Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument Research Articles

Do patients of delirium have catatonic features? An exploratory study

The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of catatonic symptoms, as per the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), in patients with delirium and to evaluate the prevalence of catatonia as defined by the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument and DSM-5 criteria in patients with delirium. Two hundred five consecutive subjects with delirium were assessed on the Delirium Rating Scale-Revised 98 version, the amended Delirium Motor Symptom Scale and the BFCRS. On the BFCRS, two-fifths (n = 80; 39%) of the study participants had two or more catatonic symptoms. When the diagnosis of catatonic syndrome was considered, 32% and 12.7% were observed to have catatonia as per the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument and proposed DSM-5 criteria, respectively. Delirium with catatonic syndrome was more common in women and in those who had onset of delirium prior to hospitalization. Amongst the delirium subtypes, hypoactive delirium was more commonly associated with catatonic syndrome. The present study suggests that a substantial number of patients with delirium have catatonic symptoms and a significant proportion have catatonic syndrome. This high prevalence makes the concurrent diagnosis of delirium and catatonia plausible. The association of catatonia with a specific motor subtype of delirium could encourage the expansion or even modification of the existing subtypes of delirium.

Prevalence and clinical correlations of catatonia in older adults referred to a liaison psychiatry service in a general hospital

AimTo determine the frequency and clinical correlations of catatonia in older patients referred to a liaison psychiatry service in a general hospital. Patients and MethodsAll patients over 65 years referred to liaison psychiatry were screened for catatonic phenomena with the Bush–Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI) between January and May 2012. Their clinical characteristics and the outcome of treatment were recorded. ResultsOne hundred and twelve patients over 65 years were referred. Ten (8.9%) met research diagnostic criteria for catatonia and 7 (6.3%) Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th Edition criteria for catatonia. All patients presented with the inhibited variant and 5 to 12 catatonic signs. Three patients presented concomitant delirium. The etiology of catatonia was multifactorial, and complications and death were frequent (40% and 20%, respectively). Lorazepam achieved full resolution of catatonia in 50% of patients. ConclusionsCatatonia in older adults referred to liaison psychiatry in a general hospital is not infrequent and has a multifactorial etiology. The BFCSI is a simple and reliable instrument to detect catatonia in this population. Lorazepam seems to be an effective treatment.

Catatonic Syndrome: Importance of Detection and Treatment with Lorazepam

A resurgence of interest has led to renewed attempts to clarify the concept and treatment of catatonia. A large prospective study was conducted to estimate the incidence of catatonic syndrome in 138 consecutive psychiatric patients admitted to a general hospital in India, to demarcate the common symptom presentations and its response to intravenous benzodiazepines. Patients were screened using the Bush Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument. Patients with two or more signs on the Instrument were subsequently administered intravenous lorazepam and their response was rated on the Bush Francis Catatonia Rating Scale. Catatonic syndrome was found in 11% of patients with a wide variety of diagnoses, especially schizophrenia. Mutism (87.5% incidence) was the most common symptom. A significant proportion (93%) of these patients showed a marked immediate response to lorazepam, with 75% showing sustained improvement. Catatonic syndrome is common, often undiagnosed, and quickly responsive to treatment, irrespective of the diagnosis. It needs to be identified and actively treated with benzodiazepines to minimize distress, and facilitate diagnosis and treatment. Most patients also need additional treatment for the underlying psychiatric condition.

Catatonia in a psychiatric intensive care facility: incidence and response to benzodiazepines.

This study was performed to establish the incidence of catatonia in a psychiatric intensive care unit, to test the Bush-Francis Catatonia Screening Instrument (BFCSI) and to assess the response of catatonic signs to benzodiazepines. During a 12-month period all patients admitted to a psychiatric intensive care unit were screened for catatonic signs using the BFCSI. Patients with catatonia were further assessed with the Bush-Francis Catatonia Rating Scale (BFCRS), the Modified Rogers Scale (MRS), and scales for associated psychotic and parkinsonian symptoms. They were treated with oral lorazepam or parenteral clonazepam and their responses evaluated daily. Neuroleptics were stopped for at least 3 days. Twenty four patients met the DSM IV criteria for catatonia, giving an incidence of 15% with a significantly higher proportion of non-Europeans. The most common associated diagnosis was schizophrenia (54%). Twenty two patients completed the benzodiazepine trial. All showed significant responses after 3 days of treatment. Sixteen (16/22, 73%) had full remission within 6 days, most within 2 to 4 days. Partial responders (n = 6) all had schizophrenia and were more likely to have longer pre-trial catatonic episodes. We find the BFCSI a simple and reliable tool to screen for catatonia, and our data attest to the efficacy of benzodiazepines in the treatment of catatonia.