Burst Fractures Research Articles

Validation of Quality Indicators Targeting Low-Value Trauma Care

Reducing low-value care has the potential to improve patient experiences and outcomes and free up health care resources. Sixteen quality indicators were recently developed targeting reductions in low-value trauma care based on a synthesis of the best available evidence, expert consensus, and patient preferences. To assess the validity of quality indicators on low-value trauma care using trauma registry data. Data from an inclusive Canadian provincial trauma system were used in this analysis. Included were all admissions for injury to any of the 57 provincial adult trauma centers between April 1, 2013, and March 31, 2020. Metrics for quality indicators were developed iteratively with clinical experts. Validity was assessed using a priori criteria based on 5 parameters: frequency (incidence and case volume), discrimination (interhospital variation), construct validity (correlation with quality indicators on high-value care), predictive validity (correlation with quality indicators on risk-adjusted outcomes), and forecasting (correlation over time). The study sample included 136 783 patient admissions (mean [SD] age, 63 [22] years; 68 428 men [50%]). Metrics were developed for 12 of the 16 quality indicators. Six quality indicators showed moderate or high validity on all measurable parameters: initial head, cervical spine, or whole-body computed tomography for low-risk patients; posttransfer repeated computed tomography; neurosurgical consultation for mild complicated traumatic brain injury; and spine service consultation for isolated thoracolumbar process fractures. Red blood cell transfusion in low-risk patients had low frequency but had moderate or high validity on all other parameters. Five quality indicators had low validity on at least 2 parameters: repeated head CT and intensive care unit admission for mild complicated traumatic brain injury, hospital admission for minor blunt abdominal trauma, orthosis for thoracolumbar burst fractures, and surgical exploration in penetrating neck injury without hard signs. This cohort study shows the feasibility of assessing low-value trauma care using routinely collected data. It provided data on quality indicators properties that can be used to decide which quality indicators are most appropriate in a given system. Results suggest that 6 quality indicators have moderate to high validity. Their implementation now needs to be tested.

Air Crash Investigation: Pattern of Spinal Injuries, Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic, and Outcomes.

Spinal injuries following an air crash can be fatal, and recognizing the patients who need immediate attention and early management could save those patients from ending up with lifelong disabilities and other consequences. However, taking appropriate actions in a pandemic situation presents additional challenges. We present our report of air crash victims with spinal injuries, along with their patterns, morphology, management, and outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. An analysis was performed on the spinal injuries of victims of the Boeing 737 crash landing at the Karipur Airport (Calicut International Airport, Kerala, India) who were treated at a tertiary care referral hospital in August 2020. Details of the initial triage, patterns of injury, morphologies, mechanisms, management principles, and outcomes at 9 months postinjury were recorded and analyzed. Of the 47 patients received at our center, 44 survivors were triaged and 13 patients (29.5%) were identified to have spinal injuries of varying severities. The majority of the injuries were chance fractures at the lumbar level, followed by burst and compression fractures. A total of 6 patients underwent surgery, following all COVID-19 guidelines based on priority. All survivors had positive outcomes with our management. No complications such as secondary infections, worsening of neurological deficits, or implant failures were recorded. A high incidence of spinal injuries is seen in air crash victims. Early prioritized surgical management in selected patients provides excellent outcomes. Disaster management during a pandemic situation is a difficult task, where proper planning and execution is necessary to provide optimal results.

Effect of early continuously intravenous tranexamic acid on perioperative blood loss in thoracolumbar burst fractures with neurological symptoms.

There is still a conflict between early surgical decompression and increased bleeding resulting from early surgery for thoracolumbar burst fractures (TBF) with neurological symptoms. The aim of this study is to investigate the effect of early continuously intravenous tranexamic acid (TXA) on perioperative blood loss in TBF with neurological symptoms who underwent early surgery. A retrospective comparative analysis was performed. The patients in study group were treated with intravenous TXA 15 mg/kg every 24 hours after admission besides intravenous TXA 15 mg/kg before skin incision and patients in control group were treated with intravenous TXA 15 mg/kg before skin incision only. Perioperative blood loss was compared between the 2 groups. The hemoglobin at admission, before surgery, 1 day and 3 days after surgery, the operation time, drainage time, blood transfusion and volume, incidence of complications and length of hospital stay were also compared. The operation time, preoperative, intraoperative, total, hidden amounts of blood loss in TXA group were significantly lower than those in control group (P < .001). The hemoglobin level in the TXA group was significantly higher than that in the control group before and 1 day after surgery (P < .05). The remove drainage time, hospitalization time, blood transfusion rate and volume in the TXA group were significantly lower than those in the control group (P < .001). There was no significant difference in the incidence of lower limb thrombosis between the 2 groups (P > .05). Early continuously intravenous TXA reduces the perioperative blood loss of patients with TBF who underwent early posterior fracture reduction, nerve decompression and pedicle screw fixation.

Long versus short segment with intermediate screw fixation for burst fractures of thoracolumbar junction: radiological and clinical results.

Long segment fixation has been frequently used to treat thoracolumbar burst fractures. In our study we want to compare the long and short segment with intermediate screw fixation of thoracolumbar junction burst fractures in relation to radiological and clinical outcomes. We collected the data of 115 patients, with thoracolumbar junction (T11-L2) burst fracture A3 or A4, according to AO Classification. Patients were divided into two groups. Group A was treated by long segment fixation. Group B was treated by short segment fixation. At admission, after surgery, and at 12-month follow-up the patients were radiographically assessed for local kyphotic angle using the Cobb method. Patients were clinically evaluated with the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for back pain. The mean difference of the preoperative, immediate postoperative, and 12-month follow-up Cobb angle was significant in both groups (P=0.018). The mean difference of the preoperative and immediate postoperative Cobb angle, Δ1, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (P=0.038), indicating that the Cobb angle correction immediately postoperative was better in patients with double level fixation. The mean difference of the immediate postoperative and 12-month follow-up Cobb angle, Δ2, was significantly greater in group A than in group B (P=0.007), indicating that the maintenance of local Cobb angle correction was better in patients with double level, long fixation. There was no difference in VAS values between group B (single) and group A (double) segment fixation immediately postoperatively (P=0.356) or after 12 months (P=0.147). In A3 and A4 thoracolumbar junction fractures, long segment fixation can correct the local kyphosis Cobb angle and maintain the correction at 12-month follow-up better than short segment fixation with intermediate screws in the fractured vertebra. However, the radiological difference was not predictive of clinical results.

Radiological outcome of operative treatment with posterior approach in patients with thoracolumbar junction traumatic injuries: A single-center pilot study in a developing country.

Background: The thoracolumbar junction (TLJ) represents a transition zone of the spine that leads to a high incidence of fractures. The treatment of burst fractures remains controversial regarding the ideal management. This study assessed the postoperative radiological outcome of TLJ fixation in patients with TLJ injuries who underwent surgery.Methods: All traumatic patients with TLJ injuries who were referred to the Khatam hospital of Zahedan between 2015 and 2020, with their thoracolumbar injury classification and severity score (TLICS) of four or more and who underwent surgery, were included in this study. The patients who entered the study were called for a follow-up examination. The degree of kyphosis, proximal junctional kyphosis, and fusion were assessed in these patients.Results: Among 273 patients, the average age was 43.5 ± 12.3 (21–73) years. One hundred and ninety-eight patients (72.5%) had no neurological symptoms at admission. Based on the above criteria, the kyphosis angle of these patients was calculated before surgery, which in 46 patients (16.8%), the kyphosis angle was more than 25°. Preoperation kyphosis was significantly associated with follow-up kyphosis (P < 0.001). Evidence of no fusion was also observed in 22 patients (8.1%). According to the Chi-square test, no association was observed between preoperative kyphosis and postoperative complications, including PJK and fusion (P > 0.05).Conclusion: According to our study, the posterior spinal fixation procedure is a low-complication method with an acceptable radiological outcome. Although kyphosis before surgery is a factor in developing long-term kyphosis, it is not associated with nonfusion and PJK.

P157. Neurologically intact TLICS 4 and 5 burst fractures should be given trial of nonoperative management

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Thoracolumbar burst fracture treatment in neurologically intact patients with a TLICS score of 4 is controversial. Scores of 5 are generally accepted to be best treated with surgical stabilization. However, evidence guiding current treatment recommendations is limited and primarily based on expert opinion. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To evaluate and report on nonoperative treatment of neurologically intact patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures and TLICS score of 4 or 5. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective Case Series. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> Neurologically intact patients with TLICS 4 and 5 burst fractures presenting acutely to a single level-1 trauma center. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Length of hospital stay, supine and upright kyphosis, vertebral height loss, canal compromise, VAS pain score at final followup and neurologic status. <h3>METHODS</h3> Data was retrospectively reviewed for patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures treated at a single Level-1 Trauma Center in New England from 2016 to 2018. Neurologically intact patients without subluxation/dislocation on supine computed tomography and subsequent upright radiographs were identified and counseled regarding treatment options. Multimodal pain control and early mobilization were encouraged. Radiographic parameters and neurologic status were followed over time. Patients that failed to mobilize due to pain were treated with surgical stabilization. <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 31 patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures graded TLICS 4 or 5 were identified, of which 21 were ultimately treated nonoperatively. Kyphosis at final followup was 13.5 degrees for the operative group vs 26.4 degrees for nonoperative cohort (p<0.001). Nonoperative patients trended towards shorter hospital length of stay (3.0 vs 7.1 days, p=0.08) and lower final pain scores (2.0 vs 4.0, p=0.14) compared to the operative group (p=0.14). Two patients (6.4%) developed radicular pain with mobilization, which resolved after surgical intervention. No patients in either operative or nonoperative treatment group experienced any decline in neurologic function. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> A trial of mobilization for neurologically intact TLICS grade 4 and 5 thoracolumbar burst fractures is a reasonable and safe treatment option, and resulted in successful nonoperative treatment in 65% of patients in our series. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Analysis of lumbar vertebrae fractures among inpatients in a primary hospital: A 10-year epidemiological study.

Background:To analyze the epidemiological characteristics and changing trends of lumbar fractures in Xingtai Orthopedic Hospital in the past 10 years, and to improve the prevention and treatment of lumbar fractures.Methods:Using the hospital information system, data on patients with lumbar fractures in our hospital from 2009 to 2018 were collected regarding their age, gender, fracture time, injury mechanism, and the type of fracture. The epidemiological characteristics and trends of lumbar fractures for the period were summarized and analyzed.Results:The age of male patients with a high incidence of lumbar fractures was 61 to 70 years, followed by 51 to 60 years. The age of female patients with the highest incidence rate was 61 to 70 years, followed by 51 to 60 years (19.22%). Lumbar fractures in group A were predominantly of men. The majority of lumbar fractures in group B were of women. In group A, the incidence rate was higher in young men (21–50 years) than in women and higher in women >51 years. Most of the affected individuals were women. In group B, there were more middle-aged and young men (21–50 years) than women; however, there were more women than men aged ≥51 years. Car accident injury was the main cause of fractures, but in group B women, low-energy injuries were the main cause of fractures. The periods of high incidence in groups A and B were 4 to 6 years and 7 to 9 years, respectively. The number of injuries in group A was the highest and burst fracture was the main fracture type. In group B, the number of fall injuries was the highest, followed by car accident injuries, and compression fracture was the main fracture type.Conclusion:The number of lumbar fractures in women caused by low-energy injuries showed an increasing trend. The type of compression fracture increased, which might be related to osteoporosis caused by the decrease in the estrogen level after menopause.

Unstable Thoracolumbar Injuries: Factors Affecting the Decision for Short-Segment vs Long-Segment Posterior Fixation.

Factors influencing the length of spinal instrumentation have been mostly evaluated in burst fractures, receiving more attention than other unstable thoracolumbar injuries. We aimed to evaluate clinical factors affecting surgical decision-making and associated complications. This was a multicentric retrospective cohort study. Outcomes of patients with AO Spine injury classification types B2, B3, and C operated through an open posterior-only approach were analyzed. Length of instrumentation was correlated with age, type of injury, comorbidities, level of injury, neurological status, and complications. Among 439 patients, 30.3% underwent short-segment fixation (SSF) and 69.7% underwent long-segment fixation (LSF). Type C injuries were treated with LSF in 89.4% of cases (P < 0.001). On multivariate analysis, age ≤39 years (OR: 2.06), AO spine type B2 (OR: 3.58), and type B3 (OR: 7.48) were statistically significant predictors for SSF, while hypertension (OR: 4.07), upper thoracic injury (OR: 9.48), midthoracic injury (OR: 6.06), and American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale A (OR: 3.14) were significantly associated with LSF. Patients with SSF had fewer overall complications (27.1% vs 50.9%, P < 0.001) and were less likely to develop pneumonia (6.0% vs 18.3%, P < 0.001) and urinary tract infections (6.8% vs 16.3%, P < 0.007). Unstable thoracolumbar injuries were mostly treated by LSF. Length of instrumentation was affected by the type of spinal injury, location of the injury, and neurological status. SSF was associated with lower rates of early complications than LSF. The decision on the length of fixation in the surgical treatment of unstable thoracolumbar injuries is affected by different factors, and it will impact the rate of postoperative complications.

Seat belt syndrome is caused by a different mechanism: A case report

Introduction and importanceSeat belt syndrome is associated with multiple visceral injuries and vertebral burst fractures. Small Intestinal perforations are seen in 5–15 % of blunt abdominal trauma. In our case, we will report a case that presented small intestinal perforation and thoracic vertebral fracture caused by a different mechanism.Case presentationPreviously healthy 48-year-old male presented to the emergency department following falling from 15 feats height. He was a paraplegic with a sensory level at T12. He did not have a clinical feature of spinal shock. He was complaining of epigastric and central abdominal pain and tenderness and was diagnosed to have a proximal Jejunal perforation associated with an unstable fracture of T12 causing spinal compression. Open intestinal repair followed by a posterior spinal exploration and pedicle screw fixation done.Clinical discussionViolent injury due to different mechanisms can have similar injuries to Seat belt syndrome. Ultrasonography is used to detect pneumoperitoneum, but the Contrast study is the gold standard to detect visceral injuries. The surgical approach to visceral injury depends on the patient's condition. But the laparoscopic approach has a more favorable postoperative outcome than open access.ConclusionIntestinal perforations associated with the neurological deficit are difficult to identify in an initial clinical assessment. Thoracolumbar fractures can associate with small bowel injuries during high-velocity trauma. Early identification and repair of the intestinal injury are important to prevent devastating complications and to improve neurological recovery after spinal surgery.

Short segment versus long segment pedicle screws fixation in management of thoracolumbar burst fractures

Background: Selection of stabilization procedures for treating thoracolumbar burst fractures remains controversial. Both long-segment and short-segment pedicle screw fixation have been used widely with no consensus on the better method. Aim of study: To compare the outcome of long segment and short segment posterior fixation as amanagement of thoracolumbar burst fractures. Patients and Methods: 60 patients fulfilling the inclusion criteria who underwent posterior pedicle screw fixation for burst fracture of thoracolumbar spine in Neurosurgery Department of Al-Azhar University Hospitals and El-Ahrar General Hospital, Zagazig between August 2019 and Febrauray 2022. Patients were randomized into one of two groups. Short segment group (30 patients) was treated by short segment fixation, i.e., 1 level above and 1 level below the fractured vertebra. Long segment group (30 patients) was treated by long segment pedicle screw fixation, i.e., fixation of 2 levels above and below the fractured vertebra. Assessment of kyphosis correction by using the Cobb method and restoration of the anterior vertebral body height was performed radiologically postoperatively and at 3 and 6 months follow up. Results: Demographic data of both groups were quite comparable. thoracolumbar burst fracture

The Efficiency and Reliability of Minimally Invasive Anterior Corpectomy and Percutaneous Posterior Stabilization for the Treatment of Unstable Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the radiological and clinical outcomes of minimally invasive anterior corpectomy and percutaneous posterior stabilization for treating unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures. Patients with unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures who underwent minimally invasive anterior corpectomy and percutaneous posterior stabilization between 2012 and 2019 at a tertiary hospital were enrolled. Radiological outcomes such as endplate subsidence and fusion status were identified on preoperative and postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography images. Preoperative and postoperative neurological statuses were evaluated using the American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale. Furthermore, operation-related parameters were analyzed. In total, 21 patients (mean follow-up period, 21.7months) were included in this study. Of them, 17 (80.95%) patients exhibited complete fusion according to the Bridwell's criteria at the final follow-up, and only 1 patient exhibited nonunion at the surgical level. Endplate subsidence was observed in 6 (28.57%) patients; however, there were no definite symptoms that would have necessitated a revision surgery. Of 15 patients with preoperative neurological impairment, 7 exhibited neurological improvement during follow-up. None of the patients experienced postoperative neurological deterioration. Regarding operation-related parameters, the mean operative time and intraoperative blood loss were 266.19±51.54min and 520.71±190.86ml, respectively. The mean length of hospital stays and days to postoperative ambulation were 12.14 and 4.20days, respectively. Minimally invasive anterolateral corpectomy with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation is a reliable surgical treatment option for unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures.

Appropriateness of Cervical Magnetic Resonance Imaging in the Evaluation and Management of C1 Jefferson Fractures

Traditionally, C1 fractures have been designated as stable or unstable based on the inherent integrity of the transverse altantal ligament. The purpose of our study was to identify adult trauma patients with C1 fractures on cervical computed tomography and evaluate whether C1-C2 alignment differed in patients with and without an associated transverse atlantal ligament injury on follow-up cervical magnetic resonance imaging. Adult trauma patients who suffered a C1 fracture were identified retrospectively. The cervical computed tomography examinations for these patients were reviewed for the following: C1 fracture classification, anterior atlantodens interval (ADI) widening, asymmetry in the lateral atlantodens interval, C1 lateral mass offset, and atlantoaxial rotation. Acute C1 fractures were grouped into those with an unequivocal transverse atlantal ligament injury (n= 12), and patients with an unequivocally intact transverse atlantal ligament (n= 20). Three patients were classified as indeterminate for transverse atlantal ligament injury. Statistically significant increases in lateral ADI asymmetry and combined C1 lateral mass offset were identified in patients with transverse atlantal ligament tears. Lateral ADI asymmetry (using a cutoff of >3 mm), combined C1 lateral mass offset, and anterior ADI demonstrate robust specificity to "rule in" transverse atlantal ligament injury. Atlantoaxial alignment was overall relatively insensitive as a screening test although sensitivity can be improved using a cutoff of >2 mm for lateral ADI asymmetry. Our findings reinforce the role of cervical magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnostic workup and clinical management of trauma patients with an acute burst fracture of the C1 vertebra.

Posterior temporary fixation of C1-C2 screw-rod system for unstable C1 burst fracture.

Whether an unstable C1 burst fracture should be treated surgically or conservatively is controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness and motion-preserving function of temporary fixation of C1–C2 screw-rod system for the reduction and fixation of unstable C1 burst fracture.We retrospectively reviewed 10 patients who were treated with posterior C1–C2 temporary fixation without fusion. We assessed age at surgery, gender, pre- and postoperative visual analog scale (VAS), Neck Disability Index (NDI), atlanto-dens interval (ADI), lateral mass distance (LMD), and rotation function of C1–C2 complex.Six males and 4 females were included in our study. The average follow-up duration was 14.1 ± 1.37 months. The left-to-right ROMs of C1–C2 rotation was 9.6° ± 1.42°. The preoperative cervical VAS was 8.30 ± 0.48; the postoperative cervical VAS of C1–C2 fusion was 2.90 ± 0.57. The preoperative VAS for removal was 2.0 ± 0.00, and the postoperative VAS for removal was 2.3 ± 0.48. The preoperative cervical NDI was 81.40% ± 2.07%, the postoperative cervical NDI of C1–C2 fusion was 18.10% ± 1.52%. The preoperative NDI for removal was 15.9% ± 1.20%. The postoperative NDI for removal was 14.5% ± 1.08%. The preoperative ADI was 4.43 ± 0.34 mm, and postoperative ADI was 1.94 ± 0.72 mm. The preoperative LMD was 6.36 ± 0.58 mm, and postoperative LMD was 1.64 ± 0.31 mm.Posterior temporary C1–C2 fixation can achieve a good fusion and satisfied reduction of C1 fracture, relieve the pain, improve the cervical function outcome, but may reduce the rotational range of motion of C1–C2. Posterior C1–C2 temporary fixation without fusion was not suitable for C1 burst fracture. We recommend permanent C1–C2 fixation and fusion for C1 burst fracture if surgery is necessary.

Assessment of Instability in Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures Using a New Bone Scan Scoring System.

Background and Objectives: Unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures require surgical management as they can result in neurological deficits if left untreated. This study aimed to evaluate whether a new bone scan scoring system could accurately assess instability in thoracolumbar burst fractures. Materials and Methods: Fifty-two patients with thoracolumbar burst fractures who underwent bone scans and magnetic resonance imaging prior to surgery between January 2015 and August 2017 at Ulsan University Hospital were selected for inclusion. Instability was determined by clinical assessment and imaging, and the Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score was determined. Bone scans were visually evaluated using a new bone scan scoring system. Bone scan findings of vertebral body (BB) and posterior column (BP) were scored separately and were summed to produce BTS {BTS (total score) = BB (body score, 5 points) + BP (posterior score, 2 points)}. The diagnostic performance of the scoring system for identifying unstable then thoracolumbar burst fractures were assessed. Results: Of the 52 thoracolumbar burst fractures, 34 (65.4%) were unstable and 31 (59.6%) had a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score ≥ 5. The diagnostic performance of using BTS ≥ 4 to identify unstable thoracolumbar burst fractures and those with a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score ≥ 5 was as follows: sensitivity, 61.8% and 58.1%; specificity, 94.4% and 81.0%; positive predictive value, 95.5% and 81.8%; and negative predictive value, 56.7% and 56.7%, respectively. Conclusions: The proposed bone scan scoring system has a high specificity and positive predictive value for identifying thoracolumbar burst fractures that are unstable or have a Thoracolumbar Injury Classification and Severity score ≥ 5. This scoring system may help to inform decisions regarding surgical management.

A Comparison of 2 Surgical Treatments for Thoracolumbar Burst Fractures: Temporary Osteosynthesis and Arthrodesis

We compared the clinical and radiological outcomes and complications of patients treated for thoracolumbar burst fractures via temporary percutaneous osteosynthesis or open definitive arthrodesis. A retrospective case-control study was performed including patients treated between 2017 and 2019 for a burst fracture of the thoracolumbar junction, either with percutaneous osteosynthesis (case group) or open arthrodesis (control group). Clinical, functional, and radiographic results were analyzed and compared between treatment groups. We included 112 patients (56 osteosynthesis/56 arthrodesis, P=1) in our study. The mean follow-up and mean age were 20±3months (20±2/20±3, P=1), and 41±10years (40±11/42±10, P=0.3), respectively. Fracture level was L1/L2 in 75% and T11/T12 in 25% of patients. The osteosynthesis group showed significantly shorter operative times (104±20minutes/176±18minutes, P<0.01) and inpatient stays (11.6±1.5days/15.6±3.8days, P<0.01). Both groups showed similar correction over kyphosis angle at final follow-up (5.8°±2.8°/6°±0.2°, P=0.57), but the osteosynthesis group showed increased segment mobility after hardware removal (3.8°±1.2°/0.9°±0.3°, P<0.01). There were no significant differences in complications, although the osteosynthesis group showed a significantly lower need for blood transfusion (21%/43%, P=0.02). Both methods of treatment yielded good clinical and radiological results with similar complication rates. Temporary osteosynthesis seems to be more beneficial than open arthrodesis because it requires shorter operative time and hospitalization, causes less bleeding, and facilitates spinal movement.

Is It Necessary to Remove the Implants After Fixation of Thoracolumbar and Lumbar Burst Fractures Without Fusion? A Retrospective Cohort Study of Elderly Patients.

ObjectiveFractures of the thoracolumbar spine are the most common fractures of the spinal column. This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine whether it is necessary to remove implants of patients aged over 65 years after the fixation of thoracolumbar and lumbar burst fractures without fusion.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study included 107 consecutive patients aged ≥65 years without neurological deficits, who underwent non-fusion short posterior segmental fixation for thoracolumbar or lumbar burst fractures. Outcome measures included the visual analog score (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), residual symptoms, complications, and imaging parameters. Patients were divided into groups A (underwent implant removal) and B (implant retention) and were examined clinically at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively and annually thereafter, with a final follow-up at 48.5 months.ResultsOverall, 96 patients with a mean age of 69.4 (range, 65–77) years were analyzed. At the latest follow-up, no significant differences were observed in functional outcomes and radiological parameters between both groups, except in the local motion range (LMR) (P = 0.006). Similarly, between preimplant removal and the latest follow-up in group A, significant differences were found only in LMR (P < 0.001). Two patients experienced screw breakage without clinical symptoms. Significant differences were only found in operation time, blood loss, ODI, and fracture type between minimally invasive group and open group.ConclusionsSimilar radiological and functional outcomes were observed in elderly patients, regardless of implant removal. Implant removal may not be necessary after weighing the risks and benefits for elderly patients. Patients should be informed about the possibility of implant breakage and accelerating degeneration of adjacent segments in advance.

Navigated, Percutaneous Posterior Cervical Minimally Invasive Surgery Fixation: Technique and Nuances.

Cervical pedicle screw fixation provides a biomechanically superior fixation in comparison to traditional lateral mass screws. The traditional open technique has limited adoption due to technical challenges and significantly increased wound morbidity. Navigated, percutaneous pedicle screw fixation circumvents the traditional technical challenges and minimizes wound morbidity. We present here a technique description and case report of navigated, percutaneous posterior cervical minimally invasive fixation. Small lateral skin incisions are made on the neck using intraoperative computed tomography-guided navigation. Navigated cervical pedicle screws were placed using the proficient minimally invasive system (Spine Wave, Shelton, CT). Minimally invasive cervical fixation options have been limited traditionally. Navigated, percutaneous cervical minimally invasive surgery (MIS) fixation provides an effective, safe option for cervical fixation. This technique is described and illustrated in a case example of a patient who suffered a burst fracture and underwent treatment. Navigated, percutaneous posterior cervical MIS fixation provides biomechanically superior fixation while avoiding the morbidity of traditional, open approaches to the posterior cervical spine. Percutaneous cervical pedicle screw techniques will be pivotal in the continued advancement of posterior cervical decompression and fusion techniques. Navigated, percutaneous cervical minimally invasive fixation is an achievable form of cervical fixation with acceptable complication rates and radiographic outcomes.

Treatment of thoracolumbar burst fractures: SpineJack vs. posterior arthrodesis-comparison of clinical and radiological outcomes.

Thoracolumbar fractures sometimes require anterior support and post-traumatic deformity correction. SpineJack proved favorable results in cadaveric and clinical studies, with satisfactory pain relief, vertebral height restoration, and low rates of above adjacent fractures, in neurologically intact fractures. We compared patients' clinical and radiological outcomes of thoracolumbar fractures treated either with posterior arthrodesis or SpineJack. We prospectively collected A2 split and A3, and A4 burst fractures between 2017 and 2021. Patients were stratified in posterior arthrodesis (PA group) and SpineJack (SJ group) and included if age ≥18 years, T11-L3 level, emergent or elective surgery, single or multiple, and neurologically intact. Age, sex, type and level, pain, operative and discharge time, vertebral body heights (VBH), posterior wall retropulsion (PWR), vertebral kyphosis (VK) and local kyphosis (LK) angles, vertebral body (VB) volume, and complications were collected. We then compared clinical-radiographic outcomes between the two groups. We found no significant differences in median postoperative pain while operative time and discharge time were shorter for SJ patients than PA ones (P<0.001). Mean anterior VBH increase was 20.7%, mid-VBH was 25.5%, and posterior VBH was 8.8%, while increase in VB volume was 26.2%. SJ patients had non-inferior VK e LK angles correction to PA ones. Mean PWR value between pre and post SJ implantation was 0.15±0.65 mm, and no adjacent above-level fractures occurred. We showed satisfactory outcomes in a selected range of neurologically intact thoracolumbar split or burst fractures. SJ leads to shorter operative and discharge time and good VB angles and diameters restoration.

What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma.

What's New in Orthopaedic Trauma.

Anterior spine surgery for the treatment of complex spine pathology: a state-of-the-art review.

The use of anterior spinal surgery for the treatment of spinal pathology has experienced a dramatic increase over the past decade. Long relegated to treat complicated anterior pathologies it has returned to mainstream spine surgery techniques for all types of conditions, providing a significant boost to the spine surgeons' armamentarium to address a wide variety of types of spinal diseases more effectively. Anterior surgery is useful whenever there is significant spinal pathology that requires direct visualization of the anterior vertebral column to best restore spinal alignment, structural integrity and neurologic function. These pathologies include spinal deformities, tumors, burst fractures, infections, vertebral avascular necrosis, pseudoarthrosis and other miscellaneous indications. Currently available approaches to the spine include transabdominal, paramedian retroperitoneal, lateral oblique retroperitoneal, thoracotomy, and thoracolumbar extensile. Most of the lumbar approaches are now done through a muscle splitting, minimalistic approach that has decreased their morbidity or more recently via tubular approaches, such as lateral lumbar interbody fusions or other ante-psoas approaches. New retractors, instrumentation, hyperlordotic implants, approved biologics and even image guidance for disc preparation and precise implant placement are all recent advances that will hopefully improve surgical outcomes in patients following anterior spinal surgery. Most importantly, these approaches require added expertise and training with a dedicated team consisting of an anteriorly trained spine surgeon working simultaneously with a dedicated vascular surgeon to ensure maximum safety and superior patient outcomes. This state of the review is dedicated to familiarizing practicing spine surgeons with the most commonly used anterior spinal approaches along with cutting-edge instrumentation and fusion techniques to improve their options for the treatment of difficult spinal pathologies.