data extracted from our clinical trauma registry, we conducted a single center retrospective cohort study. Retrospective chart review was performed to assess treatment rendered, complications, and outcome measures and then stored in a deidentified database. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> All elderly (65+) trauma patients with cervical spine injuries who presented to a single, high-volume, level I trauma center between 2010-2019 were identified. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Outcomes such as medical and surgical complication rates, length of hospitalization, and mortality at various time points were collected. <h3>METHODS</h3> Imaging characteristics of patients including psoas index (a marker for sarcopenia) and L3 Hounsfield Unit (an indicator of osteoporosis) were calculated using standard technique and recorded into the database. Patients with cervical spine trauma were sorted into upper cervical (occipital condyle, C1, and C2 vertebral fractures and ligamentous injuries) and subaxial (C3-7) cohorts and by treatment (operative vs nonoperative management). Surgical and medical morbidity variables recorded include surgical site infection, pneumonia, STEMI, DVT/PE and stroke. Pearson's Chi-squared tests were used to compare rates of mortality and complications between groups. <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 922 patients were identified, with 545 upper cervical (59%), and 377 subaxial (41%) trauma patients. Patients with upper cervical spine trauma were significantly older (p<0.001), more sarcopenic (p=0.002), osteoporotic (p=0.002), and had higher rates of dementia (p=0.003). There was no significant difference in cardiac or pulmonary comorbidities between the two groups (p=0.7). Patients with subaxial injuries had a higher injury burden, with significantly higher Injury Severity Scale (ISS) scores (p=0.008), non-contiguous spine injuries (p=0.016), closed head injury (p=0.04), and pelvic fractures (p=0.04). Comparing operative cohorts, there was a statistically significant higher proportion of medical and surgical complications in the upper cervical group (p=0.006), and specifically a higher incidence of pneumonia (p=0.009). There was also found to be higher overall mortality in all upper cervical injuries both operative and nonoperatively managed as compared to the subaxial cohort (p=0.015). There was no significant difference in in-hospital mortality between the two groups (p=0.25). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Although patients with subaxial injuries were found to be more severely traumatized with higher energy mechanisms and more severe associated injuries, our data demonstrate that patients with upper cervical trauma are at higher risk for medical and surgical complication and mortality, regardless of need for operative intervention. This is likely secondary to poor reserve given their older age, advanced sarcopenia, and the increased morbidity associated with both operative management and nonoperative immobilization. In conclusion, we have demonstrated in the largest study to date that patients with upper cervical injuries, although less severely traumatized, should be more critically evaluated given their increased risk for morbidity and mortality, which can help guide discussions with the patient and family about expected outcomes and functional status. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.